The courts will also accept digital requests to streamline execution procedures and automate administrative decisions
Dubai Courts have introduced a new system aimed at reducing the time spent on judicial procedures by welcoming digital requests to optimise execution procedures and automate administrative decisions.
The new Tanfeeth+ system allows enforcement judges to quickly access details about a respondent's assets and seize them for sale if necessary. This eliminates the need for judges to contact various departments, such as property or transport regulators in Dubai, for asset information.
The system will ensure the swift execution of verdicts, according to Dubai Courts. Additionally, the initiative includes integrating with the Ministry of Interior’s database to enforce liberty-restricting orders, travel bans, and asset seizures.
Dr Saif Ghanem Al Suwaidi, director-general of Dubai Courts, described Tanfeeth+ as a comprehensive digital initiative that enhances judicial enforcement efficiency. He highlighted that executing judgements traditionally requires communication with multiple entities. “Now, with Tanfeeth+, we can reduce the time spent on these procedures.”
He also mentioned that federal entities would be included in the next phase of the initiative.
The Digital Writ of Execution seal will facilitate the enforcement of court rulings, allowing petitioners to initiate procedures without visiting service centres.
The system also includes:
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
More From TLR
Trump Hush Money Prosecutors Argue Conviction Should Stand Despite Immunity Ruling
Coinbase UK Unit Faces £3.5M Fine for Serious Breach of Financial Crime Controls
Change of Religion in School Certificates Permitted After Conversion: Kerala HC
Related News
Sheikh Mohammed Presides over Swearing-in Ceremony of New Judges at Dubai Courts
Saudi Justice Ministry Expands Najiz Mobile App to Offer 90 Judicial Services
Supreme Court: Previous Tests for Judicial Interference in Arbitration Outdated