Top Stories

The Recovery Staircase: How the UAE Transformed Commercial Debt Recovery into a Race Against Time

From payment orders to cheque reforms, UAE has transformed debt recovery into one of the world's fastest enforcement systems.

"Justice delayed is justice denied," observed William E. Gladstone. Few legal principles capture the reality of commercial debt recovery more accurately. A creditor may be entirely in the right, obtain a court judgment, and yet recover nothing because, by then, the bank accounts are empty and the debtor has disappeared. Money recovery is not simply about proving that a debt is owed; it is about securing payment.

The claim may arise from an unpaid invoice, a dishonoured cheque or a defaulted loan. Four statutes govern debt recovery in the UAE: Federal Decree-Laws No. 50 of 2022 (commercial debts, cheques and limitation), No. 42 of 2022 (filing, payment orders and enforcement), and No. 35 of 2022 (evidence), together with the Civil Code of 1985 governing contractual obligations. The Evidence Law makes emails and WhatsApp admissions of debt admissible, overturning the long-held assumption that only a signed contract can succeed in court.

One distinctive feature shapes the entire system: the UAE has three parallel court jurisdictions. The onshore courts operate in Arabic under a civil law framework, while the DIFC and ADGM Courts conduct proceedings in English under common law, creating common law jurisdictions within a civil law state. Choosing the appropriate forum is often the first strategic decision in any recovery action.

The Four-Phase Evolution

The UAE's cheque enforcement regime has evolved through four distinct phases. From 1993 to 2020, Federal Law No. 18 of 1993 and Articles 401–403 of the Penal Code criminalised bounced cheques, allowing creditors to rely on the threat of arrest and travel bans instead of civil proceedings. Although highly effective, the system was indiscriminate, treating careless mistakes and genuine commercial disputes in the same way as fraudulent conduct.

Between 2020 and 2021, the Dubai Court of Cassation moved ahead of the legislature by broadening the meaning of "debts confirmed in writing" and making payment orders the default recovery route where no serious dispute existed, effectively changing practice before the law itself was amended. Federal Decree-Law No. 14 of 2020, which took effect in January 2022, then decriminalised most cheque offences. Banks must now pay any available balance and certify the unpaid amount, enabling creditors to proceed directly to execution. Finally, judicial decisions delivered during 2024 and 2025 closed the remaining gaps by confirming that commercial licences can be attached, reversing asset transfers made without consideration before judgment, and enforcing properly documented cost-shifting clauses.

Five Ways a Valid Debt Dies

Strangled cash flow: When a major client withholds payment, contractors and SMEs further down the supply chain are unable to pay their employees and suppliers.
Weak documentation: Cases fail not because the law is against the creditor, but because delivery notes are missing, invoices are unclear, or there is no acknowledgement of the debt.
Limitation periods: Merchant debts become time-barred after five years, reduced from ten; cheque claims after three years; civil claims after fifteen years; and DIFC and ADGM claims after six years.
Asset flight: Debtors empty bank accounts, transfer property or leave the jurisdiction.
Cost-to-value imbalance: Dubai court filing fees are approximately six per cent of the claim value, capped at around Dh40,000, before translation, expert and legal costs are added.

The Staircase: From Demand Letter to Execution

Debt recovery in Dubai operates like a staircase, with each step faster and less expensive than the next. It begins with a demand letter, which sets a payment deadline and often resolves the dispute without litigation. Many disputes must then proceed through the Centre for Amicable Settlement of Disputes before they can be formally registered.

The defining feature of the system is the payment order. Where a debt is properly documented, quantified and undisputed, a judge may issue an ex parte payment order within days, transforming documentary evidence into an enforceable title. The next stage is precautionary attachment, where freezing bank accounts and imposing travel bans before the claim is determined often proves decisive. Only then does full litigation — or arbitration where contractually required—follow, with awards ultimately enforced through the courts. Enforcement remains the final step. A judgment is merely a piece of paper until the Execution Court freezes accounts, auctions assets or restricts travel, increasingly through Dubai's digital execution portal. Many creditors obtain favourable judgments but still fail at this final stage.

Cheques deserve particular attention. In the final year before the reforms, Dubai Public Prosecution processed more than 29,000 cheque cases through fast-track penal orders. Since January 2, 2022, however, a dishonoured cheque has largely become a civil execution instrument that proceeds almost directly to the Execution Court, with criminal liability reserved for fraudulent conduct, such as issuing a bad-faith stop-payment instruction. The cheque must still be presented within six months and remains subject to a three-year limitation period.

How UAE Law Firms Sequence a Claim

Law firms approach debt recovery much like doctors approach patients: diagnosis before treatment. The process begins with an evidence audit to determine whether contracts, invoices and correspondence adequately establish the debt, followed by verification of the appropriate court and the applicable limitation period. This relatively modest preliminary exercise acts as inexpensive insurance against costly mistakes, since filing in the wrong court or pursuing a time-barred claim can defeat an otherwise valid case.

Only then does pressure begin, and it is usually applied gradually because preserving the commercial relationship may be more valuable than the debt itself. Where there is a genuine risk that the debtor may abscond or dissipate assets, however, lawyers move swiftly by seeking precautionary attachment before service of the claim alerts the debtor to empty bank accounts or dispose of property. Litigation remains the final option, and even a successful judgment merely opens the door to execution against bank accounts, shares and receivables. The most effective strategy, therefore, is prevention through stronger contracts, advance payments, post-dated cheques and bank guarantees.

