Moving Money Across Borders: Key Legal And Tax Risks Investors Often Overlook When Repatriating Funds

Cross-border investment rarely ends when the money has been transferred to the target company. If the company starts to generate profits and needs funding to finance its expansion, or pay for consultancy and intellectual-property services, the capital will flow in the other direction. Each type of payment has different implications for taxes and compliance, and the nuances can easily lead to problems for investors.

 

A dividend is not a shareholder loan, a capital injection is not a management fee, and a payment for the use of intellectual property is not an ordinary commercial purchase. Each transaction has its own requirements in terms of tax, transfer pricing, foreign exchange, company law and banking.

 

The challenge for investors is that there are no standard global rules for such transactions. Company law, tax legislation, foreign exchange and banking rules, as well as bilateral tax treaties and transfer-pricing rules, all need to be taken into account. Even within one jurisdiction, a seemingly straightforward payment can involve additional approval or documentation processes.

 

The key point for any cross-border transaction is that the legal nature of the payment is clear. The reason for the transfer, the parties involved, and the terms should be fully understood and properly documented.

 

Start With The Legal Character

 

The first step in any cross-border transfer is to define the legal nature of the payment.

 

A shareholder injecting capital into a company could take the form of subscribing for new shares, a capital injection or a shareholder loan. These options have different tax treatment, risk exposure, and requirements in terms of company law. An equity injection normally strengthens the share capital of the target company, whereas a shareholder loan creates a creditor-debtor relationship and involves terms such as interest rates, repayment schedules, and security.

 

The distinction between the two is particularly relevant for tax purposes. If the loan is between related parties, tax authorities may question whether it is truly a loan, or whether it is in fact an equity injection disguised as a loan.

Poorly documented transactions can cause headaches for investors down the line. What may seem like a routine bank transfer can trigger scrutiny from tax authorities, requiring extensive justification.

 

Dividends Require Careful Planning

 

Dividends are usually the main way for shareholders to withdraw profits from a target company, but there are a number of steps to be taken before dividend payments can be processed.

 

The company’s board of directors must approve a dividend distribution, having taken into account company law and tax considerations.

 

Company law requirements can vary depending on the jurisdiction, but generally a company can only distribute dividends if it has sufficient distributable reserves. In addition, all corporate governance requirements in the company’s constitutional documents, including shareholder or board approvals, must be met.

 

Once the board has authorised the payment, the next step is to consider the tax implications. Dividend payments are subject to taxation in both the country of origin and the country of residence. In addition, some countries levy a withholding tax on dividend payments. Double taxation agreements usually relieve shareholders of double taxation, but certain conditions must be met, such as tax residency and documentation requirements.

 

Finally, investors should be aware that the amount of the dividend payment they receive will depend on the amount of the gross payment less any applicable taxes.

 

Shareholder Loans Need Proper Terms

 

In some cases, a shareholder loan can be a good option for injecting capital into a company. A loan can be used to finance working capital, acquisitions, and other corporate purposes without immediately increasing the share capital of the company.

 

A loan can also be useful for temporary financing needs. However, a shareholder loan can give rise to significant tax and regulatory challenges if the terms are not properly structured.

 

A cross-border loan agreement should clearly state the principal amount, currency, interest rate, repayment schedule, and maturity date. In addition, the parties should consider which law will govern the contract. If the lender and borrower are related parties, the loan terms should reflect what independent parties would agree under generally accepted commercial principles.

 

The interest on a shareholder loan is subject to taxation in the country of residence of the lender. In addition, interest payments may be subject to withholding tax in the country of the borrower. However, tax deductions for interest payments may be limited if the loan agreement is considered to be between related parties or if the interest exceeds the arm’s length principle.

In addition, a shareholder loan that is supposed to be short term but turns out to be permanent, or where interest is not paid on time, runs the risk of being challenged as a disguised equity injection.

 

Capital Injections Leave A Paper Trail

 

Equity injections may seem less complicated than loans since, unlike loans, they do not involve repayment of principal. However, capital injections usually involve a number of formalities under company law.

 

Depending on the legal structure of the target company, injecting capital may require the preparation of certain documents, filing changes with the appropriate authorities, and adjustments to the company’s share capital. In the case of foreign investment, there may also be issues with foreign investment regulations.

 

The main thing to remember is that the injection of capital may require documentation, approvals, and filing of documents with the appropriate authorities. In addition, the difference between a formal subscription for new shares and an informal injection of capital may become relevant when the investor wants to withdraw money from the company.

 

A bank may require proof of payment, as well as documents indicating the approval of corporate authorities, to process a withdrawal of any funds.

 

Royalties Raise Intellectual Property Questions

 

A royalty payment represents another category of payments that require careful consideration from both a tax and a commercial perspective.

