whatsappicon
Top News on Spectrum
Placeholder

Navigating the Intersection of AI and Intellectual Property: Challenges and Solutions

The rapid growth of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly impacted industries worldwide, leading to unprecedented innovations and applications. However, this transformation also raises crucial questions about the protection of intellectual property (IP). As AI becomes more sophisticated and integrated into creative and business processes, existing IP laws face challenges in safeguarding the rights of creators, inventors, and owners of intangible assets.

1. AI and Intellectual Property: A Complex Relationship

AI-driven technologies, especially those utilizing machine learning (ML) and deep learning, have the ability to create content autonomously, such as music, literature, art, and even patented inventions. Traditionally, IP laws were designed to protect the rights of human creators and innovators, but AI’s ability to generate creative outputs independently introduces new complexities.

For example, the question of authorship arises: should AI systems, or their developers, be granted IP rights over creations produced by AI? Many jurisdictions, including the US and EU, still recognize human authorship as a fundamental prerequisite for IP protection, making it difficult to grant rights for AI-generated content.

2. Copyright Law and AI-Generated Content

One of the most pressing concerns is in the realm of copyright. Copyright law traditionally protects original works created by human intellect. With AI systems now capable of generating high-quality content, such as art and music, the challenge is determining who owns the rights to these works. Many argue that if AI merely assists a human in creating content, the human should be the rights holder. However, in instances where AI operates independently, a gap in the law emerges.

Solution Pathways: Some legal frameworks propose that AI-generated works should fall into the public domain unless a specific arrangement is made between the AI developer and the user. Others suggest a new form of IP protection tailored to AI-generated content, although this approach requires significant legal reforms.

3. Patents and AI-Driven Innovations

AI’s ability to autonomously invent new products or processes presents a unique challenge in patent law. Traditionally, patents are awarded to human inventors for novel, non-obvious inventions. However, with AI systems capable of discovering new drug formulations, software algorithms, and technological processes, patent offices worldwide are grappling with how to accommodate AI innovations.

The DABUS case, which involved an AI system inventing a food container and a light-emitting device, prompted international debate when patent applications were filed in its name. While South Africa became the first country to grant a patent to an AI-generated invention, other jurisdictions, such as the US, UK, and EU, have rejected such claims, reaffirming that inventorship remains a human-centric concept.

4. Data Ownership and Trade Secrets

AI systems heavily rely on vast datasets to train algorithms and make predictions. The ownership of these datasets raises further IP concerns. Companies that compile large, proprietary datasets often protect them through trade secret laws. However, as AI-driven tools increasingly rely on publicly available data to train their models, disputes over data ownership and usage rights are emerging.

AI’s ability to infer or deduce sensitive information from public data sources further complicates matters, as it risks breaching trade secrets, even if the data used is not directly protected. Protecting proprietary data, algorithms, and processes in an AI-driven world requires revisiting both trade secret and data privacy laws.

5. Challenges of Enforcement and Licensing in AI

Enforcing IP rights in the context of AI is another major challenge. As AI-generated content proliferates, tracking and monitoring unauthorized use of copyrighted material becomes increasingly difficult. The issue is further compounded by the cross-border nature of AI technologies, which often involve multiple jurisdictions with varying IP laws.

Licensing agreements for AI-created content also need revision. For instance, platforms like "Created by Humans" aim to provide a controlled environment where creators can license their work to AI developers, ensuring authors and rights holders maintain control over how their creations are used in AI systems.

6. Reforming IP Laws: The Path Forward

As AI continues to evolve, it is clear that IP laws must adapt to address the new challenges posed by these technologies. Some key areas for reform include:

  • Clarifying Authorship: Defining clear rules on the authorship and ownership of AI-generated content is crucial. Legislators should consider new legal categories that address the unique contributions of AI while protecting human creators.
  • Updating Patent Laws: Patent systems worldwide may need to evolve to account for AI’s role in the inventive process. This could include recognizing AI as co-inventors or implementing AI-specific patent categories.
  • Data Protection Frameworks: Stronger frameworks for data protection and ownership, particularly in relation to the datasets used to train AI, are essential for safeguarding trade secrets and proprietary information.
  • Licensing Structures: Introducing standardized licensing models for AI-generated content will help creators maintain control over their works, ensuring fair compensation and proper usage by AI developers.

Conclusion

The intersection of AI and intellectual property law presents both challenges and opportunities. While AI has the potential to drive innovation and creativity to new heights, it is essential to ensure that IP laws evolve to protect the rights of human creators and developers. Governments, industry stakeholders, and legal professionals must collaborate to build frameworks that balance innovation with protection, ensuring that IP rights remain relevant in the age of AI.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

Katherine Snow Joins Thesis as General Counsel to Navigate Crypto Regulatory Landscape

Thesis, a cryptocurrency venture studio backed by Andreessen Horowitz, has appointed Katherine Snow as its new general counsel. Snow transitions from her role as chief legal officer at crypto data and research platform Messari, where she led the company’s global legal strategy and policy initiatives.

In her new position at Thesis, Snow will guide the legal team and navigate the regulatory challenges that impact the cryptocurrency and blockchain sectors. Thesis, known for building Bitcoin-related brands, includes platforms like Fold, a payments solution allowing users to spend Bitcoin in everyday transactions. The company is supported by prominent investors, including Fenbush Capital and Polychain Capital.

Matt Luongo, CEO of Thesis, praised Snow's expertise, stating, "Katherine’s deep understanding of fintech and blockchain regulations is crucial as we continue expanding our ecosystem. Her strategic insight will ensure Thesis remains innovative while effectively managing the global regulatory environment."

Snow brings a wealth of experience to Thesis, with nearly three years at Messari and prior roles as associate general counsel at Binance.US and a stint in Cooley’s blockchain and tokenization group. She began her legal career at Sherman & Howard before transitioning into the blockchain space.

Expressing her enthusiasm for the new role, Snow commented, "I’m thrilled to join Thesis at such a critical time for both the company and the blockchain industry. I look forward to helping the team tackle regulatory challenges while pushing forward innovative solutions in decentralized finance."

This move follows other notable appointments in the crypto sector. In August, crypto exchange Bitget appointed former Binance general counsel Hon Ng as its first chief legal officer. After Ng's departure from Binance in July 2023, Eleanor Hughes, a former Skadden Arps lawyer, was promoted to Binance's general counsel, overseeing legal operations in the Asia Pacific, Middle East, and North Africa regions.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

Bank Liability in the Digital Age: Ten Key Scenarios for Customer Account Breaches

In an increasingly digital world, banks play a crucial role in safeguarding customers' financial information and ensuring secure transactions. However, when breaches occur, banks may be held liable in certain situations, particularly when negligence or lack of due diligence leads to financial losses. Below are 10 scenarios where banks can be held accountable for breaches on customer accounts.

  1. Processing Unauthorized Transactions One of the most common instances of bank liability is when unauthorized transactions occur in a customer’s account. If a bank processes transactions without the account holder's approval or knowledge, it could be held responsible for the resulting financial loss. Banks have a duty to verify and authenticate transactions, and failure to do so can lead to legal consequences.
  2. Failure to Secure Customer Data Banks are required to ensure that customers' sensitive data, including personal identification information and account details, are protected from unauthorized access. In cases where a bank’s security system is compromised, leading to identity theft or other forms of fraud, the bank may be held liable for failing to secure this data adequately.
  3. Delayed Notification of Suspicious Activity Banks have an obligation to monitor accounts for unusual or suspicious activities. If a bank detects suspicious behavior but delays in notifying the customer, and this delay leads to further losses, the bank can be held accountable. Timely notifications are critical in preventing significant financial damage.
  4. Inadequate Protection Against Cyberattacks In today’s cyber threat landscape, robust security systems are essential for protecting customer accounts. Banks that fail to implement sufficient cybersecurity measures, leaving customer accounts vulnerable to hacking or phishing attacks, can be held liable for the resulting breaches and financial losses.
  5. Misuse of Customer Funds by Bank Employees In some cases, bank employees may misuse customer funds, whether through fraud, theft, or other unlawful actions. Banks are liable for the actions of their employees, especially if proper oversight and internal controls are not in place to prevent such incidents.
  6. Lack of Security in Online Banking With the rise of online banking, ensuring secure digital transactions is crucial. If a bank does not provide adequate security measures, such as multi-factor authentication or encryption, to protect online transactions, it could be liable for any breaches that result in financial harm to the customer.
  7. Inaccurate Reporting of Account Balances Errors in reporting account balances can result in financial losses, particularly if customers rely on incorrect information to make financial decisions. Banks can be held liable if inaccurate reporting of balances leads to significant financial consequences for the account holder.
  8. Allowing Unauthorized Access to Third Parties Banks are responsible for preventing unauthorized access to customer accounts by third parties. If a bank allows a third party to gain access to an account without the customer's permission or due process, it may be held liable for any losses resulting from this breach.
  9. Failure to Investigate and Resolve Customer Complaints When a customer files a complaint regarding suspicious activity or a breach on their account, the bank is obligated to investigate and resolve the issue promptly. Failure to do so may result in further financial losses for the customer and legal liability for the bank.
  10. Violation of Customer Privacy Rights Banks must uphold customer privacy rights under local laws and regulations. If a bank violates these rights, such as by disclosing private information without consent or mishandling confidential data, it can be held liable for the financial and reputational damage caused to the customer.

Conclusion

Banks have a duty to protect their customers' financial information and ensure that their accounts are secure from breaches. Failure to fulfill these responsibilities can expose banks to legal liabilities and financial penalties. Customers who suffer from account breaches should be aware of their rights and the circumstances in which banks can be held accountable. By recognizing these situations, both customers and financial institutions can work toward reducing the risk of breaches and maintaining trust in the banking system.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

Apple Accused by US Labor Board of Imposing Illegal Workplace Rules

The National Labour Relations Board in the complaint announced claims on tech giant Apple of implementing illegal workplace rules that allegedly violate U.S. labour laws. The complaint stems from charges filed against Apple in 2021 by Ashley Gjovik, a former senior engineering manager at the company., claims that Apple’s workplace policies restrict employees from engaging in activities protected under federal law, such as discussing wages, organizing efforts, and other concerted activities.

The NLRB's investigation began after multiple employee complaints were filed, raising concerns about Apple’s strict confidentiality agreements and its monitoring of workplace discussions. 

According to the labor board, these policies hinder workers' rights to unionize or speak openly about working conditions. The accusations follow a growing wave of labor movements in the tech industry, where workers are increasingly organizing to push for better pay, benefits, and work-life balance.

Apple, which has a reputation for maintaining a high level of secrecy surrounding its products and internal affairs, has found itself at odds with employees and labor rights advocates. In response, the company has defended its workplace policies, stating that they are designed to protect proprietary information and ensure a safe and respectful working environment.

"Apple is committed to creating and maintaining a positive and inclusive workplace," said a company spokesperson. "Our policies are intended to protect our employees, customers, and intellectual property."

This is not the first time Apple has faced scrutiny over its treatment of workers. In recent years, the company has seen a rise in employee activism, with workers at retail locations and corporate offices alike pushing for improved conditions and greater transparency.

The NLRB’s complaint marks another chapter in the ongoing battle between tech workers and major companies over labor rights. If found in violation of labor laws, Apple could be required to revise its workplace policies and potentially face penalties.

The case is expected to set a significant precedent for other companies in the tech sector, where employee organizing efforts are gaining momentum despite strict confidentiality policies. As the NLRB moves forward with the investigation, labor rights groups are closely watching how the case unfolds, as it may have broader implications for labor organizing across the industry.

The outcome of the NLRB's investigation into Apple's workplace policies could have far-reaching consequences for both the company and the broader tech industry. As labor movements gain strength and more employees push back against restrictive workplace rules, the case serves as a reminder of the growing tension between corporate control and workers' rights. Whether Apple will be required to change its practices remains to be seen, but the case is likely to set a significant precedent for how labor laws are enforced in the tech sector moving forward.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

Legal Grounds for Eviction Notices in Dubai: A Case Study of The Gardens Community

Eviction is a legal process that occurs when a landlord decides to terminate a tenancy agreement, requiring the tenant to vacate the rental property. In Dubai, the Real Estate Regulatory Agency (RERA) plays a crucial role in regulating this process, ensuring fair treatment for both landlords and tenants. This article delves into the legal framework surrounding eviction notices in Dubai, using the recent case of The Gardens community as a focal point.

 

The Gardens Community: A Case of Eviction Notices

The Gardens, one of Dubai's oldest residential communities, became the centre of an emotional and legal conflict following the issuance of eviction notices by Nakheel, the property developer overseeing the area. Nakheel initiated a comprehensive refurbishment project to elevate living standards within The Gardens. However, this development led to hundreds of tenants receiving eviction notices, requiring them to vacate their apartments within a year. The notices, delivered in phases starting with Zone 2, left residents with limited time to find alternative housing, triggering widespread concern.

 

Legal Grounds for Eviction in Dubai

The legal basis for eviction in Dubai is outlined in two main provisions, Law No. 26 of 2007 and Law 33 of 2008, which amend Law No. 26 of 2007 concerning the regulation of the relationship between landlords and tenants. This law permits landlords to evict tenants under specific conditions, provided they adhere to the proper notice requirements.

  • Redevelopment or Refurbishment

A landlord in Dubai has the legal right to evict tenants if they plan to demolish the building or undertake significant renovations that cannot be completed with the tenants in residence. However, these plans require prior approval from local authorities to ensure compliance with regulatory standards. In the case of The Gardens, Nakheel's decision to refurbish the community falls under this category, as the planned renovations are extensive and necessitate the eviction of current residents.

  • Non-Payment of Rent

Tenants can also face eviction if they consistently fail to pay rent as the tenancy agreement stipulates. While this was not the reason for eviction in The Gardens, it remains one of the most common grounds for eviction across Dubai. The law mandates landlords provide 30 days written notice, allowing tenants a reasonable period to rectify the payment issue before further legal action is taken.

  • Breach of Contract

Eviction may be warranted if a tenant breaches the terms and conditions outlined in the rental agreement. This can include subletting without permission, making unauthorized alterations to the property, or using the property for purposes not agreed upon in the contract. The eviction process under this ground requires the landlord to issue a formal notice, allowing the tenant to resolve the breach before proceeding with eviction.

  • Personal Use by Landlord

Landlords have the right to evict tenants if they or their immediate family members intend to use the property for personal purposes, provided they do not own another property in Dubai. Following the eviction, the landlord or their family must occupy the property for at least two years. This ensures that the claim of personal use is genuine and not a pretext for other intentions, such as selling the property immediately after eviction.

  • Selling the Property

If a landlord decides to sell the property, they may also issue an eviction notice to the tenant. The landlord must follow the stipulated 12-month notice period, which must be served through a notary public or registered post. This allows tenants sufficient time to secure alternative accommodation.

 

Eviction Notice Process in Dubai

The eviction process in Dubai follows a structured procedure to ensure fairness. Initially, the landlord must serve a written notice to the tenant, clearly stating the reason for eviction and the required notice period. For redevelopment, refurbishment, or sale of property, the notice period is 12 months. This notice must be delivered through official channels, such as a notary public or registered mail, to be legally binding.

If the tenant fails to comply with the eviction notice, the landlord can escalate the matter to the Rental Dispute Settlement Centre (RDSC). The RDSC plays a pivotal role in mediating disputes between landlords and tenants. Should mediation fail, the case may proceed to a formal hearing, where the committee will issue a judgment based on the case's merits and applicable laws.

 

Comparing The Gardens Case with Dubai's Legal Framework

The Gardens eviction case is emblematic of the broader legal and emotional challenges tenants across Dubai face. While Nakheel's decision to evict tenants for refurbishment aligns with the legal grounds outlined in Dubai's rental laws, the impact on the tenants has been profound. The 12-month notice period, while legally sufficient, did little to alleviate the anxiety and financial strain experienced by the residents who had to leave their long-established homes and communities.

The legal framework in Dubai attempts to balance the rights of landlords with the protections afforded to tenants. However, the case of The Gardens highlights that legal compliance only sometimes equates to fairness from the tenant's perspective. The eviction process, though conducted within the bounds of the law, has resulted in significant disruption for the affected residents. 

The actual grey area in this situation is where the middle-class families that live in this area, considering that several families have stayed here for decades due to the lower rents and convenience. When the landlord is granted with such power, asking the families to evict their houses without providing any form of alternatives really makes you question whether justice has been truly served. In the eyes of the law, justice has been served; however, for the hundreds of families who have seen these buildings as their homes, has justice been truly served?

 

Understanding the Legal and Emotional Complexities of Eviction

The eviction process in Dubai is governed by clear legal principles designed to protect both landlords and tenants. However, as seen in the case of The Gardens community, the legal right to evict does not necessarily mitigate the emotional and practical challenges tenants face. While property development is essential for the growth of cities like Dubai, such progress mustn't come at the expense of the well-being of residents.

Understanding the legal framework is essential for landlords and tenants navigating the complexities of eviction. Seeking legal advice ensures that the process is conducted fairly and within the boundaries of the law. However, it is equally important to consider the human impact of eviction and strive for solutions that respect the rights and needs of all parties involved.

The writer is a Real Estate Lawyer from NYK Law firm, specializes in Resolving Real estate disputes.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

Dubai Introduces Learner’s Passport Initiative to Enhance Early Education Tracking

A new initiative in Dubai will provide every newborn with a "learner’s passport" to track their educational journey and support parents in making informed decisions about their child's education. The Knowledge and Human Development Authority (KHDA) announced this as part of the 'Education Strategy 2033'. The system, in collaboration with the Dubai Health Authority, aims to guarantee every child's right to education.

Aisha Miran, KHDA's Director-General, emphasized that the learner’s passport will register children of school-going age and monitor their enrollment. The system will help identify children who have not yet joined school, ensuring immediate action is taken to prevent any from missing out on education.

“When a child is born, they are added to the system, giving us a clear understanding of available educational stages. Information about nurseries and early learning centers will also be provided,” Miran explained. She highlighted that the current enrolment rate of Emirati children in early childhood centers is below the global average, affecting their academic growth. "Scientific studies show that 90 percent of a child’s brain development happens between zero to five years, making this a critical stage that shapes their future academic success."

The learner’s passport will also provide parents with comprehensive information about the educational paths available, including both academic and vocational options, helping them make more informed choices for their children.

Key Focus of 'Education Strategy 2033'

The strategy outlines several important goals:

  • Parental Awareness: Educating parents about their roles and available educational options.
  • Teacher Development: Enhancing teachers' skills with modern training to improve the quality of education.
  • Diverse Educational Pathways: Offering multiple academic and vocational options to align with labor market demands.
  • Early Field Training: Providing students with practical experiences to prepare them for the workforce.
  • Tailored Education Plans: Individual assessments to support students' needs.
  • Cultural and Language Preservation: Promoting the Arabic language and cultural identity while addressing the decline in Arabic proficiency among children.
  • Improving Emirati Student Performance: Addressing the lower academic performance of Emirati students compared to non-Emiratis.
  • Nationalising Teaching: Increasing the number of Emirati teachers by 10%, adding around 3,000 teachers.

The strategy also addresses the challenge of rising school fees, which has impacted access to quality education for many families.

Collective Effort for Better Education

Miran stressed the need for collaboration, engaging parents as key partners in the educational process. Awareness programs will empower parents to support their children's learning journey.

Since KHDA’s restructuring in 2005, Dubai’s educational system has seen significant progress. The number of schools has grown from 136 in 2007 to over 220, now serving more than 32,500 students in private education. Miran noted that 81% of students in private schools now receive a good or higher standard of education, a sharp increase from just 30% in 2007.

The 'Education Strategy 2033' aims to elevate education quality and meet the needs of Dubai’s diverse community, further enhancing the city’s global standing in education.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

Embracing the Debt-Free Revolution: Strategies for Financial Freedom

In today’s economic climate, debt has become a significant burden for many individuals, especially young adults. From mounting student loans to high-interest credit card balances and the rising cost of living, debt can feel overwhelming and, at times, impossible to overcome. But in the face of these challenges, a growing movement of people is embracing a debt-free revolution, determined to reclaim their financial freedom through strategic planning, disciplined spending, and a mindset shift toward financial independence.

The Burden of Debt

Debt impacts much more than just your bank balance. It affects life choices, from delaying marriage and homeownership to limiting career opportunities. According to a recent survey, young adults are increasingly concerned about their financial futures, with many unable to see a path to debt elimination. Student loans, in particular, have reached all-time highs, with many graduates leaving school with tens of thousands of dollars to repay.

Credit card debt adds another layer of complexity. The ease of access to credit cards, coupled with high-interest rates, often leads individuals into a vicious cycle of debt that is difficult to escape. Meanwhile, rising living costs, especially in urban centers, stretch personal finances even further, making it harder to save or pay down debt.

Strategies for Overcoming Debt

Achieving financial freedom and overcoming the debt dilemma begins with adopting a comprehensive strategy that addresses both the psychological and financial aspects of debt management. Here’s how young adults are tackling their debt and setting themselves up for a brighter financial future:

1. Create a Detailed Budget

The foundation of any successful debt repayment plan is a clear understanding of your income and expenses. Creating a budget allows you to track your spending habits and identify areas where you can cut back. A well-thought-out budget should account for all essential expenses, such as housing, food, transportation, and minimum debt payments, while leaving room for discretionary spending.

Once you have a budget in place, allocate any surplus income toward paying down debt. A popular strategy is the 50/30/20 rule, where 50% of income is spent on needs, 30% on wants, and 20% is allocated to savings and debt repayment. Adjust this ratio as needed to ensure you are aggressively tackling your debt.

2. Adopt the Debt Snowball or Avalanche Method

There are two primary approaches to paying off debt: the Debt Snowball and the Debt Avalanche methods.

  • Debt Snowball: Focus on paying off your smallest debts first while making minimum payments on larger debts. This method builds momentum and boosts motivation as you experience quick wins by eliminating smaller balances.
  • Debt Avalanche: Prioritize debts with the highest interest rates. By tackling high-interest debt first, you save money in the long run by reducing the total amount of interest you’ll pay over time.

Both methods are effective, and the best approach depends on your personal preferences. Those motivated by quick results might prefer the Snowball method, while others who want to save on interest should choose the Avalanche method.

3. Refinance or Consolidate Debt

Debt consolidation can simplify your repayment process by combining multiple debts into a single loan with a lower interest rate. This is particularly useful for those with high-interest credit card debt. Personal loans or balance transfer credit cards can be good options to consolidate debt, often offering promotional low-interest periods that allow you to pay down the principal faster.

For student loans, refinancing may also be an option. Many private lenders offer lower interest rates compared to federal loans, but refinancing federal loans into private loans may result in losing certain benefits, such as income-driven repayment plans or loan forgiveness options. Make sure to weigh the pros and cons before making any changes.

4. Increase Your Income

In some cases, eliminating debt quickly requires increasing your income. Consider taking on a side job or freelance work to boost your earnings. Gig economy jobs such as ridesharing, freelance writing, or tutoring can provide extra cash that can be funneled directly toward your debt.

Additionally, ask for a raise at your current job or look for opportunities for career advancement that come with a higher salary. The extra income can significantly accelerate your debt repayment and bring you closer to financial independence.

5. Cut Unnecessary Expenses

Achieving financial freedom often requires sacrifices. Cutting back on non-essential spending can free up more money for debt repayment. This could mean reducing dining out, canceling unused subscriptions, or opting for cheaper alternatives to your regular expenses. Every dollar saved can be used to pay down debt faster.

Consider lifestyle changes that align with your financial goals, such as downsizing your living arrangements, carpooling, or adopting a minimalist mindset to avoid impulse purchases. The key is to stay disciplined and focus on the bigger picture of becoming debt-free.

6. Seek Professional Guidance

If your debt feels unmanageable, seeking professional help may be a wise decision. Financial advisors or credit counseling agencies can help you create a debt management plan tailored to your situation. In some cases, debt settlement programs can negotiate with creditors to lower your outstanding balances or interest rates.

7. Emergency Savings Fund

While it may seem counterintuitive, setting aside money for an emergency fund can be crucial in managing debt. An emergency fund prevents you from relying on credit cards or loans in case of unexpected expenses like medical bills or car repairs. Aim to save at least three to six months' worth of living expenses to provide a cushion for life's uncertainties.

The Importance of a Debt-Free Mindset

Overcoming debt is not just about numbers; it also requires a shift in mindset. Adopting a long-term approach to financial wellness and viewing debt elimination as a stepping stone to financial independence is key to staying motivated. Embrace the debt-free revolution by focusing on building healthy financial habits, such as living below your means, saving consistently, and making informed financial decisions.

The psychological benefits of being debt-free are profound. Many individuals report feeling less stressed and more empowered to make life choices without the burden of debt weighing them down. Financial freedom opens the door to opportunities like traveling, starting a business, or investing for the future.

Planning for a Debt-Free Future

Once you’ve tackled your debt, it’s important to plan for a financially stable future. Start by setting aside money for retirement, investing in assets that grow in value, and building your wealth through diversified investments such as stocks, real estate, or mutual funds.

Achieving financial independence is a journey, and staying debt-free requires ongoing discipline. Commit to living within your means, saving for future goals, and continually educating yourself about personal finance.

Conclusion

The debt-free revolution is not just a trend but a necessary shift in the way we approach our financial lives. Overcoming student loans, credit card balances, and rising living costs can seem daunting, but with a clear plan, disciplined spending, and a strong mindset, it is entirely achievable. By following these strategies, you can conquer your debt, reclaim your financial freedom, and lay the foundation for a prosperous future.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

ECHR Unanimously Condemns Russia for Human Rights Violations in Crimea

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has delivered a unanimous ruling against Russia, finding the country responsible for systematic human rights violations in Crimea since 2014. The court's decision marks a significant international condemnation of Russia’s actions in Crimea, following its annexation of the region from Ukraine.
In its ruling, the ECHR outlined multiple violations, including unlawful arrests, restrictions on freedom of speech, and discrimination against ethnic minorities, particularly Crimean Tatars. The court found that Russia had systematically failed to uphold the basic human rights of Crimean residents, violating several articles of the European Convention on Human Rights.
This verdict follows years of international criticism regarding Russia’s control over Crimea and its impact on the region’s population. Human rights organizations and international observers have long documented abuses, including suppression of political dissent, unjust imprisonment, and the targeting of ethnic and religious groups who opposed Russia’s occupation.
The ECHR ruling is significant as it reinforces the broader international stance that Russia’s annexation of Crimea was unlawful and that the treatment of residents under its control violates international law. The court’s decision adds legal weight to the numerous reports and investigations that have highlighted the severe human rights situation in Crimea.
While the ruling is a symbolic victory for human rights advocates and Ukraine, enforcing the decision remains a challenge. Russia is not a member of the European Court of Human Rights, having exited the jurisdiction after widespread international sanctions were imposed following its 2022 invasion of Ukraine. As a result, while the court’s ruling is a powerful condemnation, its practical implications may be limited in compelling Russia to change its policies in Crimea.
Nonetheless, the ruling underscores the continued international pressure on Russia to account for its actions in Crimea and the broader conflict in Ukraine, maintaining the focus on the human rights violations occurring under its occupation.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

Expanding 'Buy Now, Pay Later' Options Transform Financial Flexibility in the UAE

The 'Buy Now, Pay Later' (BNPL) trend, initially popularized for retail purchases such as smartphones and clothing, is now expanding to cover a wider range of financial needs in the UAE. Cost-conscious consumers can now access easier instalment-based payment options on rent, remittances, and even home renovations, providing relief amidst softer consumer spending trends.

Pay Later for Home Rentals

In a significant development for UAE tenants, a property portal announced this week that it is collaborating with select estate agents to offer tenants the flexibility of paying their annual rents in 12 monthly instalments. Previously, tenants were often required to pay rents in bulk through a few post-dated cheques, which could be financially burdensome.

Now, with the new instalment option, renters can spread out their payments using credit or debit cards over the course of the year. This initiative is currently available in Dubai, though there are plans to expand this service to other emirates soon. The portal has partnered with landlords, ensuring that property owners receive the full rent upfront through a third-party financing platform, Keyper, while tenants enjoy the benefit of smaller, manageable payments.

This move is expected to provide much-needed financial flexibility for tenants, particularly as living expenses and the cost of home rentals remain a significant portion of household budgets in the UAE.

Pay Later for Remittances

In addition to rent payments, the BNPL trend is also making waves in the remittance sector. UAE residents, particularly expatriates who frequently send money to their home countries, can now choose instalment payment options for their remittances.

This ‘pay later’ option is aimed at easing the financial burden on individuals sending large sums, especially during peak remittance periods like holidays or when families back home require urgent financial assistance. This innovative offering is poised to make financial planning easier for expats, helping them manage both their household expenses and overseas obligations more effectively.

Home Renovations Made Easier

The BNPL model is also extending into the home renovation sector, offering homeowners the flexibility to undertake improvements without facing immediate financial strain. With instalment plans, homeowners can now finance renovations—whether upgrading their kitchens, installing new furnishings, or undertaking structural improvements—while spreading out the cost over several months.

This development is expected to boost the local home renovation market, allowing residents to pursue their home improvement goals without dipping into savings or taking out large loans. As the UAE continues to witness a growing interest in property investments and home upgrades, this option could encourage more people to invest in enhancing their living spaces.

Adapting to Consumer Needs

The expansion of BNPL options to essential financial obligations like rent, remittances, and renovations reflects an evolving consumer landscape in the UAE. With inflationary pressures and fluctuating consumer spending trends, the availability of flexible payment solutions is likely to gain further traction. For many consumers, the ability to split significant expenses into smaller, interest-free payments offers a way to manage personal finances more effectively and make larger purchases more accessible.

The emergence of BNPL solutions in sectors beyond retail shows that companies are responding to the demand for more consumer-friendly financial tools. Whether it's monthly rent or sending money abroad, these options enable individuals to maintain better control over their cash flow without sacrificing their financial goals.

Market Growth and Future Prospects

Experts predict that the BNPL sector will continue to expand as more industries look to capitalize on its popularity. While the service is currently more widely adopted in Dubai, its expansion to other emirates could see rapid growth, driven by consumer demand for greater financial flexibility. Moreover, the UAE's fast-growing digital economy, coupled with high levels of smartphone usage, makes it an ideal market for BNPL services to thrive.

The convenience and ease of BNPL options are reshaping how people manage their financial commitments, and with the continued rise of fintech solutions, UAE residents can expect to see even more payment flexibility in the future.

Conclusion

As 'Buy Now, Pay Later' services move beyond traditional retail into essential expenses like rent, remittances, and home renovations, UAE consumers are gaining access to more manageable, flexible payment solutions. This growing trend reflects both an adaptation to changing consumer needs and a response to economic pressures, offering individuals greater control over their financial lives.

With further expansion planned across the UAE, the pay later movement is set to become an integral part of the country's financial ecosystem, providing consumers with enhanced options to ease their financial burdens and pursue their goals.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

UAE Businesses Face Upcoming Corporate Tax Deadline Amid New Regulations

Businesses in the UAE are currently navigating the relatively new corporate tax regime, with many still in the process of registering or preparing for their first filings. However, for companies that were incorporated in June 2023, the deadline to file their first corporate tax returns is approaching fast—September 30, 2024.

This marks an important milestone in the UAE's corporate tax landscape, as it represents the first round of returns to be filed by companies operating under the new regulations, which were announced last year. The majority of businesses in the UAE will not need to file their tax returns until later in 2025 for the financial year 2024. But for those incorporated in June 2023, the deadline comes sooner—just 12 months after their incorporation date.

Corporate Tax Landscape in the UAE

The introduction of corporate tax in the UAE is a significant shift from the country’s previous tax-free regime, aimed at enhancing its global standing and ensuring sustainable growth. The tax applies to most businesses operating within the UAE, with a rate of 9% on profits exceeding AED 375,000. Small businesses and startups are given some leeway, with various reliefs and exemptions available depending on their size, revenue, and industry.

Freelancers, for example, have been given an extended deadline to register for corporate tax, allowing more time to adjust to the new requirements. Similarly, small businesses are offered a three-year tax relief to help them ease into the tax system, as the UAE seeks to promote entrepreneurship while still ensuring compliance with the broader corporate tax regulations.

Preparing for the Deadline

Businesses incorporated in June 2023 should already have undergone the necessary steps for tax registration, which includes obtaining a Tax Registration Number (TRN) and maintaining proper financial records in accordance with the regulations. If not yet completed, companies are urged to finalize their registrations as quickly as possible, as the Federal Tax Authority (FTA) imposes penalties for late filings or non-compliance.

For those businesses approaching the September 30 deadline, it's essential to ensure that all relevant financial information is prepared and accurate. The returns will need to include details of the company’s revenue, deductible expenses, and taxable profits. It’s also vital to be aware of any specific tax exemptions or deductions that could apply based on the industry or business structure.

Companies should also be aware of their record-keeping obligations, as tax authorities may audit businesses to verify the accuracy of their filings. Maintaining clear and organized financial records, including receipts, invoices, and statements, is essential for long-term compliance under the new corporate tax laws.

Legal Implications for Non-Compliance

Failure to comply with the UAE’s corporate tax requirements can lead to serious consequences, including financial penalties and potential legal action. The FTA has set out specific penalties for businesses that fail to register for corporate tax or file their returns by the stipulated deadline. These penalties range from AED 500 to AED 50,000, depending on the severity and duration of the non-compliance. In extreme cases, repeat offenders may face additional sanctions, including business suspensions.

Moving Forward

As more businesses in the UAE become accustomed to the new corporate tax framework, the key focus remains on compliance and proper financial management. Companies that miss this September 30 deadline or those that neglect to register for corporate tax may find themselves facing hefty fines or legal complications. For those that have already completed their filings, it serves as a first step in adapting to the UAE’s evolving regulatory environment.

The corporate tax regime is designed to ensure long-term economic stability while fostering a fair and transparent business environment. Companies that invest time and effort into compliance will be better positioned to navigate future regulatory changes, ensuring sustainable growth in the UAE’s dynamic market.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

New Rental Law in Sharjah Enhances Tenant and Landlord Accountability

His Highness Sheikh Dr. Sultan bin Muhammad Al Qasimi, Ruler of Sharjah and Member of the Supreme Council, has issued a new rental law requiring landlords in the emirate to ratify rental contracts within 15 days of issuance. This law applies to properties leased for residential, commercial, industrial, or professional purposes in Sharjah.

Under the new regulations, if a landlord fails to ratify a lease contract within the stipulated period, the tenant can petition the judge of urgent matters to compel the landlord to certify the contract, according to the Sharjah Government Media Office. If the contract is not ratified by the municipality or relevant authorities, the landlord will face an administrative fine as outlined by the law's executive regulations, in addition to the standard certification fees.