Conclusion

Compared with the world's leading debt recovery systems, the UAE framework demonstrates both notable strengths and identifiable shortcomings. In the United Kingdom, the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 provides automatic deterrence by imposing interest at eight percentage points above the Bank of England base rate on overdue business invoices, together with fixed recovery costs, without requiring any contractual provision. Its principal weakness, however, remains the comparatively slow pace of enforcement.

The European Union goes even further. Directive 2011/7/EU requires public authorities to pay within 30 days and businesses within 60 days, imposes automatic interest of around eight percentage points above the reference rate together with a fixed recovery amount of €40 per invoice, and provides the European Order for Payment, arguably the world's most comprehensive preventive debt recovery mechanism. The UAE has no direct equivalent.

Singapore, meanwhile, sets the benchmark for procedural efficiency. Its Small Claims Tribunals resolve disputes of up to SGD20,000 through a streamlined, predominantly lawyer-free online process, a model that the DIFC has consciously adapted for claims of up to Dh1 million. India offers a different lesson. Its Debts Recovery Tribunals and the SARFAESI framework are built on the same principle that inspired the UAE's payment order — that ordinary civil courts are often too slow — although the UAE extends this remedy to all creditors rather than limiting it primarily to banks.

This comparison leads to a clear conclusion. The UAE ranks among the world's fastest jurisdictions for debt enforcement through its ex parte payment order system, a cheque enforcement regime that is arguably unique following the 2022 reforms, precautionary attachment that can extend to travel bans, and the availability of three separate court systems. Its principal weakness lies in prevention. Unlike several European jurisdictions, it offers no automatic statutory interest for late commercial payments and continues to impose comparatively high court filing fees. Put simply, Europe focuses on deterrence, while the UAE excels at execution.

Money recovery under UAE law is therefore no longer a maze but a practical toolkit. A creditor with clear documentary evidence can move from a demand letter to an enforceable title within days, allowing the UAE to match — and in some respects surpass — international best practice. Yet the deeper lesson remains universal. The law rewards those who prepare and penalises those who wait. Limitation periods run silently, assets disappear quickly, and every legal system reserves its most effective remedies for creditors who maintain proper records and act without delay. An unpaid invoice, ultimately, is not merely an accounting inconvenience; it is a ticking legal clock.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Can Dubai Landlords Evict Tenants to Sell Property on Short Notice? Know Your Rights Under the UAE’s 12-Month Eviction Rule

Dubai law requires a 12-month notice period and strict legal procedures before a tenant can be asked to vacate a property.

A landlord's decision to sell a property does not give them the right to ask a tenant to vacate within a few months, even if the property is being marketed for sale. In Dubai, tenancy relationships are governed by specific legal provisions that protect both landlords and tenants, ensuring that an existing lease cannot be terminated simply because the owner wishes to dispose of the property.

Under Dubai's tenancy laws, a landlord may seek to evict a tenant upon the expiry of a tenancy contract only in limited circumstances prescribed by law. One such recognised ground is where the owner genuinely intends to sell the leased property. However, the law imposes strict procedural requirements before such an eviction can take place.

When a landlord wishes to recover possession of a property for the purpose of selling it, the tenant must be given a minimum of 12 months' notice before the intended eviction date. The notice cannot be issued informally through a phone call, email or ordinary letter. Instead, it must be served through a notary public or by registered mail. In practice, many landlords in Dubai serve notarised eviction notices through the authorised Tableegh courier service to comply with the legal notification requirements.

This requirement is set out in Article 25(2)(d) of the amended Dubai tenancy law, which allows a landlord to seek eviction after the expiry of the tenancy contract where the owner wishes to sell the property. The same provision makes it clear that the tenant must receive at least 12 months' notice through the prescribed legal channels before the eviction can take effect.

Equally important is the fact that a landlord's intention to sell a property does not automatically terminate an existing tenancy agreement. A valid lease remains binding on both the landlord and the tenant until the contractual term expires. The landlord cannot require a tenant to vacate before the end of the lease merely because a sale is planned or negotiations with a prospective buyer are underway.

The law also protects tenants when ownership of a rented property changes hands. Article 28 of Law No. (26) of 2007 Regulating the Relationship between Landlords and Tenants in the Emirate of Dubai provides that the transfer of ownership does not affect the tenant's right to continue occupying the property under an existing fixed-term tenancy agreement. In other words, a purchaser acquires the property subject to the rights of the existing tenant, who is entitled to remain in occupation until the lease expires, unless the legal requirements for eviction have been properly followed.

Therefore, where a landlord asks a tenant to vacate within only two or three months because the property is being sold, such a request will generally not comply with Dubai's statutory eviction procedures unless the tenant voluntarily agrees to leave earlier. The landlord must first issue a valid 12-month eviction notice through a notary public or registered mail, and the notice period must expire before possession can legally be recovered for the purpose of sale.

If these statutory requirements are not met and a dispute arises, tenants may seek to enforce their rights before the Dubai Rental Disputes Centre (RDC), which has jurisdiction to determine disputes between landlords and tenants in the emirate.

