Dubai Court Acquits American in $6M Cybercrime and Embezzlement Case

Dubai criminal court has cleared a 43-year-old American shareholder and consultant of all cybercrime and embezzlement charges linked to more than $6 million, ruling that the prosecution failed to meet the required standard of proof and that the case was overshadowed by reasonable doubt.

The court also threw out a related civil compensation claim, directing the complainants to bear legal costs, including lawyers’ fees.

The defendant had been charged under UAE cybercrime and penal laws, with prosecutors alleging unauthorised access to company systems, manipulation of digital platforms, and breach of trust.

Central to the case were claims that he altered operational links to seize control of corporate digital assets, including social media accounts on X (formerly Twitter), Telegram and Instagram, as well as the cryptocurrency tracking platform CoinMarketCap.

He also faced allegations of misappropriating $6,098,400 in investor funds, purportedly diverting the money into unauthorised accounts after gaining control of company systems.

The defence contested the charges on multiple grounds, with the accused consistently denying all allegations. A key element of the defence was an independent technical report that contradicted the prosecution’s expert findings, casting doubt on the reliability of the digital evidence.

It was further argued that the accused held multiple roles — as shareholder, employee and consultant — in the companies involved, Inter Data Network Inc. and Cerbellum Network Inc., which gave him legitimate authority to access systems and data.

Defence lawyers also maintained that the dispute arose from ongoing commercial disagreements and parallel overseas legal proceedings between the parties, rather than any criminal intent.

They highlighted the absence of transaction records, bank statements or any traceable financial trail linking the accused to the alleged misappropriation, along with the lack of complaints from investors or customers claiming losses.

Witness testimonies presented by the prosecution were described as unsubstantiated and unsupported by material evidence.

In its judgment, the court found that the prosecution’s technical evidence failed to establish unlawful manipulation or personal gain. Judges noted that the defendant’s role within the companies granted him legitimate access, weakening claims of unauthorised entry.

The court also underscored the absence of a clear financial record and the lack of victim complaints, concluding that the case was surrounded by what it termed “thick shadows of doubt”.

Reaffirming the principle that doubt must favour the accused, the court issued a full acquittal, dismissed the civil lawsuit, and ordered the claimants to pay legal costs and attorney fees.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.