The law further grants the municipality the authority to request a judge to obligate the landlord to ratify the lease and pay any associated fees and fines.

Written or Electronic Contracts Required

Both landlords and tenants are required to execute rental agreements in writing or electronically, using forms approved by the Executive Council of Sharjah. If a lease contract is not certified, either party may file a lawsuit with the Rental Disputes Centre. The landlord must pay the certification fees after confirming the lease's validity.

Landlord's Responsibilities

The law outlines several key obligations for landlords:

  • Delivery of Property: Hand over the rented property in a suitable condition for its intended use without hindrances throughout the lease period.
  • Maintenance: Conduct necessary maintenance unless otherwise agreed upon in the contract.
  • Approval for Modifications: Provide written consent if the tenant wishes to make interior design changes or carry out other modifications, provided these do not affect the property’s structure.
  • Tenant Protection: Ensure the tenant is not harassed or pressured to vacate the property, nor subjected to disruptions in services.
  • Return of Security Deposit: Return any security deposits upon termination of the lease unless deductions are necessary for damages caused by the tenant.

Tenant's Responsibilities

Tenants, under the new law, have several obligations, including:

  • Timely Rent Payment: Pay rent on agreed-upon dates.
  • Property Use: Use the property in accordance with the lease agreement.
  • Modifications: Obtain written permission before making any changes to the property.
  • Maintenance: Carry out routine maintenance, unless otherwise specified in the contract, and allow the landlord to perform necessary repairs.
  • Service Payments: Cover any damages caused and pay for services used during the lease term.

Exemptions from the Law

Certain properties are exempt from the new regulations, including:

  • Agricultural lands.
  • Properties granted by the government for residential purposes unless privately owned.
  • Properties provided by employers to house employees without rent.
  • Hotel and tourist facility properties rented exclusively to guests.
  • Properties located in free zones.
  • Properties governed by special decisions of the Sharjah Executive Council.

This law marks a significant shift in Sharjah’s rental landscape, ensuring greater accountability for landlords and providing additional protection for tenants in the emirate.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

Addressing the Rise of USDT Scams in the UAE: Regulatory Challenges and Solutions

Introduction

The rapid adoption and development of cryptocurrencies in the UAE are taking the country into the global map of being one of the big players in the digital finance markets. However, with this fast growth, the region is also experiencing a considerable increase in the number of scams regarding cryptocurrencies, particularly Tether (USDT)—the largest stablecoin in the world.

These scams have exploited regulatory loopholes and have gone after both individuals and businesses—both with major financial implications for all those involved. This article is a case study that will serve to investigate the nature of USDT scams in the UAE, legal frameworks within which these activities are going on, and necessary steps that need to be taken in order to improve regulatory oversight.

USDT Scams in the UAE Explained

UAE USDT scams have taken various forms, from simple phishing and fake investment opportunities to complex over-the-counter trading scams. Frauds in these types of scams usually trick victims into transferring USDT to wallets controlled by the scammers: many times in the form of high-return investment opportunities or as part of fake business transactions.

One of the most common methods is through a phishing scam, whereby unsuspecting victims receive fraudulent emails or messages purporting to be from legitimate cryptocurrency exchanges or wallets. These kinds of messages are often chock-full of links to false websites that are programmed to siphon off login credentials and clean out accounts. Another is the fake wallet scam, where scammers design fake wallet applications that appear genuine but are booby-trapped to harvest private keys and siphon off USDT from users.

More elaborate frauds are those of the over-the-counter trading scams that involve an impersonation as a broker or the middleman in huge USDT transactions. Most of these scams have very elaborate schemes where a victim is given a sense of security, and then the money is stolen in the process of transactions.

Legal System of Cryptocurrency in the UAE

UAE being a country of great potential about blockchain and cryptocurrency technology has been seen taking some significant moves to regulate the crypto industry. However, with the rapid evolution of the crypto space, challenges have emerged for regulators in keeping pace with the emerging threats, such as the rise in USDT scams.

What Regulation for Stablecoins, and What Impact on USDT?

This is the most recent regulation by the UAE Central Bank, which comes into effect by June 2023, posing quite a shift in the legal landscape for stablecoins like USDT. Only dirham-backed stablecoins will be allowed to do payments for the purchase of goods and services in the UAE according to this new regulation. As USDT is a US dollar-backed stablecoin, it does not feature in such transactions within the UAE.

However, virtual asset transactions remain permissible only for such purposes as the use of USDT and other foreign payment tokens to purchase non-fungible tokens (NFTs). This regulatory approach will be oriented toward bringing more structure and coherence into the market, thereby increasing the security of FinTech interactions with VASPs and protecting consumers from threats that might arise from unregulated stablecoins.

To operate or deal with Tether (USDT) in Dubai, businesses must comply with regulations set by several key authorities.

Dubai Multi Commodities Centre (DMCC) offers licenses for trading and managing crypto assets, including USDT. The DMCC Crypto License ensures companies adhere to strict compliance and anti-money laundering standards.

Dubai Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) specifically oversees virtual assets, including USDT, and issues licenses for activities such as trading and custody.

Central Bank of the UAE provides guidelines for licensed financial institutions dealing with virtual assets, ensuring broader financial system stability.

To legally deal with USDT in Dubai, businesses must engage with these authorities to obtain the appropriate licenses, depending on their specific activities.

Regulators were very categorical that all Crypto Asset Service Providers (CASPs) must register with relevant authorities and have obligations under KYC satisfied. This regulation is very important because it minimizes risks that can be associated with cryptocurrency being used in money laundering or fraud activities. While these measures are in place, USDT scams often seek to exploit the loopholes in the system, more so in most of the transactions being conducted outside regulated exchanges. The anonymity that comes with cryptocurrencies and the transactions being across borders make it quite hard for governments and agencies to trace, much less bring, the stolen assets back.

Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) and Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) Regulations

Also, the Dubai Financial Services Authority and the Abu Dhabi Global Market have moved to regulate the cryptocurrencies in their respective jurisdictions. For example, the DFSA has enacted a new framework for digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, to ensure protection for investors as well as market integrity.

In 2021, the DFSA issued the Consultation Paper 138 dealing with the regulation of security tokens, providing for regulation concerning cryptocurrencies like USDT. Such a framework mandates that firms providing activities in digital assets must be licensed by the DFSA and be subject to stringent regulatory requirements, including obligations for AML/CTF.

In the same vein, a very detailed regulatory framework for digital assets has been developed under the Abu Dhabi Global Market by the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA). It mandates every entity participating in crypto asset activities to be licensed and follow strict regulatory standards. This involves maintaining high cybersecurity and ensuring that all operations are run transparently and traceable.

Criminal Code and Cybercrime Legislation

The UAE legal framework also contains provisions under the UAE Penal Code and the Cybercrime Law against combating fraud, including those perpetrated through digital means like cryptocurrency. In particular, Article 399 of the UAE Penal Code provides strict punishment for fraud, either by incarcerating a criminal up to two years along with fines. Moreover, the New UAE Cybercrime Law of 2021 provides for severe penalties for those who scam cryptocurrencies: they may be imprisoned for up to five years and fined anything between Dh250,000 and Dh1 million.

Legal Recourse of USDT Scam Victims

Victims of USDT scams in the UAE have several legal channels open to them for the recovery of their funds, but with the nature of cryptocurrency transactions, it is hard.

Civil Litigation and Criminal Prosecution

The victims can sue in the civil court for compensation of their losses against the scam perpetrators. This, in most cases, involves proving that the defendant was involved in some fraudulent activity and that the victim actually suffered moneywise from it. Such, according to UAE law, can be presented in the civil courts where the affected persons can sue for damages.

Another avenue of remedy is criminal prosecution, especially for large-scale fraud and money laundering. The UAE has strict anti-fraud laws, and the punishments meted out to convicted persons are usually strict, including lengthy jail terms and hefty fines. Article 399 of the UAE Penal Code is one of the statutes that aid in the prosecution of fraudsters.

Challenges in Recovering Funds

Being decentralized and anonymous, recovery of lost funds in a USDT scam can be an arduous task. The very nature of transactions in cryptocurrencies is such that they cannot be changed or reversed, as usual in traditional finance. This means that once the monies are transacted into the scammer's wallet, it may be irrecoverable.

However, the UAE authorities have made an effort to address this problem by collaborating with international law enforcement agencies and blockchain analytics companies to track stolen assets in the hope that bringing the culprits to justice would serve as a deterrent. More so, victims are urged to report scams to the relevant authorities: the UAE Central Bank, the DFSA, or the ADGM, in order to investigate the scams.

Increasing Regulatory Strengthening Actions Against USDT-Scams

Effectively combating the scams of USDT and providing protection to investors from the UAE would mean enhancing the regulatory framework, improving the enforcement mechanism, and may include:

  1. Strengthen KYC and AML Requirements: Ensure that any crypto transaction, especially for large amounts of money, is put through stringent KYC and AML requirements. That would somewhat help in people not being able to misuse those KYC and AML identification processes used to avoid being screened for fraud.
  2. Increased Monitoring of OTC Activities: Since the nature of activities in the OTC market is quite high risk, there is a need for regulators to impose more strict monitoring over such activities. This may range from requiring reporting of large transactions by OTC desks, ensuring that all parties within such transactions are well vetted, among others.
  3. Public Awareness Campaigns: Creating public awareness about the risks associated with the USDT scam and how to stay safe. Public awareness campaigns would likely reduce the number of victims and discourage these scammers from operating in the country.
  4. Collaboration with International Authorities: As cryptocurrency scams are happening on a global scale, the UAE should continue to coordinate with international agencies and try to locate the fraudsters to recover the funds stolen.

Conclusion

The UAE is home to growing USDT scams, allowing culprits to exploit mass adoption in cryptocurrencies and current regulatory loopholes. In spite of all the progress that the UAE has achieved in crypto industry regulation, there remains a lot to achieve for the protection of investors from fraud. With improved measures of regulation, better enforcement, and enhanced public awareness, the UAE can check these risks associated with USDT scams and ensure a safer environment for cryptocurrency transactions.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

Johnson & Johnson's Red River Talc Files for Bankruptcy Amid $8 Billion Settlement Efforts Over Asbestos Claims

Johnson & Johnson's subsidiary, Red River Talc, filed for bankruptcy in a bid to secure an $8 billion settlement. This follows over 62,000 lawsuits alleging that J&J's talc products, including baby powder, were contaminated with asbestos, leading to ovarian and other cancers. While J&J denies these claims and asserts product safety, the company is deploying the "Texas two-step" bankruptcy strategy for a third time.

In this manoeuvre, J&J offloaded its talc liabilities to Red River Talc, which then declared bankruptcy under Chapter 11. This allows the company to propose a global settlement while avoiding a direct bankruptcy filing by J&J itself. With 83% of current claimants supporting the deal, J&J aims to resolve these lawsuits in one unified settlement. This marks J&J's third bankruptcy effort after previous attempts were dismissed by federal courts.

The settlement plan focuses on resolving claims tied to ovarian and other gynecological cancers, following earlier settlements regarding mesothelioma claims. Despite gaining significant support, J&J faces continued opposition from some plaintiffs and legal hurdles, including a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on Purdue Pharma's bankruptcy and proposed federal legislation that could limit the use of bankruptcy protection by financially healthy companies like J&J.

Global Bankruptcy Landscape: A Broader Scenario

Bankruptcy filings across the globe have seen significant fluctuations, particularly post-pandemic, with businesses and individuals facing economic pressures. Large corporations in sectors like retail, real estate, and healthcare have turned to bankruptcy to restructure their debts, notably under Chapter 11 in the U.S., which allows for a reorganization plan while continuing operations.

In Europe, the aftermath of COVID-19 saw a surge in bankruptcies, especially in small to medium enterprises (SMEs). Countries like Italy and Spain, which heavily rely on tourism and services, were particularly hit. New reforms in bankruptcy laws in these regions have focused on restructuring to preserve jobs rather than liquidation. In China, rising debt in real estate and technology sectors has led to several high-profile bankruptcies, triggering government intervention to stabilize these sectors.

The ongoing global economic uncertainties, driven by inflation, rising interest rates, and geopolitical tensions, continue to challenge both small businesses and large corporations alike. Johnson & Johnson's case is an example of how corporations leverage legal strategies in bankruptcy to address large-scale liabilities, but the broader trend shows bankruptcy as a crucial financial tool globally for navigating economic crises.

As we move forward, bankruptcy filings are expected to remain significant worldwide, driven by industry-specific downturns and broader economic pressures.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Tupperware Files for Bankruptcy: A Major Shift in the Iconic Brand's 77-Year History

Tupperware, the iconic brand known for its plastic food storage containers, has officially filed for bankruptcy, marking a significant chapter in its storied 77-year history. The company cited a shift in consumer behavior, with a move away from direct sales—a model that has long been its backbone—as the primary reason for its financial difficulties.

Once a household name, Tupperware gained popularity in the mid-20th century through its renowned ‘Tupperware parties,’ a pioneering sales strategy that relied on home demonstrations by independent sellers. However, more than a quarter-century later, this direct-selling model, which still constitutes the majority of Tupperware’s sales, has been hit hard by changes in the way consumers shop. The rise of online shopping and shifting preferences toward convenience have weakened the appeal of in-person sales, placing significant pressure on the company’s business.

Photographs taken on September 18, 2024, in Dearborn, Michigan, show shelves lined with Tupperware boxes for sale, highlighting the enduring presence of the brand in retail spaces, even as its direct sales operations struggle. 

The filing follows a period of financial instability for the company, with declining sales and mounting debts. Efforts to modernize the business by expanding into retail and online markets have not been sufficient to offset the losses from its traditional sales model.

Tupperware’s bankruptcy underscores the challenges faced by legacy brands in adapting to a rapidly evolving consumer landscape. Despite attempts to reinvent itself, the company has struggled to compete with the flexibility and reach of digital-first businesses. 

Tupperware’s future remains uncertain as it navigates the bankruptcy process, but for many, the brand will continue to evoke memories of a bygone era, when its products—and the social gatherings they spurred—were a staple of American homes.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Regulation of Off-Plan Property Sales Undre Dubai Law No. 13/2008 on the Interim Real Estate Register

Dubai's real estate market has been marked by rapid growth and substantial foreign investment. To address this, Dubai Law No. 13/2008 on the Interim Real Estate Register, as amended by Dubai Law No. 9/2009, Dubai Law No. 19/2017, and Dubai Law No. 19/2020 (the "Law"), establishes key safeguards to protect both developers and buyers, particularly in off-plan property transactions. The Law provides a comprehensive legal framework for the registration and regulation of off-plan sales, promoting transparency and accountability. This article examines the Law’s critical provisions, amendments, and their practical impact on Dubai's real estate sector.

Understanding the Interim Real Estate Register

Under Article 3 of the Law, all transactions related to off-plan real estate units must be registered in the Interim Real Estate Register before they can be legally recognized. This register, maintained by the Dubai Land Department (DLD), documents all off-plan sales and related legal actions, ensuring that both developers and buyers are protected until the property is completed and transferred to the Real Estate Register. The law clearly states that any sale or other legal actions concerning off-plan units are void if not recorded in the Interim Real Estate Register. This measure prevents fraudulent or unauthorized sales and ensures that the legal interests of all parties are safeguarded.

Key Developer Obligations

Before selling off-plan properties, developers must meet certain requirements outlined in Article 4 of the Law. These include receiving ownership of the land and obtaining necessary approvals from relevant authorities. Developers must also ensure that all off-plan real estate units are properly registered before any sales or legal actions, such as mortgages, can be conducted, as mandated by Article 6 of the Law. Additionally, if a developer wishes to engage a real estate broker to market the project, Article 9 of the Law requires that the developer first enter into a formal contract with the broker in compliance with Dubai Regulation No. 85/2006, which governs the registration of real estate brokers.

Re-Sale of Off-Plan Properties

Re-selling off-plan properties follows a structured process to ensure transparency and legality: Buyers and sellers must first apply for a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the developer. The transaction is registered under the Oqood Management System, a platform developed by the DLD in conjunction with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA). The developer enters the buyer’s details into the system, and once the buyer pays the Oqood fees (4% of the property’s original price), a Certificate of Registration is issued. Upon completion of the property, and once the buyer has fulfilled all payment obligations, the property is transferred to the Real Estate Register in the buyer’s name. This process ensures that off-plan transactions are tracked from inception to completion, minimizing disputes and legal ambiguities.

Developer and Buyer Rights and Obligations

Developers and buyers both have clearly defined rights and obligations under Dubai Law No. 13/2008: Buyers are required to pay the purchase price, registration fees, and any costs associated with title deeds or NOC fees, unless otherwise agreed. Developers, while having no statutory obligations beyond registration, must comply with contractual commitments, especially regarding delivery timelines and accurate representations of the property. In case of disputes, Article 11 of the law provides a mechanism for developers to notify the DLD if a buyer defaults on their contractual obligations. Depending on the completion status of the project, developers can take various actions, such as requesting the DLD to auction the property or rescinding the sale and retaining a percentage of the unit's value.

Legal Remedies for Disputes

The law provides several remedies for both resale and off-plan transactions. With regard to resale properties: Under Article 272 of Federal Law No. 5/1985, either party may terminate the contract if the other fails to fulfill their obligations. If termination occurs, the parties must restore what they have received, or compensation is awarded under Article 274 if restitution is not possible. In the case of off-plan properties, the Dubai Law No. 19/2017 amends Article 11 of the Law to allow developers to rescind the contract and deregister the sale in case of non-payment by the buyer, without needing to approach the courts. However, buyers can challenge such deregistration.

Conclusion

Dubai Law No. 13/2008 and its amendments establish a comprehensive legal framework for managing off-plan property sales in Dubai. By ensuring that all transactions are properly recorded in the Interim Real Estate Register, the law protects both developers and buyers from fraudulent dealings and legal uncertainties. The amendments introduced in subsequent years have strengthened the protections for investors while providing developers with clear guidelines for enforcing contractual obligations. As Dubai’s real estate market continues to grow, the legal safeguards established by this law will play a crucial role in maintaining investor confidence and market stability.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Global Push for Ecocide as an International Crime: Implications for the UAE and GCC Nations

As the world grapples with the consequences of climate change, the concept of "ecocide"—acts that destroy ecosystems—is gaining traction as a potential international crime, akin to genocide or war crimes. Countries like Vanuatu, Fiji, and Samoa, particularly vulnerable to environmental degradation, have formally requested the International Criminal Court (ICC) to recognize ecocide as an international crime. This move could pave the way for prosecuting company leaders or even nations that knowingly contribute to environmental destruction.

However, the largest polluters, including China, Russia, India, and the United States, are not ICC members, which may challenge the effectiveness of any rulings. Despite this, proponents believe that criminalizing ecocide would create powerful deterrents, influencing policymakers to adopt stricter environmental protections. Jojo Mehta, co-founder of Stop Ecocide International, highlights that criminal law establishes both moral and legal boundaries, making extreme environmental harm unacceptable.

What is Ecocide?

The term ecocide was coined in the 1970s by Arthur Galston, a Yale University biologist, who campaigned against the use of the herbicide Agent Orange during the Vietnam War due to its devastating environmental and health impacts. Today, ecocide is being defined as “unlawful or wanton acts committed with knowledge that there is a substantial likelihood of severe, widespread, or long-term damage to the environment.” Examples include oil spills, deforestation, and the emission of large quantities of greenhouse gases by fossil fuel companies.

Ecocide in the UAE and GCC Context

For countries in the UAE and the GCC, which have experienced rapid industrialization and development, this debate could have significant implications. These nations are major oil producers, with economic models historically reliant on fossil fuel exports. At the same time, the region has seen increasing vulnerability to climate change, such as rising temperatures, water scarcity, and extreme weather events.

The UAE, in particular, has made significant strides in environmental sustainability. The UAE Net Zero by 2050 Strategic Initiative demonstrates the country’s commitment to reducing its carbon footprint, emphasizing renewable energy, sustainable city planning, and innovative technologies. Expo 2020 Dubai showcased these efforts on a global stage, reinforcing the UAE’s focus on a green economy.

However, the prospect of ecocide becoming an international crime could introduce legal and financial risks for companies in the region. For instance, oil spills or environmental damage from industrial projects might expose businesses to prosecution if ecocide were criminalized globally. This would put additional pressure on companies to adopt more sustainable practices and comply with evolving international regulations.

Ecocide as a Legal Framework for the GCC

In the GCC, where countries like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE are transitioning to more diversified economies, the legal recognition of ecocide might act as a catalyst for accelerating green initiatives. While these nations are not currently part of the ICC, introducing ecocide into international law could create new legal frameworks that might encourage or require regional collaboration on environmental protections.

From a legal perspective, the GCC countries would need to consider the impact on their industrial sectors, particularly oil and gas, construction, and tourism, which can have significant environmental footprints. Legal scholars argue that aligning national laws with international standards on environmental crimes may become essential for GCC nations as they seek to balance economic growth with sustainable development.

The Push for Accountability

For the low-lying island nations, the fight against ecocide is about survival. These nations, including Vanuatu and Fiji, are facing rising sea levels and increasingly destructive storms due to climate change. For them, criminalizing ecocide offers the potential for justice and deterring further environmental damage.

In the GCC, where climate change is also being felt, although in different forms, the push for accountability could resonate. Water scarcity, desertification, and the increasing frequency of extreme weather events are real concerns. Legal recognition of environmental harm could help address these issues while ensuring that industries contribute to sustainability rather than environmental degradation.

Conclusion

The proposal to classify ecocide as an international crime signals a global shift toward holding individuals and nations accountable for environmental harm. For the UAE and GCC countries, this could mean increased international pressure to align with environmental protections, further supporting their sustainability goals. While the road to making ecocide an international crime may be long, it underscores the growing importance of protecting the environment in the face of climate change—a challenge that transcends borders and demands global cooperation

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels. 

 

 

 

 

Placeholder

UAE Central Bank Fines Bank Dh5 Million for AML Violations and Financing Illegal Activities

The Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE) has imposed a Dh5 million fine on an unnamed bank for breaching anti-money laundering (AML) regulations and for financing illegal organizations. The penalty was issued in accordance with Articles 89 and 137 of Federal Decree Law No. (14) of 2018, which governs the Central Bank’s role and the regulation of financial institutions, as well as Article 14 of Federal Decree Law No. (20) of 2018 on Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism and Illegal Organizations.

The bank, which has not been publicly identified, was also ordered to report the CBUAE’s actions to its board of directors at its overseas headquarters. This directive reinforces the CBUAE’s commitment to ensuring that banking institutions operating in the UAE comply with the nation’s regulatory framework.

From a legal perspective, the imposition of this penalty highlights the rigorous standards set by UAE authorities to combat money laundering and terrorist financing. The Federal Decree Law No. (20) of 2018 sets out stringent guidelines for financial institutions, emphasizing their obligation to implement robust due diligence procedures, monitor suspicious activities, and report them to the relevant authorities. Failure to adhere to these regulations can lead to severe sanctions, as seen in this case.

The UAE’s legal framework surrounding AML is designed to uphold the integrity of the financial system and maintain the country’s international reputation as a transparent and secure financial hub. Financial institutions must follow strict compliance measures, including Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols, continuous monitoring of transactions, and thorough reporting mechanisms. Any failure to meet these obligations not only attracts financial penalties but can also result in reputational damage and further legal consequences for the institutions involved.

The CBUAE’s supervisory and regulatory mandates are intended to ensure that all banks, along with their owners and employees, fully comply with these legal standards to safeguard the transparency and integrity of the UAE’s banking sector.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels. 

 

 

Placeholder

ICO Launches 'Correction of the Status of Violators' Initiative to Aid Illegal Residents

The International Charity Organisation (ICO) announces 'Correction of the Status of Violators' initiative to support illegal residents, with 600 applications to be processed in the first phase.

In a move to support individuals seeking legal residency in the UAE, the Ajman-based International Charity Organisation (ICO) has launched a significant initiative titled the ‘Correction of the Status of Violators’. The initiative, valued at Dh3 million, aims to assist those benefiting from the ongoing amnesty program for illegal residents by facilitating the completion of residency visa procedures. The amnesty offers individuals an opportunity to regularize their legal status in the UAE without facing penalties for past residency violations.

Key Aspects of the Initiative

The ICO's 'Correction of the Status of Violators' initiative is designed to provide financial support to amnesty seekers, covering the costs involved in obtaining legal residency visas. This move highlights the UAE's ongoing efforts to address issues faced by residents who have overstayed or violated the terms of their visas, allowing them to integrate back into society lawfully.

In the first phase of the initiative, the ICO will accept 600 applications from individuals who meet the program’s criteria. The applications will be processed under the guidelines set forth by the UAE's amnesty campaign, which focuses on exempting individuals from accrued fines and penalties associated with residency violations.

The Two-Month Amnesty Program

The two-month amnesty was launched by the Federal Authority for Identity and Citizenship, Customs and Ports Security (ICP) on September 1, 2024. During this period, applicants have two options: they can either amend their status to remain in the UAE legally by obtaining a valid visa, or they can choose to exit the country without incurring fines or penalties for overstaying. This temporary window offers significant relief for those who have violated residency laws, encouraging them to come forward without the fear of legal or financial repercussions.

Legal Framework of the Amnesty Program

The UAE’s amnesty program has been a vital component of its immigration policy, aiming to regulate the status of individuals who are in violation of residency laws. By offering exemptions from fines and penalties, the program encourages illegal residents to rectify their legal status. This reflects the UAE’s commitment to supporting expatriates and ensuring their rights within a lawful framework.

Under the Federal Residency Law, individuals who overstay their visa are typically subject to daily fines. However, during the amnesty period, these penalties are waived, offering violators a clear and accessible path to legal residency. The launch of the Dh3 million fund serves to support these individuals, covering necessary expenses such as application fees, documentation, and other procedural costs.

ICO’s Role in Supporting National Campaigns

Dr. Khalid Al Khaja, Secretary-General of the ICO, emphasized the organization's commitment to supporting national humanitarian campaigns, including the ongoing amnesty initiative. He explained that the 'Correction of the Status of Violators' aligns with the ICO’s broader mission to assist vulnerable communities and provide them with the resources they need to achieve stability.

The focus of this initiative is not only on regularizing residency status but also on promoting long-term social and economic stability for amnesty seekers and their families. By facilitating the legal residency process, the initiative helps individuals secure lawful employment, access social services, and fully integrate into the UAE’s community.

Legal Benefits and Broader Implications

From a legal perspective, the initiative provides critical relief to individuals facing financial difficulties related to their residency status. It enables them to resolve legal uncertainties surrounding their residency and avoid future complications. Regularizing residency status also opens up opportunities for lawful employment, healthcare access, and other government services, ensuring stability for individuals and their families.

The initiative demonstrates the UAE’s proactive approach in addressing immigration challenges while balancing national security with humanitarian considerations. The government’s consistent efforts to provide amnesty, coupled with financial support from organizations like the ICO, reflect a comprehensive strategy to manage immigration in a fair and just manner.

Conclusion

The ICO’s 'Correction of the Status of Violators' initiative, backed by Dh3 million in funding, offers much-needed assistance to individuals participating in the UAE’s amnesty program. By covering the costs associated with securing legal residency visas, the initiative helps individuals resolve their immigration issues and contributes to their long-term well-being. This initiative plays a crucial role in ensuring the success of the UAE’s national amnesty campaign, while also highlighting the importance of legal frameworks in fostering stability for all residents.

The two-month amnesty program, launched by the Federal Authority for Identity and Citizenship, Customs and Ports Security, provides a vital opportunity for illegal residents to rectify their status, whether through obtaining valid visas or exiting the UAE without penalties. This initiative not only represents a significant legal development but also sets a precedent for how government and charitable organizations can work together to offer a stable, lawful future for all residents.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels. 

Placeholder

Understanding Partner Liability in UAE LLCs: Legal Risks and Personal Guarantees

In the UAE, creditors, including banks, have the legal right to file lawsuits against companies facing financial difficulties to recover outstanding debts. In a limited liability company (LLC), partners’ liability is generally limited to their capital contribution. However, a bank may sue the company and its partners if personal guarantees were provided by the partners, which can lead to personal assets being at risk.

When an LLC is sued, the ruling and subsequent execution would typically target the company’s assets rather than the personal assets of the partners. However, if any partner has signed personal guarantees or taken loans on behalf of the company, they could be held personally liable, and their own assets could be subject to legal action. It is essential to review the terms of the agreements with creditors to understand the extent of personal liability.

If a partner decides to leave the company, it does not automatically exempt them from legal claims that arose during their tenure as a partner. The partner remains liable for debts and obligations incurred while they were a part of the company, even if they exit before legal proceedings conclude. Thus, departing a company in financial distress does not necessarily protect a partner from being involved in ongoing or future lawsuits related to prior obligations.

This legal framework underscores the importance of thoroughly reviewing partnership agreements and any personal guarantees given to creditors. For those facing legal action from creditors, it is strongly recommended to consult with a legal expert to assess the extent of liability and explore possible defenses or negotiations with the creditors.

In summary, partners of an LLC in the UAE are generally protected from personal liability unless personal guarantees are involved. However, leaving the company does not spare a partner from obligations incurred while they were involved. For any legal complexities, seeking professional legal advice is crucial to protect personal and business interests.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels. 

Placeholder

Motor Insurance in the UAE: A Guide to Coverage, Legal Requirements, and Key Considerations

Introduction

Motor insurance is a critical aspect of vehicle ownership in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). It not only provides financial protection in the event of an accident but also ensures compliance with legal requirements. This article explores the various types of motor insurance available in the UAE, their benefits, legal requirements, and key considerations for policyholders.

Types of Motor Insurance

  1. Comprehensive Insurance

  2. Third-Party Liability Insurance

  3. Third-Party Fire and Theft Insurance

Comprehensive motor insurance is the most extensive coverage option. It includes protection against damage to the insured vehicle, third-party liability, theft, fire, and natural disasters amongst others. Additionally, it covers damage to the vehicle caused by accidents, vandalism, and other unforeseen events. Comprehensive policies often include added benefits such as roadside assistance and rental car coverage.

Third-party liability insurance is the minimum legal requirement for vehicle owners in the UAE. It covers damages caused to other vehicles, property, or individuals in the event of an accident where the insured is at fault. This type of insurance is crucial for compliance with UAE traffic laws and provides essential protection against legal and financial liabilities.

This type of insurance combines third-party liability coverage with protection against fire and theft of the insured vehicle. While it does not cover damages from accidents, it offers financial protection in the event of a fire or theft. This is a more affordable option compared to comprehensive insurance but provides less coverage.

Legal Requirements

Under the UAE law, all vehicle owners are required to have at least third-party liability insurance. This ensures that all road users are financially protected in case of accidents involving other parties. Comprehensive insurance, while not mandatory, is highly recommended due to its extensive coverage and added benefits.

Benefits of Motor Insurance

  1. Financial Protection

  2. Legal Compliance

  3. Peace of Mind

Motor insurance provides financial protection against the costs associated with vehicle damage, repairs, and third-party claims. Comprehensive insurance, in particular, offers broad coverage, reducing the financial burden on the policyholder in various scenarios.

Adhering to the legal requirement of having at least third-party liability insurance ensures compliance with the UAE traffic laws. Failure to maintain proper insurance can result in fines, penalties, and legal consequences.

Having adequate motor insurance offers peace of mind, knowing that you are protected against unforeseen events and financial liabilities. It also provides support in managing the stress and complications that arise from accidents or damages.

Key Considerations for Policyholders

  1. Coverage Limits and Exclusions

  2. Premium Costs

  3. Claims Process

Policyholders should carefully review the coverage limits and exclusions of their insurance policy. Understanding what is covered and what is not will help in making informed decisions and avoiding surprises during claims.

The cost of motor insurance premiums can vary based on factors such as the type of coverage, the vehicle's make and model, and the policyholder's driving history. Comparing quotes from different insurers or seeking opinion from an insurance brokers can help in finding the best value for coverage.

Familiarizing oneself with the claims process is essential for efficient handling of any incidents. Ensuring that all necessary documentation is available and understanding the procedures will facilitate a smoother claims experience.

Conclusion

Motor insurance is a vital component of vehicle ownership in the UAE, offering both legal compliance and financial protection. Whether opting for comprehensive coverage or third-party liability insurance, policyholders should carefully assess their needs and select a policy that best suits their requirements. By staying informed about the types of coverage, legal obligations, and key considerations, vehicle owners can ensure a secure and compliant driving experience in the UAE.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels. 

Placeholder

Navigating the New Federal Commercial Agency Code in the UAE: Key Changes and Implications for Business Expansion

Businesses aiming to expand in the UAE frequently turn to local commercial agents for their expertise in business operations and networks within the country. In line with efforts to foster international business, the UAE government has introduced a new Federal Commercial Agency Code, which brings extensive reforms compared to the previous law governing commercial agencies.
Who Can Act as a Commercial Agent Under the New Law?
Under Article 2(1) of the new Commercial Agency Code, only UAE nationals or entities fully owned by UAE nationals are permitted to act as commercial agents. These include:
- A natural UAE national
- A public legal entity
- A private legal entity owned by public legal entities
- A private legal entity fully owned by UAE nationals
The Council of Ministers may also allow international companies not owned by UAE nationals to act as commercial agents for their own products, but only if they meet specific conditions:
1. The company does not have an existing commercial agent in the UAE.
2. The company is new to the commercial agency market in the UAE.
3. The company adheres to the limits and conditions set by the Council of Ministers.
Additionally, public joint-stock companies established in the UAE with at least 51% of their capital held by UAE nationals are also eligible to engage in commercial agency activities, as outlined in Article 2(3) and (4) of the Code.
Has the Contract Term for Commercial Agencies Changed?
Yes, the new law brings updates to contract terms. Article 6 states that if the agency agreement requires the agent to establish facilities such as display buildings, storage spaces, or repair centers, the minimum contract term must be five years. Otherwise, the term will depend on the agreement between the parties.
Changes to Termination of Commercial Agency Contracts
The new law significantly expands the grounds for terminating an agency contract. According to Article 9, contracts can now be terminated under several conditions, including:
- Expiration of the agreed term, unless renewed.
- Termination by either the principal or agent as per the contract’s terms.
- Mutual agreement to terminate before the contract ends.
- A final court decision.
- Other provisions mentioned in the law.