Dubai's rental framework is designed to strike a balance between the rights of property owners and tenants. While landlords are entitled to recover possession of a property for legitimate reasons, including a genuine sale, they must comply with the notice requirements prescribed by law. For tenants, this means that an existing tenancy cannot ordinarily be cut short simply because the landlord decides to put the property on the market.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Choosing the Right Trademark Class in the UAE: Why Proper Classification is Critical to Securing Effective Brand Protection

Understanding the latest Nice Classification rules and choosing the correct trademark classes can help businesses avoid costly disputes.

Selecting the correct trademark class is one of the most important decisions a business makes when seeking to protect its brand in the United Arab Emirates. Under UAE law, trademark protection is neither general nor automatic; it applies only to the specific class or classes of goods and services for which registration is granted.

An applicant who selects the wrong class, or registers within an unduly narrow scope, risks leaving the brand exposed precisely where protection is needed most. A sound understanding of the classification system, combined with a disciplined approach to aligning a business's actual activities with the appropriate classes, is therefore fundamental to an effective trademark filing strategy in the UAE.

The Legal Framework Governing Trademark Classification

Trademark classification in the UAE is governed by Federal Decree-Law No. 36 of 2021 on Trademarks, which came into force on January 2, 2022, replacing the earlier Federal Law No. 37 of 1992, together with its Executive Regulations issued under Cabinet Decision No. 57 of 2022. The law permits a single application to be filed for the registration of a trademark covering one or more categories of goods or services, in accordance with the Executive Regulations. It also clarifies that goods or services are not considered similar merely because they fall within the same class, nor are they regarded as different simply because they fall into separate classes determined by the Ministry. Administration of the trademark register rests with the Ministry of Economy and Tourism, which maintains the official register recording all trademarks, their owners, and the relevant goods or services.

The Nice Classification and its Recent Update

For trademark classification, the UAE adopts the Nice Classification, the international system established under the Nice Agreement of 1957 and administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). The Nice Classification comprises 45 classes, with Classes 1 to 34 covering goods and Classes 35 to 45 covering services, providing a uniform framework that enables trademark offices worldwide to classify and examine applications consistently.

The international classification system was recently updated. WIPO confirmed that the 13th edition of the Nice Classification came into effect on January 1, 2026, with new editions published every three years and annual amendments introduced between editions.

Following this international revision, the Ministry of Economy and Tourism adopted the updated edition for use in the UAE. The Ministry announced that the 13th edition of the Nice Classification became the mandatory classification system for trademark registration, with all new applications filed from January 27, 2026 onwards required to comply with the revised class structure. The Ministry has advised that selecting an incorrect or outdated class may result in office actions, delays or refusals, and has recommended that applicants carefully review their specifications against the updated classification. Applications filed before that date, together with existing registrations, continue to be assessed under the edition applicable at the time of filing and are not automatically reclassified.

Why Correct Classification Matters

The importance of correct classification follows directly from the structure of the law. Because the Decree-Law limits the scope of protection to the goods or services specified in the application, a trademark registered in one class provides no automatic rights over the use of an identical or similar mark in an unrelated class. A business whose commercial activities span multiple categories but registers in only one may discover that its legal remedies against infringement extend only to that single class, leaving related or complementary business activities without protection.

This has significant practical implications beyond the registration process itself. The scope of protection defined by the registered class is the basis upon which a rights holder relies when bringing infringement claims, opposing conflicting trademark applications or seeking the cancellation of competing registrations before the Ministry or the competent courts.

Identifying the Correct Class

Identifying the appropriate class or classes requires applicants to look beyond the wording of their trade licence and instead examine the goods they actually sell or the services they genuinely provide. A business licensed broadly for information technology services, for example, may in reality market software products, provide software-as-a-service (SaaS) platforms and separately offer consultancy or training services, each of which may fall within different classes or require protection across multiple classes.

Businesses should also consider their anticipated future expansion. Extending trademark protection after registration generally requires a fresh application, payment of additional fees and a new examination process, during which the expanded business activities remain unprotected. The Executive Regulations, together with the Ministry's published Nice Classification guidance, remain the authoritative references for determining the correct classification of goods and services. Reliance on outdated class lists is particularly discouraged now that the 13th edition governs all new filings.

Multi-Class Protection

Multi-class protection is expressly recognised under UAE law and, in practice, is essential for many businesses whose operations extend beyond a single category. A clothing manufacturer that also operates retail outlets, for instance, will generally require protection in both the class covering apparel and the class covering retail services. Likewise, a technology company that develops software while also providing consultancy services will typically require separate classes for each activity. A restaurant selling branded packaged food products for retail purchase may similarly need protection under both a services class and a goods class.

As official fees under the Ministry's schedule are charged on a per-class basis, filing across multiple classes inevitably increases the initial registration cost. However, this expense should be weighed against the considerably greater financial, commercial and legal risks that arise when businesses later discover that key aspects of their operations were never adequately protected.

Common Errors in Class Selection

Several mistakes continue to arise frequently during the trademark registration process:

Classifying a trademark according to the activities listed on the trade licence rather than the goods or services actually offered to customers.
Filing in a single class where the business clearly operates across several categories.
Using specifications that are excessively broad or insufficiently precise, increasing the likelihood of objections during examination.
Overlooking reasonably foreseeable business expansion when preparing the initial application.
Assuming that registering a trade name with a Department of Economic Development or a free zone authority automatically provides trademark protection. It does not. Company registration and trademark registration operate under entirely separate legal frameworks, administered by different authorities, and one cannot substitute for the other.

