Is the UAE Market Ready for a Dedicated Franchise Law to Bring Greater Clarity, Balance and Confidence?

Franchising has become an important route for international and regional brands seeking to expand in the United Arab Emirates. From restaurants and retail outlets to education, healthcare, fitness and professional services, the franchise model allows businesses to enter new markets without having to own and operate every outlet themselves.

 

Yet there is an interesting legal gap at the heart of this growing market: the UAE does not have a dedicated federal franchise law.

 

That does not mean franchising is unregulated. Far from it. Franchise relationships are affected by a combination of commercial agency legislation, civil and commercial contract principles, competition law, consumer protection rules, intellectual property legislation, company law and, depending on the structure, free-zone regulations.

 

The result is a framework that can provide considerable contractual flexibility, but which may also leave important questions to be determined by the wording of individual franchise agreements and the way the relationship is structured.

 

As the UAE continues to position itself as an international business and investment hub, the question is therefore becoming more relevant: would a dedicated franchise statute strengthen the market, or would it create unnecessary regulation around a system that already works?

 

A Legal Framework Built Around Multiple Laws

 

The first point to understand is that franchising in the UAE does not operate within one comprehensive statute. Current legal analysis identifies the Federal Law No. 3 of 2022 regulating commercial agencies, the Civil Transactions Law, the Commercial Transactions Law, trademark and other intellectual property legislation, competition law and consumer protection legislation among the key laws that can affect franchise arrangements.

 

This framework reflects the fact that a franchise is not simply a licence to use a brand. It is usually a combination of intellectual property rights, operational know-how, business methods, quality standards, supply arrangements, marketing obligations, and continuing commercial support. The franchise agreement therefore becomes particularly important.

 

It normally sets out the territory, term, fees, royalties, marketing contributions, intellectual property rights, training, supply requirements, operating standards, renewal, termination, post-termination obligations, confidentiality and dispute resolution.

 

The flexibility of this contractual model is one of the UAE's attractions. But it can also produce an imbalance where a sophisticated international franchisor negotiates against a smaller or less experienced franchisee. That is where the argument for a dedicated law begins.

 

Commercial Agency: The Line That Franchisors Cannot Ignore

 

One of the most important issues is whether a franchise arrangement could fall within the UAE's commercial agency regime. Federal Law No. 3 of 2022 defines a commercial agency broadly, covering representation of a principal by an agent under an agreement involving agency, distribution, sale, offer or concession, or the provision of goods or services in the UAE in return for commission or profit. This matters because a franchise agreement can contain elements resembling distribution, agency or concession arrangements.

 

The legal consequences can be significant where an arrangement is registered as a commercial agency. The Commercial Agencies Law provides a specific statutory framework, including provisions concerning the relationship between principals and agents, territory and disputes. The law also provides that commercial agency contracts are considered to be in the common interest of the contracting parties and gives UAE courts jurisdiction over disputes concerning such contracts.

 

For franchisors, the issue is therefore not merely whether an agreement is labelled a "franchise agreement". Its substance and structure matter.

 

A dedicated franchise law could provide a clearer test for distinguishing a franchise from a commercial agency, reducing uncertainty over which statutory regime applies.

 

Contract Law Remains the Foundation

 

For franchise arrangements outside the commercial agency regime, general principles of UAE civil and commercial law remain central. This places considerable emphasis on the negotiated contract.

 

That can be positive. International franchisors often need sophisticated agreements capable of dealing with brand standards, technology, intellectual property, supply chains and changing business models. A rigid statutory framework may not always accommodate those requirements.

 

However, contractual freedom also creates questions about bargaining power. A franchisee may invest heavily in premises, staff, equipment and marketing based on the expectation of operating a particular brand for several years. If the agreement contains broad termination rights, restrictive renewal conditions or substantial post-termination obligations, the franchisee's investment may be exposed.

 

Conversely, a franchisor must be able to protect its brand from a franchisee whose performance damages reputation or breaches operational standards.