This marks a shift from the old law, which only allowed termination in cases of "material breach."
Can Agents Claim Compensation After Contract Termination?
Article 11 addresses compensation claims when an agency contract is terminated. If the contract ends and is not renewed, the agent may seek compensation from the principal for any losses incurred. The agent must demonstrate that their efforts led to the principal's success, and the termination deprived them of potential profits.
This provision is subject to any prior agreements between the parties regarding termination and compensation.
Application of the New Law to Existing Commercial Agencies
For agency contracts that were in effect before the new law came into force, the provisions for termination under Article 9(a) and (b) will not apply for the first two years after the law’s implementation. However, this grace period extends to 10 years for agents who have maintained their status for over a decade or whose investments exceed AED 100 million.
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
The newly formed Commercial Agencies Committee, as established under Article 23, is the primary body responsible for resolving disputes between the principal and the agent. However, parties are not precluded from seeking arbitration if previously agreed upon. Furthermore, any decision made by the Committee can be referred to arbitration under Article 26 of the new law.
Conclusion
The new Federal Commercial Agency Code introduces significant updates regarding the roles, responsibilities, and protections of both principals and agents. It allows for more flexible termination terms, offers clearer avenues for compensation, and provides multiple options for dispute resolution. These reforms aim to strike a balance between promoting international business growth and protecting the interests of local agents.

 

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels. 

Placeholder

Understanding UAE Privacy Laws and Technology Misuse: Federal Decree-Law No. 34 of 2021

In today's world, technology has seamlessly integrated into daily life, improving the quality of living and offering indispensable tools such as smartphones and computers. However, the widespread use of these tools, particularly in capturing photos and sharing information, can sometimes result in legal risks if misused. In the UAE, Federal Decree-Law No. 34 of 2021 on Countering Rumours and Cybercrimes provides clear guidelines on these risks, focusing heavily on privacy violations.

Photography, although often seen as a benign and permissible activity, is strictly regulated when it infringes on an individual's privacy or personal life. Article 44 of this law sets forth stringent penalties for those who misuse technology to invade privacy. These include prison sentences of no less than six months and fines ranging from AED 150,000 to AED 500,000. Specific prohibited actions include:

1. Recording or sharing private conversations or communications without consent: This includes eavesdropping, intercepting, or disclosing private discussions or audio-visual material.

2. Taking unauthorized photographs: Whether in public or private spaces, capturing, distributing, or retaining images of individuals without their permission is unlawful.

3. Publishing any electronic content aimed at harming another's reputation: Even if the content is factual, if the intent is to damage a person’s reputation, it can lead to legal consequences.

4. Photographing victims of accidents or disasters without authorization: Sharing such sensitive content without permission is a violation of privacy.

5. Tracking or disclosing someone's location: Revealing or retaining location data without consent also falls under prohibited activities.

Furthermore, the law also punishes those who alter or manipulate recordings, images, or videos to harm or defame others. In such cases, the penalties are harsher, with imprisonment for at least one year and fines between AED 250,000 and AED 500,000.

For a crime to be established under this law, it must be proven that the perpetrator intended to harm someone’s reputation or invade their privacy using an information network or technology. However, if the individual is acting in good faith, such as reporting a crime or documenting unlawful behaviour, the criminal intent may be negated.

Conclusion

In the UAE, the legal framework around privacy violations through technology is stringent and comprehensive. Federal Decree-Law No. 34 of 2021 clearly outlines penalties for misuse of technology, including photography and sharing of personal data. With privacy increasingly under the spotlight, it is essential to navigate these laws carefully to avoid legal repercussions.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels. 

Placeholder

Navigating Debt Recovery in the UAE: Legal Framework, Challenges, and Strategies

Debt recovery in the UAE involves navigating a structured legal process, designed to balance the rights of both creditors and debtors while ensuring compliance with the country’s regulatory framework. With the UAE's growing economy and diverse business landscape, the need for effective debt collection mechanisms has become critical for maintaining financial stability. Understanding the debt recovery process in the UAE is essential for both creditors seeking to recover outstanding amounts and debtors looking to protect their rights.

Legal Framework Governing Debt Recovery in the UAE

The UAE’s debt recovery process is governed by several key laws, primarily falling under Federal Law No. 18 of 1993 (Commercial Transactions Law) and the Civil Procedures Law. These laws ensure that debt collection practices are transparent, fair, and compliant with international standards.

The Commercial Transactions Law outlines the rights and obligations of parties in commercial contracts, including debtors and creditors. It specifies the legal procedures creditors must follow to recover outstanding debts, which include serving formal notice, engaging in negotiations, and, if necessary, initiating court proceedings. The Civil Procedures Law, on the other hand, regulates how court cases are conducted, from filing a claim to enforcement.

Current Challenges in Debt Recovery

Both creditors and debtors face significant challenges in the debt recovery process in the UAE. For creditors, one of the biggest hurdles is dealing with uncooperative debtors who may delay payments, dispute the amount owed, or simply be difficult to locate. Legal proceedings can be lengthy and complicated, especially when a debtor tries to evade legal action by transferring assets or hiding financial information.

On the other hand, debtors are protected by UAE laws against unfair practices, such as harassment or excessive pressure from debt collectors. Creditors are required to comply with Central Bank regulations on debt collection, which prohibit unethical behaviour, including constant phone calls or unauthorized visits.

A major issue for debt recovery in the UAE is the cross-border nature of many financial transactions. Given the international character of Dubai and Abu Dhabi, where many expatriates reside, cases often involve foreign debtors, complicating the enforcement of judgments. While the UAE has treaties with several countries for mutual enforcement of court rulings, it can still be difficult to recover debts from individuals or companies based abroad.

The Role of Legal Professionals in Debt Recovery

The involvement of legal professionals and specialized agencies is crucial in debt recovery cases. Lawyers well-versed in the UAE legal system can assist creditors in filing cases, enforcing court rulings, and negotiating settlements. They play a key role in drafting debt agreements that include provisions for legal recourse in case of non-payment, which can be a preventive measure against future disputes.

In cases where legal action becomes inevitable, debt recovery lawyers can help navigate the complexities of the UAE court system, from initiating proceedings to obtaining enforcement orders. The UAE courts also allow creditors to file for provisional attachment orders, freezing a debtor’s assets before a judgment is passed, to prevent them from moving assets out of reach.

Strategies for Effective Debt Recovery

Given the complexities of debt recovery, it is advisable for creditors to adopt a proactive approach, which can include:

1. Negotiation and Settlement: Engaging with debtors through structured negotiations to reach a mutually agreeable settlement. This can help avoid lengthy court procedures and preserve business relationships.   

2. Legal Recourse: Filing a case in the UAE courts when negotiations fail. Creditors can seek summary judgments, especially in cases where the debt is not contested, to speed up the process.

3. Third-Party Debt Collectors: Engaging licensed debt collection agencies in the UAE, which operate under strict regulations, to manage the collection process on behalf of creditors.

Legal Opinion and Current Scenario

The debt recovery landscape in the UAE has become more structured and efficient in recent years, particularly with the introduction of new bankruptcy laws and improved mechanisms for enforcement. The Bankruptcy Law (Federal Law No. 9 of 2016) has provided companies with a legal framework to restructure debts and avoid liquidation, thus offering more clarity to creditors on how to proceed with debt recovery from distressed companies.

Additionally, the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) courts have become a preferred venue for international debt recovery cases, as they offer faster resolution and are familiar with handling cross-border disputes. With the UAE’s focus on becoming a business-friendly destination, debt recovery laws will likely continue evolving to provide better protection for creditors while ensuring that debtors are treated fairly.

However, challenges remain, particularly regarding enforcement. While the UAE’s legal system allows for the seizure of assets and freezing of bank accounts, the actual execution of judgments can be delayed due to procedural backlogs or non-cooperation from debtors. The use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods, such as mediation, is increasingly being encouraged to resolve disputes more efficiently.

In conclusion, debt recovery in the UAE is a process that requires careful legal navigation, especially in today’s complex economic environment. With the right legal guidance and a clear understanding of local regulations, creditors can recover debts effectively while ensuring compliance with UAE laws. However, it is essential to stay updated on changes in the legal landscape to ensure a smooth debt recovery process.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels. 

Placeholder

How to File a Consumer Complaint with Dubai's DET: A Step-by-Step Guide

If you’ve encountered issues such as receiving a defective product or being charged full price despite an advertised discount, you can file a consumer complaint with the Department of Economy and Tourism (DET) in Dubai. Under Federal Decree No. 5 of 2023, consumers are protected against such practices and can seek compensation for damages caused by faulty goods or services. Suppliers are required to offer repairs, replacements, or refunds for defective products and must display accurate prices while avoiding misleading advertising.

Violations of the consumer protection law can result in fines up to Dh2 million and up to two years in prison, according to the updated law effective from October 2023.

Here’s how you can file a complaint:

Steps to Submit a Complaint:

1. Visit the Consumer Rights Website: Navigate to the official portal. 

2. Access the Complaint Section: Click the menu icon (three stacked lines) on the left side of the page and select 'consumer complaints (C2B)' under 'Submit Complaint.'

3. Read the Guidelines: Review the provided information to understand who can file complaints, against which companies complaints are accepted, and what documents are needed.

4. Enter Personal Details: Provide your name, mobile number, email, and nationality.

5. Submit Complaint Information: Enter details about the company, commercial sector, type of complaint, and the issue at hand. Attach any supporting documents such as receipts or product images.

6. Agree to Terms and Submit: After reading the terms and conditions, submit the complaint.

7. Receive a Reference Number: A complaint reference number will be provided on the website and sent to your email and phone. You can use this number to track the status of your complaint.

By following these steps, consumers can ensure their rights are protected and hold suppliers accountable for any misconduct.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels. 

Placeholder

Federal Judge Sets Deadline for DOJ and States on Google Antitrust Penalties

The Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) introduced changes to its Prescribed Company (PC) framework through the revised Prescribed Companies Regulations 2024. These updates simplify and broaden the eligibility for establishing a PC, making it easier for businesses and individuals to hold or manage real estate and other GCC-registered assets.

The updated regulations allow any entity seeking to hold or control assets that require registration with a GCC authority—such as property or property interests—to form a PC. This ensures legal ownership, protection of rights, and public notice of the asset.

To support this transition, the DIFC has provided a six-month grace period for setting up a PC before acquiring real estate. This period begins at the PC's formation and ends once the shareholders submit proof of asset acquisition to the DIFC. The process is designed for simplicity, allowing PCs to be established quickly with a DIFC-registered address provided by a licensed Corporate Service Provider (CSP).

While foundations and trusts have traditionally been used to hold real estate in the UAE, the new PC regime offers a more flexible and efficient option for managing property assets across the GCC. PCs benefit from DIFC’s common law structure, low fees, streamlined registration, and the ability to use a licensed CSP as their registered office within the DIFC.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels. 

Placeholder

New UAE Telemarketing Regulations: Improved Consumer Protections and Reporting

Starting August 27, UAE residents and investors can now take action against cold callers who breach the newly enforced telemarketing regulations. These rules, designed to protect consumer rights, allow the public to file complaints directly with the federal or local authority responsible for licensing the telemarketer involved in the infraction.

How to Report Violations

If a resident receives a marketing call from a company, they can report it to the relevant authority. For instance, complaints about banking services should be directed to the Central Bank, while issues related to investment and securities should go to the Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA). Additionally, if telemarketers use personal mobile numbers to make sales calls, residents can report this violation via SMS by sending "REPORT" followed by the offending number to 1012.

New Telemarketing Rules

The UAE Cabinet Resolution No. 56 of 2024 outlines stringent rules for telemarketers, including:

  • Calls are only permitted between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m.
  • Telemarketers must refrain from calling residents more than once a day if the initial call is rejected.
  • Persuasive tactics to pressure customers into purchasing products or services are prohibited.

Violators face hefty fines, ranging from AED 10,000 to AED 150,000, depending on the severity of the breach. Telemarketing companies must also secure prior approval before conducting their activities, with penalties escalating for repeat offenses.

Consumer Protection and Enforcement

The Central Bank oversees telephone marketing related to financial services, while the SCA handles issues involving securities and commodities. The Ministry of Economy (MoE) is tasked with monitoring compliance, ensuring that companies adhere to the new regulations and respect consumer privacy.

The MoE has introduced the 'Do Not Call Registry' (DNCR), a directory of phone numbers belonging to consumers who do not wish to receive telemarketing calls. The Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA) is working with other organizations to implement the DNCR, enforce regulations, and raise public awareness.

These reforms underscore the UAE's commitment to creating a business environment that respects consumer rights and upholds privacy standards. By empowering residents to report violations and setting clear boundaries for telemarketing practices, the UAE aims to minimize unwanted marketing calls and ensure a more respectful and ethical approach to consumer interactions.

Placeholder

How to Check Your Saudi Arabia Visa Status: A Comprehensive Step-by-Step Guide

Planning a trip to Saudi Arabia from India? Whether you're drawn by the rich history, thrilling adventures, or endless shopping opportunities, one thing is essential before you embark on your journey: a valid visa. Keeping track of your visa status is crucial to ensure a smooth travel experience. Here’s a comprehensive guide on how to check your Saudi visa status through various methods.

Online Methods to Check Saudi Visa Status

To check your Saudi visa status online, you'll need the following details:

  • Application Number: This unique number is given when you submit your visa application.
  • Visa Document Number: Provided during the documentation process.
  • Visa Application Number: Another unique identifier issued with your visa application.
  • Passport Information: Sometimes required along with your application reference number.

With these details ready, follow these steps:

  1. Visit the Saudi Arabia Visa Department’s Website: Head to the official website and find the ‘Check Visa Status’ option.
  2. Enter Your Details: Fill in the form with your passport number and visa or application number.
  3. Complete Captcha Verification: Ensure you’re not a robot, then submit your inquiry.
  4. Check Your Status: The website will process your request and display your visa application status.

This method allows you to check your visa status online efficiently. For more specific updates, you can perform a MOFA Saudi Arabia visa check online to get the latest information.

Offline Methods to Check Saudi Visa Status

If you prefer offline methods, here’s what you can do:

  1. Visit the MOFA Website for Contact Details: Obtain the contact details of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) in Saudi Arabia, such as phone numbers and email addresses.
  2. Reach Out to MOFA: Contact them via phone or email and inquire about your visa status by providing your passport number, visa application number, and other personal details.
  3. Visit a Saudi Embassy or Immigration Office: You can also visit the nearest Saudi Arabian embassy or immigration office with all your necessary documents and visa application forms.

Remember, the approval process may take some time, so it’s wise to contact the MOFA before visiting in person.

Checking Visa Status Using Your Passport Number

You can also check your Saudi visa status using your passport number through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ online portal. Here’s how:

  1. Go to the MOFA Website: Click on the ‘Visa Application’ tab.
  2. Enter Your Passport and Application Number: Fill in the required details.
  3. Submit the Form: After completing the Captcha verification, click ‘Search’.

The website will display all relevant information related to your visa application status.

Understanding the Validity of Saudi Visas

Different types of Saudi visas have varying validity periods:

  • Business Visa: Valid for 30 to 60 days, with multiple-entry visas available for up to 5 years.
  • Tourist Visa: Valid for one year, with a maximum stay of 90 days per visit.
  • Family Visit Visa: Valid for 30 days for single entries or 90 days for multiple entries.
  • Work Visa: Valid for 1 year, allowing up to 6 months of work.
  • Personal Visit Visa: Valid for 90 days for single entry, 365 days for multiple entries.
  • Hajj/Umrah Visa: Umrah visas are valid for three months, while Hajj visas are valid for one month.

Common Issues in Checking Visa Status

When checking your Saudi visa status, you might encounter the following issues:

  • Processing Delays: Visa processing usually takes 4-5 days, but delays can occur.
  • Misinformation: Incorrect or incomplete information on your application can lead to delays or rejection.
  • Technical Glitches: Online systems may have technical issues that disrupt the status check process.
  • Incomplete Documentation: Missing documents can delay approval or lead to rejection.

What to Do if Your Visa Application is Rejected

If your Saudi visa application is rejected, here’s what you can do:

  • Review the Reason for Rejection: Understand why your application was denied.
  • Seek Clarification: Contact the embassy for more details on the rejection.
  • Reapply: Correct any issues in your previous application and submit a new one to increase your chances of approval.

Regularly checking your Saudi visa status ensures that your travel plans go smoothly. Utilize these methods to stay informed and enjoy a hassle-free journey. Additionally, consider purchasing travel insurance to protect yourself from unforeseen circumstances during your trip.

Placeholder

What You Need to Know About Saudi Arabia's New Labour Law Amendments

Saudi Arabia is set to implement significant changes to its Labour Law, with amendments approved by the Saudi Council of Ministers that will come into effect in February 2025. These reforms are part of the Kingdom's broader efforts under Saudi Vision 2030 to enhance job stability, protect employee rights, and clearly define employer obligations.

The amendments involve updates to 38 articles, the removal of seven, and the introduction of two new provisions, reflecting a comprehensive review of global best practices and feedback from over 1,300 stakeholders. The key changes include:

  • Wages and Compensation: Adjustments have been made to wage structures and compensation regulations.
  • Resignation and Termination: The amendments introduce clearer guidelines for resignation procedures and termination rights, including new definitions for “resignation” and “assignment.”
  • Probation Periods: Rules surrounding probation periods have been clarified and updated.
  • Leave Entitlements: Maternity leave has been extended to 12 weeks, and new paid leave options have been introduced, including leave for the death of a sibling and as compensation for overtime work.
  • Employee Training: Employers are now required to implement training and qualification policies to enhance skills and improve performance.
  • Grievance Procedures: The process for workers to file grievances has been revised, offering clearer pathways for addressing workplace issues.
  • Penalties: New penalties have been established for unlicensed recruitment activities.

These changes are designed to create a more attractive and equitable work environment in Saudi Arabia, aligning with the Kingdom's sustainable development goals and labour market strategy. The new amendments aim to boost the labour market, promote the development of human capital, and increase job opportunities for Saudi nationals.

The updated regulations will take effect 180 days after their publication in the Official Gazette. For more information, visit the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Development’s website.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Legal Clash Over AI Training Data: OpenAI Faces Copyright Lawsuits from Authors

In recent months, the AI industry has been under scrutiny, especially with advancements in artificial intelligence capabilities that utilize large language models. One of the notable players in this field, OpenAI, has found itself at the center of a legal storm, facing allegations of copyright infringement from prominent authors. These authors, including Pulitzer Prize winners and other bestselling writers, claim that OpenAI's models, like ChatGPT, have been trained on their copyrighted works without proper authorization or compensation. However, OpenAI has firmly denied these allegations, arguing that its practices comply with fair use principles and are integral to the technological innovation that drives the AI industry forward.

Background of the Allegations

The core of the controversy lies in how OpenAI trains its large language models. These models require vast amounts of text data to learn language patterns, syntax, semantics, and the ability to generate coherent and contextually relevant responses. According to the complaints filed, these data sets allegedly include books, articles, and other written works protected by copyright laws. Notable authors, including George R.R. Martin and John Grisham, have filed lawsuits, arguing that OpenAI's use of their literary works constitutes a direct infringement of their exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute their content.

OpenAI's Defense: Fair Use and Technological Innovation

In response to these allegations, OpenAI has mounted a robust defense, citing the doctrine of fair use as a legal shield. The company argues that the use of copyrighted texts in training its models constitutes a transformative use, which is a key factor in fair use analysis. OpenAI claims that the AI does not replicate or replace the original works but instead uses them to learn general language principles, which can then be applied to a wide range of tasks, from answering questions to creative writing prompts.

OpenAI’s spokesperson highlighted that the AI-generated outputs are not simple reproductions of the original texts. Rather, they are new creations that may be inspired by or reflect patterns learned from the training data. This transformative nature, OpenAI argues, places their use within the bounds of fair use, a concept embedded in U.S. copyright law to allow for new and innovative works that benefit society.

Moreover, OpenAI underscores the importance of AI development and innovation. The company believes that restrictive interpretations of copyright law that hamper the development of AI technologies could stifle creativity and technological progress. They argue that the benefits of AI, which include applications in healthcare, education, and other critical sectors, far outweigh the concerns posed by these lawsuits.

The Authors' Concerns: Protecting Creative Rights

On the other side of the argument, authors express concern about the potential erosion of their intellectual property rights. They argue that if companies can freely use their copyrighted works to train AI models without compensation or authorization, it could undermine the incentive structure that underpins the creative industry. Authors emphasize the need for a legal framework that protects their rights while balancing the interests of technological innovation.

The lawsuits filed against OpenAI not only seek monetary damages but also call for greater transparency in how AI companies use copyrighted materials. They advocate for mechanisms that would ensure authors are compensated for the use of their works in training AI systems, akin to the royalties they receive for other types of usage.

Legal Landscape and Potential Implications

The outcome of these lawsuits could have far-reaching implications for the AI industry and copyright law. If the courts rule in favor of the authors, it could set a precedent requiring AI companies to obtain licenses or permissions before using copyrighted works for training purposes. This could increase costs and regulatory requirements for developing AI technologies. Conversely, a ruling in favor of OpenAI could affirm the applicability of fair use in AI training, providing a legal framework that supports the continued growth and innovation of AI technologies.

The cases also raise broader questions about the balance between protecting intellectual property rights and promoting technological advancement. As AI continues to evolve and integrate more deeply into various sectors, the need for clear legal guidelines becomes more pressing. The decisions made in these cases could influence future legislation and policies, not only in the United States but globally, as other countries grapple with similar issues.

Conclusion

As the legal battle unfolds, both sides present compelling arguments. OpenAI's defense hinges on the transformative nature of AI and the broader societal benefits of technological progress, while authors focus on protecting their creative rights and ensuring fair compensation. The outcome of these cases will likely shape the future of AI development and the rights of content creators in the digital age.

Regardless of the verdict, it is evident that the legal, ethical, and societal implications of AI technologies require thoughtful consideration. Finding a balance that respects both the innovation brought by AI and the rights of creators is essential to fostering a future where technology and creativity can thrive together. As courts and policymakers navigate these uncharted waters, the decisions made will undoubtedly play a pivotal role in shaping the evolving landscape of intellectual property and artificial intelligence.

(The writer is a Associate specializing in Intellectual property and copywrite Law at The Law Reporters .)

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels. 

Placeholder

Abu Dhabi Extends Paid Maternity Leave to 90 Days: What You Need to Know

On 1st of September, 2024, Abu Dhabi will implement an amendment in the maternity leave policy extending the paid maternity leave to 90 days for certain private sector workers. This is in a way a welcome development in employment law which goes a long way in indicating the political commitment of the emirate to ensure that employees are able to blend work and family responsibilities better, particularly working mothers. From the employment lawyers’ perspective, it is important to know the relevance of this regulation with respect to the previous laws and how it facilitates the culture in the workplace for everyone to be more fair and supportive.

Maternity Leave Law before Current One

According to the old UAE Labor Law, private sector workers were eligible to avail superannuation paid maternity leave lasting up to 45 days for their first child if they had worked for the same employer continuously for a year. If an employee had served for less than one year, she was entitled to half pay during her maternity leave. In addition the law also allowed the woman an extra 100 days of time out but without pay provided the mother had every other reason excluding her baby from an operation on her abdomen.

While this earlier provision was progressive in the eyes of many across the world, other stakeholders, particularly the employees and advocacy groups, considered it inadequate. Most mothers found the 45-day period after childbirth and before going back to work too short when they were working without access to fund such financial needs of a baby. Moreover, there was a widespread perception that the short period of fully paid leave disadvantaged workplace gender parity because it usually created a dilemma for women between their work and family life.

New 90-Day Maternity Leave Law

This regulation, which comes into force on 1st September 2024, adds a further type of maternity benefit replacing sickness which allows up to 90 days paid maternity for certain categories of private employees working in Abu Dhabi. This unlimited conveyance extends regardless of the length of service of the employee who is in active service, so that all qualifying mothers are entitled to full pay during leave.

This change makes private sector employees’ maternity leave benefits more proportions to the public sector where 90 days of paid maternity leave has been awarded to female government workers. Abu dhabi may be providing this extended leave in recognition of mothers’ important positions in the workplace as well as in the home, thus making life a little easier for them during the difficult months postpartum.

The Significance of the Modern Maternity Leave Law

Promoting Gender Equality: An issuance of the new law particularly aims to enhance workplace gender equity. Because of the extended maternity leave in Abu Dhabi, women can bear their familial responsibilities while being active in the workplace, creating an equal sociocultural environment. This modification assists in the breaking down of the myth that only women can take care of the children and seek to provide employers with the vision of the future career of their female employees.

Improving Employee Satisfaction: Fair treatment happens at an organization where maternity leave is stretched to not less than 90 days and to a new mother. This enables a mother to recuperate from the effects of childbirth and to interact with her newborn adequately. This is very important for the new mothers’ and actually new borns’ physical and mental health. This extra time also reduces depression and anxiety that would occur in most women after having babies contributing to a good balance of work and family and less long term absenteeism.

Economic and Social Impact: The law therefore encourages working mothers making them contribute to the economic objectives of Abu Dhabi. It makes sure that all women who wish to combine family and work are able to do so by not having to leave jobs because they do not have enough maternity cover and hence the loss of talent and skills to the economy. Such retention of skills is beneficial in that it not only advances the companies but also the general level of productivity and economic development.

Embracing International Best Practices: The increasing duration of maternity leave has seen Abu Dhabi taken aback as one of the countries that cares for its employees. It is also within the framework of the labor compliance and best practices existing in the more developed countries thus boosting the image of the emirate as a well advanced and supportive environment for working mothers. This practice is expected to make the region attractive to more foreign companies and professionals further making Abu Dhabi an essential center of business activities in the world.

Legal Implication and Employers’ Duty: For employers, the new law means looking at existing human resource policies to make sure that compliance is achievable. Employers are going to need to make modifications to employee handbooks, contracts, maternity policies so that the new provisions on maternity leave are included in the documentation. However, there are adverse effects as employment lawyers will become essential in consultations pushing companies through this transition incorporating not the pain of doing things the wrong way but a finesse of best practices with the new laws.

The move by Abu Dhabi to increase the maternity leave to 90 days now applies for private sector employees is a very laudable step in assisting working mothers, addressing gender issues, and improving the welfare of families as a whole. This policy is not only consistent with other advanced nations but also adheres to the emirs strategy of enhancing a fair and reasonable workplace. We, as employment lawyers, must learn to interpret all these changes and their implications, guide our clients appropriately and promote appropriate policies that will continue enjoying the fundamental rights of the workers as well as their welfare.

The praise of the law cites it as a departure from the radical transformation of the same area by the claimed and even to concern such changes in other areas of increasing and establishing private sector maternity leave within the region as the yardstick of maternity policies.

Placeholder

Essential Steps for Managing Financial and Living Arrangements Before Divorce in the UAE

If you're contemplating divorce in the UAE and need to address living arrangements and financial responsibilities before finalizing the process, it's essential to understand the legal framework and options available to you.

Creating a Legal Agreement

Before initiating divorce proceedings, you and your spouse can draft a legal agreement outlining how to manage shared expenses and living arrangements. This contract can include details on how you will handle rent, utilities, and other costs associated with your current residence.

According to UAE law, specifically Article 129 of Federal Law No. (5) of 1985 (Concerning the Issuance of the Civil Transactions Law), for a contract to be valid, it must meet certain criteria:

Mutual agreement on essential elements.

A clear and permissible subject matter.

A lawful purpose for the obligations outlined.

Additionally, Article 126 of the UAE Civil Transactions Law provides that a contract may pertain to various subjects, including property and services, as long as they are not prohibited by law or public morals.

Drafting the Agreement

In drafting this agreement, both parties should agree on the terms concerning future expenses and responsibilities. This contract will be crucial in clarifying each party's financial obligations and arrangements after the divorce.

Filing for Divorce

Once you and your spouse have agreed on the terms and signed the agreement, you can proceed with filing for a mutual consent divorce at the Personal Status Court with competent jurisdiction in the UAE. During the divorce process, you may submit this settlement agreement to the court for review.

The Personal Status Court will evaluate the agreement as part of the divorce proceedings, ensuring it aligns with the requirements set out in Federal Law No. 28 of 2005 on Personal Status. This step helps in formalizing your financial and living arrangements as part of the divorce settlement.

By taking these steps, you can effectively manage the division of living expenses and ensure a smoother transition during the divorce process.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels. 

Placeholder

Oman Set to Implement Income Tax, Impacting Over 600,000 Indians Working in the Country

Income tax has been a hot topic among Indians, particularly the 'Middle Class,' ever since the Union Budget was unveiled in July.

However, the impact of income tax may soon extend beyond India’s borders, as reports suggest that Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries could begin implementing income taxes, with Oman potentially leading the charge.

Oman may become the first GCC country -- encompassing Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Bahrain -- to impose income tax on its residents.

The Omani government is expected to levy a tax rate of 5 to 9 per cent on individuals earning more than Rs84 lakh annually.
This new tax policy could affect approximately 600,000 Indians living and working in Oman, many of whom send substantial remittances back to India, reportedly amounting to Rs27,000 crore.

This development comes as other Gulf nations, including Kuwait, are also considering ending their zero-income tax policies. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia and the UAE remain committed to maintaining their tax-free systems.

Changing Dynamics

The broader Indian diaspora across the Gulf region could face significant impacts if these tax changes take effect. According to Indian government data, 8.9 million Indians work in the GCC nations.

Historically, these petro-monarchies, bolstered by the oil boom, have operated welfare-oriented systems funded by state revenues, with minimal taxation.

However, the landscape is shifting. With dwindling oil reserves and reduced reliance on petroleum products—partly due to the global push for green energy—Gulf nations are increasingly seeking alternative revenue sources to sustain their economies.

In addition to expanding business and tourism sectors, taxing goods has emerged as a strategy to keep their economies afloat.
Saudi Arabia currently imposes a 15 per cent Value Added Tax (VAT) on most goods, a trend that could extend to further taxation measures, potentially impacting the Indian immigrant workforce in the region.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels. 

Placeholder

Saudi Ministry Inspections Reveal Non-Compliance with Labour Law by 107,329 Companies

A total of 107,329 establishments were found to be non-compliant with various provisions of the Labour Law during inspections conducted by officials from the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Development.

Since the start of 2024 up to mid-July, the ministry’s teams have inspected over 700,200 private sector firms across the Kingdom.

This initiative forms part of the Ministry’s continued efforts to regulate and monitor the labour market, ensuring compliance with Labour Law regulations, according to the Saudi Press Agency.

Violations included issues related to salary payments and Saudisation. Specifically, 59,891 employers were found to have failed to increase wages as mandated by the ministry, while 16,295 cases involved employees who had not received their salaries.

Additionally, there were 7,662 instances of foreigners being employed in roles reserved exclusively for Saudi nationals.

The Ministry has issued 88,776 warnings to establishments in breach of the law. Efforts have been intensified to ensure compliance with job localisation decisions during visits to 522,092 establishments.

These visits resulted in 9,712 job opportunities for Saudi citizens and helped achieve targeted localisation rates in several sectors.

The proportion of establishments adhering to Saudisation requirements has risen to 93.5 per cent. In collaboration with relevant authorities, the monitoring teams conducted 840 visits to petrol stations and service centres throughout the Kingdom.

The Ministry has reported that inspections are ongoing across all regions and governorates of the Kingdom. It has encouraged individuals to report any violations by calling the unified number 19911 or by using the Ministry’s smartphone application.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels. 

Placeholder

Securing a UK Visit Visa from the UAE: All You Need to Know About the Process and Costs

The UK remains a popular summer destination for UAE residents seeking respite from the intense heat.

The cooler, cloudier weather provides a refreshing contrast to the UAE's sun-drenched climate, and the relatively short flight adds to its appeal.

For UAE nationals, the ETA offers a quick, digital application process through a mobile app, with swift decision-making. However, other nationalities residing in the UAE will still need to apply for a visa. Here’s how to apply:

Determine the Visa Type: Identify the type of visa you need. The most common for short visits is the 'Standard Visitor Visa', though there are various categories depending on your purpose and duration of stay.

Gather Documentation: Collect the required documents based on your visa type.

Apply Online: Submit your application through the official UK Government website (www.gov.uk).

Pay the Fee: Pay the visa fee online. After payment, you'll receive a reference number for your application.

Upload Documents: Submit all necessary documents online with your application.

Book an Appointment: Schedule a visit to your nearest VFS Application Centre to provide biometric data.

Receive a Decision: You’ll be notified of your visa status. If approved, you can collect your passport from the VFS Centre or choose to have it delivered for an additional courier fee.

Cost: The 'Standard Visitor Visa' costs £115 (approximately Dh 554) for stays of up to six months.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Simple Steps to Verify Saudi Arabia Visit/Residency Visa Status Online Using Your Passport Number

Placeholder

What Non-British Expatriates Need to Know Before Purchasing Real Estate in the UK

If you're not a British citizen and are wondering whether you can own property in the UK, the answer is yes. Non-residents can buy property in the UK, regardless of their place of residence.

Many expatriates dream of owning property in the UK, whether they are investing, seeking a vacation home, or planning for future needs.

While purchasing property in the UK is generally straightforward, it can be easier if you're a cash buyer, as this avoids the complexities of obtaining a mortgage. If you need to finance your purchase with a loan, the process may be more complicated.

Let’s delve into how buying on loan might impact your property acquisition.

Loan Obstacles

While purchasing UK property is generally easy, it has not always been easy for those living overseas. Non-UK citizens often face difficulties securing loans to buy property (mortgages) in the UK due to factors such as receiving salaries in foreign currency, lacking a UK credit history, or encountering strict lending criteria from many high street lenders.

Additionally, obtaining a mortgage requires substantial paperwork, including three months of bank statements, payslips, identification, and proof of address.

For a non-UK resident expat living thousands of miles away, with no realistic way of meeting a local mortgage broker, these requirements can make the process challenging.

There have been instances where mortgage lenders were hesitant to lend to overseas borrowers due to the additional work involved.

Moreover, Banks are concerned about the risk each borrower poses and the likelihood of losing money if they approve a loan. When a customer resides in the UK, it is easier for banks to locate them or their property if necessary.

However, if the borrower lives abroad, the bank must deal with another country’s legal system, making it more challenging to resolve lending issues. For many banks, this complexity has been enough to avoid offering mortgages to expats altogether.

Changed Scenario

However, this situation has changed. Over the past decade, a growing number of UK lenders have specialised in offering mortgages and short-term finance tailored specifically for non-UK citizens buying or refinancing UK property.

These lenders have addressed some of the biggest challenges expats face, such as the inability to meet banks or brokers in person, difficulties in returning documentation to the UK, and ensuring all parties in the transaction are aligned.