Consequences of Choosing the Wrong Class

Selecting the wrong trademark class can have consequences that extend well beyond procedural delays. The Ministry may issue an objection or refuse the application during examination, requiring amendments or a fresh filing. Even where registration is granted, if the trademark is registered in a class that does not accurately reflect the owner's actual goods or services, the owner's ability to prevent third parties from using a similar mark in the class that truly matters to the business may be significantly restricted.

Correcting an incorrect classification generally requires filing a new application in the appropriate class, paying fresh official fees and undergoing another examination process. Throughout this period, the business remains without effective trademark protection for those goods or services.

Correct trademark classification is therefore far more than a procedural requirement. It defines, in precise legal terms, the scope of protection that a registered trademark provides — and equally, what it does not protect. Careful consideration at the filing stage remains one of the most effective safeguards a business can adopt to build a robust and commercially effective brand protection strategy in the UAE.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Can Hotels in the UAE Be Held Legally Responsible for Cash and Valuables Stolen from Room Safes? Understanding Your Rights

UAE law sets out specific legal conditions that determine when a hotel can be held liable for the loss or theft of money and other valuables.

Guests staying in hotels across the UAE often rely on in-room safes to store cash, jewellery, important documents and other valuables during their stay. However, if money or valuable items go missing from a room safe, the hotel is not automatically responsible for compensating the guest. Instead, liability is governed by the provisions of the UAE Civil Transactions Law, which clearly defines the circumstances in which a hotel proprietor may be required to reimburse a guest for any loss.

Under Article 928 of the UAE Civil Transactions Law, Federal Decree-Law No. (25) of 2025, a hotel proprietor is generally not liable for the loss of money, negotiable instruments or other valuable items kept by guests unless one of the specific legal conditions is satisfied.

The first situation arises where the hotel has expressly accepted the guest's valuables for safekeeping. In such cases, the hotel assumes responsibility for protecting those items and may be held liable if they are subsequently lost, damaged or stolen.

Liability may also arise where the hotel has unreasonably refused to accept valuables for safekeeping despite a guest's request. In addition, a hotel can be held responsible if the loss or theft occurred because of the fault, negligence or wrongful act of the hotel proprietor or any of its employees.

Merely discovering that cash has disappeared from a room safe does not, by itself, entitle a guest to compensation. The burden remains on the guest to establish that the hotel falls within one of the situations recognised by law. Whether liability exists will ultimately depend on the evidence presented, including the circumstances surrounding the theft and any proof of negligence or failure on the part of the hotel.

The law also places important obligations on guests. Article 929 requires a guest to notify the hotel proprietor or the person in charge immediately after discovering any theft, loss or damage. Failure to report the incident without justified reason may result in the guest losing the legal right to seek compensation.

In addition, any legal claim against the hotel proprietor must be brought within six months from the date the guest leaves the hotel. Claims filed after this statutory period will not be heard by the court.

As a result, guests seeking compensation for money stolen from a hotel room safe must not only report the incident without delay but also demonstrate that the hotel bears legal responsibility under the conditions prescribed by the UAE Civil Transactions Law. Where these requirements are met, the court will determine the extent of compensation based on the evidence presented in each individual case.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

UAE Authority Takes Legal Action Against Two Individuals Over Offensive Social Media Live Broadcast

The National Media Authority says digital platforms must not be used to undermine UAE's national identity and social harmony.

The UAE's National Media Authority (NMA) has taken legal action against two individuals for violating media content standards after they promoted offensive content during a live broadcast on social media.

The authority announced on Monday, August 3, that the broadcast contained material deemed disrespectful to the UAE's culture, civilisational heritage and national identity. It also said the content offended the prevailing values of society.

In addition to initiating legal proceedings, the NMA suspended the publicity permit granted to one of the violators for three months.

The authority reaffirmed that it will not tolerate the misuse of digital platforms to publish content intended to generate views or increase engagement at the expense of societal values. It also warned against content that stirs controversy within the community or undermines the country's values, principles and national identity.

Legal experts in the UAE have repeatedly warned residents that even a seemingly harmless social media post or comment can lead to criminal proceedings if it breaches the country's laws or established standards. Penalties for online defamation and cybercrimes can be severe, including fines of up to Dh500,000, imprisonment and deportation for expatriates.

Individuals using social media platforms in the UAE are advised to comply with the country's laws and regulations to avoid substantial penalties. Key principles include:

Respecting beliefs and religions
Honouring cultural heritage
Protecting national unity
Respecting the country's ruling system
Safeguarding foreign relations
Refraining from spreading rumours and fake news
Respecting privacy rights
Complying with legal and security regulations
Following official state directives
Upholding the country's legal framework

UAE media laws

Two key laws govern media activities and online content in the UAE:

Media Regulation Law: This legislation governs all forms of media activity in the country, defining the rights and responsibilities of media institutions and individuals. It promotes responsible media freedom, provided such activity complies with the law and respects societal values.

