Imagine discovering that someone has lodged a police complaint accusing you of a crime you never committed. Your reputation may be damaged, your family placed under considerable stress and your professional life disrupted while you respond to allegations that have no factual basis. Even if an investigation eventually clears your name, the experience can have consequences that extend well beyond the conclusion of the case.
The situation raises another important question: what happens when the person making the accusation knows that the allegations are untrue?
Under UAE law, deliberately filing a false criminal report can itself constitute an offence. The right to report suspected wrongdoing is an important part of the justice system, but it does not give individuals the freedom to invent incidents, manufacture evidence or use criminal complaints to target others. The law seeks to protect both the public's ability to report genuine offences and the rights of individuals against deliberate misuse of legal processes.
When Does a False Report Become a Criminal Offence?
The principal provisions dealing with false reporting are Articles 324 and 325 of Federal Decree-Law No. 31 of 2021, Promulgating the Crimes and Penalties Law.
Article 324 deals with reports made to judicial or administrative authorities concerning incidents or dangers that do not exist, as well as allegations of criminal offences that the person knows have not taken place. A person found guilty of such conduct may face incarceration for up to six months and/or a fine.
Article 325 addresses the false and bad-faith accusation of another person before the authorities for an act punishable under criminal or administrative law. Significantly, criminal liability under this provision does not depend on whether the allegation eventually leads to criminal or disciplinary proceedings against the individual named in the complaint.
The provision also covers the deliberate attribution of material evidence to a crime and conduct intended to bring legal proceedings against someone whom the complainant knows to be innocent. The distinction between the two provisions is important. While Article 324 addresses fabricated incidents and reports of non-existent crimes, Article 325 extends to deliberately implicating another person and misusing the authorities to initiate action against them.
A Mistaken Complaint Does Not Automatically Attract Liability
An allegation that cannot ultimately be proved is not necessarily a false report in the criminal sense. Individuals may approach the police with genuine concerns, only for subsequent investigations to reveal that the available evidence does not establish an offence. A case may also be closed without charges or end in an acquittal. None of these outcomes, on its own, establishes that the original complainant committed an offence.
The central consideration under Article 325 is whether the accusation was knowingly false and made in bad faith. The law distinguishes between a person who reports suspected wrongdoing on reasonable grounds and someone who deliberately makes allegations despite knowing that they are untrue.
Consider a commercial dispute in which one business partner suspects that the other has misappropriated company funds. The concerned partner approaches the authorities and submits financial records and other available information in support of the complaint. If an investigation subsequently finds no evidence of a criminal offence, that finding does not automatically make the complainant criminally liable.
The position changes if the complainant knowingly invents financial transactions, submits fabricated documents or accuses the other party of criminal conduct despite being aware that no such wrongdoing occurred. In those circumstances, the complaint may cross the line into criminal false reporting. The distinction is fundamental: the law protects the right to report suspected offences, but not the deliberate use of that right to harm another person.
The Penalties Can Extend Beyond an Ordinary Fine
The consequences of a false report under Article 325 may be considerably more serious than those associated with a routine complaint. Where the falsely attributed offence amounts to a felony, the law provides for both incarceration and a fine. Further, where the false report results in the imposition of a penalty prescribed for a felony, the person responsible for the false accusation may face the same penalty imposed.
These provisions reflect the seriousness with which UAE law treats attempts to manipulate criminal proceedings. A fabricated allegation can expose an innocent individual to investigation, restrictions on personal freedom, damage to employment prospects and lasting harm to professional and personal relationships. The person responsible for manufacturing the allegation may, in turn, face substantial criminal consequences.
The potential liability is not limited to the immediate effects of making the complaint. Where false information or fabricated evidence has influenced the course of an investigation or judicial proceedings, the circumstances may have wider implications for the person who deliberately set the process in motion.
Can a Falsely Accused Person Seek Compensation?
Criminal prosecution is not the only possible legal consequence of making a false report. UAE law also provides a route through which an individual who has suffered harm from a false accusation may seek financial compensation.
Article 26 of Federal Decree-Law No. 38 of 2022, Promulgating the Criminal Procedures Law, addresses compensation for damage resulting from false accusations made by a reporting person or victim. It also provides for the criminal court to award compensation, upon the accused person's request, against an individual convicted of perjury or making a false report.
This provision offers an additional remedy to individuals who have suffered loss because another person deliberately misused the reporting process. Depending on the circumstances, the harm may involve financial losses, professional damage or other consequences arising from the false accusation. However, compensation is not granted automatically. The affected individual must pursue the claim before the competent court, which will examine the relevant facts and the damage established.
Why Evidence and Intent Matter
Establishing a false report requires more than demonstrating that the original allegation was not proved. Investigators and courts may need to examine the circumstances in which the complaint was made, the information available to the complainant at the time and whether there is evidence of deliberate dishonesty.
Communications, emails, financial records, CCTV footage and witness statements may help reconstruct events and establish whether an allegation was made in good faith. Where documents or physical evidence are suspected to have been fabricated, their origin, authenticity and connection to the complaint may also become significant.
Anyone who believes they have been falsely accused should retain relevant documents and communications, preserve potential evidence and avoid exchanges that could aggravate the dispute. Obtaining legal advice at an early stage can also help determine the appropriate course of action and whether a separate complaint or compensation claim may be justified.
The same caution applies to those considering filing criminal complaints. Allegations should be based on genuine concerns and the facts reasonably available, rather than assumptions, personal disagreements or an intention to cause harm. Where information is uncertain, it is important to distinguish between what is known and what is merely suspected.
Preserving the Integrity of the Justice System
The ability to report suspected criminal activity is essential to the effective functioning of the rule of law. Individuals should be able to approach the authorities without fear of facing criminal liability simply because an investigation does not substantiate their concerns. At the same time, the reporting process cannot be allowed to become an instrument for settling personal disputes, damaging reputations or exposing innocent people to criminal proceedings.
By penalising deliberate false reporting, UAE law seeks to maintain this balance. It protects the legitimate exercise of the right to report wrongdoing while placing clear limits on conduct intended to mislead the authorities or manipulate the administration of justice.
Conclusion
Articles 324 and 325 of the UAE Crimes and Penalties Law establish that deliberately making false reports or knowingly implicating an innocent person can carry serious criminal consequences. The provisions also reinforce the distinction between an allegation made in good faith and one deliberately manufactured to cause harm.
Reporting a suspected crime is a serious responsibility, and the justice system must remain accessible to those who genuinely seek its protection. But when that process is knowingly abused, the person making the accusation may find themselves facing legal consequences of their own.
For enquiries or further information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.