UAE Borrowers Face Tough Civil Actions Over Bounced Security Cheques in Personal Loan Defaults

Personal loans have become a cornerstone of financial transactions for individuals in the UAE, providing a means for consumers to manage a wide range of expenses, from medical bills to home renovations. When providing such loans, banks typically seek security from borrowers to safeguard their interests. One common form of security is the use of security cheques, which are often drawn by the borrower and held by the bank as collateral for the loan amount.

 

While security cheques are intended to ensure repayment of a loan, they can lead to significant legal consequences for borrowers if they are dishonored. This article examines the legal consequences when a cheque is dishonored due to insufficient funds, the remedies available to borrowers, and best practices for navigating these situations.

 

In the UAE, the legal framework surrounding personal loans, including the use of security cheques, is governed by regulations such as Regulation No. 29/2011 issued by the Central Bank of the UAE and the UAE Commercial Transactions Law (Federal Law No. 18 of 1993). These provisions establish clear guidelines on personal loans, credit cards, and the prohibition of blank cheques, aiming to protect consumers from financial exploitation.

 

The Role of Cheques in Personal Loan Agreements

In personal loan agreements, banks typically require security cheques as a guarantee for repayment. If the borrower defaults on the loan, the bank may deposit the security cheque to recover the outstanding amount.

 

Under Regulation No. 29/2011, the Central Bank of the UAE has implemented strict guidelines to regulate such practices. Notably, Article 15 prohibits the use of blank cheques for loans, thereby ensuring that borrowers are not exposed to undue risks. A blank cheque could, in theory, be filled in with an amount far exceeding the actual debt owed, which would be detrimental to the borrower. As such, the regulation requires that cheques used as collateral must be fully completed and reflect the agreed loan terms.

 

However, while this regulation protects borrowers from potential misuse, the dishonor of a cheque can still create serious legal consequences if the cheque is returned due to insufficient funds.

 

Consequences of a Cheque Execution Case

If a borrower defaults on a loan and the security cheque issued to the bank is dishonored due to insufficient funds, the bank can pursue a civil remedy by filing a Cheque Execution Case. This legal procedure is governed by the Civil Procedure Code and the Commercial Code, which empower the bank to initiate enforcement actions to recover the outstanding debt.

 

When a security cheque bounces, the bank can submit the dishonored cheque to the court for compulsory execution. Under Article 635 bis of the Commercial Code, a dishonored cheque is treated as a writ of execution, which means the bank can request the court to enforce the debt recovery process.

 

Once the bank files the case, it must serve the debtor with a writ of execution, demanding repayment of the outstanding debt within seven days. If the debtor fails to settle the debt within this period, the bank may request further enforcement actions, such as the provisional seizure of the debtor’s assets, as outlined in Article 234 of the Civil Procedure Code.

 

In addition to asset seizure, the bank can also request a travel ban under Article 324, preventing the debtor from leaving the UAE until the debt is settled in full.

Historically, issuing a cheque that was dishonored due to insufficient funds was treated as a criminal offense in the UAE. Borrowers could face prosecution, fines, and even imprisonment for issuing a cheque without sufficient funds to cover the payment. While the decriminalisation of cheque dishonor under Federal Decree No. 14/2020 has removed criminal penalties, the civil consequences—including Cheque Execution Cases, asset seizures, and travel bans—remain enforceable through the legal system.

 

Remedies Available to Borrowers

While the consequences of a Cheque Execution Case can be severe, borrowers have several legal remedies available to protect their rights. One of the most important is the right to file an objection to the execution case if the bank claims an amount that exceeds what is owed.

 

The UAE Court of Cassation has ruled that cheques may serve not only as a means of payment but also as a guarantee for debt. If a cheque is issued as a guarantee, its encashment is contingent upon the borrower’s failure to meet the agreed loan terms. The bank has the burden of proving that the conditions for encashment have been met, which can provide borrowers with an opportunity to challenge encashment in court if those conditions are disputed.

 

This legal precedent underscores the importance of clarifying whether the cheque is intended as a payment instrument or as a guarantee. It also provides a strong basis for challenging encashment if the cheque was issued under specific conditions that have not been fulfilled.

 

Best Practices for Borrowers

To mitigate the legal risks associated with security cheques, borrowers should prioritise clear documentation and a thorough understanding of loan terms. It is crucial to ensure that the loan agreement specifies the nature of the cheque -- whether it serves as a guarantee or immediate payment -- so as to avoid disputes over its intended use. Ambiguities in the agreement can lead to complications, particularly in the event of non-payment.

 

In cases of loan restructuring, borrowers are advised to seek legal counsel before agreeing to any changes. Restructuring can alter the terms of the loan and potentially affect the use of the security cheque, so professional guidance helps safeguard the borrower’s interests.

 

Borrowers should also be fully aware of their rights, particularly regarding the conditions under which a security cheque may be encashed. If the cheque is issued as a guarantee, it cannot be encashed until specific conditions, such as a default in payment, are met. Understanding these conditions can help prevent unwanted consequences, including Cheque Execution Cases.

 

Finally, borrowers must avoid issuing blank or incomplete cheques. Such cheques expose them to significant risk, as banks could encash them for amounts exceeding the loan balance. Properly completing the cheque is essential to minimising this risk.

 

 

For any enquiries please fill out this form, or contact info@thelawreporters.com and  Follow  The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels