Restrictive Covenants in the UAE: Looking Beyond Non-Compete Clauses to Build Stronger Employment Protection

When UAE employers think about restrictive covenants, non-compete clauses are usually the first thing that comes to mind. However, an effective protection strategy extends well beyond non-compete obligations. It should also include non-solicitation provisions, confidentiality undertakings, trade secret protections and garden leave clauses, each governed by a different, and sometimes overlapping, area of UAE law.


This article explores that broader legal framework for mainland companies, highlights where the DIFC and ADGM regimes differ, and concludes with practical drafting guidance.

Non-Compete Clauses: The Statutory Baseline

Onshore non-compete clauses are governed by Article 10 of Federal Decree-Law No. 33 of 2021 on the Regulation of Labour Relations, supplemented by Article 12 of Cabinet Resolution No. 1 of 2022 (the Executive Regulations). Such clauses are enforceable only where the employee's role provided genuine access to clients or confidential business information. The restriction must form part of the employment contract itself rather than a side agreement. It must also be limited in duration (subject to a maximum of two years), geographical scope and restricted activities, and go no further than necessary to protect a legitimate business interest. Articles 909 and 910 of the Civil Code (Federal Law No. 5 of 1985) reinforce the principle of proportionality and permit liquidated damages clauses, although courts may reduce excessive amounts.


A non-compete clause becomes unenforceable if the employer unlawfully terminates the employee or dismisses them during probation, or where both parties agree in writing to waive the restriction. An employee, or a new employer, may also buy out the covenant by paying up to three months' wages, provided the former employer gives written consent. Claims must be brought within one year of discovering the breach, and the employer bears the burden of proving actual, quantifiable loss. Since onshore courts do not grant injunctions, damages generally remain the only available remedy.

Non-Solicitation: A Valuable Contractual Protection

Unlike non-compete clauses, non-solicitation and non-dealing provisions have no specific statutory basis under the Labour Law. They are contractual obligations assessed against the same principles of reasonableness, while courts may also rely on the unfair competition provisions of the Commercial Transactions Law where a competitor has induced a contractual breach. As these clauses restrict contact with identified clients or employees rather than preventing employment altogether, they are generally easier to justify and enforce, particularly for senior executives and client-facing personnel.

Effective drafting should clearly identify the protected clients or employees, such as clients with whom the employee dealt during the twelve months preceding termination, rather than referring broadly to "all clients". The duration should also remain proportionate, typically between six and twelve months.

Confidentiality Obligations: A Multi-Layered Framework

Confidentiality obligations arise from several overlapping legal sources. Article 16 of the Labour Law requires employees to maintain the confidentiality of information obtained during employment and to return company documents upon termination. Article 44(5) permits summary dismissal without notice or gratuity for disclosing company secrets. Article 905(5) of the Civil Code imposes a continuing duty to protect commercial secrets even after employment ends, while Article 922 excludes trade secret disclosure claims from the standard one-year limitation period.

Criminal liability may also arise. Article 432 of the Penal Code (Federal Decree-Law No. 31 of 2021) criminalises the unauthorised disclosure of confidential information entrusted through a person's profession or position, carrying a minimum one-year prison sentence and fines starting from Dh20,000. Article 369 of the Commercial Companies Law separately penalises insiders who misuse corporate information. Depending on the circumstances, breaches involving electronic information may also engage the Cybercrimes Law and the Personal Data Protection Law.

Well-drafted confidentiality clauses and non-disclosure agreements complement these statutory protections by clearly defining confidential information, specifying a reasonable duration and recognising exceptions for disclosures required by regulators or courts.

Protection of Trade Secrets

The UAE does not have a standalone trade secrets statute. Instead, protection is derived from the Civil Code, Penal Code, Commercial Companies Law and Federal Law No. 11 of 2021 on Industrial Property Rights. Articles 61 to 63 of that law protect "undisclosed information" that has commercial value because it remains secret and has been safeguarded through reasonable protective measures. This approach is broadly consistent with Article 39 of the TRIPS Agreement, to which the UAE is a signatory.

The DIFC adopts a more codified approach through its Intellectual Property Law, which defines trade secret protection more comprehensively and provides a dedicated misappropriation regime enforceable before the DIFC Courts. Unlike onshore courts, the DIFC Courts can grant injunctions.

Regardless of jurisdiction, employers must demonstrate that they actively protected confidential information. Contractual provisions should therefore be supported by practical safeguards, including restricted system access, confidentiality markings and documented data-classification policies. Without evidence of such measures, trade secret claims can be difficult to sustain.

Garden Leave

Garden leave allows an employer to require a departing employee to remain away from work throughout all or part of the contractual notice period while continuing to receive full salary and benefits. It is commonly used alongside non-compete and confidentiality provisions to prevent senior employees from immediately joining competitors while their access to clients and company systems is withdrawn.

During garden leave, the employment relationship continues. The employee remains bound by contractual obligations, cannot commence new UAE-sponsored employment until the existing work permit has been cancelled or transferred, and continues to accrue gratuity and annual leave entitlements. Employers should avoid imposing conditions that exceed what the notice period reasonably justifies, as withholding salary or benefits may expose them to claims for arbitrary dismissal under Article 47 of the Labour Law.

Free Zones: DIFC and ADGM

The DIFC and ADGM operate common law-based employment regimes independent of the federal Labour Law. Although neither jurisdiction expressly regulates post-termination restrictive covenants, English case law on reasonableness is highly persuasive before their courts. Importantly, both jurisdictions can grant injunctions, a significant advantage over the mainland courts.

Unlike the federal regime, neither the DIFC nor the ADGM imposes a statutory two-year limit. Instead, each restriction is assessed according to whether it is reasonably necessary to protect legitimate business interests in light of the employee's specific role and responsibilities.

Practical Drafting Guidance

• Include restrictive covenants within the signed employment contract itself rather than in an offer letter or separate policy.
• Tailor each covenant to the employee's actual access to clients, confidential information and commercial influence, rather than adopting a standard template for every employee.
• Define the duration, geographical scope and restricted activities with precision, ensuring they remain proportionate to the business interest being protected.
• Support restrictive covenants with a carefully calculated liquidated damages clause that reflects a genuine pre-estimate of likely loss.
• Maintain documentary evidence of protective measures, including access logs, confidentiality markings, exit interviews and prompt system deactivation, to strengthen any future claim.
• Carefully consider governing law and dispute resolution provisions, particularly whether a DIFC or ADGM structure, with access to injunctive relief, better serves the employer's commercial objectives than a purely onshore arrangement.
  
  

Conclusion

Restrictive covenants are most effective when drafted with precision and supported by practical business measures. For mainland employers, a non-compete clause alone is rarely sufficient. Combining proportionate non-compete, non-solicitation, confidentiality, trade secret and garden leave provisions, while understanding the important distinctions between the mainland, DIFC and ADGM regimes, offers employers the strongest legal framework for protecting client relationships, confidential information and workforce stability in a market where employee mobility remains the norm.

 

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.