 

A well-designed franchise statute would therefore need to strike a balance rather than simply favour one side.

 

Competition Law and Franchising

 

Competition law is another increasingly important part of the picture. Federal Decree-Law No. 36 of 2023 regarding the regulation of competition is intended to protect and enhance competition, combat monopolistic practices and prevent conduct that distorts, restricts or prevents free competition. Its scope extends to economic activities in the UAE and certain conduct outside the UAE that affects competition within the country.

 

This is relevant to franchise arrangements because franchisors frequently impose restrictions relating to territories, suppliers, pricing, customers, online sales and competing businesses.

 

Such restrictions can have legitimate commercial purposes. A franchisor may need to maintain uniform standards, protect confidential know-how or prevent free-riding between franchisees. But restrictions cannot simply be assumed to be lawful because they appear in a franchise agreement.

 

The UAE's competition regime has also recently become more significant with Cabinet Resolution No. 59 of 2026 concerning the executive regulations of the Competition Law, which took effect on July 30, 2026.

 

A future franchise law should therefore work alongside competition legislation rather than create a separate regime that conflicts with it.

 

Consumer Protection Does Not Stop at the Franchise Agreement

 

The ultimate customer is not a party to the franchise agreement, but consumer protection law can nevertheless have a direct impact on the franchise network. Federal Decree-Law No. 5 of 2023 amended the Federal Law No. 15 of 2020 on Consumer Protection. Among other matters, the framework addresses quality, safety, pricing, consumer data and information provided to consumers. Suppliers must also meet specific invoicing and consumer information requirements.

 

For franchisors, this raises a practical question: who carries responsibility when a franchise outlet fails to meet the brand's standards?

 

A franchise law could clarify responsibilities between franchisor and franchisee without diminishing the consumer's statutory rights. This would be particularly valuable for businesses operating across multiple emirates, where a consumer may see the same brand as a single business even though individual outlets are owned by different franchisees.

 

Intellectual Property is the Heart of the Franchise Model

 

Without intellectual property protection, there is little meaningful franchise system to protect. The franchisor typically grants the franchisee rights to use trademarks, logos, trade names, copyrighted material, operating manuals, recipes, designs, software and other proprietary material.

 

The UAE's Federal Decree-Law No. 36 of 2021 on Trademarks provides the principal trademark framework, while other legislation protects different categories of intellectual property. The Ministry of Economy and Tourism identifies trademark and industrial property legislation as part of the country's broader IP framework.

 

A dedicated franchise statute could strengthen this area by expressly recognising the licensing and controlled use of franchise intellectual property.

 

It could also establish clearer rules concerning confidentiality, trade secrets, know-how and the return or destruction of proprietary materials after termination.

 

This would be particularly important as franchises increasingly depend on technology, digital platforms, customer databases and proprietary business systems rather than merely physical branding.

 

Foreign Investment Has Changed the Equation

 

The UAE's foreign investment reforms have also altered the context in which franchising operates. The country's corporate framework permits 100 per cent foreign ownership for many mainland activities, although strategic activities remain subject to specific restrictions and approvals. The UAE Government states that foreign investors can own up to 100 per cent of companies in eligible activities.

 

This reduces one of the historical reasons international businesses relied on local partners or particular agency structures. For franchising, it means a foreign brand has more choices in deciding how to establish its presence: direct investment, a subsidiary, a branch where permitted, a joint venture or a franchise arrangement.

 

A modern franchise law should recognise this changed investment landscape rather than be built around older assumptions about foreign ownership.

 

Free Zones Add Another Layer

 

The UAE's free zones create further complexity. Free-zone businesses benefit from simplified establishment procedures and, generally, full foreign ownership. However, the rules and licensing requirements can vary between individual free zones.

 

For a franchisor, the question is not simply where the franchise company is incorporated. It is also where the franchise outlets operate and whether the business is supplying the UAE mainland.