Combating Rumours and Cybercrimes Law: This law protects society against rumours, misinformation and cybercrimes. It criminalises the publication of false news and the use of electronic means to commit offences against individuals or the state, while safeguarding national security, social stability, and the reputation and privacy of individuals.

The copy has been tightened, restructured for better news flow, corrected to British English, and repetitive wording has been removed while preserving the original information and overall length.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

UAE Non-Compete Clauses After Termination: When Employers Can Enforce Restrictions and Why Wrongful Dismissal May Void Them

UAE law limits the enforcement of non-compete clauses where an employer ends employment without lawful justification.

The UAE has established a clear legal framework governing the enforceability of non-compete clauses in employment contracts, balancing employers' legitimate business interests with employees' right to pursue future employment. While employers are permitted to include post-employment restrictions in certain circumstances, these provisions are not automatically enforceable, particularly where an employee has been dismissed without a valid reason or in breach of the law.

A non-compete clause is commonly included in employment contracts where the nature of an employee's role gives them access to sensitive business information, confidential data, trade secrets or valuable client relationships. Such clauses are intended to prevent employees from using that knowledge to compete directly with their former employer after leaving the organisation.

However, UAE law imposes strict conditions on the validity of these restrictions. Under Article 10 of the UAE Labour Law, a non-compete clause is enforceable only where it is necessary to protect the employer's legitimate business interests. The restriction must also be reasonable in its scope, including the duration of the restriction, the geographical area covered and the type of work or business activities prohibited. The law further provides that the restriction cannot exceed two years from the date the employment relationship ends.

Importantly, the Labour Law also protects employees from unfair enforcement of non-compete obligations. It expressly states that an employer cannot rely on a non-compete clause if the employment contract has been terminated by the employer in violation of the provisions of the Labour Law. In such circumstances, the employer loses the legal right to enforce the post-employment restriction against the employee.

This protection has been further strengthened under Article 851 of the UAE Civil Transactions Law No. (25) of 2025. The provision makes it clear that an employer may not invoke a non-compete agreement if it rescinds the employment contract or refuses to renew it without any act on the part of the employee that justifies such action. Likewise, an employer cannot enforce the restriction if it has itself committed an act that legally entitled the employee to terminate the employment contract.

Taken together, these legal provisions reinforce the principle that employers cannot benefit from restrictive covenants where they are responsible for bringing the employment relationship to an end without lawful justification. Employees who are dismissed for reasons unrelated to their performance or conduct, or who resign because of the employer's breach of legal obligations, may therefore not be bound by a non-compete clause, even if it is expressly included in their employment contract.

The UAE's approach reflects an effort to strike a fair balance between protecting businesses from unfair competition and ensuring that employees are not prevented from earning a livelihood because of an unjustified or unlawful termination. While non-compete clauses remain an important tool for safeguarding confidential information and commercial interests, their enforceability ultimately depends on compliance with the conditions laid down by UAE law and the circumstances in which the employment relationship comes to an end.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

UAE's New Competition Regulations Transform Merger Control, Making Early Regulatory Clearance Essential

The UAE's new Executive Regulations have transformed merger control into a comprehensive approval regime.

For more than two years, dealmakers in the UAE operated under a competition law whose most important procedures existed only on paper. That period has now come to an end.

On April 20, 2026, the UAE Cabinet issued Cabinet Resolution No. 59 of 2026, the long-awaited Executive Regulations to Federal Decree-Law No. 36 of 2023 on the Regulation of Competition. The Executive Regulations entered into force on July 30, 2026, replacing the implementing framework introduced under the previous competition law in 2014 and completing the overhaul of the UAE's merger control and competition regime.

For anyone planning an acquisition, merger or joint venture with a UAE dimension, the practical message is clear: competition approval is no longer a procedural formality to be addressed at the end of a transaction. It is now a substantive regulatory process administered by the Competition Department of the Ministry of Economy and Tourism, with defined timelines, detailed filing requirements and significant penalties for non-compliance.

When Does a Deal Become an 'Economic Concentration'?

The starting point for every transaction is a simple but fundamental question: does the deal amount to an economic concentration?

The concept is deliberately broad. It covers any transaction resulting in the full or partial transfer of ownership or usufruct rights in assets, rights, stocks, shares or obligations, where the outcome is that one establishment, or a group of establishments, acquires direct or indirect control over another.

This definition extends well beyond conventional share acquisitions. Asset transactions, mergers, certain joint ventures and arrangements that confer control through contractual rights may all fall within its scope.

Control, rather than deal structure, is the determining factor. If a transaction changes who ultimately controls a business operating in the UAE, merger control analysis must be undertaken.

The Thresholds That Trigger a Mandatory Filing

Under Cabinet Resolution No. 3 of 2025, a filing with the Ministry is mandatory where either of two alternative thresholds is met:

Turnover threshold: the parties' annual sales in the relevant market within the UAE exceeded Dh300 million during the previous financial year; or

Market share threshold: the parties' combined market share exceeds 40% of total transactions in the relevant market within the UAE during the previous financial year.

Two aspects of these thresholds deserve particular attention. First, they operate independently. A transaction may require notification based solely on turnover, even where the parties have relatively modest market shares. Secondly, the turnover test relates to the relevant UAE market, meaning that even foreign-to-foreign transactions may require notification if the parties generate sufficient revenue within the country.

