Trump Admin Seeks Revival of Executive Orders Targeting Major US Law Firms

Trump Admin Seeks Revival of Executive Orders Targeting Major US Law Firms

Justice Department argues federal judges overstepped authority in blocking orders aimed at firms representing political adversaries.

AuthorStaff WriterMar 12, 2026, 11:53 AM

The Trump administration has asked a federal appeals court to reinstate executive orders that sought to penalise four prominent US law firms, claiming that lower court judges exceeded their authority by blocking directives that fall within core presidential powers.

 

In its filing to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the Justice Department said the judges "bent over backwards" to invalidate orders against Perkins Coie, WilmerHale, Jenner & Block and Susman Godfrey, "without considering their plainly constitutional aspects and applications."

 

The law firms, challenging the directives, argued that the Republican president retaliated unlawfully against them for representing his political opponents, clients challenging his policies, or employing lawyers involved in previous government investigations of the president.

 

Trump's executive orders aimed to restrict lawyers from accessing federal buildings and to terminate US government contracts held by clients of the firms. Judges ruled that the orders violated the First Amendment’s free speech protections and the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of due process, issuing permanent injunctions against their enforcement.

 

The administration’s filing comes after the Justice Department initially moved to abandon its appeals on Monday, only to reverse course the following day. It marked the first detailed explanation of the legal rationale for seeking to reinstate the orders.

 

WilmerHale said in a statement on Friday: "We disagree with the government’s decision to appeal this judicial consensus, and we will proudly continue to defend our clients and our firm."

 

Trump had accused the four firms of "weaponising" the legal system against him and his allies while promoting workplace diversity policies he deemed discriminatory.

 

The Justice Department countered that the case "is not about the sanctity of the American law firm" but concerns "lower courts encroaching on the constitutional power of the president" in matters of national security and other domains.

 

Last year, nine other leading firms, including Paul Weiss, Skadden Arps, Latham & Watkins and Kirkland & Ellis, reached settlements with Trump, collectively pledging nearly $1 billion in free legal work to causes he supports.

 

The administration faced a Friday deadline to file its opening court papers; the D.C. Circuit has yet to set a date to hear the appeal.

 

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.