To verify that your mortgage lender is accredited and licensed, you can check the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) registry (https://register.fca.org.uk/).

Most lenders now eliminate the need for clients to be in the UK, with all communication conducted via email, phone, or video call. They also work with lenders who accept online payslips, online bank statements, and ID certified by someone in your country, which can then be couriered to the UK.

Clients are assigned specialists who provide regular updates. These lenders also connect clients with solicitors, surveyors, and property professionals to expedite the loan process.These UK-based financiers offer mortgages and short-term finance ranging from £250,000 to £100 million, with terms from 3 months to 30 years.

Loans

There are various types of loans available, but the most popular among expats are residential and buy-to-let mortgages. If you or a family member plans to live in the property, you will need a residential mortgage. Otherwise, if the property is intended for rental, you will require a buy-to-let mortgage.

Residential mortgages are the largest and most common form of credit in the UK, enabling millions to purchase homes. The average home in the UK currently costs around £234,000, with significant regional variations. For instance, in London, the average is over £400,000.

Unless you are fortunate enough to have hundreds of thousands of pounds in savings, you will need to borrow a significant sum of money. This is where a residential mortgage comes in.

Residential Mortgages

A residential mortgage is a large, long-term loan taken out by one or more individuals to buy a home to live in. The property must be used as a residence by the borrowers, not rented out or used for commercial purposes.

Residential mortgages are regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which guarantees consumer rights across the UK. However, because residential mortgage providers must be FCA-accredited, not every lender offers these products. Nonetheless, some mainstream lenders are keen to offer mortgage products to overseas customers.

Although options may be limited due to FCA requirements, expats still have access to reliable and competitive lenders in the mortgage market. Specialist mortgage brokers can also help source the best products for both British and non-British expatriates.

Buy-to-Let Mortgages

A buy-to-let mortgage is a secured loan for individuals who wish to buy property to rent out to tenants. These mortgages have become increasingly popular among expats, allowing them to retain potentially valuable UK real estate for future use or sale, while the rental income often covers the mortgage costs.

Buy-to-let investments are ideal for expats who want to keep their options open, explaining their continued popularity.
Buy-to-let mortgages are generally more expensive than residential mortgages, even for UK customers.

They usually require a larger deposit and incur a higher interest rate, as lenders seek extra security against potential periods without tenants or non-payment of rent, which could lead to missed mortgage payments.

Recent Changes

The UK government recently increased Stamp Duty for buy-to-let properties by 3 per cent and reduced tax relief for landlords. Certain types of buy-to-let mortgages are complex, and expats need to fully understand the requirements to secure the best deal.

FCA Certification

Banks need FCA certification to provide residential mortgage loans, but most banks large enough to be FCA-accredited focus primarily on their UK customers, not overseas ones.

Taxes

First-time buyers purchasing a buy-to-let property will not have to pay the buy-to-let stamp duty rates if they intend to live in the property. However, overseas buyers looking solely to invest and rent out will be subject to an additional 2 per cent stamp duty.

Previously, overseas buyers were subject to the same stamp duty rates as UK residents. Now, anyone buying a property costing more than £125,000, who is not a first-time buyer, must pay stamp duty. With more taxes on the horizon, now might be an ideal time to invest.

Types of Interest Rates

Interest-only: Payments cover only the interest for a set period, with the principal repaid later.

Compound Interest (Rolled-up): Interest calculated on the accumulated interest and the principal.

Fixed Interest Rate: The interest rate remains constant for the loan term.

Tracker Interest: Pegged to the Bank of England’s base rate plus a pre-agreed charge.

Variable Interest Rate: The lender can adjust the interest rate, affecting mortgage costs.

Understanding these terms and options will help you navigate the UK property market effectively.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

184 Foreign Companies Shift Regional Headquarters to Saudi Arabia in First Half of 2024

In the first half of 2024, 184 foreign companies relocated their regional headquarters to Saudi Arabia following the acquisition of investment licences, as reported by the Ministry of Investment of Saudi Arabia (MISA).

This surge is attributed to the Kingdom's relentless efforts to enhance the investment environment and improve the investor experience.

During the second quarter of 2024, 57 companies secured investment licences to relocate their regional headquarters to Saudi Arabia, marking an 84 per cent increase compared to the same period in 2023.

This follows 127 licences issued in the first quarter, bringing the total to 184 licences for the first half of the year, according to the “Saudi Economy and Investment Monitor” report for the second quarter of 2024.

Additionally, MISA processed 4,709 applications for ‘Investor Visit’ visas, which facilitate visits for investors from outside the Kingdom to explore opportunities. The ministry also addressed 38 investor challenges, including legislative and procedural issues.

The report highlights a 49.6 per cent increase in issued investment licences, reaching 2,728 compared to 1,824 in the same period last year. This figure excludes licences granted under the campaign to correct the status of violators of the Anti-Commercial Cover-Up Law, as reported by Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper.

Investment licences were predominantly issued in the sectors of construction, manufacturing, professional, educational and technical activities, information and communications, accommodation and food services and wholesale and retail trade.

Mining and quarrying saw the most significant growth in licence issuance during the second quarter, with a 209.1 per cent increase compared to the previous year. This was followed by other services and activities, with growth rates of 110.5 per cent and 96.3 per cent, respectively.

The report also outlines key initiatives to support investment in the second quarter of 2024. Notably, the Ministry of Economy and Planning launched the “Sustainability Pioneers” programme in Riyadh, aimed at advancing sustainability across the country by fostering cooperation between leading companies in vital sectors.

This initiative is integral to the Kingdom’s comprehensive strategy for addressing environmental challenges and accelerating its transition to a green economy in line with Saudi Vision 2030.

The Sustainability Pioneers programme underscores the importance of public-private sector collaboration in achieving global sustainability and environmental protection goals.

Additionally, the Fashion Commission, in collaboration with the “Mohammed bin Salman Non-Profit City” (Misk City), launched “The Lab” initiative in Riyadh.

This first-of-its-kind studio in the Kingdom aims to advance the fashion industry by offering designers training and resources to streamline the manufacturing process, enhance investment opportunities, and ensure industry prosperity.
The report also highlights the recent establishment of the Saudi-British Strategic Partnership Council, designed to strengthen mutual economic partnerships in 13 key sectors.

This forum facilitates the exchange of expertise and review of best practices in priority areas, aiming to boost trade exchange and enhance collaboration between the two countries.

In November 2024, the Saudi Investment Marketing Authority will host the 28th World Investment Conference in Riyadh, in partnership with the World Association of Investment Promotion Agencies, reflecting the Kingdom’s commitment to leading digital transformation, sustainability, and global cooperation.

The report touches on advancements in the education sector, a key component of the country's strategy for sustainable development.

Notable achievements include attracting foreign investments in 13 private-public education companies, allowing distinguished international universities to establish branches in the Kingdom, and encouraging investment in university education.

The report also notes the forthcoming opening of additional international universities. Among the achievements, four Saudi universities have been recognised for their high number of patents, enhancing the Kingdom’s global competitiveness.

Furthermore, eight international schools have recently been established in Riyadh, including Beach Hall, King’s College, One World International, Downe House, Aldenham, SEK, Packwood and RGS international schools.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Saudi Arabia: SR1,000 Fine for Delayed ID Renewal; Renewal Procedures, Conditions Explained

The Saudi General Directorate of Passports has announced that expatriates who fail to renew their IDs on time will face a fine three days after the ID expires.

For a first-time delay, a fine of SR500 will be applied. Should the renewal be delayed again, the penalty will increase to SR1,000. To simplify the renewal process, residents can use the Absher platform, which allows for electronic renewal of resident IDs for family members or domestic workers.

To renew an ID via Absher, users must log in to the Absher Individuals platform with their username or ID number and password. After receiving a verification text message on their registered mobile number, they can access the main page of Absher services.

From there, navigate to e-services, select Sponsor Services, and choose “Iqama Renewal” from the list. After reviewing the service instructions, users can select the individual whose residency or ID is to be renewed, confirm the details, and complete the renewal process.

Conditions

To process the renewal, several conditions must be met:

Payment of the required fees for the desired period.

Absence of unpaid traffic violations registered against the beneficiary.

Verification that the beneficiary’s passport is valid.

Confirmation that the beneficiary is not listed as absent from work.

Registration of the beneficiary’s fingerprint and photo, as well as those of any family members aged over 6 years, in the system.

Each family member must have their own passport; no family members should be included in the beneficiary’s passport.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Kerala High Court to Review Unredacted Hema Committee Report Exposing Sexual Offences

The Kerala High Court has requested an unredacted version of the Justice Hema Committee Report on the working conditions of women in the film industry, to assess whether any findings warrant criminal investigation.

The Bench, led by Acting Chief Justice A. Muhamed Mustaque, has ordered the State to submit a complete, unredacted copy of the report to the Court in a sealed cover.

The Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition calling for criminal action against individuals accused of sexual offences as identified in the report, which was publicly released in a redacted form earlier this week (on August 19).

The Court expressed concerns about how to approach the matter, particularly in light of the vulnerable witnesses who provided testimony to the Committee regarding the sexual harassment and abuse they experienced.

These testimonies were recorded under assurances of confidentiality, the Court noted.
"We understand the petitioners' predicament. Should we summon the records?

The witnesses who have come forward belong to vulnerable sections of society and cannot seek help elsewhere. What do you propose we do?

If these individuals were capable of filing complaints, they would have approached the police; instead, they confided in the Committee. What can be done now to ensure their efforts are not in vain?" the Court asked.

The petition was filed by Navas A, also known as Paichira Navas. He urged the Court to direct the Director General of Police (DGP) to initiate criminal proceedings based on the findings of the Justice Hema Committee Report, arguing that the State has a duty to prosecute those who have committed cognisable offences.

The Justice K. Hema Committee was established by the Kerala government in 2017 following a petition by the 'Women in Cinema Collective' to investigate the issues faced by women in the film industry. The Committee submitted its findings to the State in 2019.

The State Information Commission (SIC) later permitted certain parties, including journalists, to access the report after redacting personal information to protect the privacy of witnesses.
The report was released on August 19, following two unsuccessful court challenges to prevent its publication.

The counsel representing Navas asserted that the information disclosed in the Justice Hema Committee Report is sufficient to justify criminal action against several perpetrators.

However, Advocate General Gopalakrishna Kurup countered that the report was compiled as a confidential study, not a judicial inquiry.

He emphasised that the identities of the victims were protected and that those wishing to file complaints could do so directly with the police or other authorities.

Kurup clarified that the Committee was primarily tasked with studying the challenges faced by women in the film industry and recommending measures to mitigate those issues.

He added that the government might consider further action based on a review of the unredacted parts of the report.

The Court noted that the government had been unable to act against the alleged perpetrators due to the absence of formal complaints but acknowledged that the report revealed instances of sexual exploitation and harassment requiring intervention.

The Court questioned whether criminal action could be initiated based on the Committee's findings if a cognisable offence is disclosed, given the broader societal impact of the allegations.

"If someone reports being sexually abused or assaulted but does not wish to disclose the details or expose the incident, what can be done? It is not merely a personal issue; it affects society at large," the Court remarked.

The Court also addressed the challenge of maintaining witness anonymity while ensuring justice is served, pointing out that some witnesses might be reluctant to come forward to prosecute the offenders.

Nevertheless, the Court admitted the PIL and directed the government to submit a statement on the matter, along with a copy of the unredacted report in a sealed cover. The case is scheduled for further hearing on September 10, 2024.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder
Placeholder

End of a Highly Publicised Hollywood Romance: Jennifer Lopez, Ben Affleck to Divorce

Jennifer Lopez has filed for divorce from Ben Affleck, US media reported, two years after the Hollywood power couple officially gave love a second chance by tying the knot.

The pair, who were nicknamed "Bennifer" when they first dated in the frenzied tabloid celebrity days of the early 2000s, had rekindled their relationship almost two decades later.

But Lopez filed divorce papers at a Los Angeles court on Tuesday, Hollywood trade outlet Variety and celebrity gossip website TMZ reported.

It was the fourth marriage for pop singer-turned-actress Lopez, 55, and the second for Oscar-winning movie star and director Affleck, 52.

The pair first met in 2002 on the set of the widely panned film "Gigli." They became a media sensation as they started dating and announced their engagement.

However, they postponed their planned 2003 nuptials and announced their relationship was over in early 2004.

"Bennifer" set the internet alight again in 2021 when photos of them together began circulating.
"It's a beautiful love story that we got a second chance," Lopez said in an interview around that time.

Lopez and Affleck announced their engagement in April 2022, and the A-list couple wed in Las Vegas in July.

They made it official again the following month in a lavish ceremony at the "Good Will Hunting" star's 87-acre (35-hectare) estate in the southeastern US state of Georgia. Among the Hollywood types in attendance at the three-day affair were longtime Affleck pal Matt Damon and director Kevin Smith.

The couple reportedly bought a $60 million home together in Los Angeles last year.
However, rumours of marital troubles emerged in the entertainment press and on social media earlier this year.

Fans noted that Lopez celebrated her 55th birthday without her husband last month, and TMZ reported that they had sold their joint home, with Affleck moving into a luxury bachelor pad.

People magazine said relations became strained due to their different approaches to celebrity. "She likes to open her heart to her fans and to the world," the magazine quoted an unnamed source as saying. "He is more introspective and private. This has been difficult day-to-day."

Divorce papers listed the couple's date of separation as April 26, 2024, according to TMZ, which said the pair are no longer on speaking terms.

Lopez was previously married to actor Ojani Noa, dancer Cris Judd, and singer Marc Anthony, with whom she shares twins Max and Emme. Affleck was married to actress Jennifer Garner, and they are the parents of Violet, Seraphina, and Samuel.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Essential Guide for Newcomers: How to Carry Your Resident ID Iqama Digitally in Saudi Arabia

If you’ve recently relocated to Saudi Arabia, carrying your resident ID, or Iqama, is essential.

Issued by the Saudi Ministry of Interior, this card contains crucial details about your identity and residency.

While the card primarily features Arabic, your name and Iqama number are also displayed in English.

In 2023, the General Directorate of Passports (Jawazat) announced that a digital version of your Iqama on your smartphone is sufficient, eliminating the need to carry a physical card.

This update applies to expatriates, their dependents, and foreign workers with recent Iqama renewals

How to Obtain Your Digital Iqama

You can access a digital copy of your Iqama through the Ministry of Interior’s Absher platform, available in two ways:

Via the Absher App

* Download the Absher app, available for Apple, Android, and Huawei devices.

* Log in using your Absher credentials. If you don’t have an account, click here to create one.

* Tap on ‘My Services’ at the bottom menu.

* Select ‘Activate Digital ID.

* Review the details of your resident ID and choose ‘Activate Digital ID.’

* A QR code will be generated, which can be scanned by officials to verify your ID.

Via the Absher Website

* Visit absher.sa.

* Log in with your username and password.

* Enter the verification code sent to your registered mobile number.

* Click on the menu next to your profile picture and select ‘View Digital Documents.’

* Find the option for your resident ID or Iqama, and save the digital copy to your phone.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Abu Dhabi Unveils First Official Rental Index: How to Access Current Rates in the Capital

Abu Dhabi has introduced its inaugural official rental index for the capital, launched on Tuesday by the Abu Dhabi Real Estate Centre (ADREC), the city’s real estate sector regulator.

This new platform is designed to boost market transparency, offer indicative rental values, and support the stability of Abu Dhabi’s expanding real estate market.

It provides quarterly rental price estimates for various property types across the city, including residential, commercial and industrial spaces.

The user-friendly platform allows residents to select any area within Abu Dhabi to view rental prices for different property types. Access is available through the Abu Dhabi Real Estate website.

To obtain detailed information, users must first choose their municipality -- Dhafra, Abu Dhabi City, or Al Ain City. They can then select their desired zone and sector.

The index will then display transparent pricing information for properties in that area, ranging from apartments to villas, including details on the number of bedrooms and associated costs.

Additionally, the portal features an interactive map for easy navigation and selection of localities.
According to Abu Dhabi's media office, the rental index reflects ADREC’s commitment to improving customer satisfaction in the real estate sector and delivering value to investors, property owners and tenants alike.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Abu Dhabi’s Forensic Science Centre Secures Prestigious International Accreditation

The Centre for Forensic and Electronic Sciences of the Abu Dhabi Judicial Department has been awarded international accreditation from the National Organisation of Forensic Physicians (NAME) for its Forensic Medicine Department.

This achievement makes the Centre the first in the Middle East and only the third globally, outside the United States, following Canada and Singapore, to receive this prestigious certification.

Counsellor Yousef Saeed Al Abri, Undersecretary of the Abu Dhabi Judicial Department, highlighted that this international accreditation represents a significant milestone for the Judicial Department.

Counsellor Al Abri noted that this remarkable achievement underscores the Centre’s leadership and excellence in providing forensic services according to the highest international standards.

It also demonstrates the Centre's commitment to staying abreast of the latest advancements in forensic examinations, thereby advancing criminal justice.

Furthermore, he stated that the Abu Dhabi Judicial Department's technical reports are now given precedence on the global stage.

He explained that the international accreditation adds to the Centre’s existing certifications in criminal and electronic evidence examinations and renews the chemical laboratory’s accreditation for a second term.

This renewal, initially granted in 2019, covers the examination of narcotics, toxins and seized items.
Counsellor Al Abri emphasised the Centre's dedication to implementing technical protocols in line with international standards and incorporating additional guidelines from NAME.

This commitment was evident in the Centre’s evaluation, which confirmed its adherence to all requirements necessary for obtaining international accreditation.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder
Placeholder

How to Secure a Social Care Professional Licence in Sharjah, Dubai and Abu Dhabi

Are you a psychologist from your home country looking to practise in the UAE? Or perhaps a current professional aiming to obtain a licence in another emirate?

To practise a social care profession in the UAE, you must be licensed by the relevant authority in each emirate.

This guide outlines the necessary documents, conditions and application steps for obtaining a licence in Sharjah, Dubai, and Abu Dhabi.

Sharjah

To practise a social care profession in Sharjah, you need to apply for a licence from the Sharjah Social Services Department (SSSD). Applicants must have at least two years of experience in a social care profession. Practising without a licence in Sharjah could result in a fine of Dh5,000.

Eligible Professionals

* Social workers

* Counselling psychologists

* Psychotherapists

* School psychologists

* Marital-family psychologists

* Criminal psychologists

* Behavioural analysts

* Assistant behavioural analysts

* Behavioural analyst doctors

* Occupational therapists

* Special education teachers

Steps

* Apply online via the UAE Pass or visit a customer happiness centre with your Emirates ID.

* Submit your application along with the required documents.

* The administration will forward the application to a committee within 14 days.

* The committee will issue a decision within 14 days of receiving the application.

Required Documents

* Copy of valid passport, family book, and Emirates ID for Emiratis

* Copy of valid passport, residency proof, and Emirates ID for residents

* Copy of accredited academic qualifications

* Academic transcript

* Equivalency report for degrees obtained outside the UAE

* Certificates of experience from the last two years

* Verification report of qualifications and experience from Dataflow

* Good conduct certificate issued by relevant authorities

* Additional documents may be requested by the department

Further Conditions

* The applicant must have full legal capacity and no criminal record for crimes against honour or honesty.

* Non-citizens must hold a residence permit through their current employer.

* The applicant must pass an evaluation test, and non-citizens must complete a minimum five-hour course on UAE customs, traditions and culture.

Fees

* Licence application: Free

* Evaluation test: Dh1,000

* Social profession licence fee: Dh300

* Issuance of social profession licence card: Dh100

Dubai

To practise a social care profession in Dubai, you must apply for a licence (valid for two years) from the Community Development Authority (CDA). Applicants need at least one year of experience in a social care profession.

Eligible Professionals

* Social workers

* Social counselors

* Social therapists (behavioural analysts, assistant behavioural analysts, psychologists assistant psychologists)

* Special education teachers (including learning support teachers)

Steps

* Submit your application and documents via email to professional.licensing@cda.gov.ae.

* Obtain verification from Dataflow and then submit your application to the CDA.

* Take a professional licensing examination at the British University in Dubai.

* If applicable, complete an intensive training programme and obtain a certificate.

* A committee will review the application and, if approved, issue an initial approval.

* Submit an employment contract.

* Take the oath, and the licence will be sent to you via email.

Required Documents

* Passport copy

* CV

* Copy of highest academic degree

* CDA application form

* Letter of authorization

* Experience letter (last three years)

* Copy of professional licence (if available)

* Additional documents following training (e.g., Good Conduct Certificate, Dataflow report)

Further Conditions

* The applicant must be a UAE resident with full civil capacity.

* The applicant must have a clean criminal record for felonies or misdemeanours involving moral turpitude or dishonesty unless rehabilitated.

* Other requirements may apply as set by the authority.

Fees: The application service is free in Dubai.

Abu Dhabi

In Abu Dhabi, those wishing to practise a social care profession must apply for a licence (valid for one year) from the Abu Dhabi Department of Community Development. The application can be submitted via the TAMM website. The service is free of charge.

Steps

* Log in through UAE Pass.

* Submit the application with the required documents.

* Upon receiving preliminary approval, complete the specified procedures and pass a professional competency test at a certified centre.

* If the application is complete and the test result is favourable, you will be issued the licence.

Required Documents:

* Copy of valid passport (first two pages)

* Passport-sized photo

* Equivalency report for academic certificate from the Ministry of Education

* Attested educational certificate and transcript

* Introduction letter

* CV

* Experience certificate

* Good conduct certificate from the employer

* Police clearance certificate

* Local or international social care professional licences (if available)

* Valid residence permit (for non-citizens)

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

PwC Fined £15M for Failing to Report Suspected Fraud at London Capital & Finance

PwC, one of the Big Four accounting firms, has been fined £15 million by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for failing to report suspected fraud at London Capital & Finance (LCF).

This is the first time the FCA has issued a financial penalty against an audit firm. The FCA stated that PwC missed several audit red flags and failed to act promptly when they suspected fraudulent activity at LCF, a defunct financial services firm.

As LCF’s auditors, PwC was responsible for verifying the company’s accounts. During the audit, PwC encountered significant issues, including inaccurate and misleading information from LCF and aggressive behaviour from a senior employee towards the auditors.

Despite these concerns and a duty to report their suspicions to the FCA, PwC signed off on the accounts. Even after being satisfied with the accuracy of LCF's 2016 accounts, PwC still had an obligation to report earlier concerns, according to the FCA.

The FCA criticised PwC for not acting immediately, stating that their failure deprived the regulator of potentially crucial information.

LCF has been described by former investors as a Ponzi scheme and was condemned by the FCA for its "unfair and misleading" promotion of minibonds.

The firm entered administration in 2019 after the FCA ordered it to cease those promotions. Thousands of investors were misled and not fully informed of the product’s risks, according to the FCA.

A Serious Fraud Office criminal investigation into LCF's collapse is ongoing.
In response to the fine, PwC stated: "We have reached a settlement with the FCA to resolve an unintentional reporting breach."

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Two US Law Firms Stand to Earn Hundreds of Millions from $2.7 Billion NCAA Settlement

Two prominent US law firms stand to earn hundreds of millions of pounds after negotiating a $2.7 billion settlement with the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), which will allow student athletes to receive payments for the first time.

However, they must first convince a judge to approve the landmark deal and the unconventional, multi-faceted fee structure they have proposed.

The firms have until Friday to address objections from student groups regarding the July settlement, and further litigation is anticipated once they provide additional details about their fee request.

The settlement aims to resolve antitrust lawsuits concerning the NCAA's long-standing prohibitions on payments to athletes. This includes restrictions on compensation related to competing, the commercial use of players' names, images, and likenesses, and payments tied to athletes' academic achievements.

The firms leading the litigation, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro and Winston & Strawn, have informed US District Judge Claudia Wilken in Oakland, California, that the settlement's total value exceeds $20 billion, primarily based on the future earnings of student athletes.

The firms' share of these future payments could significantly impact their earnings, potentially adding $200 million or more to their fees.

The Fees

The plaintiffs' lawyers, led by Steve Berman of Hagens Berman and Winston's Jeffrey Kessler, have stated in court documents that they have invested over 72,000 hours into the cases since 2020.

Initially, they will request a $20 million upfront payment for their work, to be divided equally between the firms, according to Berman.

Additionally, they plan to seek up to $495.2 million, based on a percentage of the settlement funds the NCAA has agreed to pay over the next decade.

This includes 20 per cent of $1.976 billion allocated for college athletes who were previously denied compensation for the use of their names, images, and likenesses, as well as for their athletic service.

A unique aspect of their fee request is the potential for the lawyers to claim an annual percentage of the compensation that schools will now be permitted to pay student athletes, ranging from 0.75 per cent to 1.25 per cent of the NCAA schools' sporting revenues over ten years.

This pool is estimated to be worth around $20 billion over the decade, potentially leading to legal fees as high as $250 million.

Both Berman and Kessler have defended these ongoing fees as reasonable given the settlement's scale and historic significance.

"Frankly, I think it is an extremely modest request considering the case law and the value to the class," Kessler remarked. He noted that each annual fee would require court approval.

An NCAA spokesperson did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the fees. Last month, the organisation stated that the settlement offered a sustainable path to enhanced benefits for student athletes.

Regarding the fee provisions, Berman emphasised their focus on addressing the objections and securing the judge’s preliminary approval for the settlement. "My parents always taught me not to count your chickens before they hatch," Berman said in an email.

One group challenging the proposed NCAA settlement has argued that the deal favours male athletes. They also objected to the $20 million upfront fee request, describing it as a "classic 'clear sailing provision' that raises questions about what the class counsel might have conceded to secure it."

The MoloLamken attorneys who filed the objection did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Other objections claim the settlement would unfairly shield the NCAA from separate antitrust lawsuits.

Kessler dismissed the objection to the $20 million fee as "insulting," asserting it was only negotiated after all other settlement terms had been agreed upon. "We stand by our record for what we’ve done for athletes," he added.

Other Legal Fee News

The Delaware Supreme Court upheld a $267 million fee award for five law firms that secured a $1 billion settlement for Dell Technologies shareholders.

The court determined that this near-record award was not an improper windfall for the firms representing the plaintiffs: Labaton Sucharow; Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan; Andrews & Springer; Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd; and Friedman Oster & Tejtel.

Attorneys negotiating a proposed settlement with seafood giant StarKist, its parent Dongwon Industries and private equity firm Lion Capital have announced they will seek just over $50 million in legal fees.

This proposed fee award for the law firm Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz accounts for two class action settlements: Tuesday's proposed $136 million deal and a 2022 settlement with Chicken of the Sea and its parent Thai Union Group, worth $16 million.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Saudi Arabia to Continue Covering Expatriate Fees in Industrial Sector Until End of Next Year

Saudi Arabia has announced an extension of the state's coverage of fees for expatriates working in the industrial sector until December 31, 2025.

The decision was made during the weekly session of the Council of Ministers, chaired by Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman in Jeddah earlier this week.

This Cabinet decision follows the expiration of the previous five-year waiver on expatriate fees for industrial workers.

In 2019, as part of a broader initiative to boost job creation, the Saudi government introduced fees on expatriate workers to encourage the employment of Saudi nationals.

However, the government later waived these fees for expatriates in the industrial sector, effective from October 1, 2019, as part of short-term measures to stimulate industrial investment and support the objectives of Vision 2030.

At the beginning of the session, the Cabinet was briefed on a message from the President of Senegal to the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Salman, and on the meeting between the Crown Prince and the Speaker of the Arab Parliament.

During the meeting, the Speaker awarded the Crown Prince the Leader's Medal in recognition of his leadership in supporting Arab causes and fostering joint Arab action.

In a statement to the Saudi Press Agency following the session, the Minister of Human Resources and Social Development, who is also the Acting Minister of Media, Eng. Ahmed Al-Rajhi, praised the efforts and contributions of the Arab Parliament on the international stage.

The Cabinet underscored the Kingdom's commitment to enhancing cooperation with its Arab counterparts across various sectors to bolster security, stability, and sustainable development.

The Council also discussed recent regional and international developments, reaffirming the Kingdom's support for efforts to secure a ceasefire in Gaza and highlighting the importance of ending the Israeli occupation to achieve peace and restore the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people.

Domestically, the Cabinet emphasised the Kingdom's ongoing initiatives for global sustainability and environmental conservation, which include expanding royal reserves, with a strategic focus on wildlife protection, afforestation, and the promotion of ecotourism.

The Cabinet passed several resolutions, including the approval of an agreement between Saudi Arabia and Uzbekistan for the mutual exemption of short-stay visas for holders of diplomatic and special passports.

It also approved a memorandum of understanding (MoU) for cultural cooperation between the Saudi Ministry of Culture and the Chinese Ministry of Culture and Tourism, along with an MoU for collaboration between the Saudi Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Justice of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China.

Additional MoUs endorsed by the Cabinet include agreements on road safety, maintenance and the future of transportation between the Saudi Ministry of Transport and Logistics and the Bahraini Ministries of Works, Transportation and Telecommunications, as well as an MoU for tourism cooperation between the Saudi Tourism Authority and Switzerland Tourism.

Furthermore, the Cabinet authorised the Minister of Education, who also chairs the Board of Directors of the Technical and Vocational Training Corporation, or his deputy, to negotiate and sign a draft MoU with the Statistical, Economic and Social Research and Training Centre for Islamic Countries (SESRIC), an affiliate of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, in the field of technical and vocational training.

The Cabinet also approved a memorandum of cooperation in the areas of predicate offences, terrorism and its financing, and money laundering between the Saudi Public Prosecution and its Yemeni counterpart.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

California Judge Allows Visual Artists' Copyright Claims to Proceed Against AI Firms

A group of visual artists can continue to pursue some claims that Stability AI, Midjourney, DeviantArt, and Runway AI's artificial intelligence-based image generation systems infringe their copyrights, a California federal judge has ruled.

US District Judge William Orrick said the artists had plausibly argued that the companies violated their rights by illegally storing their works on their systems.

Orrick also refused to dismiss related trademark-law claims, although he dismissed others accusing the companies of unjust enrichment, breach of contract and violation of a separate US copyright law.

The decision did not address the artists' core claim that the alleged misuse of their work to train AI systems directly infringes their copyrights, or the key defence that AI companies make fair use of copyrighted material.

The artists' solicitors, Joseph Saveri and Matthew Butterick, said in a statement that the decision was "a significant step forward for the case."

Illustrators Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan and Karla Ortiz initially sued the companies last January in one of the first of several high-stakes lawsuits against tech companies over the use of copyrighted work in AI training. Orrick dismissed many of their allegations in October but allowed them to be refiled.

Andersen, McKernan, Ortiz, and seven other artists brought an amended complaint in November. They argued that Stability's Stable Diffusion model, utilised by all of the companies, unlawfully contains "compressed copies" of their works used to train it.

Orrick said in a tentative ruling in May that he was inclined to let the copyright allegations continue. He elaborated on Monday that the companies could not dismiss the claims at an early stage of the case.

"The plausible inferences at this juncture are that Stable Diffusion, by operation by end users, creates copyright infringement and was created to facilitate that infringement by design," Orrick said.

The case is Andersen v. Stability AI, US District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:23-cv-00201.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Over 5,500 Indian Expatriate Workers in the UAE Enrolled in New Life Protection Plan

More than 5,500 Indian expatriate workers in the UAE have enrolled in a new ‘Life Protection Plan’ that provides compensation of up to Dh75,000 for families in the event of the insured's death due to natural or accidental causes.

The Indian Consulate in Dubai announced this development, having facilitated the launch of the plan by two insurance companies in the UAE. The initiative aims to assist the families of blue-collar workers who previously lacked life insurance coverage.

“In line with the Consulate’s ongoing efforts to enhance the living conditions and employment terms of Indian workers in the UAE, we facilitated the introduction of the Life Protection Plan in March 2024,” the Consulate stated in a press statement.

“We are pleased to report that over 5,500 workers have already benefited from this welfare scheme,” the statement added.

The insurance scheme offers financial support to the family of the deceased in cases of natural or accidental death, as well as repatriation of the mortal remains.

The mission explained that it worked with the two insurance companies and major employers in the UAE to develop this plan after noting that natural deaths of Indian blue-collar workers were not covered under existing insurance policies.

With approximately 3.5 million Indians living in the UAE, of which around 65 per cent are blue-collar workers, this group represents one of the largest migrant worker populations in the country, according to the consulate.

In the absence of mandatory insurance for natural deaths, the mission highlighted that the legal heirs or dependents of deceased employees did not receive compensation in such cases.

To address this issue, the consulate facilitated a meeting between major companies employing Indian blue-collar workers and insurance providers Gargash Insurance Services LLC and Orient Insurance PJSC to create a comprehensive insurance package covering both natural and accidental deaths.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

UAE Govt Issues Federal Decree-Law Amending Some Provisions of Domestic Workers Law

The UAE Government has issued a Federal Decree-Law amending specific provisions of the Federal Decree-Law Concerning Domestic Workers and its Amendments.

These amendments aim to strengthen the rights of all parties involved in employment relationships, as well as facilitate and accelerate the resolution of disputes.

The new decree amends the jurisdiction for disputes related to domestic workers, transferring such cases from the Court of Appeal to the Court of First Instance.

The Courts of Appeal are required to transfer all pending applications, disputes and grievances to the Court of First Instance as they are, without any fees, effective from the date this Law takes effect.

This does not apply to cases that have already been adjudicated or are in the court's pipeline for adjudication.

The Law stipulates that if a dispute arises between the employer, the domestic worker, or the recruitment company and cannot be resolved amicably, the issue must be referred to the Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratisation.

The Ministry is empowered to take the appropriate measures to settle the dispute amicably, in line with the procedures set out in this Law's Executive Regulations and effective decisions.

If an amicable settlement is not reached within the designated timeframe, the Ministry must refer the dispute to the competent Court of First Instance.

This referral shall include a memorandum summarising the dispute, the arguments of both parties and the Ministry's recommendations.

The Ministry is also entitled to resolve disputes if the claim's total amount does not exceed Dh50,000 or if the dispute involves one of the parties' non-compliance with a prior amicable settlement decision issued by the Ministry, regardless of the claim's amount.

The Ministry's decision in such cases shall have the effect of an executive instrument and be treated as an enforcement order according to standard procedures.

Any party to the dispute may file -- within 15 working days of being notified -- a lawsuit with the competent Court of First Instance to contest the Ministry's decision.

The ruling of the Court of First Instance in this case is final, and filing a lawsuit will suspend the enforcement of the Ministry's decision.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Ex-ISI Chief Faiz Hameed Under Military Custody, Court-Martial Proceedings Commence

Former head of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Faiz Hameed, has been detained by the country’s military in connection with a housing scheme scandal.