Where either threshold is met, the application must be submitted before completion. The law requires it to be filed at least 90 days before closing, and the transaction must not be implemented until approval has been granted.

What the Filing Now Requires

Article 10 of the Executive Regulations sets out the information and documents required for an Economic Concentration Application and modernises the filing process in several important respects.

The documentary formalities have been simplified. Only the power of attorney now requires certification and attestation. Under the previous regime, each party's constitutional and corporate documents also required certification, often adding weeks to the preparation process.

Documents may now be submitted in their original language, accompanied by an English or Arabic translation, replacing the earlier requirement for certified Arabic translations of all foreign-language documents.

At the same time, the substantive content of the application has become more rigorous. Filings must include an economic report addressing issues such as market definition, market dynamics, the competitive landscape, horizontal overlaps and vertical relationships between the parties, together with the anticipated positive effects of the transaction.

Applicants must also provide proof of payment of the filing fee, the amount of which will be confirmed through a ministerial resolution.

The practical consequence is that a UAE filing can no longer be treated as a routine administrative exercise. It now requires robust economic analysis prepared with the same level of care expected in more established merger control jurisdictions.

The Review Timeline Dealmakers Must Build Into Their Timetables

The Executive Regulations bring welcome clarity to the review process, which now unfolds in two stages.

The first is a formal examination. The Ministry has 10 working days, extendable by a further 10 working days, to confirm that the application is complete. If information is missing, it may request further details, and the statutory review period is suspended until the requested information is provided.

The second stage is the substantive review. Once the application is deemed complete, the Ministry has 90 days to assess it, with the option of extending the review by a further 45 days at its discretion.

At the conclusion of the process, the Ministry may approve the transaction, approve it subject to conditions, reject it, or determine that no filing was required.

One aspect of the regime requires particular attention: if the Ministry fails to issue a decision within the statutory period, the application is deemed rejected, not approved. In the UAE, silence does not amount to consent. Transaction timetables must therefore allow for the maximum review period, together with any objection proceedings, rather than assuming an expedited or tacit approval.

The Regulations also strengthen the Ministry's investigative powers. The Competition Department may invite the parties and interested third parties to meetings and conduct site inspections where necessary, including reviewing business records and electronic files.

Third Parties Now Have a Formal Voice

Another important development is the introduction of a formal mechanism for third-party objections.

Once the Ministry publishes basic details of a proposed transaction on its website, interested parties — including competitors, customers and suppliers — may submit a reasoned objection within 15 working days.

The Ministry will consider the objection and, where it considers the concerns credible, invite the transaction parties to respond within specified timeframes before continuing its review.

For contested or strategically sensitive transactions, this creates a genuine opportunity for opponents to raise competition concerns and highlights the need for transaction parties to anticipate potential objections and prepare their responses in advance.

Conditions Precedent, Standstill and the Cost of Getting It Wrong

Where a filing is, or may be, required, competition approval should be expressly reflected in the transaction documents.

The sale and purchase agreement or joint venture agreement should include Ministry approval as a condition precedent to completion, allocate responsibility for preparing and pursuing the filing, set out cooperation and information-sharing obligations, and establish a long-stop date that realistically accommodates the statutory review period and any extensions.

Equally important is the standstill obligation. During the review period, the parties must not take any steps to complete the economic concentration. Premature integration — commonly known as gun jumping — creates enforcement risks even where the transaction would ultimately have been approved.

The penalties for completing a notifiable transaction without approval are significant: fines ranging from 2% to 10% of annual revenues generated from the relevant goods or services in the UAE during the previous financial year or, where those revenues cannot be determined, fines ranging from Dh500,000 to Dh5 million.

For businesses with substantial UAE revenues, the cost of failing to notify can far exceed the professional fees associated with securing proper regulatory clearance.

Why Competition Risk Belongs at Signing, Not Closing

Perhaps the most important discipline imposed by the new regime is timing.

Competition analysis undertaken on the eve of closing is simply too late. By then, the transaction structure is fixed, the timetable committed, and the parties have limited flexibility to respond to a filing obligation, an information request or a third-party objection.

Instead, the assessment should be carried out before signing, when the parties can define the relevant market, gather the turnover and market share data needed to assess the thresholds, structure the transaction and its conditions precedent around the regulatory process, and build sufficient time into the timetable for both the formal examination and substantive review.

Early assessment also guards against a more subtle risk: the deemed rejection rule. A party that files late or submits an incomplete application risks not merely delay but exhausting the statutory review period altogether.

The Question Every Dealmaker Should Now Ask

The entry into force of the Executive Regulations on July 30, 2026 marks the point at which UAE merger control became a fully operational and procedurally sophisticated regime.

For every acquisition, merger or joint venture involving the UAE market, one question should now sit at the top of every due diligence checklist:

Does this transaction amount to an economic concentration, and do the parties meet the filing thresholds?

If the answer is yes — or even potentially yes — the competition workstream should begin immediately. The filing should be planned with the same rigour as the transaction itself, and the transaction documents should reflect the regulatory requirements.