 

A franchise law could provide useful clarity by establishing baseline federal principles applicable to franchise relationships while preserving the regulatory autonomy of individual free zones. That could reduce uncertainty without eliminating the flexibility that makes free zones attractive.

 

Franchise Disclosure: Perhaps the Biggest Missing Piece

 

One of the strongest arguments for dedicated legislation concerns pre-contractual disclosure. There is currently no general UAE franchise disclosure regime requiring a franchisor to provide a prospective franchisee with a standardised disclosure document before signing.

 

That means the quality and extent of information available to a prospective franchisee can depend heavily on negotiation and due diligence.

 

A disclosure regime could require franchisors to provide information about the business, ownership, litigation history, intellectual property, fees, financial commitments, termination provisions, existing franchise network and material risks. Such a requirement would not necessarily prevent a franchisee from making a bad investment. But it could make the decision more informed.

 

For a market seeking sophisticated international investors, transparency can be an advantage rather than a burden.

 

Should Franchisees Receive Greater Statutory Protection?

 

This is perhaps the most sensitive question. A franchisee is an independent business owner, not an employee. It takes commercial risk and should be expected to conduct due diligence before investing.

 

At the same time, the franchisor often controls the brand, business model, operating standards and contractual framework. This can create a significant imbalance in bargaining power. A franchise statute could therefore introduce targeted protections without turning franchisees into protected consumers.

 

Possible measures could include reasonable notice requirements before termination, minimum standards for renewal, restrictions on unfair contractual terms, protection for franchisee investments in certain circumstances and clearer rules governing post-termination restrictions.

 

However, excessive protection could discourage international brands from entering the UAE. The objective should be balance, not regulation for its own sake.

 

Dispute Resolution Needs Greater Predictability

 

Franchise disputes can be particularly complex because they may involve unpaid royalties, trademark rights, confidential information, supply obligations, termination, territorial restrictions and claims for damages.

 

The agreement should therefore carefully address governing law, jurisdiction, arbitration, emergency relief, confidentiality and enforcement.

 

The UAE has developed into a major arbitration and dispute-resolution hub, while the federal courts and specialist financial-centre jurisdictions provide different options depending on the structure of the transaction.

 

A franchise statute could establish clearer principles without preventing sophisticated parties from choosing arbitration or another agreed dispute-resolution mechanism where legally permissible.

 

So, Does the UAE Need a Franchise Law?

 

The answer may be yes — but not necessarily a highly prescriptive one.

 

The UAE's existing framework has helped franchising develop without imposing a separate regulatory regime. Its flexibility is valuable, particularly for sophisticated international businesses.

 

But the absence of a dedicated statute also means that important franchise-specific questions are dispersed across different areas of law. A carefully drafted franchise law could fill those gaps.

 

It could define what constitutes a franchise; distinguish franchising from commercial agency and distribution; introduce proportionate pre-contractual disclosure; establish basic standards for termination and renewal; recognise franchisee investments; clarify intellectual property and confidentiality obligations; address competition concerns; and provide a coherent framework for dispute resolution. It should also preserve contractual freedom for commercially sophisticated parties.

 

The UAE has repeatedly demonstrated a willingness to update its commercial laws as its economy evolves. The recent reforms in company ownership, competition regulation, intellectual property and commercial agencies show that the legal environment is already moving towards greater sophistication.

 

Franchising is now sufficiently important to merit the same attention. The real question, therefore, may no longer be whether the UAE can operate without a franchise law. It clearly can.

 

The more important question is whether a dedicated framework could make the market more transparent for franchisees, more predictable for franchisors and more attractive to international brands. If designed carefully, the answer could be yes.

 

For the UAE, the opportunity is not to regulate franchising out of existence, but to create a legal framework that reflects the sophistication of the market it has already become.

 

Dr. Sunil Ambalavellil is the Global Executive Chairman of Kaden Boriss, an international law firm specialising in franchise and business agreements. A seasoned legal adviser, he has advised and supported the international growth of numerous global brands, helping them navigate the legal complexities of cross-border expansion.

For enquiries or further information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.