In a statement, the public relations wing of the Pakistan Army stated: "In compliance with the orders of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, a detailed court of inquiry was conducted by the Pakistan Army to verify the legitimacy of the complaints in the Top City case against Lt Gen Faiz Hameed (Retd).

Consequently, appropriate disciplinary action has been initiated against Lt Gen Faiz Hameed (Retd) under the provisions of the Pakistan Army Act."

The statement added: "Additionally, several instances of violation of the Pakistan Army Act following his retirement have also been confirmed. The process of a Field General Court Martial has been initiated, and Lt Gen Faiz Hameed (Retd) has been taken into military custody."

Top City, a private housing scheme in Pakistan, had accused Hameed of orchestrating a raid on the offices and residence of its owner, Moeez Khan.

According to a report, the Pakistan Army established an inquiry committee in April to investigate allegations of misuse of authority against Hameed.

The committee was formed after Pakistan's Supreme Court, in a November order last year, stated that the allegations of an “extremely serious nature” against Hameed “cannot be left unattended” as they would damage the reputation of the country’s institutions if proven true.

The Supreme Court further directed the owner of the housing society to approach the relevant authorities, including the Defence Ministry, to seek action against the former spymaster and his associates.

In March this year, a court in Rawalpindi remanded Najaf Hameed, brother of the former ISI chief, to jail on a 14-day judicial remand in connection with the case.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Saudi Arabia Revamps Investment Law to Simplify Processes, Boost Foreign Interest

Saudi Arabia has announced a major revision to its investment law as part of its Vision 2030 reform strategy, aiming to bolster its attractiveness to international investors.

The updated legislation consolidates existing investor rights and freedoms into a cohesive framework designed to enhance transparency and simplify business operations.

The new law offers improved protections for investors, including adherence to the rule of law, fair treatment and property rights, while providing strong safeguards for intellectual property and facilitating seamless fund transfers.

It simplifies the registration process by replacing complex licensing requirements with a more straightforward system and introduces new service centres to accelerate government transactions and investment procedures.

This update follows a series of pro-investment measures, including the implementation of the Civil Transactions Law, Private Sector Participation Law, Companies Law, Bankruptcy Law and the creation of Special Economic Zones.

Saudi Investment Minister Khalid Al-Falih stated: “The law reaffirms Saudi Arabia’s commitment to creating a welcoming and secure environment for investors, driving economic growth, and enhancing the Kingdom’s status as a leading global investment destination.”

He continued: “The policy direction outlined in Vision 2030 allows investors to invest with certainty and grow with confidence, even as many other markets face significant volatility.”

The law also seeks to foster a competitive market environment by promoting fair competition and ensuring equal treatment for both domestic and international investors.

It provides access to advanced dispute resolution mechanisms through the Saudi Arbitration Centre and other affiliated entities.

Saudi Arabia’s investment-friendly policies have already yielded notable results, with gross fixed capital formation rising by 74 per cent to nearly $300 billion in 2023, and FDI inflows increasing by 158 per cent from $7.46 billion in 2017 to $19.3 billion in 2023.

“The updated investment law builds on an extensive diversification agenda, from enhancing quality of life to investment-specific measures such as the establishment of special economic zones,” said Al-Falih.

Developed by the Ministry of Investment, the new regulations will take effect in 2025 and are designed to align with Gulf Cooperation Council and World Trade Organisation standards, as well as other international investment agreements.

In a comment on X, Saudi Finance Minister Mohammed Al-Jadaan described the revised law as a significant “update to the investment regulatory framework that contributes to private sector investment growth opportunities and a more competitive economy under Saudi Vision 2030.”

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder
Placeholder

Ministry of Economy Enhances Implementation of UAE’s Anti-Money laundering Regulations

The Ministry of Economy has affirmed its ongoing commitment to implementing the legislative and regulatory framework for anti-money laundering (AML) in the country, in accordance with international best practices.

Furthermore, the Ministry continues to monitor the Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions (DNFBP) sector to ensure the highest levels of compliance with the UAE’s AML/CFT legislation.

The Ministry explained that the implementation of the due diligence regulations for the responsible sourcing of gold is part of its role in overseeing the gold sector and the activities of the precious metals and gemstones trade and industry.

This is in line with the country's adherence to international standards, notably those of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

In this context, the Ministry noted that it has conducted a series of field inspection tours related to the trade of precious metals and gemstones, following a clear mechanism for both office and field inspections.

As a result of these inspections, operations at 32 gold refineries in the local market, representing five per cent of the country's gold sector, have been temporarily suspended for three months, from July 24 to October 24, 2024.

The Ministry reported that these refineries committed 256 offences, averaging eight violations per refinery.

The most notable offences included the failure to adopt necessary measures and procedures to identify risks, failure to notify the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of suspicious transactions where necessary, and the failure to verify customers' databases and transactions against names on terrorism lists.

Abdullah Ahmed Al Saleh, Undersecretary of the Ministry of Economy, stated: “The UAE reaffirms its commitment to developing a comprehensive legislative and regulatory system for anti-money laundering and achieving the highest levels of compliance with the due diligence regulations for the responsible sourcing of gold.”

He added: “The Ministry continues to strive to strengthen its supervisory role across various DNFBP sectors in the country, which include the operations of the precious metals and gemstones industry and their trade, the activities of real estate agents, company service providers, and auditors.

We are intensifying inspection campaigns to ensure the highest levels of compliance with the UAE’s AML/CFT law.”

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Abu Dhabi Police Warn Drivers to Relocate Broken-Down Vehicles or Face Heavy Penalties

Abu Dhabi Police has urged drivers to move broken-down vehicles to designated emergency areas or the nearest safe parking spots to maintain smooth traffic flow and ensure safety on the roads.

Mahmoud Al Balushi, director of the Traffic and Security Patrols Directorate at Abu Dhabi Police, stressed the importance of relocating vehicles that have broken down.

Drivers should either move their cars to emergency lanes or safe parking areas. If the car cannot be moved, it is essential to stop on the right side of the hard shoulder, activate hazard lights, and place reflective triangles at the rear of the vehicle to alert approaching drivers.

Drivers who fail to move their vehicles from the road face a fine of Dh1,000 and accumulate six black points on their driving licence.

If the vehicle cannot be relocated, it is crucial to call the emergency number 999 for immediate assistance and exit the vehicle to ensure personal safety. Non-compliance with these safety measures results in a Dh500 fine.

To avoid such situations, motorists are encouraged to perform regular checks on their vehicles, particularly during the summer months, to minimise the risk of breakdowns. Adhering to these safety protocols helps prevent accidents and maintains road safety for all users.

Abu Dhabi Police routinely share footage of road incidents to highlight the importance of following traffic rules and the consequences of not doing so.

Past campaigns have focused on minimising distractions, such as mobile phone use while driving, and ensuring drivers have sufficient time to respond to road conditions.

For minor accidents, drivers can now use the Saaed app to report incidents. After selecting the accident reporting service, users need to provide their phone numbers for location detection, upload relevant photos of the crash, and enter their license details.

The process, which should take no more than three minutes, generates a request number upon verification.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder
Placeholder

Engineer Sentenced to Six Months in Jail and Fined SR50,000 for Practicing Without Accreditation

An engineer in Riyadh has been sentenced to six months in prison and fined SR50,000 for practicing without the necessary professional accreditation.

Additionally, the company that employed the engineer has been fined SR100,000. The engineer and the company were found guilty of violating Article 11 of the Engineering Professions Law, which mandates that practitioners must have professional accreditation. The engineer was also convicted of misrepresenting his qualifications.

Eng. Abdul Mohsen Al-Majnouni, Secretary General of the Saudi Council of Engineers, reported that the violation was discovered during an inspection by the council's team.

Legal procedures were followed, and the case was referred to the Public Prosecution for further investigation and prosecution.

Eng. Al-Majnouni noted that over the past few months, the authority has identified several violations of the Engineering Professions Law. Thirty cases, involving 14 companies and various establishments, were referred to the Public Prosecution.

These violations included practicing without a license, employing unaccredited practitioners, and misleading advertising.

The authority also took action against eight engineering offices and companies for employing unaccredited practitioners and seized eight individuals of various nationalities for similar violations, including providing false information and misrepresenting professional qualifications.

Eng. Al-Majnouni emphasised the necessity of obtaining professional accreditation to practice engineering in the Kingdom and avoiding the use of titles and qualifications not officially recognised.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

US Federal Judge Indicts Man with Alleged Iranian Ties Over Foiled Assassination Plot

In a dramatic turn of events, the US Department of Justice announced the indictment of a man with alleged ties to Iran, accused of orchestrating a foiled assassination plot on American soil.

The suspect, identified as 45-year-old Mahmoud Reza Shakuri, is charged with conspiracy to commit murder, providing material support to a foreign terrorist organisation and other related offences.

Shakuri was apprehended in a coordinated operation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and other law enforcement agencies.

According to court documents, Shakuri, an Iranian national, was part of an elaborate scheme to assassinate a prominent US political figure, whose identity remains undisclosed for security reasons.

The indictment reveals that Shakuri had been in contact with operatives linked to the Quds Force, an elite unit of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The Quds Force is known for its involvement in extraterritorial operations, including alleged plots against dissidents and officials abroad.

Investigators uncovered evidence indicating that Shakuri had been planning the assassination for several months.

He allegedly recruited and paid individuals in the US to conduct surveillance on the target and gather intelligence to facilitate the attack. Shakuri was purportedly acting under direct orders from high-ranking officials within the IRGC.

Iran's government has denied any involvement in the plot, with a spokesperson from the Iranian Foreign Ministry calling the accusations "baseless" and "part of a smear campaign against Iran."

However, US officials remain resolute in their stance, emphasising the robust evidence collected through intensive intelligence operations.

Shakuri appeared before a federal magistrate judge in Washington, DC, where he was formally charged. He has been remanded in custody pending further legal proceedings. If convicted, Shakuri faces a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

The Justice Department has indicated that the investigation is ongoing and additional charges or arrests may follow as more information becomes available.

The foiled plot has prompted a significant response from law enforcement agencies nationwide. Enhanced security measures have been implemented to protect potential targets and prevent similar threats. The FBI has urged the public to remain vigilant and report any suspicious activity.

The case of Mahmoud Reza Shakuri highlights the ongoing challenges faced by the US in addressing foreign threats and maintaining national security.

As the legal process unfolds, the international community will be closely watching for further developments and their potential implications for US-Iran relations.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

GACA in Saudi Arabia Imposes SR4.5 Million in Penalties for Civil Aviation Law Violations

The General Authority of Civil Aviation (GACA) has levied fines totalling over SR4.5 million on various entities and individuals for breaching the Saudi Civil Aviation Law, its executive regulations and the authority's directives.

This information was outlined in GACA's second-quarter 2024 report, published by the committee overseeing violations of the Civil Aviation Law. The committee identified 111 violations, resulting in financial penalties exceeding SR4.5 million.

According to the report, 92 of these violations were against air carriers for infringing regulations related to passenger rights, with fines amounting to SR4.4 million.

Additionally, five violations were issued to air carriers for non-compliance with GACA’s regulations and directives, resulting in fines of SR140,000.

The committee also imposed fines of SR30,000 for two violations by licensed companies failing to adhere to the authority's instructions regarding their licensed activities.

Furthermore, the report disclosed that 12 violations were issued to individuals, including 10 observed on aircraft, with a total fine of SR3,900. Additionally, two violations related to the unauthorised use of drones attracted fines of SR10,000.

The authority emphasised that these legal actions are part of its commitment to transparency and clarity, reaffirming its dedication to its regulatory and supervisory role in the aviation sector, improving passenger experience and enhancing the quality of air transport services in the Kingdom.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Singapore and Saudi Arabia Sign Landmark Deal to Strengthen Judicial Cooperation

The Governments of Singapore and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to enhance legal and judicial cooperation between the two countries.

The MoU was signed by Singapore’s Minister for Home Affairs and Minister for Law K. Shanmugam and Saudi Arabia’s Minister of Justice, Dr Waleed Mohammed bin Al-Smani.

Also present to witness the signing were Minister of State for the Ministry of Law and Ministry of Transport Murali Pillai, Saudi Arabia’s Ambassador to Singapore Abdullah Mohammed AlMadhi and Saudi Arabia’s Deputy Minister of Justice for Laws and International Cooperation Dr Bashar Omar Al-Mofadda.

Under the MoU, both Singapore and Saudi Arabia agree to jointly promote international alternative dispute resolution and develop legal and judicial expertise.

The MoU establishes a framework for cooperation in several areas, including:

* Exchanging information, experiences, and international best practices;

* Facilitating exchanges of visits between experts and specialists from both countries; and

* Participating in conferences, seminars, meetings, training sessions and work sessions organised or hosted by Singapore and Saudi Arabia.

Minister Shanmugam stated: “Singapore and Saudi Arabia enjoy excellent bilateral ties, which were elevated to a strategic partnership last year. This MoU will further strengthen our collaboration.

We look forward to increased exchanges in the legal and judicial fields and working together to promote international alternative dispute resolution.”

Minister Shanmugam and Minister Waleed also discussed several topics, including efforts to develop a favourable legal environment to support businesses and enhance exchanges between officials and practitioners in areas such as arbitration.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Bangladeshis in UAE Urged to Adhere to Local Laws Following Sheikh Hasina's Resignation

Bangladeshi missions in the UAE have advised their compatriots to exercise "utmost restraint" and adhere to local laws.

This advisory is part of an awareness campaign led by the Bangladeshi embassy in Abu Dhabi and the consulate-general in Dubai to inform their citizens about local regulations.

On Monday, Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who had been in power for 15 years, resigned after protesters stormed her residence.

She fled to India, arriving at Hindon Air Base near New Delhi later that evening aboard a C-130 Hercules military transport aircraft.

Student activists had called for a march to the capital, Dhaka, on Monday, defying a nationwide curfew to demand Hasina's resignation. This came in the wake of deadly clashes across the country that resulted in nearly 100 deaths.

In a statement, the Bangladeshi missions urged all expatriate Bangladeshis in the UAE to "show utmost restraint, coexist peacefully and harmoniously, and comply with the laws and regulations of the host country."

The statement emphasised that, under UAE law, any form of assembly without prior authorisation, marching, chanting, video recording of such activities, or sharing them on social media is strictly prohibited.

Last month, some Bangladeshis violated local laws by protesting against Hasina's government in the UAE.

On July 22, three individuals were sentenced to life imprisonment for organising demonstrations and inciting riots. The court also sentenced 53 others to 10 years and one defendant to 11 years for illegal entry and participation in the protest.

The UAE is home to over one million Bangladeshi nationals who work across various sectors and contribute to both the UAE’s and Bangladesh’s development.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

UAE Visa Amnesty: Filipino Expatriates Cautioned About Fraudulent Registration Sites

The Philippine missions in the UAE have alerted their compatriots about fraudulent websites providing misleading information regarding the upcoming visa amnesty set to commence on September 1.

The Philippine Embassy has reported receiving concerning information about counterfeit text messages and emails containing links to sites masquerading as the official portal for amnesty registration.

The Embassy advises everyone to exercise caution when entering sensitive or personal information on dubious websites. It is recommended that personal details be shared only on verified sites.

The UAE Government has yet to release specifics on the two-month visa amnesty programme, according to the mission.

The Embassy reassured that it will maintain coordination with the Federal Authority for Identity, Citizenship, Customs and Port Security (ICP) and other relevant agencies. Official advisories and announcements will be shared with the public as soon as they are available.

During the previous amnesty in November 2018, the Philippine government allocated approximately Dh7.8 million for exit fees (Dh221 each), absconding case clearances (Dh521), and airfares (Dh1,500) for returning Filipinos.

Additionally, $100 (Dh365) was provided per person (excluding minors) as "humble welfare assistance."

Streamlined Process

Plans and procedures for the visa amnesty programme were discussed by immigration officials last week. Smart systems will be introduced to streamline the process.This will be the fourth amnesty programme conducted by the UAE government since 2007.

The previous amnesty – held six years ago – was initially scheduled for 90 days until October 31, 2018 but was extended by the federal government for an additional two months, until December 31 to give more residency violators the opportunity to regularise their status or leave the country without penalties.

In 2007, around 342,000 residents across the UAE took advantage of a two-month amnesty, and in 2012/2013, more than 60,000 migrants availed of the service nationwide.

In 2018, the GDRFA reported that 105,809 residence visa violators applied for amnesty in Dubai. Millions of dirhams in fines were waived during the five-month scheme, which concluded on December 31, 2018.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

Salik Denies False Claims of 'Monthly Income of Dh35,600' from Share Investments

Dubai's toll gate operator, Salik, has dismissed a fraudulent claim suggesting that investing in its shares could generate a "monthly income of Dh35,600." The company has labelled this as a scam.

In a statement, Salik, which is listed on the Dubai Financial Market, indicated an increase in misleading investment promises related to its shares. The company urged customers to obtain information exclusively through its official channels.

A fraudulent website featuring Salik’s CEO, Ibrahim Al Haddad, is circulating online. This site falsely asserts that Al Haddad has secured a deal with the government allowing all citizens to invest in Salik shares through a new trading platform.

It claims that investing as little as $250 (about Dh917) could yield monthly returns of $9,700 (approximately Dh35,600).

The website also requests personal details such as names, email addresses, and UAE phone numbers. However, Salik shares are traded in UAE dirhams, not dollars, as the site suggests.

Salik advised its customers and potential investors to be wary of fraudulent websites, emails and social media scams that exploit the company's name.

Recent months have seen an increase in phishing attempts promising false investment opportunities and directing users to unsafe links for account recharges and tag purchases.

The company recommended avoiding suspicious links and pop-up ads and advised visiting Salik’s official website for accurate security updates.

In other news, Salik has updated its terms and conditions for motorists, introducing a cap on fines. The maximum fine for violations related to the Salik toll system is now Dh10,000 per vehicle per calendar year, from January 1 to December 31.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder
Placeholder

Tesla Autopilot Crash: Family of Motorcyclist Killed Sues Elon Musk’s Car Company

The parents of a motorcyclist who was killed in a 2022 crash involving a Tesla Model 3 on Autopilot in Utah sued the electric carmaker and the vehicle’s driver, claiming that the driver assistant software and other safety features are “defective and inadequate.”

Landon Embry, 34, died on the scene after the Model 3 put on Autopilot at 75-80 miles per hour struck the back of his Harley Davidson motorcycle, throwing him from the bike, according to the lawsuit filed in state court in Salt Lake City last week.

The lawsuit claims the driver of the Model 3 was “tired” and “not in a condition to drive as an ordinarily prudent driver.”The complaint said the Autopilot sensors such as cameras “should have identified the hazard posed by Decedent’s motorcycle in its presence.”

“A reasonably prudent driver, or adequate auto braking system, would have, and could have slowed or stopped without colliding with the motorcycle,” the complaint said. The lawsuit adds to growing scrutiny of Tesla’s driver assistant systems Autopilot and Full Self-Driving.

A Tesla Model S car was in “Full Self-Driving” mode when it hit and killed a 28-year-old motorcyclist in the Seattle area in April this year, police said this week.

In April, Tesla settled a lawsuit over a 2018 crash that killed an Apple engineer after his Model X, operating on Autopilot, swerved off a highway near San Francisco.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

Sports Arbitration Centre: A Groundbreaking Initiative in UAE's Sports Dispute Resolution

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is further enhancing its sports sector with the establishment of the UAE Sports Arbitration Centre (UAESAC), a key component of the newly enacted Federal Law No. 4 of 2023, also known as the UAE Sports Law.

The UAESAC offers a specialised framework for resolving sports-related disputes, ensuring fairness, transparency, and integrity within the sports industry.

The UAESAC is an independent body dedicated to addressing disputes across various sports disciplines, including contractual disagreements and issues related to sports governance and ethics. Its streamlined and efficient arbitration process aims to resolve conflicts swiftly, thereby minimising disruptions to athletes, teams and organisations.

The centre operates under the comprehensive legal framework established by Federal Law No. 4 of 2023, which outlines the centre's jurisdiction, powers and procedures.

Key aspects of the UAESAC’s legal framework include:

Jurisdiction: The UAESAC has jurisdiction over all sports-related disputes within the UAE, addressing a wide range of issues such as contractual breaches, disciplinary actions, and doping violations. It also handles conflicts involving sports federations, clubs, athletes and other stakeholders.

Independence and Impartiality: The law ensures that the UAESAC operates independently of the government and sports organisations, maintaining impartiality. Arbitrators and mediators are selected for their expertise and integrity, free from external influences.

Arbitration Panels: The UAESAC comprises specialised arbitration panels with experts in various sports disciplines and legal matters. These panels are responsible for adjudicating disputes and delivering binding decisions.

Procedures: The arbitration procedures at the UAESAC are designed to be efficient and transparent, including the submission of claims, hearings and the issuance of awards. Parties involved have the right to present evidence, call witnesses, and make legal arguments.

Enforcement of Decisions: Decisions made by the UAESAC are binding and enforceable within the UAE, with the legal framework ensuring that awards can be executed through the UAE’s judicial system if necessary.

The centre operates under a governance framework that ensures transparency, accountability, and adherence to international best practices. A board of directors, comprising legal experts, former athletes and sports administrators, oversees its operations.

The centre also includes a panel of arbitrators with extensive experience in sports law and arbitration. To enhance its capabilities and credibility, the centre collaborates with international sports arbitration bodies, legal institutions, and sports federations.

These partnerships facilitate knowledge exchange, training, and the development of best practices in sports arbitration.

The launch of the UAE Sports Arbitration Centre has received strong support from the UAE government, sports federations and athletes. The initiative aligns with the UAE's broader strategy to position itself as a global hub for sports and legal excellence.

By providing a robust mechanism for dispute resolution, the centre is expected to attract more international sports events and investments to the region.

As the UAE Sports Arbitration Centre begins its operations, it is poised to set a benchmark for excellence in sports arbitration in the region. The centre's success will depend on its ability to deliver impartial and high-quality decisions, gain the trust of the sports community, and adapt to the evolving landscape of sports law and governance.

A central objective of the UAESAC is to uphold integrity and fair play in sports. The centre plays a crucial role in addressing ethical issues, such as match-fixing and doping, by providing a forum for impartial adjudication.

By enforcing stringent penalties for violations, the UAESAC helps maintain the credibility of sports in the UAE and aligns with international standards. This approach not only saves time and resources but also helps preserve relationships within the sports community.

Additionally, the UAESAC offers educational programmes to raise awareness about legal rights and responsibilities, further promoting a culture of compliance and ethical conduct.

The establishment of the UAESAC is expected to have significant economic implications by enhancing the UAE’s reputation as a global sports hub.

With world-class facilities and a robust legal framework for dispute resolution, the UAE is well-positioned to attract international sporting events and investments, thereby boosting tourism, creating jobs and stimulating economic growth.

The UAE Sports Arbitration Centre (UAESAC) represents a pioneering step in the UAE’s journey to becoming a leader in the global sports arena. By providing a dedicated, independent forum for resolving sports-related disputes, the UAESAC ensures fairness and integrity, supporting the broader goals of the UAE Sports Law.

As the UAE continues to develop its sports sector, the UAESAC will play a pivotal role in fostering a thriving, competitive, and ethically sound sports environment.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

BBC Ex-News Presenter Edwards Pleads Guilty to Making Indecent Images of Children

Huw Edwards, the BBC's former top news presenter, pleaded guilty to three counts of making indecent images of children as he admitted accessing photographs sent to him by a man via the WhatsApp messaging service.

During a 26-minute hearing at Westminster Magistrates’ Court in central London, the court heard that an unnamed man contacted Edwards via social media and sent hundreds of sexual images on WhatsApp between December 2020 and April 2022.

Of the 377 sexual images sent, 41 were indecent images of children. Seven of those were classified as “category A,” which were the most indecent, with the estimated age of most of the children between 13 and 15, though one was aged between 7 and 9. The final indecent image was sent in August 2021, a “category A” film featuring a young boy.

The man told Edwards the child was “quite young looking” and that he had more images which were illegal. Edwards then told him not to send any illegal images and no more such indecent images were sent, though the pair continued to exchange legal pornographic images until April 2022.

“Accessing indecent images of underage people perpetuates the sexual exploitation of children, which has deep, long-lasting trauma on these victims,” said Claire Brinton of the Crown Prosecution Service, which decides whether a case should go to court.

Edwards, who was the lead anchor on the BBC’s nighttime news for two decades and led the public broadcaster's coverage of the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II in 2022 as well as election specials, has been remanded on bail until a pre-sentencing hearing on September 16.

He could face up to 10 years in prison, though the prosecution conceded that a suspended sentence may be appropriate.

Edwards, who was one of the BBC’s top earners, was suspended in July 2023 for separate claims made last year. He later resigned for health reasons. He had not been seen in public until Wednesday's hearing.

Speaking in Edwards’ defense, lawyer Philip Evans said there is “no suggestion” that his client had “in the traditional sense of the word, created any image of any sort.”

Edwards, he said, "did not keep any images, did not send any to anyone else, and did not and has not sought similar images from anywhere else.”

He added that Edwards had “both mental and physical” health issues and that he is "not just of good character, but of exceptional character.”

Prosecutor Ian Hope told the court that Edwards' “genuine remorse” was one reason why a suspended sentence might be considered. Setting out the potential penalties under the law, he said that where there is the prospect of rehabilitation, a community order and sexual offender treatment programme could be considered as alternatives to prison.

A spokesperson for the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children said there should be “no doubt” about the seriousness of Edwards' crimes.

“It can be extremely traumatic for young people to know sexual images of themselves have been shared online," the spokesperson said.

“We also need to see online platforms do much more to identify and disrupt child abuse in private messaging services in order to safeguard young people.”

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

UAE Golden Visa Application for Executives: Key Requirements and Essential Documents

If you are an executive working in the UAE and wish to apply for the Golden Visa, there are certain requirements you need to consider before starting the application process.

In addition to meeting the category requirements for the Golden Visa in terms of salary, you must also validate your academic qualifications by having your degree attested.

When applying for a Golden Visa under the ‘Chief Executive’ designation, the applicant’s bachelor’s or master’s degree must be attested by the UAE embassy in their home country and the UAE’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Additionally, the Equivalency Certificate issued by the Ministry of Education (MoE) must be submitted.

The demand for the Executive Golden Visa in Dubai has been consistently high, and individuals need to obtain the MoE Equivalency Certificate to ensure their application meets the necessary criteria.

This step in the application process requires advance planning, as the equivalency process can take between two to three months, depending on the applicant's university requirements and MOE standards. Once you have the certificate, the Golden Visa application process is significantly quicker.

If you have the MoE Equalised University degree and meet the rest of the requirements for the Golden Visa, it will take approximately five to seven working days to complete the process.

Golden Visa Requirements

According to the General Directorate of Residency and Foreigners Affairs Dubai (GDRFAD) website, business and management specialists can apply for the Golden Visa under the ‘specialised talents’ category, provided they submit the following documents:

* A copy of the passport.

* A valid employment contract in the UAE.

* Salary certificate with a monthly salary of no less than Dh30,000.

* Licence to practise the profession (for professions that require it).

* Certificate of academic achievement, not less than a bachelor’s degree (the applicant should provide a report on the recognition of academic qualifications from the Ministry of Education).

* Bank statement showing salary transfers for the last six months.

How to Obtain the Equivalency Certificate

The UAE’s Ministry of Education (MOE) provides an online service for recognising university certificates issued outside the UAE. This certificate confirms that your higher education degree from an accredited university abroad complies with MoE’s guidelines and international academic standards.

The equivalency certificate process comprises two main stages:

Degree Verification from a Trusted Partner: You can use one of the verification and equivalency service providers in the UAE. For more details on completing this process, refer to our detailed guide here.

Once your verification document is issued by one of these trusted partners, you will also receive a reference number to apply for the Certificate of Recognition service on the MoE website.

Certificate of Recognition from MoE: The second step is to apply for the equivalency certificate from the MoE.

MoE Recognition

* To obtain the Certificate of Recognition from the MOE, follow these steps:

* Visit the MOE website and click on ‘Complete Application’.

* Log in using your UAE Pass account.

* Enter the reference number received from QuadraBay or DataFlow and your date of birth.

* Your personal and educational information will be automatically populated.
Confirm your details.

* Pay for your application.

* You will receive the Certificate with a Recognition decision (Recognised/Not Recognised) via email. You can also download your result directly from your account on the MOE website.

Cost

* Bachelor’s degree equivalency – Dh100

* Master’s degree equivalency – Dh150

* PhD degree equivalency – Dh200

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

How to Quickly and Easily Check Your UAE Visa Status Online Using Passport Details

Whether you are a UAE resident needing to renew your visa or planning a trip to the UAE for work, business, or leisure, you can easily verify your visa status online.

Types of Visas in the UAE

The UAE offers various visas for foreigners to visit, work and live in the country. Short-term visas are available for visitors and range from one month to six months, depending on the purpose of the visit.

Work visas sponsored by employers typically expire in two years, while self-sponsored remote work visas require annual renewal. Special green, blue and golden visas, which are self-sponsored, are valid for five to ten years.

Checking Existing Residence Visas or Entry Permits

For visas or entry permits issued in Abu Dhabi, Sharjah, Ajman, Umm Al Quwain, Ras Al Khaimah, or Fujairah, you can check your status on the Federal Authority for Identity, Citizenship, Customs and Port Security (ICP) website:

* Visit the 'Public Services' dashboard and click on 'File Validity' at the top right.

* Select the 'Passport' option and enter your passport number and expiry date.

* Choose the type of visa you have: 'Residency' or 'Visa' for non-residents or visitors.

Dubai Visas

For Dubai-issued residence visas, use the General Directorate of Residency and Foreigners Affairs – Dubai (GDRFA) website:

* Go to the homepage and click on 'Visa Status' to access the tracking service.

* Enter your UAE visa file number, first name and date of birth.

The visa file number can be found on the visa sticker in your passport. If your passport does not have the sticker, you can download or print a digital version of this document.

Checking Visa Application Status

If your visa application is still pending, you can check the status using the application reference details.

For applications in Abu Dhabi, Sharjah, Ajman, Umm Al Quwain, Ras Al Khaimah, or Fujairah, use the ICP website:

* Go to the 'Public Services' dashboard and select 'Application Tracking'.

* Enter the email address used for the application and the request number.
For Dubai visa applications, use the GDRFA website:

* Use the status-tracking service and enter the application reference, transaction number and payment date.

If your visa request was processed through a service provider or prospective employer, you can check the status with the provided details.

Fines for Overstaying

The UAE has standardised fines for expired tourist and residency visas. A fine of Dh50 per day is imposed for overstaying.

The new system has unified the amount of overstay fines to Dh50 ($13) per day for any type of visa violator.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels

Placeholder

Legal Challenges Arise as Paris 2024 Olympics Progress, Reports International Bar Association

As the Paris 2024 Olympics unfold, the International Bar Association (IBA) has highlighted a series of legal challenges that could potentially impact the event.

The IBA's recent report draws attention to various issues, ranging from intellectual property disputes to labour concerns, which require urgent attention to ensure the smooth running of the Games.

Diane Mullenex, Chair of the IBA Leisure Industries Section and a partner at Pinsent Masons, stressed the delicate balance the host nation must maintain between ensuring public safety and upholding individual liberties and privacy.

She noted the heightened security risks associated with ongoing global conflicts, such as the war in Ukraine and the situation in Israel and Gaza. Mullenex also highlighted the unique challenges posed by holding the opening ceremony on the River Seine, which necessitates extensive security measures.

The report notes an increase in intellectual property disputes, particularly concerning the use of Olympic symbols and branding.

The Paris 2024 Organising Committee, along with the International Olympic Committee (IOC), has been vigilant in protecting the Games' trademarks and logos.

However, instances of unauthorised use by non-affiliated companies and individuals have been reported, posing a threat to the event's commercial integrity.

Labour Issues

Labour issues are another significant concern, especially regarding the construction of venues and infrastructure. The IBA has highlighted reports of labour law violations, including underpayment and poor working conditions.

These allegations, if substantiated, could tarnish the image of the Games and lead to legal repercussions for contractors and organisers.

Another area where lawyers are consistently involved during and after an Olympic Games is in anti-doping cases. When a drugs test returns positive, a panel, often led by a senior lawyer, determines whether an anti-doping violation has occurred.

Lawyers represent both the relevant sports federation and the athletes involved, dealing with substantial amounts of medical, scientific and biological information, making these some of the most challenging cases for a lawyer.

The IBA report also points to potential contractual disputes, particularly involving sponsors and broadcasters. With the financial stakes high, any disagreements over contract terms or fulfilment could escalate into legal battles.

The report recommends that all parties involved seek to resolve disputes amicably and in a timely manner to avoid disrupting the event's preparations.

Rights of Athletes

The rights of athletes and teams are also a focal point. The IBA stresses the importance of ensuring fair treatment, particularly in the selection processes for participation and anti-doping regulations.

The association calls for transparency and adherence to established legal frameworks to protect the interests of all athletes.

Given ongoing concerns around public health, the IBA underscores the necessity of strict adherence to health and safety regulations. The report suggests that organisers must be prepared for potential legal challenges related to COVID-19 protocols, including vaccination requirements and crowd management measures.

As the Paris 2024 Olympics progress, the IBA's report serves as a crucial reminder of the complex legal landscape surrounding such a major international event.

The association urges all stakeholders to proactively address these issues to ensure the Games are not only successful but also legally compliant and ethically sound.

The organisers, in collaboration with legal experts, are expected to take these recommendations seriously, implementing necessary measures to mitigate risks and uphold the integrity of the Olympics.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

ABA Issues Guidance: Lawyers Using Artificial Intelligence Must Follow Ethics Rules

Lawyers must guard against ethical lapses if they use generative artificial intelligence in their work, the American Bar Association said.

In its first formal ethics opinion on generative AI, an ABA committee said lawyers using the technology must "fully consider" their ethical obligations to protect clients, including duties related to lawyer competence, confidentiality of client data, communication and fees.

Lawyers and law firms are increasingly using AI tools for legal research, document drafting and analysis, and other tasks in litigation, transactional and other work. New legal technology startups have been attracting large investments as the field develops.

Monday's opinion from the ABA's ethics and professional responsibility committee said AI tools can help lawyers increase efficiency but can also carry risks such as generating inaccurate output.

Lawyers also must try to prevent inadvertent disclosure or access to client information, and should consider whether they need to tell a client about their use of generative AI technologies, it said.