The UAE has aligned its merger control framework with international best practice. Dealmakers who adapt their processes early and proactively will find the new regime manageable. Those who leave competition approval until the final stages of a transaction may discover that the most expensive provision in the agreement is the one they never included.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Can an Employer Extend Your UAE Probation Period After It Has Already Expired? Here's What the Law Says

An employer in the UAE cannot extend or reimpose an employee's probation period once it has expired and the employee has continued working without interruption. Under the UAE Labour Law, a probation period can only be imposed once by the same employer, and once it ends successfully, the employment relationship automatically continues under the full terms of the employment contract.

This issue often arises when companies undergo restructuring or changes in ownership or management. However, such internal changes do not affect the legal status of an employee who has already completed probation. The employment contract is between the employee and the company as the legal entity, not its directors, managers or shareholders.

The matter is governed by Article 9 of the UAE Labour Law, which stipulates that an employee may not be placed on probation more than once with the same employer. If the employee successfully completes the probation period and continues working, the employment contract becomes fully valid in accordance with its agreed terms, and the probation period is counted as part of the employee's total length of service.

Accordingly, where an employee has completed the agreed probation period—for example, three months—and has continued working thereafter without being notified of termination during probation, the employer cannot later decide to extend the probation by another period. Such an extension would not be consistent with the provisions of the law.

Once probation has ended, the employee is no longer considered to be on probation. Any subsequent termination of employment must therefore comply with the notice requirements and other contractual and statutory obligations applicable to regular employees. An employer cannot rely on probation-related provisions after the probation period has already expired.

The UAE Labour Law is designed to provide certainty for both employers and employees by ensuring that probation is a one-time assessment period. Once that stage has been successfully completed, the employment relationship proceeds under the full protection of the employment contract and the law.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

UAE Arbitration Enters a New Era: What the New Civil Transactions Law Means for Existing Contracts and Future Disputes

The UAE's new Civil Transactions Law brings major changes to arbitration, contractual rights and enforcement.

Every arbitration begins with the same story: two parties entered into an agreement, something went wrong, and a tribunal must resolve the dispute. But tribunals do not decide cases in a vacuum — they are guided by the governing law. In the UAE, for more than four decades, that law was Federal Law No. 5 of 1985, the Civil Transactions Law, which quietly underpinned virtually every arbitral award governed by UAE law.

The challenge was its age. Enacted long before the internet, digital commerce and globalisation transformed business, the 1985 code increasingly struggled to reflect modern commercial realities. Arbitrators experienced these shortcomings first-hand. Construction contracts were largely left to judicial discretion, often producing inconsistent outcomes. Article 390, governing liquidated damages, gave judges and arbitrators broad authority to adjust agreed compensation to reflect actual loss, reducing carefully negotiated contractual provisions to little more than guidelines. Conduct during pre-contract negotiations also remained legally uncertain. In effect, sophisticated international parties choosing UAE arbitration were relying on a legal framework older than many of the lawyers applying it.

Recognising these limitations, the UAE chose replacement over reform. Federal Decree-Law No. 25 of 2025, the new Civil Transactions Law, came into force on June 1, 2026, replacing the 1985 legislation in its entirety. It also marks the culmination of a broader legislative modernisation programme, following reforms to the Civil Procedure, Commercial Transactions, Competition and Personal Status laws.

What Happens to Arbitration Clauses Signed Before June 1, 2026?

The good news is that existing arbitration clauses remain valid. They do not expire, become ineffective or require re-execution. Arbitration agreements are governed by Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 (the Arbitration Law) rather than the Civil Transactions Law.

Indeed, the new legislation reinforces the doctrine of separability, under which an arbitration agreement survives challenges to the underlying contract. While contracts signed before June 2026 continue to be governed by the old Civil Transactions Law for issues concerning their formation and validity, parties should recognise that the legal landscape surrounding those contracts has changed in three important respects.

Limitation Periods Have Changed.

Articles 6 and 7 of the new law provide that limitation periods apply immediately to claims that had not expired before the law came into force. Where the new limitation period is shorter, it runs from June 1, 2026.

Consider a subcontractor holding an unpaid claim dating back to 2023 and assuming ample time remains to commence proceedings. That assumption could now prove costly. Any party with outstanding but unfiled claims should recalculate limitation periods under the new legislation without delay.

Some Contractual Provisions May Not Survive the Transition.

The new law introduces mandatory provisions that may override existing contractual terms regardless of when the contract was signed. These include contractual limitation periods that are shorter than the statutory three-year period for decennial liability claims, as well as contractual caps on decennial liability.

One provision is particularly relevant to arbitration. Article 958 provides that an arbitration clause contained only within the pre-printed general conditions of an insurance policy may be unenforceable unless it is set out in a separate agreement signed by both parties. Insurers and policyholders relying on standard-form arbitration clauses should review their contracts carefully.

Tribunals May Have to Navigate Two Legal Regimes.

Practitioners generally agree that parties should avoid leaving this issue to chance.

Hogan Lovells offers a useful illustration: a contract signed before 2026 but terminated in 2031, with arbitration commencing in 2033, would remain governed by the old Civil Transactions Law. However, an arbitral tribunal hearing the dispute in 2033 may still be influenced by principles introduced under the new law when considering procedural fairness, abuse of rights, construction defects and evidential standards.

For this reason, parties should expressly identify the applicable legal framework whenever contracts are amended or supplemented. K&L Gates similarly notes that although the new code does not govern contracts concluded before June 2026, it is likely to shape future judicial and arbitral decision-making.

What's Actually New for Arbitral Claims?

The substantive reforms will influence how claims are pleaded and argued before arbitral tribunals.

For the first time, the legislation expressly imposes a duty to negotiate in good faith. A party that negotiates dishonestly, conceals material information or misuses confidential information during pre-contract discussions may now incur liability even if no final contract is concluded.

The treatment of liquidated damages has also evolved. Article 340 preserves parties' ability to agree liquidated damages but no longer permits courts to adjust compensation simply by reassessing the actual loss. Instead, the law specifies the circumstances in which agreed amounts may be reduced or increased. Upward adjustments will generally be permitted only where there is evidence of fraud, bad faith or gross negligence by the debtor.

Enforcement also assumes greater importance. An arbitral award has little practical value until recognised and enforced by the courts. Under Article 53(1) of the Arbitration Law, an award may be annulled if it conflicts with public policy — a concept interpreted broadly under UAE law.

As the new Civil Transactions Law places greater emphasis on public order, tribunals must consider issues such as illegality, nullity and abuse of rights more carefully. Failure to do so may expose an otherwise sound award to enforcement challenges.

The Drawbacks

The reforms also present significant challenges.

The most immediate is interpretative uncertainty. For four decades, arbitrators relied on an extensive body of Court of Cassation jurisprudence interpreting the 1985 code. That body of precedent will now have limited application, while new case law under the revised legislation will take years to develop. This uncertainty inevitably increases legal costs, prolongs proceedings and affects parties' negotiating positions.

Secondly, the transitional limitation rules may operate harshly in practice. Parties who believed they had complied with existing deadlines under the old law could suddenly find themselves facing significantly shorter limitation periods beginning on June 1, 2026.

Thirdly, mandatory statutory provisions inevitably restrict party autonomy, a cornerstone of arbitration. Where legislation overrides negotiated contractual terms irrespective of the contract date, and courts retain broader powers to modify agreements in exceptional circumstances, commercial certainty is reduced.

Even the revised enforcement framework has been described by commentators as a "double-edged sword"—streamlining enforcement while simultaneously expanding the grounds on which courts may intervene. Scholars have also criticised the new code's conflict-of-law provisions, arguing that they represent a missed opportunity for comprehensive modernisation.

On balance, the new Civil Transactions Law represents a significant step towards modernising UAE private law. For arbitrators and commercial parties alike, however, the coming decade will require careful attention. Deadlines should be recalculated, contractual provisions reviewed, and assumptions based on the old legal framework abandoned. The old rulebook has gone; arbitration strategy must now evolve with the new one.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Can UAE Employers Refuse to Extend Annual Leave? What employees should know about their legal rights and the risks of overstaying

Staying away from work without approval could lead to loss of pay or even dismissal under UAE employment law.

Employees in the UAE who need to extend their annual leave because of an emergency may assume that having sufficient leave balance guarantees approval. However, the UAE's employment legislation makes it clear that while employees have statutory annual leave entitlements, extending an approved period of leave remains subject to the employer's consent and operational requirements.

Under the UAE Employment Law, employees who have completed more than one year of continuous service are entitled to 30 calendar days of annual leave with full pay for each completed year of service. This entitlement is provided under Federal Decree-Law No. 33 of 2021 on the Regulation of Employment Relations and applies to eligible employees in the private sector.

Although annual leave is a statutory right, the law also grants employers the authority to determine when employees may take that leave. Leave schedules may be fixed according to business requirements, and employers may rotate leave among staff to ensure the smooth functioning of the workplace. The law further requires employers to notify employees of their approved leave dates at least one month in advance, where applicable.

This means that an employee cannot unilaterally decide to extend an approved holiday, even if they have unused annual leave remaining. A request for additional leave is subject to the employer's approval, and an employer is legally entitled to refuse such a request where operational or business needs justify the decision.

Employees who encounter unforeseen circumstances, such as a family emergency, medical issue or travel disruption while on leave, should notify their employer immediately and formally request an extension. Providing supporting documents, such as medical reports, hospital records or official travel documents, may help demonstrate that the request is genuine and encourage the employer to exercise discretion in approving the additional leave.

If an employee remains absent after the approved leave period without obtaining the employer's consent, the legal consequences can be significant. Under the Employment Law, an employee who fails to return to work immediately after the expiry of approved leave without a legitimate reason is not entitled to receive wages for the unauthorised period of absence.

In more serious cases, prolonged unauthorised absence may expose an employee to disciplinary action, including dismissal. The law permits an employer to terminate employment without notice, following a written investigation, if an employee is absent without a lawful reason or an acceptable justification for more than seven consecutive days or more than 20 non-consecutive days within a year.

Employees facing unavoidable emergencies should therefore communicate with their employer at the earliest opportunity, explain the circumstances and submit any available documentary evidence supporting the request. While employers are not legally obliged to approve every request for an extension of annual leave, timely communication and credible supporting documents may assist in obtaining approval.

Ultimately, employees should not assume that unused annual leave can be taken at their own discretion. Under the UAE Employment Law, extending annual leave remains subject to the employer's approval, and remaining away from work without authorisation may result in loss of salary and, in certain circumstances, termination of employment.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.