 

A royalty is a payment made by one party to another for the right to use intellectual property, which may include trademarks, patents, copyright, technical expertise, and other know-how. In most cases, the receipt of royalties is subject to taxation and therefore withholding tax in the country of origin.

 

If the parties are related, the amount of royalties is subject to transfer pricing rules. In addition, determining the value of intellectual property for the purposes of royalties can sometimes be a challenge, especially when it comes to intangible assets such as brands, technical expertise, and know-how.

 

A properly drafted licensing agreement should state which intellectual property is being used, the scope of the licence, the territory, the term of the licence, and the terms of payment. The commercial justification for the royalty must also be established to ensure that the transaction meets the requirements of the tax authorities.

 

Management Fees Need Substance

Similar to royalty payments, management and consultancy fees also require careful documentation to ensure that the transaction meets the requirements of tax and company law.

 

If a company is to account for management fees as an expense, it must be able to demonstrate that the fees were actually incurred and that the cost was justified. Contracts, invoices, and documents confirming the provision of services, as well as a detailed cost breakdown, may be required.

 

This is especially important in the case of parent-subsidiary relationships, where the parent company pays fees to the subsidiary for services rendered. In this case, the description of the services provided under the contract is of particular importance to the tax authorities, since vague wording such as “management services” does not provide sufficient information about the services rendered.

 

The tax authorities may also review whether the services were actually provided and whether the cost was justified. It is therefore important to understand that a management fee is not automatically deductible as an expense, even if it is documented.

 

Foreign Exchange Can Alter The Transaction

 

Another factor to consider when making cross-border payments is the foreign exchange regulations of the countries involved.

 

In some jurisdictions, the currency regime is completely liberalized. In others, there may be restrictions on currency conversions, as well as reporting requirements for large transfers of funds. Some jurisdictions may require prior approval from the local central bank for transfers, loans, dividends, or other types of payments. In addition, there may be specific requirements for documenting each transaction.

 

Currency risk is also an important aspect of cross-border payments. For example, a shareholder loan denominated in US dollars can turn into an expensive burden for a company that earns income in a different currency.

 

The terms of the contract should therefore clearly state the currency of the payment, as well as any additional details related to currency conversion and bank fees. This applies to all types of payments, including dividends, fees, interest on loans, and royalties.

 

Banks Are Part Of The Process

 

Even if a transaction meets all the requirements of the law, investors need to be aware that banks can impose their own requirements when processing payments.

In particular, banks can ask for information on the beneficial owners of companies, the source of funds, and documentation on the transaction. Large transactions and complex cross-border payments often require additional documentation from banks, including information on the parties to the transaction, the purpose of the payment, and supporting documents such as tax documents, contracts, and invoices.

 

If the payment documentation is not prepared correctly, the transfer of funds may be delayed. In addition, different banks may have different requirements for the same transaction.

 

Withholding Tax Can Change The Final Amount

 

Withholding tax deserves special attention because it is applied to the payment itself, reducing the amount received by the payee.

 

Dividends, interest on loans, and royalties are some of the most common types of payments subject to withholding tax, but management and consultancy fees can also be subject to it. The applicable rates and the responsibilities of the tax authorities may differ depending on the jurisdiction, but the principle is the same: the tax is withheld from the payment by the party responsible for making the payment.

 

Tax treaties between countries often reduce or eliminates withholding tax, but in order for a company to benefit from a reduced rate, it must apply to the local tax authorities to withhold tax at the lower rate.

 

The timing of withholding tax is also of great importance. In many cases, the company that makes the payment is required to withhold tax at source and remit it to the tax authorities, even if the final recipient of the payment is a tax resident in another jurisdiction.

 

Documentation Is The Common Thread

 

For all types of cross-border payments, one rule applies: the legal and commercial documentation should clearly state the nature of the transaction.

 

Investors considering cross-border payments should therefore be aware of the differences between dividends, shareholder loans, capital injections, royalties, management fees, and other types of payments. The parties should also be aware of the company law and tax implications of each type of payment, as well as any documentation requirements imposed by banks.

 

In addition, the documentation should be consistent with the nature of the payment. If a payment is made as a dividend, it must not appear as a loan in the accounting records or as a management fee in the bank transfer documents.

 

Cross-border investment is not simply a matter of transferring money from one account to another. At every stage, the legitimacy of the transaction and its compliance with the requirements of the law must be established. It is therefore important for investors to carefully consider the options for withdrawing profits, injecting capital, and paying fees to related parties, as well as the consequences for taxes and banking.

Dr. Sunil Ambalavelil is the Global Executive Chairman of Kaden Boriss, an international law firm specialising in franchise and business agreements. A seasoned legal adviser, he has advised and supported the international growth of numerous global brands, helping them navigate the legal complexities of cross-border expansion.
For enquiries or further information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.