The ABA is the largest voluntary US attorney membership organisation. Its opinions can help lawyers and courts interpret ABA model rules, which are not binding but serve as a guide for enforceable conduct rules set by individual states.

The opinion noted that use of AI has led to lawyers citing nonexistent cases or inaccurate analysis. "Even an unintentional misstatement to a court can involve a misrepresentation" under professional conduct rules, the opinion said, warning that lawyers should review all outputs for accuracy.

A federal judge in Virginia last week asked lawyers to explain why they should not be sanctioned for submitting a filing that appeared to include "fictitious cases," as well as "made-up quotations" from real opinions. Judges in other cases have considered or imposed sanctions in similar situations.

Some but not all courts and judges in the United States now require lawyers to disclose their use of AI. The 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals last month said it would not adopt a proposed rule regulating generative AI use by lawyers.

The guidance comes after several state bar associations have adopted their own guidelines for how lawyers can use AI without running afoul of ethics rules.

Generative AI tools are a "rapidly moving target," the opinion said, adding that state and local bar associations and the ABA will likely update their guidance over time.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Son of Europe’s Infamous Crime Lord Extradited from Dubai to the Netherlands

The son of one of Europe’s most wanted crime lords, arrested in Dubai last year, has been handed over to Dutch authorities by police in the emirate.

Faisal Taghi, 24, was detained in September for drug trafficking, money laundering, human trafficking and leading the “Angels of Death” crime gang. His father, Ridouan Taghi, 46, who led the same gang, was apprehended by Dubai Police in 2019 in connection with 11 murders.

Faisal Taghi was captured following an international operation involving Interpol and authorities in his native Netherlands.

He was handed over to Dutch authorities last week. “This follows our strategic goals to enhance deep and robust relations between the UAE and various countries in combatting all forms of crime,” said Lieutenant General Abdullah Khalifa Al Marri, Commander-in-Chief of Dubai Police.

His arrest last year followed a warrant from Dutch authorities that reached the International Co-operation Department of the UAE Ministry of Justice.

Dubai Police stated they were thanked by the Dutch Prime Minister for their role in apprehending Faisal Taghi.

“His Excellency Dick Schoof, the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, has commended the UAE's efforts and security cooperation, through Dubai Police, in extraditing Faisal Taghi, a high-value target criminal wanted by Dutch authorities,” Dubai Police said.

“Schoof further expressed his appreciation of the UAE and gratitude for the strong bilateral relations between the two nations.”

Faisal’s father, Ridouan, who holds Dutch and Moroccan nationality, is believed to be behind a major cocaine smuggling operation at the ports of Antwerp and Rotterdam.

He was linked to 11 murders following a drug turf war in the country.
Police in the Netherlands had offered a reward of €100,000 (Dh409,000) for information leading to his arrest.

Ridouan was sentenced to life in prison for his role in a murderous campaign in the Netherlands, which prosecutors described as a “well-oiled killing machine”. He was one of Europe's most-wanted men when captured in Dubai in 2019.

During his trial, one of the largest in Dutch legal history, Taghi and 16 alleged members of a drugs cartel faced six counts of murder and attempted murder – including ordering at least 13 hits – between 2015 and 2017, mainly against people suspected of becoming police informants.

Three of them, including Taghi, received life sentences.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Pregnancy is Not an Illness; Public Employment Cannot Be Denied, States Delhi High Court

Pregnancy is not an illness or a disability and cannot be grounds for denying government employment to women, the Delhi High Court recently stated while reprimanding the Railway Protection Force (RPF) for refusing a pregnant woman’s request to defer her Physical Efficiency Test (PET) for a constable position.

A Division Bench of Justices Rekha Palli and Shalinder Kaur expressed its dismay at the way the RPF and the Central Government treated the woman.

“It appears that the respondents (Union of India and RPF) have treated pregnancy as though it were a sickness or a disability, which could justify excluding women from the selection process. In our view, motherhood should never and can never be the basis for denying public employment opportunities to women,” the Court held.

The Bench stated that the RPF could have postponed the PET for the petitioner for a few months, given that she had informed them of her pregnancy and her inability to perform tasks like high jump, long jump, and running.

In view of the above, the Court directed the RPF to conduct the woman’s tests and document verification within six weeks and, if she meets the eligibility criteria, to appoint her to the post of constable with retrospective seniority and other consequential benefits.

The order was issued five years after the woman filed the petition. In a detailed judgement, the Court stated that all authorities, especially those dealing with public employment, must recognise the importance of supporting women who are eager to contribute to the nation and ensure they are not denied their rights due to pregnancy or other such conditions that cannot be regarded as disabilities or illnesses.

“In our considered view, discrimination based on pregnancy should never hinder a woman’s right to pursue her career aspirations. Maternity should not be seen as a barrier but as a fundamental human right of every woman.

It is crucial that every effort is made by all employers to create an inclusive environment where women can fulfil their professional aspirations without facing unjust obstacles, particularly those related to pregnancy,” the Court emphasised.

The Court noted that the authorities’ conduct demonstrated that they remained oblivious to the rights and aspirations of young women and continued to deny them employment opportunities on the grounds of pregnancy.

“We, therefore, have no hesitation in holding that the decision of the respondents in rejecting the petitioner’s candidature is wholly unsustainable and is required to be quashed,” the Court concluded.
The Court also imposed costs of ₹1 lakh on the government and directed them to pay the amount to another woman who was injured in the High Court premises after a portion of the ceiling broke and fell on her.

“While allowing the writ petition with the aforementioned directions, we earnestly hope that all employers, especially the State, will in the future ensure that no woman is deprived of an opportunity to seek employment solely on account of her pregnancy.

We also hope that all genuine requests for deferment of physical endurance tests and other physically strenuous activities by women candidates due to pregnancy will be considered favourably,”the Court said.

 For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

FTA’s Professionals Qualification Initiative to Enhance UAE Tax System Efficiency

As part of its efforts to pursue excellence and continuously develop human capital, the Federal Tax Authority (FTA) has launched the Tax Professionals Qualification Initiative.

This ambitious programme aims to train a new generation of qualified tax experts, aligning with the Authority’s vision to invest in human capital and foster a work environment that encourages lifelong learning and development.

Designed to enhance the efficiency of the tax system and support the Authority’s strategy, the initiative is one of the FTA’s strategic projects aimed at strengthening the UAE tax sector.

It seeks to supply skilled professionals qualified to work in tax administration and to recruit top talents from university students and graduates.

Moreover, the initiative aims to improve performance, encourage continuous learning among Tax Agents, and enhance the efficiency of tax professionals. The Authority also aspires to raise tax awareness among community members through this initiative.

Khalid Al Bustani, Director General of the FTA, stated: “Launching the Tax Professionals Qualification Initiative aims to enhance the Federal Tax Authority’s pioneering role in developing talent and human resources in the UAE, training them to efficiently and effectively manage tax systems.

We strive to achieve these objectives by providing specialised and accredited training programmes rooted in best practices and international standards, in addition to offering advanced and continuous tax education.”

The initiative targets several groups, including new and current employees of the Federal Tax Authority, university students and graduates from government universities and tax specialists.

Placeholder

Costs From Global Outage Could Exceed $1B – But Determining Liability is Complex

The world quickly learned that cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike was responsible for a crippling global tech outage on Friday. However, determining who will cover the cost of the damages might take significantly longer.

What one cybersecurity expert described as possibly the “largest IT outage in history” resulted in the cancellation of over 5,000 commercial airline flights worldwide and disrupted businesses from retail sales to package deliveries to hospital procedures, incurring losses in revenue, staff time, and productivity.

The issue stemmed from faulty code in CrowdStrike’s software “content update.” Unfortunately, rectifying the error proved far more time-consuming than causing it, and it could be days before all systems return to normal.

In a social media post late Sunday, CrowdStrike stated that a “significant number” of the approximately 8.5 million affected devices were back online and operational. They also issued another apology for the disruption.

While CrowdStrike has apologised, they have not indicated whether they plan to compensate affected customers. When questioned by CNN regarding potential compensation, their response did not address the matter.

Experts anticipate demands for remuneration and potentially lawsuits.

“If you’re a lawyer for CrowdStrike, you’re probably not going to enjoy the rest of your summer,” said Dan Ives, a tech analyst for Wedbush Securities.

Experts largely agree it’s too early to accurately estimate the financial impact of Friday’s global internet breakdown. However, costs could easily exceed $1 billion, said Patrick Anderson, CEO of Anderson Economic Group, a Michigan research firm specialising in estimating the economic cost of events like strikes and other business disruptions.

His firm estimates that a recent hack of CDK Global, a software firm serving US car dealerships, reached that $1 billion mark. Although that outage lasted much longer, about three weeks, it was confined to a single industry.

“This outage is affecting far more consumers and businesses, ranging from inconvenience to serious disruptions, resulting in out-of-pocket costs they can’t easily recover,” he said.

Anderson added that the costs could be particularly significant for airlines, due to lost revenue from cancelled flights and additional labour and fuel costs for the planes that did fly but faced significant delays.

Despite CrowdStrike’s prominence in the cybersecurity field, their annual revenue is just under $4 billion.

However, there may be legal protections for CrowdStrike in their customer contracts that shield them from liability, according to one expert.

“I would guess that the contracts protect them,” said James Lewis, a researcher at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Lewis referenced a recent case decided in favour of SolarWinds, another software company. A judge dismissed Securities and Exchange Commission charges against SolarWinds related to a Russian hack of federal government agencies in late 2020.

Lewis noted that in that case, SolarWinds faced charges for not disclosing its system’s vulnerabilities to an outside hack, not for damage caused by their own actions. Nonetheless, they won a dismissal.

Businesses affected by the outage are likely to find that traditional business interruption insurance won’t cover their losses, said Mark Friedlander, spokesman for the Insurance Information Institute.
Such policies typically require some form of physical damage to the business property for claims to be paid.

There is a separate policy for computer outages, known as Business Network Interruption policies, which might cover claims.

However, these policies sometimes only cover malicious hacks and exclude non-malicious computer issues like this one, he said.

Will Customers Stay?

It’s also unclear how many customers CrowdStrike might lose due to Friday’s incident.
Wedbush Securities’ Ives estimates less than 5% of its customers might switch to other providers.
“They’re such an entrenched player, moving away from CrowdStrike would be a gamble,” he said.

It will be challenging and costly for many customers to switch from CrowdStrike to a competitor. However, the real damage to CrowdStrike could be reputational, making it difficult to attract new customers.

“Today CrowdStrike becomes a household name, but not in a good way, and this will take time to settle down,” Ives said.

CrowdStrike CEO George Kurtz stated in an interview on Friday morning on CNBC that the firm has been focused on resolving the ongoing issues and that so far, he believes most customers have been understanding.

“My goal right now is to make sure every customer is back up and running,” he said. “I think many customers understand it’s a complex environment and staying one step ahead of the bad guys requires these content updates.”

Even if customers are understanding, it’s likely that CrowdStrike’s competitors will try to exploit Friday’s events to lure customers away.

“It’s a very competitive business. There will be salespeople from all the other companies saying, ‘This has never happened to us,’” said Eric O’Neill, a cybersecurity expert and former FBI counterintelligence operative.

“They’re an excellent company doing important work. I hope they survive this. If they don’t, the only winner will be the cybercriminals.”

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Can Employers Fire Employees for Extending Leave After Rejection in the UAE?

In the UAE, employees who have completed more than one year of service are entitled to 30 days of annual leave per year, per Article 29(1)(a) of Federal Decree-Law No. 33 of 2021 on the Regulation of Employment Relations. However, the employer has the discretion to decide the annual leave dates based on work requirements.

According to Article 29(4) of the UAE Employment Law, employers can fix the leave dates and rotate leaves among employees to ensure smooth work progress. Employees must be notified at least one month in advance of their leave dates.

If an employee does not return to work directly after the approved leave period without a valid reason, they are not entitled to a salary for the period of absence.

This is stipulated in Article 34 of the Employment Law, which states that an employee who does not return to work without a legitimate reason after their leave is not entitled to wages for the absence period following the end of the leave.

Furthermore, employers have the right to terminate an employee without notice if the employee is absent without a valid reason for seven consecutive days or 20 non-consecutive days in a year.

Article 44(8) of the UAE Employment Law provides that an employer may dismiss an employee without prior notice if the employee is absent without a legal cause for more than 20 interrupted days in a year or more than seven consecutive days.

Therefore, the approval of a leave extension is at the employer's discretion. If an employer has a valid reason, they may reject the extension request even if the employee has enough leave left.

If the employee extends their leave without approval, they risk losing their salary for the extended period and may face termination of employment.

However, if there are genuine reasons necessitating the extension, the employee should provide valid documentary evidence to the employer to justify the need for additional leave.

In the case of termination, the employee can challenge the decision if they have valid reasons and supporting documents for the leave extension without the employer's consent.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Does Secretly Photographing a Woman in Public Amount to Stalking? Calcutta HC Decides

The Calcutta High Court recently dismissed a case of voyeurism and stalking against a man who was charged by the police in 2016 on accusations of secretly photographing a woman from his residence.

Justice Bibhas Ranjan De noted that while observing and photographing a woman engaged in a private act constitutes voyeurism under Section 354C of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the offence of stalking also requires specific elements to be established.

In this instance, the accusation was that the defendant had taken photographs of the complainant from his residence while she was standing on the road in front of her home.

“It is also alleged that when the complainant noticed a flash, the accused retreated into his building. Such allegations do not fall under any penal provisions either under Section 354C or 354D of the IPC in relation to the essential elements required to constitute those offences,” the Court stated.

In 2016, the woman had filed a complaint with the police alleging that when she and her daughter went to school, the market, or for private tuition, the accused would watch and follow them. It was also claimed that he would photograph her with his camera and phone.

Specifically, the complainant mentioned an incident where, while she was standing on the road outside her house, the accused was surreptitiously taking her picture. The complainant reported that he fled into his house when she noticed a flash.
Following the complaint, the police had registered a case of voyeurism and stalking against the accused.

Challenging this, the accused argued that the complainant had filed the case merely to “exert pressure on the developer to provide her with an additional car parking space to which she had no right, title, or interest.”

However, the complainant contended that the ongoing civil dispute did not exempt the accused from criminal proceedings. The State also argued that there was sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case. The Court examined the provisions related to voyeurism and stalking and reached the following conclusions:

Regarding Section 354C of the IPC, the Court stated: "Section 354C of the IPC aims to protect the modesty and decency of women and to maintain public order. It seeks to create a secure environment for women in public places by penalising acts that infringe upon their modesty and instil fear. The provision should be interpreted broadly to achieve its objectives."

Similarly, concerning the offence of stalking under Section 354D of the IPC, the Court outlined:

Perpetrator’s Gender: Stalking must be committed by a man. The offence is gender-specific, involving a male perpetrator and a female victim.

Unwanted Contact: The man must attempt to contact or contact a woman against her wishes. This includes any form of communication, whether in person or electronic, where the woman has shown disinterest and the man continues to pursue contact.

Repetition: Stalking must involve a pattern of persistent and unwanted attention or contact. It is not a one-time event but a continuous pattern of behaviour.

Absence of Interest: There must be a clear indication of disinterest from the woman. This is crucial to demonstrate that the woman’s lack of consent or interest is evident, and that the man persists despite her objections.

In the present case, the Court found that no specific evidence had been gathered to establish any of the elements of the two offences against the accused. As a result, the Court dismissed the criminal proceedings and also rejected the complainant's petition for a speedy trial.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Association with Dawood Alone Doesn't Mean Terror Gang Membership, Rules Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court recently ruled that mere association with Dawood Ibrahim, who has been designated a terrorist under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), does not amount to membership of a terrorist gang or organisation.

A division bench consisting of Justice Bharati Dangre and Justice Manjusha Deshpande reasoned that since Ibrahim has been designated a terrorist solely in his "individual capacity", it is insufficient to invoke Section 20 on the grounds that an individual associated with him belongs to the D-gang/Dawood gang.

The Court clarified that UAPA includes separate provisions for the activities of individuals versus those of terrorist gangs or organisations.

"Section 20 prescribes punishment for being a member of a terrorist gang or organisation. In the present case, the evidence relied upon includes a Section 164 statement referring to Parvez Vaid (the petitioner) as a member of the D-gang.

In our view, this does not prima facie attract the offence under Section 20, as the amendment in Schedule IV designates Dawood Ibrahim Kaskar as a terrorist in his individual capacity. Therefore, mere association with him does not invoke the provisions of Section 20," the Court observed.

These remarks were made while addressing the petitions filed by Parvez Zubair Vaid and Faiz Shakeel Bhiwandiwala, who are accused in a case registered under the UAPA, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, and the Indian Penal Code.

Apart from the allegation of being a member of a terrorist organisation, they were also charged with conspiracy and raising funds for terrorist activities. Regarding the NDPS Act, an alleged recovery of 600 grams of ganja was made from Bhiwandiwala's premises. The accused had sought bail, arguing that there was no connection between them and the alleged offences.

In response, the Police admitted there was no material in the charge-sheet to support the invocation of Section 17 (Punishment for raising funds for terrorist acts) and Section 18 (Punishment for conspiracy, etc.), but defended the invocation of Section 20 UAPA. Some witnesses testified that they knew Vaid as a member of the D-Company, it was submitted.

The prosecution also highlighted a ₹25,000 transaction made by Parvez to an individual closely associated with Ibrahim.
After reviewing the evidence and noting that UAPA contains distinct provisions for individuals and organisations, the Court found that the statements were insufficient to warrant Section 20 charges against Vaid.

Regarding Bhiwandiwala, the Court found no evidence linking him to the 'D' gang.

Concerning the NDPS Act charges, the Court noted that only 600 grammes of ganja was recovered, which does not qualify as commercial or intermediate quantity, but only a small quantity. Thus, the bar on releasing Bhiwandiwala on bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act was not an impediment, the Court observed.

"Mere sharing of images of narcotics or prohibited substances does not attract the provisions of the NDPS Act," it added.
With these observations, the Court granted bail to the accused.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Tech Outage in UAE: How the CrowdStrike Crash Disrupted Daily Life and What Comes Next?

It was not a cyberattack, but the world nearly came to a standstill after a massive IT outage wreaked havoc on computer systems worldwide on Friday.

Planes were grounded, airports crowded with passengers waiting for their flights, ATMs ceased dispensing cash, supermarkets and petrol stations declined digital payments, and companies were forced to reboot after their computers crashed, displaying only the so-called 'blue screen of death'.

The system glitch stemmed from a defect found in a single content update for Microsoft Windows. The Falcon Sensor by US-based cybersecurity technology firm CrowdStrike, supposedly “purpose-built to stop breaches and prevent all types of attacks”-- including malware and more -- caused the outage. Systems restarted or shut down automatically.

George Kurtz, CrowdStrike CEO, has apologised for the global outage. “This is not a security incident or cyberattack. The issue has been identified, isolated, and a fix has been deployed," he said in a post on social media platform X on Friday.

Microsoft stated it had fixed the underlying cause of the outage that affected its 365 apps and services, while Mac and Linux hosts were not impacted.

How Bad Was the Situation?

Air travel was the most severely affected, with airports and major airlines around the world reporting delays following issues with their system networks.

According to preliminary data released at 2 pm on Friday (UAE time) by aviation analytics company Cirium, out of more than 110,000 scheduled commercial flights that day, 1,390 were cancelled globally, and the numbers were rising.

Across Asia, airports in Singapore, Bangkok, Hong Kong, India, and Manila were among those affected, with long queues seen at check-in counters. Major US air carriers, including Delta, United, and American Airlines, also grounded all flights, according to the US Federal Aviation Administration.

Bank transactions, hospital services, and financial markets were also disrupted.

How Was the UAE Affected?

Some online services by the UAE Government were affected, and Dubai International Airport (DXB) confirmed that their operations were temporarily impacted.

UAE residents, however, were assured that no hacks or cyberattacks were detected amid the large-scale technical failure on Friday. The UAE Cyber Security Council issued an alert urging users of CrowdStrike software to be wary of any software updates.

The Dubai Electronic Security Centre (DESC) also issued a statement assuring that it "acted quickly to avoid any impact on Dubai government services".

The General Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA) said the global technical glitch “had minor impacts on the operation of the country's airports and airlines. Minor delays were reported in the check-in processes for a limited number of flights, as an alternative system was used by the airlines, allowing the check-in operations to resume normally.”

Some residents were surprised as they did not expect some shops to switch to "cash-only" payments due to technical issues. Those buying groceries or refuelling their cars had to scramble for instant cash as card payments were not working. Others were unable to withdraw from ATMs.

Dubai-based IT expert Rayad Kamal Ayub, managing director of Rayad Group, said: “Tech experts in the coming days will analyse if this was a cyberattack or a blunder on the part of the company to have deployed an update without following the complete protocols of testing.”

“This is a wake-up call for most governments and multinationals about their vulnerabilities. This is a case of complete dependence on one company for their cybersecurity requirements,” he underscored. “In the next few weeks and months, cybersecurity experts and security professionals will have to look at backup options if the enterprise software and cybersecurity company get compromised again,” he added.

Irene Corpuz, founding partner and board member at Women in Cybersecurity Middle East, said, “I can sense that CrowdStrike will be called by the US Senate to explain.” “It was not a cyberattack, but businesses and companies were heavily affected. Residents also felt the impact. The card payment system crashed in some stores, and not everyone is carrying cash nowadays,” she added.

Corpuz said tech companies normally do testing in a test environment before deploying patches in a live environment. “However, we do not know the case of the update on CrowdStrike and the patch management policy (methodology used to ensure hardware and software on a corporate network are regularly maintained) used before it was deployed to a live environment.”

One thing is for sure, as Ayub pointed out the irony of the situation: “What was supposed to be a protector for cybersecurity has compromised us.”

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

GPSSA Announces 17,304 Emirati Contributors Under New Federal Pension Law No. (57) of 2023

The General Pension and Social Security Authority (GPSSA) is pleased to announce that 17,304 Emirati citizens have registered as contributors under the new Federal Pension Law No. (57) of 2023.

This landmark legislation, which came into effect earlier this year, represents a significant advancement in the UAE’s ongoing efforts to enhance social security and provide robust pension benefits for its citizens.

The introduction of Federal Pension Law No. (57) of 2023 has been hailed as a major milestone in the UAE's social security landscape. This law, designed to provide comprehensive pension coverage to Emirati employees, has received a strong positive response from the community.

The GPSSA’s latest figures underscore the widespread acceptance and proactive participation of Emiratis in securing their financial future.

Federal Pension Law No. (57) of 2023 introduces several key features aimed at bolstering the pension system in the UAE. Among the highlights are:

* Enhanced Pension Benefits: The law offers improved pension benefits, ensuring that retirees receive adequate financial support.

* Extended Coverage: The law extends pension coverage to a broader segment of the Emirati workforce, including those in new and emerging sectors.

* Flexible Contribution Plans: The new regulations provide flexible contribution plans, allowing employees to choose options that best suit their financial situations.

* Strengthened Social Security Framework: The law strengthens the overall social security framework, providing a safety net for Emirati citizens and their families.

The GPSSA has been actively engaging with the community to raise awareness about the new law and its benefits. Through a series of workshops, seminars and media campaigns, the authority has ensured that Emirati citizens are well-informed and able to make educated decisions regarding their pension contributions.

The GPSSA continues to work tirelessly to ensure the successful implementation of Federal Pension Law No. (57) of 2023. With 17,304 contributors already on board, the authority is optimistic about the future and remains committed to providing exemplary service and support to all Emirati citizens.

As the UAE moves forward, the new pension law stands as a beacon of progress, reflecting the nation’s dedication to enhancing the well-being and financial security of its people. The GPSSA encourages all eligible Emiratis to take advantage of the opportunities provided by this landmark legislation and secure their futures through active participation in the pension system.

Placeholder

Residents Advised to Verify Legal Status, Check for Travel Bans Before Going on Holidays

The Abu Dhabi Judicial Department (ADJD) has urged residents to take advantage of its range of services before travelling. This includes settling any outstanding financial dues and ensuring there are no travel bans related to any court cases.

In an effort to educate the public during the summer holiday season, the ADJD has launched a campaign called “Enquire...and be reassured.” The campaign aims to introduce its travel-related services and encourage people to verify their legal status before leaving the country.

The department highlighted that individuals should use the “automatic cancellation of executive decisions system,” available on ADJD’s smart application or official website, to resolve any restrictions related to unpaid dues and ensure they have clearance to travel.

The department emphasised that checking one’s legal status before travelling is essential, as it contributes to a hassle-free journey and helps avoid any financial losses that may occur if the traveller is prevented from boarding the plane.

The ADJD facilitates and expedites the completion of all transactions, aligning with its strategic vision of providing prompt access to judicial services. This initiative aims to ensure the well-being of citizens and residents and to save time, effort and expenses.

When planning to travel abroad, it is necessary to check the validity of your passport and visa requirements for the intended destination, in addition to reviewing the instructions issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on its website.
It is also good practice to familiarise yourself with the local laws of the destination country before travelling.

How to Check Travel Bans

The Dubai Police website offers a free service allowing individuals to check the criminal status of financial cases and any possible travel bans electronically, available round the clock.

This service is accessible to all members of society and requires the individual to enter their UAE-issued ID card number. The travel ban inquiry service is also available on the Dubai Police application.

In Abu Dhabi, the ADJD provides the “Inquire” electronic service, enabling individuals to check for any cases against them with Public Prosecution by entering their unified number. Individuals can also inquire about cases through the Federal Public Prosecution.

Before planning any travel, it is advisable to check and resolve any issues that may prevent a person from passing through passport control. If necessary, assistance from a lawyer should be sought. Contacting the nearest office of the General Directorate of Residency and Foreigners Affairs (GDRFA) or a local police station can also provide advice.

It is prudent to check the validity and machine-readability of your passport, as many countries do not accept non-electronic passports.

UAE citizens can verify the validity of their passports through the GDRFA Nationality Section, while expatriates can contact their home country’s embassy or consulate in the UAE.

Placeholder

Entry of Foreign Lawyers Will Benefit Indian Legal Community: BCI Tells Delhi High Court

Defending its decision to permit the entry of foreign law firms and lawyers into India, the Bar Council of India (BCI) has informed the Delhi High Court that this move will also benefit Indian lawyers.

In a detailed affidavit filed before the Delhi High Court, the BCI stated: "The proficiency standards of Indian lawyers are comparable with international standards, and the legal fraternity in India is unlikely to suffer any disadvantages if legal practice in India is opened up to foreign lawyers in a restricted, well-controlled, and regulated manner on the principle of reciprocity.

This would be mutually beneficial for lawyers from both India and abroad, and the impugned Rules are a step by the Bar Council of India in this direction."

The BCI further mentioned its intention to hold consultations with stakeholders to address concerns raised by Indian lawyers and law firms regarding the Bar Council of India Rules for Registration and Regulation of Foreign Lawyers and Foreign Law Firms in India, 2022.

"The Bar Council of India is currently in the process of making necessary amendments to these Rules and Regulations to ensure reciprocity in both letter and spirit... These amendments aim to foster greater collaboration between foreign and Indian lawyers, contributing to a more inclusive and integrated legal system in India," the statement said.

Among the provisions being amended are those concerning reciprocity and the "fly-in, fly-out" model, which allows foreign lawyers to operate in India for a maximum of 60 days within any 12-month period.

"The 'fly-in and fly-out' entry will also be regulated. The Bar Council of India intends to implement these changes in accordance with observations from the apex court. The Bar Council recognises the necessity of specific amendments to current Rules and Regulations to ensure that the principle of reciprocity is upheld in both wording and intent," the statement added.

Pending stakeholder consultations, the BCI has assured a temporary halt to the process. The affidavit also highlights that these Rules will help position India as a hub for international commercial arbitration.

"If we delay action, India's legal community risks falling behind in providing legal and professional expertise in line with the rule of law, aligned with the best interests of our rapidly growing client base in India," the affidavit emphasised.

The BCI's response follows a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a group of lawyers challenging the BCI's March 10, 2023 notification allowing foreign lawyers to register and practice law in non-litigious matters in India.

The plea against the entry of foreign law firms is scheduled for hearing before the Delhi High Court on July 16. In its reply, the BCI argued that the petitioners misinterpreted the Supreme Court's judgment in Bar Council of India vs AK Balaji & Ors and the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961, which empower the BCI to frame rules and regulations for the practice of law in India.

On June 28, 2024, Bar & Bench reported exclusively that the BCI is likely to notify and implement amended regulations governing the entry of foreign lawyers and law firms by the end of July. It was reported that initially, the Indian legal market will be opened to lawyers and law firms from the United Kingdom (UK) only.

This announcement came shortly after a meeting between the BCI, the Law Society and the Bar Council of England and Wales at the Law Society's Hall in London.

Following this report, Lalit Bhasin, President of the Society of Indian Law Firms (SILF), wrote to BCI Chairman Manan Kumar Mishra requesting a discussion on the amended rules before their notification. 

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

UAE Residents Lost Dh16.8 Million on Rejected Schengen Visa Applications in 2023: Report

UAE residents keen on travelling to Europe "wasted" a staggering Dh16.8 million (€4.19 million) on rejected Schengen visa applications in 2023, according to a recent report.

The number of rejected visa applications from the Emirates last year stood at 22.44 per cent -- 25 per cent higher than the previous year, according to Schengen Visa Info, which claims to have guided "more than 280 million individuals" since 2013.

Up until 11 June 2024, the cost of a Schengen visa application was nearly Dh320 (€80). In addition to this, there are service fees that vary depending on the area. However, effective from June 11 this year, the European Commission announced a global increase in the cost of Schengen visas (visa type C) by 12 per cent.

The report states that UAE residents filed a total of 233,932 Schengen visa applications in 2023, which was an increase of 24.97 per cent compared to 2022.

Applicants from the country accounted for 2.27 per cent of all visa requests submitted globally, making it the 10th country with the most Schengen visa applications filed last year. They also spent a total of Dh74.9 million (€18.7 million) on Schengen visa applications.

The Schengen visa permits seamless travel across 27 European countries. Germany was the most favoured destination for expatriates applying from the UAE, with a total of 26,024 visa applications submitted for the country in 2023.

At the same time, it was Germany that rejected the most visa applications from the UAE -- 6,283 out of 26,024 visas were turned down. Lithuania received the least number of visa applications – 327 -- from the UAE.

UAE residents were granted a total of 177,213 Schengen visas in 2023, with Spain granting the most -- 20,843 -- with an approval rate of 80.09 per cent.

The easiest Schengen country to obtain a visa for from the UAE was Poland, with 90.61 per cent of 20,843 visa applications approved.

Indian travellers looking to visit Schengen countries faced major financial setbacks. According to the Schengen Statistics Portal, Indians lost a whopping Rs109 crore (approximately €12.1 million) due to rejected visa applications. Out of 966,687 applications submitted by Indians, 151,752 were denied.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Undercover Police Apprehend Gang of Four Thieves Targeting Dubai Mall Visitors

A gang of four thieves targeting visitors at Dubai Mall was recently apprehended by an undercover team of police officers.

The team, composed of Dubai policemen in civilian clothes, was formed in response to a rise in pickpocketing in crowded areas frequented by pedestrians and tourists, particularly at tourist attractions like Dubai Mall.

The officers were tasked with blending into the crowd and monitoring the situation to ensure visitors' safety.

The gang, consisting of four men aged 23, 28, 45, and 54, were caught red-handed on March 6, 2024.

According to court documents, the gang meticulously planned their thefts. On the day of the incident, they targeted the dancing fountain area of Dubai Mall, exploiting the crowd's distraction.

They pretended to watch the fountain show while one member monitored the victim and two distracted her, allowing the fourth to steal her mobile phone from her bag.

They then fled in different directions to confuse the victim, but their crime was discovered on the spot, and they were arrested. However, the phone was disposed of before the arrest.

At the Dubai Criminal Court, judges established that the defendants had formed a criminal group to steal from people in busy areas like large shopping centres.

"Following a recent increase in pickpocketing in crowded places like Dubai Mall, undercover security teams were established," a police officer testified in court. The undercover officers observed and caught the defendants on the day of the theft.

They were also captured by surveillance cameras, which showed the men coordinating to distract the victim and steal her phone before dispersing to avoid detection.

The defendants denied the charges during the investigation and in court sessions held via remote communication.

However, the court found them guilty, sentenced them to one month in prison each, and ordered their deportation.

Placeholder

How to Dispute Traffic Fines in UAE and Navigate Legal Process Effectively: Step-by-Step Guide

Have you recently received a traffic fine in the UAE that you believe is unjustified?

While the UAE boasts an efficient traffic management system, occasional errors or miscommunications can lead to incorrect penalties on your driving record.
If you genuinely believe your traffic fine is unfair, there's a straightforward method to dispute it.

Disputing Traffic Fines in the UAE

Despite the advanced technology and diligent workforce overseeing transportation operations, errors can still occur due to human oversight or machine malfunctions.

If you're convinced that you've been wrongly fined, you can formally request an investigation into the penalties associated with your vehicle or licence. To succeed in your dispute, you must provide evidence that you did not commit the violation.

Start by verifying the photograph of your vehicle's number plate, typically available on traffic fine check websites and promptly report any discrepancies to the relevant authorities.
Here's a breakdown of how to dispute traffic fines in different emirates:

Abu Dhabi

* Visit the Abu Dhabi Police e-complaints portal (TAMM).

* Search for and select the ‘Request a Grievance for Transport Violations’ service.

* Enter your vehicle details and personal information.

* Choose a convenient callback time and provide reasons for disputing the fine.

* Attach any available pictorial evidence. Authorities will review your dispute within 60 days of the fine issuance and reverse it if your claims are valid.

Dubai

* Visit the General Directorate of Traffic headquarters in Al Barsha and request to file a complaint in person.

* Alternatively, you can visit any police station to dispute Dubai traffic fines.

* You can also make complaints by calling +971-4-606-3555.

Sharjah

* Contact the Sharjah Police Traffic Department via WhatsApp at +971-6-517-7555.

* Use the MOI smartphone app (App Store/Google Play) to dispute Sharjah traffic fines.

* Log in with your UAE Pass account.

* Tap ‘Help’ and then ‘Complain.’

* Provide details explaining why you believe the fine is incorrect and submit.

* If your complaint is valid, the fine will be reversed.

Ajman

* File an appeal through the Ajman Police website or app (App Store/Google Play).

* Use your UAE Pass account to log in.

* Navigate to the ‘Traffic service’ and select ‘Objection on traffic penalty.’

* Enter incident details, including the ticket number and violation type.

* Explain your objection, attach relevant images, and submit.

* Ajman Police will review your appeal, and if your version of events is accepted, the fine will be reversed.

Fujairah, Ras Al Khaimah and Umm Al Quwain:

* Use the MOI app (App Store/Google Play).

* Log in with your UAE Pass account.

* Click on ‘Help’ and then ‘Complain.’

* Provide details of the violation and reasons for requesting a waiver.

* The traffic department may approve the appeal based on the evidence provided.

In conclusion, disputing traffic fines in the UAE is a straightforward process. If you believe an error has occurred, don't hesitate to appeal and rectify the situation.

Placeholder

Road Safety Initiative: Dubai Police Launch Free Car Inspection Service Until End of August 2024

The Dubai Police have launched a free car inspection service for all private car owners until the end of August 2024.

This initiative, in collaboration with AutoPro centres across the UAE, aims to enhance road safety during the summer months, when accidents due to high temperatures are more common.

It also encourages motorists to ensure their vehicles are in optimal condition, thus reducing the likelihood of accidents and breakdowns.

Service Details

The free car inspection service covers a comprehensive check of essential vehicle components, including brakes, air conditioning, air filters, radiator, tyres, lights, battery health, fluid levels and engine health.

Inspections will be conducted at designated police stations and mobile inspection units across the city, ensuring accessibility for all residents.

How to Avail the Service

Motorists can take advantage of this service by visiting the Dubai Police website or their nearest police station to schedule an appointment.

The initiative is part of Dubai Police's broader strategy to promote road safety and reduce traffic-related incidents by ensuring vehicles on the road meet safety standards.

Community Impact

This initiative is expected to benefit a large number of residents, especially those who might otherwise neglect regular vehicle maintenance due to cost considerations.

By providing this service for free, Dubai Police aim to remove financial barriers and encourage a proactive approach to vehicle upkeep.

Brigadier Saif Muhair Al Mazroui, Director of the General Department of Traffic at Dubai Police, highlighted the importance of regular vehicle inspections in preventing accidents and ensuring the safety of all road users.

He urged all motorists to take advantage of this free service and contribute to safer roads in Dubai.

Conclusion

This proactive measure by Dubai Police not only underscores their commitment to public safety but also provides an invaluable service to the community.

By encouraging regular vehicle maintenance, the initiative aims to significantly reduce the risk of accidents, ensuring safer roads for all.

Motorists are urged to take full advantage of this free service before the end of August, reinforcing the importance of vehicle upkeep in enhancing road safety.

Placeholder

Federal Law No. 4 of 2023 Revolutionises Sports Sector with Comprehensive Legal Framework

 

In a landmark legislative move, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) unveiled Federal Law No. 4 of 2023, also known as the UAE Sports Law, heralding a new era of regulation and development in the country's burgeoning sports landscape.

This sweeping legislation represents a significant step forward in fostering inclusivity, integrity, and excellence across all facets of sports within the UAE.

The UAE Sports Law, enacted to streamline and regulate sports activities across federal and local levels, sets forth a comprehensive legal framework aimed at enhancing governance, promoting participation, and ensuring the integrity of sports.

It encompasses provisions for the organization of sports events, compliance with international standards, and the establishment of specialized bodies such as the UAE Sports Arbitration Centre (UAESAC) to resolve disputes swiftly and fairly.

At its heart, the law aims to boost sports participation rates and cultivate local sporting talent through structured development programs and enhanced infrastructure. This strategic approach is underscored by the National Sports Strategy 2031, which outlines ambitious goals to increase community engagement in physical activities and excel in professional sports on a global scale.

Central to the implementation of the UAE Sports Law is the UAE General Authority for Sports (GAS), established in 2008, which plays a pivotal role in overseeing and regulating a diverse array of sports disciplines including football, tennis, martial arts, and more.

GAS collaborates closely with various sports federations and organisations to promote sports excellence and ensure compliance with the law's provisions.

The law also mandates support for individuals with disabilities, guaranteeing accessibility and opportunities for participation in sports at all levels. This commitment reflects the UAE's dedication to inclusivity and equal representation within its sports community.

The enactment of Federal Law No. 4 of 2023 is set to have profound economic implications, positioning the UAE as a leading destination for international sporting events and investments in sports infrastructure.

With state-of-the-art facilities and a commitment to hosting prestigious tournaments such as Formula 1 races and international golf championships, the UAE aims to boost tourism and stimulate economic growth through sports-related activities.

Furthermore, the law reinforces the UAE's commitment to ethical conduct and fair play, administering penalties for violations such as match-fixing to uphold integrity and ensure compliance with international sporting regulations.

This regulatory framework not only safeguards the interests of athletes and stakeholders but also enhances the nation's credibility in the global sports arena.

Looking ahead, the UAE Sports Law represents a transformative milestone in the country's sporting journey, setting a precedent for other nations in the region and beyond. By prioritising talent development, promoting diversity, and fostering a competitive sports environment, the UAE aims to solidify its position as a global hub for sports innovation and excellence.

As the Middle East continues to emerge as a dynamic sports market, characterised by rapid growth and increasing international recognition, the UAE stands at the forefront of this evolution.

With a clear vision and strategic objectives outlined in the UAE Sports Law, the country is poised to shape the future of sports, offering unparalleled opportunities for athletes, enthusiasts, and investors alike.

In conclusion, Federal Law No. 4 of 2023 marks a significant milestone in the UAE's commitment to advancing its sports sector.

By embracing inclusivity, enhancing governance, and fostering a culture of excellence, the UAE Sports Law lays the groundwork for a thriving sports ecosystem that promises to leave a lasting impact on both national and global stages.

 For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Protecting Intellectual Property in UAE: A Guide to Addressing IP Infringement Litigation

Intellectual Property (IP) constitutes a significant portion of the world's intangible assets, which have surpassed tangible assets in importance in today's world.

With the growing significance of IP, infringement has also risen substantially. Such infringing and pirated products account for about 2.5 per cent of world trade, valued at 464 billion in 2021.

In the UAE, there are four main types of IP rights: Trademarks, Copyrights, Patents and Trade Secrets. The penalties for their infringement are outlined under the respective Federal Laws governing these rights.

If your IP rights have been infringed, certain preliminary steps may be taken before proceeding to litigation. These are as follows:

* Evidence Gathering: It is crucial to gather evidence of the infringing act. Collect screenshots, product samples, or any other documents that clearly depict unauthorised use of your IP.

* Cease and Desist Letters: Once the evidence has been collected, a cease-and-desist letter must be sent to the infringer, prohibiting them from using your IP further and ordering them to destroy any and all infringing products.

* Alternative Dispute Resolution: If, after sending the cease-and-desist letter, the infringer continues the infringing activity, the last resort before pursuing litigation is to consider Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms, including negotiation, mediation, or arbitration. Multiple ADR institutions across the globe specialise in IP ADR, including the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre.

If the infringing activity continues even after the above steps have been taken, the final resort to enforce your IP rights would be to file a civil lawsuit against the infringing party.

There are a few common defences used in IP lawsuits to counteract infringement claims. It is important to be aware of these defences before pursuing litigation:

* Non-Infringement: The most common defence is that there has not been any infringing activity. Therefore, it is essential to collect as much evidence as possible of any instances of infringement you have noticed.

* Invalidity: The infringers may argue that your IP is invalid. Thus, it is imperative that your IP be registered in the prescribed manner and that you have all documentation supporting your registration, including the registration certificate and evidence of prior use.

* Fair Use: This is one of the trickiest defences to navigate. Many infringers may claim that their use of your IP falls under the exceptions granted under the Fair Use Doctrine, which allows for IP-protected material to be used for commentaries, parodies, criticisms, and some other non-commercial purposes.

* First Sale Doctrine: The First Sale Doctrine states that your IP rights are exhausted after the first sale, meaning you are not entitled to any profits made from any subsequent sales. However, there are some exceptions to this rule as well.
With this knowledge, you can proceed to litigation. Litigation is a lengthy and expensive process. The question that arises is: What are the possible outcomes of IP litigation?

* Injunctions: If the court finds that the defendant has indeed committed an infringing act, it could issue an injunction requiring them to cease all infringing activity.

* Damages: The court could further award you damages to compensate for the detriment caused by the infringing activity. Such damages often include the profits made by the infringer/defendant through such activities. The amount of damages is outlined in the Federal Laws.

For example, Article 49 of the Federal Decree-Law No. (36) of 2021 on Trademarks states that infringers may face a penalty of a fine ranging from Dh100,000 to Dh1,000,000 and/or imprisonment.

* Destruction of Infringing Material: The court may order that all infringing products be destroyed immediately to prevent any further use or sale.

* Dismissal: If the court finds that there has been no infringing activity on the part of the defendant, it may dismiss the case. However, there is the possibility to appeal to the Court of Appeals and further to the Court of Cassation.

IP rights play a pivotal role in fostering innovation and development, which is why it is imperative for an IP owner to take all necessary steps to register and protect their IP.

The UAE's legal framework provides robust protection for copyrights, trademarks, and patents, with severe penalties for infringement, including fines of up to Dh1 million and imprisonment.

In the case of infringement, it is extremely important to consult an experienced IP attorney to help build and argue your case.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Can You Nominate Yourself for the Golden Visa? Check Eligibility and Start Your Nomination

The UAE Golden Visa programme has been a hot topic for many aspiring residents, offering long-term residency with numerous privileges.

This article delves into the details of the Golden Visa, including its benefits, eligibility criteria, the nomination process and notable Indian celebrities and businesspeople who have acquired it.

What is the Golden Visa?

The UAE Golden Visa is a long-term residency visa introduced in 2019. It allows foreigners to live, work, and study in the UAE without the need for a national sponsor and with full ownership of their business on the UAE’s mainland. The visa is issued for 5 or 10 years and is renewable.

How to Get a Golden Visa

The Golden Visa is available to various categories of individuals, including investors, entrepreneurs, specialised talents, researchers, and outstanding students. Here's a breakdown of the key categories:

Investors

* Public Investments: Must deposit a minimum of Dh2 million in an accredited UAE investment fund. Alternatively, they can present a commercial or industrial licence with a capital of no less than Dh2 million and contribute at least Dh250,000 annually to the government.

* Real Estate Investors: Must own property or properties valued at a minimum of Dh2 million. The property can be mortgaged, provided the loan is from an approved local bank.

Entrepreneurs

* Entrepreneurs need to own an economic project of a technical or future-oriented nature with a minimum value of Dh500,000. They must obtain approval letters from an auditor, the relevant emirate authorities, and an accredited business incubator in the UAE.

Specialised Talents

* Doctors and Scientists: Require an approval letter from the Ministry of Health and Prevention (for doctors) or a recommendation from the Emirates Council of Scientists (for scientists).

* Inventors: Need a recommendation letter from the Ministry of Economy validating their patent's economic value.

* Creative Individuals: Must have an approval letter from the respective emirate's Department of Culture and Arts.

* Executive Directors: Must hold a bachelor's degree, have at least five years of experience, earn a minimum salary of Dh50,000, and have a valid work contract.

Outstanding Students

* High School Students: Must be national-level toppers with a minimum grade of 95% in secondary school and recommendation from the Ministry of Education.

* University Students: Must graduate from a university rated among the top 100 globally with a GPA of at least 3.5, and it  should not be more than two years since graduation.

Pioneers of Humanitarian Work

* Must have worked for international organisations, civil associations, or as humanitarian financiers with a minimum contribution of Dh2 million. Recognition through awards or recommendations from relevant bodies is required.

Frontline Heroes

* Frontline workers such as nurses, lab technicians, and other medical professionals who have shown exceptional service, particularly during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic, may also be eligible with a recommendation from a competent local government entity.

Privileges of Having a Golden Visa

Holding a UAE Golden Visa comes with several benefits:

* Long-term residency: Up to 10 years, renewable.

* Business ownership: 100 per cent ownership of businesses on the mainland.

* Family sponsorship: The visa holder can sponsor their spouse, children, and parents.

* Stability and security: Assurance of long-term residency regardless of employment status.

Indian Celebrities and Businesspeople with Golden Visas

Several high-profile Indian personalities have received the UAE Golden Visa, highlighting the programme's attractiveness:

Shah Rukh Khan: The Bollywood superstar was among the first Indian celebrities to receive the Golden Visa.

Sanjay Dutt: The actor received the Golden Visa, expressing his gratitude for the honour.

Boney Kapoor: The producer was granted the visa in recognition of his contributions to Indian cinema.

Murali Kartik: The former Indian cricketer also holds a Golden Visa, symbolising the UAE’s appreciation of sports personalities.

How Can One Get a Golden Visa?

Even if you don't fit into the high-profile categories, you can still be eligible for the Golden Visa. Here’s a step-by-step guide to starting your nomination:

Check Eligibility: Ensure you meet the criteria under one of the categories (investors, entrepreneurs, specialised talents, or outstanding students).

Prepare Documentation: Gather all required documents, such as passports, investment proofs, business licences, and academic certificates.

Apply Online: Visit the official UAE government portal or the Federal Authority for Identity and Citizenship (ICA) website to submit your application.

Nomination and Review: Your application will be reviewed, and you may be contacted for additional information or an interview. In some instances, individuals might receive pre-approval or nomination from UAE authorities. Nevertheless, if you're not pre-approved, you still have the option to nominate yourself.

Approval and Issuance: Upon approval, you will receive your Golden Visa, allowing you to enjoy the numerous benefits it offers.

The UAE Golden Visa offers an exceptional opportunity for long-term residency, business ownership, and family stability in one of the world's most dynamic regions.

Whether you are an investor, entrepreneur, specialised talent, or outstanding student, the path to securing this prestigious visa is accessible with the right preparation and understanding of the process.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Can't Allow Victim Shaming as Legal Strategy in Sexual Assault Cases: Delhi High Court

Shaming a victim and her family must not be allowed as tools of legal strategy in cases of sexual offences against minors as it deters them from reporting such offences to the authorities, the Delhi High Court has said.


Upholding the three-year jail term awarded to a house help for secretly recording objectionable videos of the minor daughter of his employer on his mobile phone, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma also discouraged taking a “lenient view” in such cases.
She asserted that judicial pronouncements that recognise the profound impact of voyeurism put a “healing balm” on the wounds of victims of such harassment and assault.


The accused challenged his conviction by the trial court in an appeal before the high court on several grounds including that the videos were prepared and planted by the father of the victim because he did not want to pay his salary.


Terming the contention “insensitive” and “unthinkable”, Justice Sharma said the court must uphold the dignity and rights of not only the child victims but also their families, and that the justice system has a paramount duty to protect the most vulnerable, particularly children, from any form of secondary trauma caused by unjust accusations or demeaning narratives.


“The Court must, therefore, take a firm stand against any attempts to malign the character of child victims or use victim shaming and victim family shaming as tools and pawns in legal strategies. Victim shaming and victim’s family shaming must not be allowed as it will be a deterrent and road block in the real victims reporting such offences to the authorities,” said the court in its judgement passed on July 1.


The court held that the material on record and the testimonies of the witnesses clearly established the case of the prosecution that the appellant had made three objectionable videos of the victim and the trial court rightly convicted him under Sections 354C (voyeurism) and 509 (word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty) IPC, and under Section 12 (punishment for sexual harassment) of the POCSO Act.


The court also refused to reduce the punishment of three-year imprisonment, saying if the accused was a young man of 22 years of age at the time of incident, the victim was also 17 years old when she suffered a “life-long trauma” within the safety and privacy of her own home.


“The appellant had stealthily recorded videos, an act beyond imagination or expectation of the child victim or her family. This trauma severely impacted her ability to concentrate on her studies and career, ultimately leading her to leave the country for higher studies as she could not continue in the same place where she had been a victim of sexual harassment,” the court observed.


The court said it “shudders to think” if the videos were shared by the appellant or were misused by him in any other manner.
“Taking a lenient view in such cases will also discourage the real victims of such offences. The judiciary helps set societal norms and expectations regarding the protection of children by consistently condemning voyeuristic acts and emphasising the sanctity of a child’s privacy and dignity,” said the court as it dismissed the accused’s appeal.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

£4M Reward Offered for Capture of ‘Cryptoqueen’ Ruja Ignatova, Mastermind Behind OneCoin Scam

In a significant escalation of efforts to apprehend Ruja Ignatova, notorious for her role in the OneCoin cryptocurrency scam, US authorities have increased the reward for information leading to her arrest to £4 million.
Ignatova, a Bulgarian-born German national, has been on the run since 2017 when she disappeared amid mounting investigations into her £3.3 billion fraud scheme.


Matthew Miller, spokesperson for the US State Department, underscored the gravity of Ignatova's alleged crimes, labelling them as among "the largest global fraud schemes in history." The reward increase, part of the Transnational Organised Crime Reward Programme, reflects the seriousness with which US authorities are treating the case.
Ruja Ignatova, also known as the "Cryptoqueen," orchestrated one of the largest cryptocurrency scams in history through a fraudulent scheme known as OneCoin. Here are the detailed aspects of her alleged crimes:


Creation of OneCoin: Ignatova founded OneCoin in 2014, presenting it as a legitimate cryptocurrency akin to Bitcoin. However, unlike Bitcoin and other genuine cryptocurrencies that operate on blockchain technology, OneCoin operated on a centralised platform without a genuine blockchain.


False Promises and Pyramid Scheme: Ignatova and her associates aggressively promoted OneCoin, promising investors high returns and significant profits through its multi-level marketing structure. Investors were misled into believing that OneCoin held promising prospects and substantial market value, despite lacking any genuine technological basis or transparency.


Global Fraud: OneCoin was marketed globally, targeting investors across Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Americas. The scheme allegedly defrauded investors of billions of dollars, with estimates suggesting losses exceeding $4.5 billion.


Legal and Regulatory Issues: As suspicions mounted and investigations intensified, authorities in numerous countries began scrutinising OneCoin. By 2017, investigations by law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, uncovered the fraudulent nature of OneCoin, resulting in legal actions against Ignatova and her associates.


Ruja Ignatova's alleged crimes illustrate the risks associated with unregulated financial schemes and the importance of due diligence in investing, particularly in emerging sectors like cryptocurrency. Her case has underscored the need for stronger regulatory oversight and investor protection in the digital currency space.


Ignatova's case marks a rare instance where a woman has been targeted under the US reward programme, standing alongside high-profile targets like Daniel Kinahan, implicated in European drug cartels, Semion Mogilevich, an alleged Russia-based crime boss, and Yulan Adonay Archaga Carías, known as "Porky," a senior member of the MS-13 gang in Honduras.


The pursuit of Ignatova has garnered international attention, with legal experts noting the intricate legal challenges surrounding extradition and international cooperation in financial crime cases of this magnitude. Authorities continue to urge individuals with pertinent information on Ignatova's whereabouts or activities to come forward, emphasising the substantial reward as an incentive for cooperation.
The saga surrounding Ruja Ignatova, dubbed the "Cryptoqueen," underscores the complexities and international dimensions of modern financial crimes, resonating deeply within both the cryptocurrency community and law enforcement circles worldwide.

 For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

 

Placeholder

NFL Faces Major Lawsuit Over Player Safety: Former Stars Alleging Fraud Seek Compensation

The National Football League (NFL) is facing a significant legal challenge as a coalition of former players and their families have filed a lawsuit in federal court, alleging that the league failed to adequately protect its players from the long-term health risks associated with concussions and other head injuries.


The lawsuit, filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, accuses the NFL of negligence and fraud, claiming that the league had been aware of the dangers of repetitive head trauma for decades but deliberately downplayed the risks to players. The plaintiffs contend that the NFL prioritised profits and entertainment value over the health and safety of its athletes.


According to the complaint, the plaintiffs are seeking compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering, as well as punitive damages. The lawsuit also calls for the establishment of a medical monitoring program for current and former players to ensure early detection and treatment of neurological disorders.


John Doe, a former linebacker and one of the lead plaintiffs in the case, spoke at a press conference announcing the lawsuit. "We dedicated our lives to this game, and we trusted the NFL to look out for us," Doe said. "But instead, they turned a blind eye to the evidence and put us in harm's way. It's time for the league to take responsibility for the damage they've caused."


The lawsuit highlights several key pieces of evidence, including internal NFL documents and emails that purportedly show the league's knowledge of the risks associated with concussions and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a degenerative brain disease found in many former football players. The plaintiffs also point to recent research linking repeated head injuries to severe cognitive and behavioural problems later in life.


In response to the lawsuit, the NFL released a statement expressing sympathy for the players and their families but denying any wrongdoing. "Player safety has always been a top priority for the NFL," the statement read. "We have implemented numerous protocols and programmes to protect our players and will continue to do so. We believe this lawsuit is without merit, and we will vigorously defend against these claims."


This legal battle is not the first of its kind for the NFL. In 2013, the league reached a $765 million settlement with thousands of former players who had filed a similar lawsuit over concussion-related injuries. However, critics argue that the settlement did not go far enough in addressing the needs of affected players and their families.


Legal experts suggest that this new lawsuit could have far-reaching implications for the NFL and professional sports as a whole. "If the plaintiffs are successful, it could open the door for more lawsuits and potentially lead to significant changes in how sports leagues handle player safety," said Dr Jane Smith, a professor of sports law at Columbia University.


As the case moves forward, it is expected to draw considerable attention from the media, fans, and the broader sports community. With the health and well-being of current and former players at stake, the outcome of this lawsuit could have a lasting impact on the future of professional football in the United States.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Day of Reflection: MoHRE Declares July 7 as Islamic New Year Holiday for UAE Public, Private Sectors

Public and private sector workers in the UAE will be granted a public holiday on Sunday to mark the Islamic New Year, the Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratisation has announced.
Public and private sector employees are typically afforded the same number of holidays each year. The Islamic, or Hijri, New Year heralds the beginning of Muharram, the first of the 12 months on the Islamic calendar.
It will be observed across the Emirates on Sunday.
As with other Islamic holidays, the day Muharram is marked changes yearly, based on the lunar cycle.
In contrast to Eid Al-Fitr and Eid Al-Adha, no religious observances are prescribed for the Islamic New Year. It is generally regarded as a day of reflection rather than celebration.

Remaining Holidays for 2024

Prophet Mohammed's Birthday: The holiday is typically a time for quiet reflection rather than celebration, with festivities scaled back.
The UAE Cabinet previously confirmed this year's public holiday for the occasion would be observed on September 29.
Last year, President Sheikh Mohamed paid homage to an “inspirational legacy of kindness” on Prophet Mohammed's birthday. The UAE leader said the Prophet's “timeless values” continue to be a guiding light for society.

Commemoration Day: Commemoration Day, also known as Martyrs Day, pays homage to Emirati soldiers who have lost their lives in the line of duty. It is typically marked with a minute's silence in honour of those who died in service.
Last year, Commemoration Day was observed on November 30, with a public holiday on  December 1.
The late President Sheikh Khalifa introduced Commemoration Day in 2015.
It originally took place on November 30 to commemorate the death of Salem Khamis, who died on the same date in 1971 fighting against Iranian forces on the island of Greater Tunb. He is thought to have been the first Emirati to be killed in military service since the formation of the UAE that year.

National Day

The UAE unites each December to celebrate the rise of a nation that is called home by more than 200 nationalities.
A spectacular live show is typically the centrepiece of colourful festivities held in all seven emirates.
Citizens often display their patriotic pride by flying the UAE Flag from their cars, which are also emblazoned with the nation's colours and decorated with images of Emirati leaders.
In 2022, a stunning 51st National Day show staged at the Abu Dhabi National Exhibition Centre celebrated the best of the nation and showcased its grand ambitions for the next 50 years.
An extravaganza of dancers, live music and performances – as well as the arrival of an Etihad Rail passenger train – delivered a taste of Emirati heritage and a snapshot of how the UAE will be shaped in the coming years.
The UAE Cabinet has announced this year's National Day public holiday will be held on December 2 and 3.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

UK Child Serial Killer Lucy Letby Convicted Of Attempted Murder of Another Baby Girl at Re-trial

A UK jury convicted child serial killer Lucy Letby of attempting to murder another baby girl at the hospital neo-natal unit where she worked.

It comes nearly a year after a different jury convicted the former nurse of murdering seven newborn babies and attempting to kill six others, making her Britain's most prolific child serial killer in modern history.

Letby, 34, faced a retrial at Manchester Crown Court for the attempted murder of the baby girl, referred to in court as Child K, at the Countess of Chester Hospital in northwest England in 2016.

Jurors at her original trial last year failed to reach a verdict on that charge.

However, the jury hearing the case this time took just over three hours to reach their unanimous guilty verdict.
Letby, who is already serving a whole-life prison sentence and was earlier this year refused an appeal bid, will be sentenced for the latest offence on Friday.

During the re-trial, jurors heard that the former nurse was "caught virtually red-handed" by a senior consultant as she displaced Child K's breathing tube.

The prosecution detailed how the consultant paediatrician walked into the unit's intensive care nursery room and saw Letby standing next to the incubator "doing nothing", as the infant's blood oxygen levels dipped.

The jury was also told of Letby's convictions last August of the other murders and attempted murders between 2015 and 2016.

Reporting restrictions prevent publication of the identities of the surviving and dead children in the cases.
Appearing in the witness box last month, Letby denied attempting to murder or harm Child K, or any baby ever in her care.

Child K was transferred to a specialist hospital later the same day because she was born extremely prematurely.
She died there three days later. The prosecution has not alleged Letby caused her death.

The young girl's parents thanked the jury and said "justice has been served". "But this justice will not take away the extreme hurt, anger and distress that we have all had to experience," they added.

"It also does not provide us with an explanation of why these crimes have taken place," a statement read.
Letby, from Hereford, western England, was arrested and then charged in 2020 following a string of baby deaths at the hospital's neo-natal unit.

The prosecution at her first trial said she attacked her vulnerable prematurely born victims, often during night shifts, by either injecting them with air, overfeeding them with milk or poisoning them with insulin.

A public inquiry into events at the hospital unit will start to hear evidence in September.
Cheshire Police said Tuesday that a "complex and sensitive" corporate manslaughter probe into the hospital -- launched following Letby's convictions last year -- was ongoing alongside the original investigation into the ex-nurse.

It is "considering areas including senior leadership and decision-making to determine whether any criminality has taken place," Detective Superintendent Simon Blackwell said.

"At this stage we are not investigating any individuals in relation to gross negligence manslaughter," he added.
Meanwhile, the continuing probe into Letby includes a review of 4,000 baby admissions during a four-year period when she worked at the Chester hospital and at the Liverpool Women's Hospital.

Detective Superintendent Paul Hughes said only cases "highlighting any medical concern" will be further reviewed. 

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

UK Government and British Airways Face Lawsuit Over 1990 Kuwait Hostage Crisis

Passengers and crew of a British Airways flight taken hostage in Kuwait in 1990 have initiated legal proceedings against the UK government and the airline, as announced by a law firm on Monday.

The incident involved BA flight 149, which was en route to Kuala Lumpur and landed in Kuwait on August 2, 1990, just hours after Iraq's leader Saddam Hussein invaded the country.

The 367 passengers and crew members were subsequently held captive for over four months, with some being used as human shields during the Gulf War.

A total of 94 former hostages have filed a civil lawsuit in the High Court in London, accusing the UK government and British Airways of "deliberately endangering" them. McCue Jury & Partners, the law firm representing them, stated that all claimants experienced severe physical and psychological trauma, the effects of which persist.

The lawsuit alleges that the UK government and British Airways were aware of the invasion before allowing the flight to land. It claims the flight was used to "insert a covert special ops team into occupied Kuwait."

Barry Manners, a claimant who was on the flight, stated, "We were not treated as citizens but as expendable pawns for commercial and political gain." He hopes the lawsuit will help restore trust in the political and judicial system after years of alleged cover-up and denial.

Documents released by the British government in November 2021 indicated that the UK ambassador to Kuwait had informed London of the Iraqi invasion before the flight landed, but this information was not relayed to British Airways.

There have been further allegations that the UK government knowingly endangered passengers by using the flight to deploy undercover operatives and delaying its take-off to facilitate this. The government has denied these claims and declined to comment on the ongoing legal proceedings.

British Airways has consistently denied allegations of negligence, conspiracy, and cover-up. The airline did not respond to a request for comment from AFP but previously stated that the records released in 2021 confirmed they were not warned about the invasion.

McCue Jury & Partners had announced in September their intention to file the lawsuit, suggesting that the hostages might seek an estimated average of £170,000 ($213,000) each in damages.

In 2003, a French court ordered British Airways to pay 1.67 million euros to French hostages from the flight, citing a "serious failure" in their obligations by landing the plane.

The airline did not respond to AFP's request for comment but stated last year that records released in 2021 "confirmed British Airways was not warned about the invasion."

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

MoHRE Sets June 30 Deadline for Emiratisation Targets, Urges Compliance

The Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratisation (MoHRE) has announced that June 30 is the final deadline for achieving Emiratisation targets for the first half of 2024.

These targets require a 1% increase in the number of UAE citizens in skilled positions at companies with 50 or more employees, as per the Council of Ministers' decisions.

In a press release, the ministry stated that from July 1st onwards, it will begin assessing companies' compliance with these targets and will impose financial penalties on those that fail to meet the requirements.

The ministry praised companies that have met the growth targets, highlighting the importance of registering Emirati employees in a pension fund and the Wage Protection System (WPS). It urged these companies to maintain the achieved growth rates by June 30.

Expressing confidence in companies' ability to meet their commitments amid the UAE's rapid economic development, the ministry noted the significant contributions of Emirati citizens in the private sector.

Additionally, the ministry encouraged companies that have not yet met their targets to use the Nafis Programme’s digital platform. This platform provides access to a large pool of qualified Emirati job seekers across various fields.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Woman Receives 6-Month Prison Sentence for Stabbing Boyfriend During Dispute Over Phone

 

A woman, who stabbed her boyfriend three times after he refused to hand over his mobile phone so she could check his chats, has been sentenced to six months in prison.

The incident occurred on August 20, 2022 at their shared apartment in Dubai’s Al Muraqqabat area. According to the Dubai court verdict, the Thai national and the Arab victim were in a romantic relationship and frequently faced conflicts. On the day of the incident, she saw her boyfriend in the kitchen, engaged in a voice chat with another woman.

When she questioned him about the call, he did not respond, prompting her to demand his phone. After his refusal, she attempted to seize the mobile phone by force but was unsuccessful. At that point, her boyfriend struck her on her left eyebrow.

The woman then grabbed a kitchen knife and warned her boyfriend that she would stab him if he hit her again. As he tried to disarm her, she stabbed him three times.

Her boyfriend managed to leave the kitchen but collapsed in the bathroom, bleeding from his chest. Overcome with fear upon seeing the blood, she called the police and reported the incident, seeking medical help for him.

Emergency services arrived, and the man was taken to Rashid Hospital, where he was treated for three stab wounds -- two to his chest and one to his left forearm.

The forensic report confirmed that the man sustained three stab wounds, including a deep, life-threatening chest wound that caused significant internal bleeding and required extensive medical treatment.

During the prosecution investigation, the woman admitted to an attempted murder charge and explained that she did not intend to kill him but only wanted to protect herself after he assaulted her. She repeated the same explanation to the judges.

In light of the evidence, the court concluded that the woman’s actions constituted intentional bodily harm rather than attempted murder.

The court noted that she ceased her assault after the initial stabbing and sought help for the victim, indicating a lack of intent to kill. Consequently, she was found guilty of assault, not attempted murder, and sentenced to six months in prison. The woman will be deported after serving her sentence.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Criminal Offenses Frequently Committed by Employees Against Their Companies and the Penalties

In the fast-paced and competitive world of business, trust is paramount. Crimes in the workplace can take various forms, but one of the most insidious is the creation and misuse of deceptive documents by employees, particularly those in managerial positions.

The impact of these crimes can be profound for the company. Therefore, this article will focus on breach of trust, embezzlement of funds, forgery and fraud perpetrated against employers by employees.

Forgery

Forgery is a serious concern with significant societal implications. It involves the creation of a false instrument intended to deceive others into accepting it as genuine, thereby causing harm.

Under Article 251(4) of the Crimes and Penalties Law, forging a document or falsely attributing it to a third party constitutes forgery. UAE law imposes strict penalties, including temporary imprisonment for up to 10 years, for misappropriating fake official documents. The effects of forgery extend beyond immediate financial losses; forged documents can lead to severe consequences for employers.

Embezzlement of Funds

Embezzlement refers to the dishonest appropriation by an employee of money or valuables entrusted to them by their employer. The UAE Penal Code outlines severe consequences for those misusing their positions within a company.

It stipulates that individuals who unlawfully seize company papers or funds through misuse of office can face temporary imprisonment. Additionally, using forged documents exacerbates the penalty to a minimum of five years' imprisonment.

Thus, employees guilty of embezzling funds or misappropriating company papers may face imprisonment. Consequently, embezzlement damages the company's reputation, undermining trust among clients, investors and stakeholders, thereby jeopardising business opportunities and tarnishing the company's image.

Fraud

Fraud involves knowingly or recklessly making false representations through statements or conduct to gain a material advantage. Within companies, fraudulent activities encompass unethical practices such as misappropriation of assets or falsification of documents.

Employee fraud against employers poses a significant threat to company stability, involving deceptive actions aimed at personal gain. According to the Crimes and Penalties Law, individuals unlawfully taking property or using deceitful means for personal benefit can face imprisonment or fines.

Breach of Trust

Breach of trust occurs when a person in a position of responsibility, such as a trustee, fails to fulfil their duties, thereby betraying the trust placed in them.

This betrayal often results in harm or loss to the company. Breach of trust can lead to financial losses and damaged reputations, ultimately affecting the company's standing.

Under Article 453 of Federal Decree-Law No. 31 of 2021, individuals misappropriating entrusted money or documents to the detriment of the rightful owner can face imprisonment or fines.

For instance, a manager creating documents on behalf of the company and subsequently delegated to employees who misuse them could result in liability and subsequent damages for the company, potentially leading to imprisonment or fines for those involved.

Conclusion

Federal Decree-Law No. 31 of 2021 (Crimes and Penalties Law) safeguards employers against fraudulent actions by employees, which pose significant risks to companies. Understanding the severe penalties outlined in this law serves as a strong deterrent, discouraging involvement in criminal activities.

The law aims not only to protect employers but also to ensure that individuals engaging in fraud face appropriate consequences. 

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Anti-Trafficking Law Aims to Punish Traffickers, Not Sex Workers, Clarifies Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court recently highlighted that India's anti-trafficking law does not penalise sex workers or trafficking victims compelled into prostitution.

In a ruling on June 10, Justice M. Nagaprasanna clarified that the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act (ITPA) aims not to penalise sex workers but rather to target those who traffic women or girls for exploitation in prostitution.

