United Arab Emirates UAE
Receive Only The Best Posts Via Email
The Delhi High Court has made clear critical comments about the civil lawsuit brought by Hindi film actor Juhi Chawla, who is apparently trying to halt the roll-out of 5G technology by stoking fears about the dangers of radiation. The court opined that this suit was a popularity stunt and calling it a "defective and vexatious" civil suit. Multiple flaws were cited by the court in the filing of this lawsuit and this might well be a good lesson in the effective presentation of a case, learned the hard way.
Key Flaws Pointed Out by the Court
The plaint seemed to be heavily non-compliant to stipulations containing the ingredients of a civil suit, joinder of parties and the presentation of the plaint. The issues pointed out by the court could be a ready reckoner to identifying mistakes that one should not commit while drafting a plaint.
Drafting and Presentation: The Civil Procedure Code mandates that a plain must contain a precise and brief presentation of the facts of the case and that the evidence cannot be included in the plaint at this stage. However, the plaintiff did not comply with Order VI of the Code of Civil Procedure, which mandates the above mentioned and went ahead with a non-concise elucidation of the facts and had also included evidence in the action.
Furthermore, the Code is specific about including only material content and averments in the plaint. However, as per the court's interpretation the plaint was cluttered with unnecessary, scandalous, frivolous argument and the abovementioned is in direct contravention of the Order VI, Rule 16 of the Code which sets out this drafting etiquette.
Joinder: Furthermore, the plaintiffs had also joined 33 defendants without complying with Order I Rule 3 of the CPC, which elucidates on who maybe joined as defendants in a suit. The plaintiffs had also included various causes of action, without complying with Order II, Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Verification: The mandatory "verification" part in a Plaint, where the plaintiff verifies that the averments and contents of the plaint are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and that no material facts were concealed, was missing from the plaint and rightly pointed out. [Order VI Rule 15]
Affidavits: The affidavits presented the picture that the parties did not have a complete idea of the facts, and they were based on information or legal advice. To be more precise, in the affidavit filed in the lawsuit, the plaintiffs (paragraphs 1-8) alleged that the action was based on their knowledge (paragraphs 1-169) and that the briefs were based on information and legal advice, meaning that the plaintiffs had no personal knowledge of the deviations expressed by the plaintiff. Hence, the court declared that the same is not maintainable.
Mandatory Notification: The plaintiffs made no mandatory notification under paragraph 80 (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure and did not value the lawsuit properly for the purpose of court fees. When the plaintiffs filed the lawsuit on 28 May 2021, the Registry had objected, stating the case might not be maintainable. However, the plaintiffs, instead of explaining maintainability, declared that the action could be maintained and asked them to list the matter anyways. Undertaking to bear the costs and consequences of it, whereupon the matter was listed.
Issues under the Specific Relief Act: The plaintiff never approached the defendant to assert a right and the defendants were not given an opportunity to address any of the plaintiff's alleged rights, which is in contravention of the requirements of Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act of 1963. Moreover, mandatory injunctions require an obligation to exist against the defendant where the same has to be breached. The requirement was not fulfilled as per the facts of this suit [Section 39 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963].
The Conclusions by the Court
The court described the plaintiffs "entire action as an abuse of procedure and law, leading to a waste of court time". The court opined that this suit was for publicity and a fine of Rs 20 lakh was imposed on direct deposit to the Delhi Legal Services Authority. It was also found by the court that the link for the hearing was shared by Juhi on social media, which led to repeated interruptions of the court proceedings. The remainder of the court fee of Rs. 1,95,594 was also earmarked for deposit.
Artificial Intelligence Policy for Healthcare in Dubai has been introduced by Informatics and Smart Health Department at the Dubai Health Authority. The policy fits into the UAE Strategy for Artificial Intelligence, which aims to meet the UAE Centennial 2071 goals, improve government performance, and invest in AI adoption. The goal of Dubai's AI policy for the health industry is to establish regulatory...
His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum issued Decree No. (24) of 2021 regulating the use of 3D printing in the construction sector in the Emirate. The decree has been implemented to promote Dubai as a regional and global hub for the use of this technology. The Dubai Municipality is tasked with overseeing the implementation of the new decree and the Emirate aims to ensure 25 per cent of...
As the world becomes a smaller place and sharing personal data for availing services, for reasons ranging across identity verification and targeted marketing through mails, has become so much more frequent and necessary than ever. It is even reported by multiple sources that personal data of individuals get sold on the black market for prices ranging across several hundred dollars for significant...
The UAE Public Prosecution released a short informational video across its social media accounts explaining the penalties of creating fake e-mails, websites, and online accounts. According to the video, Article (11) of the Federal Decree-Law No. 34 of 2021 on combatting rumours and cybercrimes, stipulates that any person who creates a fake website, online account, or e-mail, impersonating a natural...
Counsellor Yousef Saeed Al-Abri, the Undersecretary of the Abu Dhabi Judicial Department, launched the interactive lawsuit filing service in Abu Dhabi courts. Abu Dhabi being the first of its kind in the world to launch the same. It relies on Artificial Intelligence to accurately and promptly determine the type of lawsuit, the competent court, and the applicable fees, through easy steps and a user-friendly...
The Dubai Municipality will work with private sector companies and investors to create a futuristic, human-centred version of the city that capitalises on opportunities thrown up by the metaverse, according to Dawood Abdul Rahman Al Hajri, Director-General of Dubai Municipality. Al Hajri introduced the One Human Reality concept to delegates during a plenary session, entitled ‘Operating Cities...