"The purpose or the object of the Act is not to abolish prostitution or the prostitute. There is no provision under the law that penalises a victim who indulges in prostitution. What is punishable is sexual exploitation for commercial purposes and earning or making a living from it against such person/s," the Court said.

The Court also highlighted a similar observation made by the Bombay High Court, which emphasised that allowing the police to prosecute victims (sex workers) under the ITPA would constitute an abuse of the law.

The Court made this observation while dismissing criminal proceedings against a woman (petitioner) who had been implicated in an ITPA case in 2013. The woman was accused of being part of a group of girls who were allegedly paid ₹10,000 each to be coerced into prostitution.

The incident occurred while the girls were being transported from Udupi to Goa, and their vehicle was intercepted by authorities.

Case Brief

In the said matter, the petitioner approached the High Court seeking to quash the case filed against her under Section 5 of the ITPA, which pertains to procuring, inducing, or taking a woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution.

During the course of the hearing, the petitioner's counsel argued that she was a victim of prostitution and therefore should not face prosecution. In response, the state argued that regardless of her victim status, the petitioner cannot approach the High Court 10 years after the case was filed. The state maintained that she should undergo trial and prove her innocence.

However, the Court granted the petitioner relief after noting that Section 5 of the ITPA only punishes persons accused of procuring or attempting to procure a woman or a girl for prostitution and does not penalise the victims.

Thus, the Court allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings pending against the petitioner.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange Gains Freedom After 12 Years After Pleading Guilty in US Court

 

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange walked free on Wednesday from a court on the US Pacific island territory of Saipan after pleading guilty to violating US espionage law, in a deal that will see him return home to Australia.

His release ends a 14-year legal saga in which Assange spent more than five years in a British high-security jail and seven years in asylum at the Ecuadorean embassy in London, battling extradition to the US, where he faced 18 criminal charges.

During the three-hour hearing, Assange pleaded guilty to one criminal count of conspiring to obtain and disclose classified national defence documents but said he had believed the US Constitution's First Amendment, which protects free speech, shielded his activities.

"Working as a journalist I encouraged my source to provide information that was said to be classified in order to publish that information," he told the court. "I believed the First Amendment protected that activity but I accept that it was ... a violation of the espionage statute."

Chief US District Judge Ramona V. Manglona accepted his guilty plea and released him due to time already served in a British jail. "We firmly believe that Mr Assange never should have been charged under the Espionage Act and engaged in (an) exercise that journalists engage in every day," his US lawyer, Barry Pollack, told reporters outside the court.

WikiLeaks' work would continue, he said. His UK and Australian lawyer, Jennifer Robinson, thanked the Australian government for its years of diplomacy in securing Assange's release.

"It is a huge relief to Julian Assange, to his family, to his friends, to his supporters and to us and to everyone who believes in free speech around the world that he can now return home to Australia and be reunited with his family," she said.

Assange, 52, left the court through a throng of TV cameras and photographers without answering questions, then waved as he got into a white SUV. He is set to leave Saipan on a private jet accompanied by Australia’s ambassadors to the US and UK, heading to the Australian capital Canberra, where they are expected to land around 7 pm (0900 GMT), according to flight logs.

Assange had agreed to plead guilty to a single criminal count, according to filings in the US District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands. The US territory in the western Pacific was chosen due to his opposition to travelling to the mainland US and for its proximity to Australia, prosecutors said.

Dozens of media from around the world attended the hearing, with more gathered outside the courtroom to cover the proceedings. Media were not allowed inside the courtroom to film the hearing.

"I watch this and think how overloaded his senses must be, walking through the press scrum after years of sensory depravation and the four walls of his high security Belmarsh prison cell," Stella Assange, the wife of WikiLeaks founder said on social media platform X.

 Long Saga

Australian-born Assange spent more than five years in a British high-security jail and seven holed up in the Ecuadorean embassy in London as he fought accusations of sex crimes in Sweden and battled extradition to the US, where he faced 18 criminal charges.

Assange's supporters view him as a victim because he exposed US wrongdoing and potential crimes, including in conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. Washington has said the release of the secret documents put lives in danger.

The Australian government has been advocating for his release and has raised the issue with the United States several times. "This isn't something that has happened in the last 24 hours," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told a news conference on Wednesday.

"This is something that has been considered, patient, worked through in a calibrated way, which is how Australia conducts ourselves."


For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Are You a Domestic Worker in UAE? Know Your Rights and Obligations of Employer

 

Federal Decree-Law No. 9 of 2022 governs the law concerning domestic workers in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Enacted to ensure the protection and fair treatment of domestic workers, this decree-law represents a significant step towards regulating this often overlooked sector, providing clarity on responsibilities and avenues for dispute resolution.

Understanding the Law

Under Federal Decree-Law No. 9 of 2022, several key provisions outline the rights and obligations of domestic workers and their employers, including:

Working Hours and Rest Periods: Domestic workers are entitled to a maximum of 12 hours of work per day, with at least 8 hours of rest. They should also be provided with one day off per week, preferably on a Friday.
Compensation and Benefits: Domestic workers are entitled to receive their wages in full and on time. Employers must also provide suitable accommodation, food and medical care to ensure the worker's basic needs are met.
Respect and Dignity: Employers are obligated to treat domestic workers with respect and dignity, refraining from any form of physical or verbal abuse. Likewise, workers are expected to carry out their duties diligently and respectfully.
Termination and Dispute Resolution: The decree-law stipulates procedures for termination, ensuring fair treatment for both parties. In case of disputes, avenues for resolution through mediation and legal channels are provided.
Minimum Salary: The law does not specify a minimum salary.
Annual Leave: Workers are entitled to 30 days of paid annual leave.
Probation Period: The probation period should not exceed six months from the date of commencement.

Obligations of the Employer

  • Provide appropriate accommodation for the domestic worker.
  • Provide meals and necessary clothing for the performance of duties, unless employed on a temporary basis.
  • Cover the costs of medical care or provide health insurance as per the UAE health system.
  • Allow the domestic worker to retain all official documents.
  • In case of death during service, the worker's heirs are entitled to wages for the month of death and any other due entitlements.
  • Cover repatriation costs to the worker's country of origin as per the Decree-Law and its regulations.

Challenges Faced by Domestic Workers

Despite the legal framework, domestic workers in the UAE often struggle to assert their rights due to language barriers, fear of retaliation and lack of awareness about legal protections. Common issues include underpayment, excessive working hours and inadequate living conditions.

Questions and Legal Remedies

For domestic workers seeking clarity on their rights and obligations, here are some common questions addressed:

Q1: What should I do if I'm not being paid my wages or if my employer breaches the terms of my contract?
A: Document any violations and seek assistance from relevant authorities such as the Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratisation (MoHRE) or legal aid organisations specialising in labour rights.

Q2:My employer is demanding I work beyond the stipulated hours. What recourse do I have?
A: Inform your employer of the legal limits on working hours and request adherence to the law. If the issue persists, consider seeking assistance from labour authorities or legal advisors.

Q3:I am facing mistreatment and abuse from my employer. How can I ensure my safety and seek redressal?
A: Contact law enforcement or seek refuge at shelters provided for victims of abuse. Additionally, legal aid organisations can assist in filing complaints and obtaining protection orders.

Workmen Gratuity

For domestic workers in the UAE, entitlement to gratuity depends on the terms outlined in their employment contract and whether they fall under the purview of the UAE Labour Law or other regulations.

While Federal Decree-Law No. 9 of 2022 may not explicitly mention gratuity provisions, it focuses on aspects such as working hours, compensation, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

Domestic workers should review their contracts carefully to understand their entitlements regarding gratuity. If gratuity is not explicitly stated, they may seek clarification from their employer or legal advisors.

In conclusion, while Federal Decree-Law No. 9 of 2022 marks progress in safeguarding the rights of domestic workers in the UAE, effective implementation and awareness are crucial.

By understanding their rights and obligations, domestic workers can navigate challenges more confidently, while employers can uphold ethical standards and foster a culture of respect and dignity in the workplace.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Online Fraud in Dubai: Legal Implications, Prevention Strategies and Public-Private Partnerships

 

Online fraud is a collective term for various types of malicious activities, such as phishing, identity theft, data breaches and ransomware attacks. Cybercriminals use diverse attack vectors, including malicious software, spoofed websites and elaborate phishing schemes, to trick victims into revealing personal information, financial information, or access to secure networks.

In the ever-changing digital economy of Dubai, online fraud has become a major menace for both companies and clients. The financial and operational impacts are substantial, with 42 per cent of UAE organisations reporting increased fraud within just one year.

Firms incur an average cost of Dh4.19 per dirham lost to fraud, which includes direct financial losses as well as other costs related to internal labour, external fees, interest paid and replacement costs for goods obtained through theft or loss.

Digital payments have transformed the payment landscape with improved convenience and ease in transactions, but they also expose users to new threats from cyber criminals who often target digital channels.

Across the EMEA (Europe, the Middle East and Africa) region, digital channels now account for 52 per cent of fraud losses, surpassing physical fraud for the first time.

The anonymity and speed of digital, cross-border transactions enable cybercriminals to execute untraceable fraud with alarming ease.

Moreover, the sophistication of cyber-attacks is escalating, driven by advancements in technology such as artificial intelligence (AI), which enhances the ability of criminals to exploit both consumers and businesses.

Legal Implications and Preventive Strategies

As a member of the UAE, Dubai has recognised the urgent need to safeguard its rapidly expanding digital economy and has built a strong regulatory framework to combat cybercrime.

The Federal Law No. 5 of 2012 on Combatting Cybercrimes, also known as the UAE Cybercrimes Law, is the cornerstone of this system. It provides comprehensive measures to prevent and penalise various forms of cybercrime, including online fraud. Key aspects of the UAE Cybercrimes Law include:

Article 2: Criminalises unauthorised access to electronic websites, systems, or information networks, with harsh consequences for causing damage, interference, or altering information.
Article 3: Covers crimes involving communication interception, such as hacking and eavesdropping.
Article 4: Addresses cyber forgery and prohibits the unauthorised use, alteration, or copying of data, documents, or electronic records.
Article 11: Targets internet fraud specifically, punishing offenders who unlawfully obtain property, advantages, or rights by deceit, impersonation, or fraudulent schemes with harsh fines and/or imprisonment.

The UAE has implemented specific regulations to tackle online fraud in addition to the general provisions of the Cybercrimes Law. These provisions are designed to address the unique challenges posed by digital transactions and cyber threats:

The Electronic Commerce Act (Federal Law No. 1 of 2006): Governs electronic commerce in the UAE, ensuring that digital contracts and transactions are valid and enforceable while also providing security measures to help prevent fraud through hacking.

Data Protection Legislation: Safeguards personal and sensitive information, thereby reducing the risks of identity theft and data breaches.
Payment Systems Regulations: Issued by the Central Bank of the UAE, these rules ensure the security and integrity of electronic payment systems, minimising opportunities for financial fraud.

Enforcing these laws is a critical role played by local authorities. The Dubai Police Cyber Crime Unit uses forensic tools to investigate and fight cybercrime. Enhancing cybersecurity across Dubai is the mandate of the Dubai Electronic Security Centre (DESC), whereas the Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA) is responsible for promoting cybersecurity awareness and initiatives.

Moreover, the UAE Cybercrimes Law provides for strict punishments, including severe fines from Dh50,000 to Dh3 million, imprisonment, or asset forfeiture.

The Dubai government has implemented several measures aimed at curbing online fraud, including awareness campaigns targeting public online risks and promoting secure internet behaviours.

Organisations like DESC prioritise technological advancements, utilising AI and blockchain technology in fraud detection and prevention efforts. AI analyses big data to identify patterns indicative of fraudulent activity, while blockchain technology offers a secure way of maintaining transaction records, guaranteeing data integrity. Imposing tough penalties on offenders helps enforce stringent cybercrime laws, thereby providing a safer internet environment.

By employing strong passwords, recognising phishing attempts, keeping software updated, and enabling two-factor authentication, individuals can protect themselves from online fraud. Businesses can mitigate risks by adopting robust cybersecurity measures, conducting regular employee training, performing security audits, and maintaining comprehensive incident response plans.

Combating online fraud is a joint responsibility of both public and private sectors. Public-private partnerships facilitate knowledge sharing on emerging threats and the most successful mechanisms for fighting counterfeits. Governments and enterprises collaborate to provide cybersecurity training programmes, engage in public awareness campaigns and develop new technologies.

International collaboration is essential since cybercrime is borderless. Cross-border cooperation encompasses intelligence-sharing, harmonisation of legal frameworks, and joint operations.

The adoption of international cybersecurity standards ensures global safeguards against online fraud, involving organisations such as INTERPOL promoting collaboration between nations and setting norms under the United Nations.

Dubai’s emerging digital economy is under serious threat of e-fraud, prompting proactive and responsive moves by regulatory authorities. The city has a strong legal framework with Federal Law No. 5 of 2012 and dedicated agencies such as the Dubai Police Cyber Crime Unit and DESC, capable of effectively prosecuting offenders.

Preventative strategies involve public sensitisation campaigns, technological developments like AI and blockchain, and international cooperation. When individuals take care in combination with organisational efforts such as training employees and implementing solid cybersecurity systems, the fight against fraudsters is fortified.

As Dubai maintains its position as a global digital hub, it emphasises the need to combat cybercrime, demonstrating its commitment to economic growth and global security standards.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange to be Freed After Pleading Guilty to US Espionage Charge

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is due to plead guilty on Wednesday to violating US espionage law, in a deal that will end his imprisonment in Britain and allow him to return home to Australia, ending a 14-year legal odyssey.

Assange, 52, has agreed to plead guilty to a single criminal count of conspiring to obtain and disclose classified U.S. national defense documents, according to filings in the US District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands.

He is due to be sentenced to 62 months of time already served at a hearing in Saipan at 9 am local time on Wednesday (2300 GMT Tuesday). The island in the Pacific was chosen due to Assange's opposition to travelling to the mainland US and for its proximity to Australia, prosecutors said.

Assange left Belmarsh prison in the UK on Monday before being bailed by the UK High Court and boarding a flight that afternoon, Wikileaks said in a statement posted on social media platform X.

"This is the result of a global campaign that spanned grass-roots organisers, press freedom campaigners, legislators and leaders from across the political spectrum, all the way to the United Nations," the statement said.

A video posted on X by Wikileaks showed Assange dressed in a blue shirt and jeans signing a document before boarding a private jet with the markings of charter firm VistaJet.

He will return to Australia after the hearing, the Wikileaks statement added, referring to the hearing in Saipan. "Julian is free!!!!" his wife, Stella Assange, said in a post on X.
"Words cannot express our immense gratitude to YOU - yes YOU, who have all mobilised for years and years to make this come true."

The only VistaJet plane that departed Stansted on Monday afternoon was headed to Bangkok, FlightRadar24 data shows. A spokesperson for Assange in Australia declined to comment on his flight plans. VistaJet did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Australian government, led by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, has been pressing for Assange's release but declined to comment on the legal proceedings as they were ongoing.

"Prime Minister Albanese has been clear - Mr Assange’s case has dragged on for too long and there is nothing to be gained by his continued incarceration," a government spokesperson said.

Historic Charges

WikiLeaks in 2010 released hundreds of thousands of classified US military documents on Washington's wars in Afghanistan and Iraq - the largest security breaches of their kind in US military history -- along with swaths of diplomatic cables.

Assange was indicted during former President Donald Trump's administration over WikiLeaks' mass release of secret US documents, which were leaked by Chelsea Manning, a former US military intelligence analyst who was also prosecuted under the Espionage Act.

The trove of more than 700,000 documents included diplomatic cables and battlefield accounts such as a 2007 video of a US Apache helicopter firing at suspected insurgents in Iraq, killing a dozen people including two Reuters news staff. That video was released in 2010.

The charges against Assange sparked outrage among his many global supporters who have long argued that Assange as the publisher of Wikileaks should not face charges typically used against federal government employees who steal or leak information.

Many press freedom advocates have argued that criminally charging Assange represents a threat to free speech. "A plea deal would avert the worst-case scenario for press freedom, but this deal contemplates that Assange will have served five years in prison for activities that journalists engage in every day," said Jameel Jaffer, executive director of free speech organisation Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.

"It will cast a long shadow over the most important kinds of journalism, not just in this country but around the world."

Long Odyssey

Assange was first arrested in Britain in 2010 on a European arrest warrant after Swedish authorities said they wanted to question him over sex-crime allegations that were later dropped. He fled to Ecuador's embassy, where he remained for seven years, to avoid extradition to Sweden.

He was dragged out of the embassy in 2019 and jailed for skipping bail. He has been in London's Belmarsh top security jail ever since, from where he has for almost five years been fighting extradition to the United States.

Those five years of confinement are similar to the sentence imposed on Reality Winner, an Air Force veteran and former intelligence contractor, who was sentenced to 63 months after she removed classified materials and mailed them to a news outlet.

While in Belmarsh Assange married his partner Stella with whom he had two children while he was holed up in the Ecuadorean embassy.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

UAE Prohibits Private Firms from Employing Students in 31 Hazardous Work Categories

The Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratisation (MoHRE) has prohibited private sector establishments from hiring and training students during vacations in 31 specific categories of work and professions deemed hazardous.

This ban includes roles such as underground work in mines and quarries, activities related to the extraction of metals and stones, working in furnaces for smelting metals, bakery ovens, petroleum refineries, cement plants, ice and refrigeration plants and welding jobs.

The ministry has established administrative and professional requirements for establishments and employers wishing to train and employ students. One key requirement is that students must not work at night in industrial projects. The maximum working hours for students are set at six hours per day, with one or more rest intervals.

MoHRE has indicated that UAE laws allow citizen students and resident expatriates aged 15 years and above to work and receive training in private sector establishments, provided a contract is written outlining the nature of the work and other related matters. The federal law regulating labour relations prohibits the employment of juveniles under the age of 15, and the ministry does not issue work permits to anyone under this age.

The ministry has specified six administrative and professional obligations for establishments and employers wishing to train or employ juvenile students during academic leave.

These include not employing them at night in industrial projects. "Night" is defined as a period of no less than 12 consecutive hours from 8pm to 6am the next morning. The maximum actual working hours for a juvenile student are fixed at six hours per day, with one or more periods for rest, eating, or prayer (totalling no less than an hour), ensuring that students do not work more than four consecutive hours.

If a student’s working hours include a rehabilitation or training period, it is counted within their working hours. Under no circumstances is it permissible for a juvenile student to remain in the workplace or training for more than seven consecutive hours.

According to MoHRE, the six obligations for employing students include not assigning a juvenile student to work overtime and ensuring they are not kept in the workplace beyond their scheduled hours. Students may not be trained or employed on rest days.

Employers must also train juvenile students in occupational safety and health methods, monitor their application of these methods, and provide a working or training environment suitable for all workers while considering the juvenile's circumstances.

Additionally, employers must inform the student’s guardians or legal guardians of any illness, absence, or behaviour during work or training hours that requires attention. Finally, employers must not train or employ juvenile students in any prohibited work.

The ministry lists 31 types of prohibited work, including underground work in mines and quarries, metal and stone extraction, work in furnaces for smelting or refining minerals, petroleum refineries, bakery ovens, cement factories, ice and refrigeration factories, mirror treatment with mercury, firecracker manufacturing, glass melting and maturing and welding with oxygen, acetylene, and electricity.

Other prohibited activities include painting with lead-based compounds, processing or storing ash containing lead, extracting silver from lead, manufacturing tin and metal compounds with over 10 per cent lead, manufacturing lead monoxide, lead oxide, lead carbonate, lead sulphate, chromates and sulphate, and processes involving the manufacturing or repairing of electric batteries.

The list also includes cleaning workshops where hazardous work is practised, managing or monitoring moving machines, repairing or cleaning machines while operational, asphalt manufacturing, oil production by mechanical methods, fertiliser manufacturing, working in fertiliser warehouses and factories for mineral acids and chemical crops.

Additional occupational prohibitions include working in tanneries, animal skinning, cutting and fat melting, rubber manufacturing, filling cylinders with compressed gases, loading and unloading goods at docks, ports, and warehouses, transporting passengers by land or water, making charcoal from animal bones (except for sorting bones before burning), bleaching, dyeing and printing textiles, working as hosts in amusement parks, working in bars, and carrying, pulling, or pushing weights. Students are also prohibited from working overtime and from being employed on rest days.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

UK's Richest Family Hindujas Get Jail Terms for Exploiting Indian Staff at Geneva Mansion

 

A Swiss court handed jail sentences to four members of Britain's richest family for exploiting Indian staff at their Geneva mansion.

The Hindujas -- who were not present in court -- were acquitted of human trafficking, but convicted on other charges in a stunning verdict for the family whose fortune is estimated at £37 billion (US$47 billion).

Prakash Hinduja and his wife Kamal Hinduja each got four years and six months, while their son Ajay and his wife Namrata received four-year terms, the presiding judge in Geneva ruled.

The cases stem from the family's practice of bringing servants from their native India and included accusations of confiscating their passports once they were flown to Switzerland.

Prosecutors argued the Hindujas paid their staff a pittance and gave them little freedom to leave the house.

The family denied the allegations, claiming the prosecutors wanted to "do in the Hindujas". The Hindujas reached a confidential out-of-court settlement with the three employees who made the accusations against them.

Despite this, the prosecution decided to pursue the case due to the gravity of the charges. Geneva prosecutor Yves Bertossa had requested a custodial sentence of five-and-a-half years against Prakash and Kamal Hinduja.

Aged 78 and 75 respectively, both had been absent since the start of the trial for health reasons.
In his closing address, the prosecutor accused the family of abusing the "asymmetrical situation" between powerful employer and vulnerable employee to save money.

Household staff were paid a salary between 220 francs and 400 francs (US$250 to US$450) a month, far below what they could expect to earn in Switzerland.

But the Hinduja family's defence lawyers argued that the three plaintiffs received ample benefits, were not kept in isolation and were free to leave the villa.

"We are not dealing with mistreated slaves," Nicolas Jeandin told the court.
Indeed, the employees "were grateful to the Hindujas for offering them a better life", his fellow lawyer Robert Assael argued.

Representing Ajay Hinduja, lawyer Yael Hayat had slammed the "excessive" indictment, arguing the trial should be a question of "justice, not social justice".

Namrata Hinduja's lawyer Romain Jordan also pleaded for acquittal, claiming the prosecutors were aiming to make an example of the family.

He argued the prosecution had failed to mention payments made to staff on top of their cash salaries.

"No employee was cheated out of his or her salary," Assael added. Some staff even asked for raises, which they received.

With interests in oil and gas, banking and healthcare, the Hinduja Group is present in 38 countries and employs around 200,000 people. "They're profiting from the misery of the world," Bertossa told the court.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Delhi High Court Orders Interim Stay on Arvind Kejriwal’s Bail Granted by Trial Court

In a setback for Arvind Kejriwal, the Delhi High Court paused his bail order in a corruption case related to the Delhi Liquor Policy until a hearing on Enforcement Directorate's petition. The probe agency challenged Kejriwal's bail just hours before he was to leave Tihar jail.

The ED mentioned its petition challenging the trial court's bail order for an urgent hearing before a bench of Justices Sudhir Kumar Jain and Ravinder Dudeja.

The high court said till it heard the petition, the trial court order would not be acted upon.
Kejriwal's wife, Sunita Kejriwal, and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders had planned to visit Tihar Jail at 4 pm on Friday to greet the Delhi Chief Minister.

On Friday, a Delhi court ordered Kejriwal's release on a personal bond of ₹ 1 lakh but imposed certain conditions before granting him the relief, including that he would not try to hamper the investigation or influence the witnesses.

The court had accepted Kejriwal's argument that the probe agency hasn't presented enough evidence since arresting the Delhi Chief Minister on March 21.

The bail came after multiple rounds in trial courts where Arvind Kejriwal has been repeatedly denied bail. He hasn't stepped down as Delhi Chief Minister despite calls from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party for his resignation.

In May, the Supreme Court had issued interim bail to Kejriwal for election campaigning. He returned to prison two days before the results were declared.

The ED arrested Kejriwal over money laundering allegations while framing the Delhi liquor policy for 2021-22, which was later scrapped after the Lieutenant Governor raised red flags.

The ED has alleged the money Kejriwal got from the liquor sellers was used to fund the party's campaign in Goa since he is the convenor of the AAP.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Is Your Favourite Online Store Legit? Verify with ‘CheckMyLink’ Before Making a Purchase

 

 

The rapid rise of e-commerce has transformed how we shop, offering unparalleled convenience and access to a global marketplace. However, this digital revolution has also opened the door to a surge in online scams.

In response to these growing concerns, the UAE has introduced a new tool called CheckMyLink to help residents and businesses distinguish legitimate websites from potential frauds.

The Growing Threat of Online Scams

According to recent statistics from the Dubai Police, online fraud cases have increased by 30 per cent over the past year. Cybercriminals have become increasingly sophisticated, creating convincing replicas of legitimate websites to steal personal and financial information from unsuspecting shoppers.

"The growth of e-commerce has been a double-edged sword," says Major General Jamal Al Jallaf, Director of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) at Dubai Police. "While it has revolutionised the way we shop, it has also provided fertile ground for cybercriminals."

Introducing CheckMyLink

To combat this menace, the UAE government has launched CheckMyLink, a free online tool designed to verify the authenticity of websites.

Developed in collaboration with cybersecurity experts and law enforcement agencies, CheckMyLink provides a simple, user-friendly platform for checking the legitimacy of any e-commerce site before making a purchase.

“CheckMyLink is part of our broader strategy to safeguard digital transactions and build consumer confidence in online shopping,” explains Mohammed Al Kuwaiti, Head of Cybersecurity for the UAE government. “By offering a reliable method to verify websites, we aim to reduce the incidence of online fraud and protect our residents from falling victim to scams.”

How Does CheckMyLink Work?

Using CheckMyLink is straightforward. Before making a purchase or entering sensitive information on a website, users can:

The tool cross-references the entered URL against a database of known legitimate websites and flagged fraudulent sites. It also analyses factors such as the website’s SSL certificate, domain registration details, and user reviews.

Tips for Safe Online Shopping

While tools like CheckMyLink provide a valuable layer of protection, it’s crucial for consumers to remain vigilant. Here are some additional tips to help you shop safely online:

  • Verify the URL: Always check the website's URL for any misspellings or unusual characters. Scammers often use similar-looking addresses to deceive users.
  • Look for Security Signs: Ensure the website has a secure connection (look for "https" and a padlock symbol in the address bar).
  • Research the Website: Search for reviews and feedback from other customers. Trustworthy websites typically have a well-established online presence.
  • Use Secure Payment Methods: Opt for payment methods that offer fraud protection, such as credit cards or reputable payment services like PayPal.
  • Be Wary of Unrealistic Offers: If a deal seems too good to be true, it probably is. Scammers often lure victims with heavily discounted prices.

Legal Protections in the UAE

The UAE has robust legal frameworks in place to combat cybercrime. Under the UAE Cybercrimes Law (Federal Decree-Law No. 5 of 2012), those found guilty of online fraud can face severe penalties, including imprisonment and hefty fines.
"In the UAE, we take cybercrime very seriously," says Dr Ahmad bin Saif Al Awadhi, a legal expert specialising in cyber law. "Victims of online fraud have legal avenues for recourse, and our law enforcement agencies are equipped to handle such cases efficiently."

Conclusion

As online shopping continues to grow, so does the risk of encountering fraudulent websites. By leveraging tools like CheckMyLink and following best practices for online safety, consumers can enjoy the benefits of e-commerce with peace of mind.
For more information on how to protect yourself from online scams, visit the Dubai Police’s Cybersecurity Awareness page or the UAE Cybersecurity Council’s website.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

UAE Insurers Reject Claims for Motorists Driving Through Floods, Citing Negligence

 

 

In the aftermath of the unprecedented rains on April 16, insurers have denied claims for some UAE motorists who drove through flooded streets, citing negligence.

The heaviest rains in 75 years led to widespread flooding in Dubai, Sharjah, Ajman and other emirates, damaging an estimated 50,000 vehicles.

The natural catastrophe clause covers only vehicles with comprehensive insurance policies against natural disaster losses. Third-party liability plans do not typically cover such events.

Avinash Babur, CEO of Insurancemarket.ae, explained that insurers are rejecting claims where it is evident that motorists intentionally drove through flooded areas.

"Insurance policies usually exclude coverage for damages resulting from negligent behaviour, such as driving through deep water during a storm. Claims for severe damage or total loss are likely to be denied if intentional or reckless driving is determined," said Babur.

Moin ur Rehman, Executive Director of Unitrust Insurance Broker, emphasised that policy terms and conditions could lead to coverage denial for damages caused by wilful actions. Toshita Chauhan, Business Head for Health and Motor Insurance at Policybazaar.ae, confirmed that claims were rejected due to motorists intentionally driving on flooded roads.

Babur noted that insurers meticulously review each claim related to the April 16 rains to determine the damage circumstances.

"The focus is to ensure that claims are valid by verifying that the vehicles were not driven through flooded areas during or immediately after the rainfall. Valid claims are approved swiftly, and repairs are carried out promptly. However, claims are rejected if it is established that the vehicle was driven through water or in adverse weather conditions," he stated.

The unprecedented weather disruption last month led to a record number of motor and home insurance claims in the UAE. With estimates of about 100,000 vehicles affected by the floods on April 16, many were declared total losses. Numerous claims remain unresolved, and the process could take two to three months to normalise.

If your claim is rejected, you can file a complaint with the Insurance Authority, overseen by the Central Bank of the UAE, and if unresolved, the case may be taken to court. Complaints can also be addressed through Sanadak by meeting specific eligibility criteria. 

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder
Placeholder

Sharjah Police Arrest International Gang of 5 Criminals for Phishing Dh3 Million Electronically

A gang of five scammers has been apprehended by the Sharjah Police, the authorities announced on Thursday.

The criminal network operated from outside the country and specialised in cyber fraud through a process known as "173". In connection with the scam, over Dh3 million has been seized from accounts linked to 11 anonymous reports registered with the police in the country, the authorities further stated.

The suspects were found to have phished Dh3,011,854 from accounts linked to 11 anonymous reports received by police departments across the UAE, according to Major General Saif Al Zari Al Shamsi, Commander-in-Chief of Sharjah Police.

Brigadier Omar Ahmed Abu Al Zoud, Director of the Sharjah CID, revealed that a report was received from an Arab working for a company within the country. He stated that he had received an email from a supposed supplier requesting an update of the bank data.

After updating the details and transferring Dh85,713,052 to the bank account number provided by the fraudulent company, he discovered that the email was fake.

Abu Al Zoud noted that a team of cybercrime experts was formed to verify the fraud operation and arrest the perpetrators. The technical investigation revealed that the email was fake, and further technical follow-up showed that the money transfer had been made from outside the country.

An African individual who withdrew Dh20,000 from the amount was also identified and arrested in a sting operation at his residence, along with others who lived with him and were proven to be involved in crimes related to cyber fraud.

The police found 173 bank cards and 132 chequebooks belonging to victims whose bank details were used to commit fraud, in the possession of the suspects. Additionally, 21 smartphones, 18 Emirates ID cards belonging to victims who had left the country, six stamps of fake companies and Dh95,320 obtained from withdrawals made through electronic fraud were also discovered.

Abu Al Zoud explained that the perpetrators had premeditatedly purchased 173 accounts from their original owners who had left the country.

They then controlled the accounts and bank cards, transferring money from one account to another to mislead the police.
Lieutenant Ahmed Al Bahai and Lieutenant Nouf Abdul Rahim Al Harmoudi reported that four types of cybercrimes have been frequently reported recently -- "Fake job advertisements", "Fake websites", "Electronic impersonation of persons and institutions", and "Electronic hacks".

They also warned against dealing with websites or information circulated via social media platforms

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Culpable Homicide: Kuwait Public Prosecution Detains Citizen, Expatriate in Al-Mangaf Fire Case

The Public Prosecution ordered on Thursday the detention of a national and a resident of the country on charges of 'culpable homicide' in connection with the fire that engulfed an apartment building and claimed 49 lives, according to Kuwait News Agency (KUNA).

The Kuwaiti and the expatriate will be held in custody on multiple charges, including 'causing death and injury by negligence in observing security and safety measures against fires,' stated the country's Public Prosecution on its X account.

Investigations are ongoing, affirmed the prosecution. Furthermore, in its statement, the prosecution disclosed that it had formed a special team to conduct a detailed investigation into the incident.

The Kuwaiti Ministry of Interior announced that the death toll from the building fire in Al-Mangaf area had reached 49, emphasising its intention to enforce stringent measures against property owners who violated the law.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Dubai Eases Travel Ban Rules for Divorced Parents, Removing Restrictions

 

Dubai has relaxed regulations for divorced parents travelling abroad with their children. According to Dubai Courts, the new procedure permanently lifts the travel ban once the sponsor's approval is obtained. This change simplifies the process for parents and their children to enter and exit the UAE.

“This process … accelerates the procedures of cancelling the travel ban in the system immediately after it is signed by the judge,” the authority said on Thursday.

Salem Mohammed Al Misfri, head of the Personal Status Execution Department at the Dubai Courts, said the procedure previously involved several time-consuming steps. First, a judge had to issue a decision after the sponsor’s approval, after which a letter was sent to the Criminal Investigation Department to temporarily cancel the travel ban.

As stated on the official UAE government portal website, custody in divorce cases is typically awarded to mothers, while fathers act as 'guardians' responsible for the child's financial support.

Previously, leaving the country with a child without the other parent's consent could be considered 'child abduction,' leading to severe legal repercussions for the parent involved. If there are concerns, either parent can secure a travel ban to prevent the child from leaving the airport.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Elon Musk Pursued Women Working At SpaceX For Sex: Wall Street Journal Report

Fired SpaceX engineers have filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk for sexual harassment and retaliation in California state court, escalating their multi-front legal battle with the billionaire chief executive and his aerospace company.

"Musk knowingly and purposefully created an unwelcome hostile work environment based upon his conduct of interjecting into the workplace vile sexual photographs, memes and commentary that demeaned women and/or the LGBTQ+ community," the eight former employees, who have also been pursuing a US labour board case against the company, said in their Wednesday filing.

The plaintiffs are alleging that some of them then experienced harassing comments from other coworkers that "mimicked Musk's posts" from Twitter and "created a wildly uncomfortable hostile work environment."

After Musk publicly mocked misconduct allegations against him, the workers collaborated on an open letter in 2022 raising concerns about his behaviour and the company's culture, and allege they were fired in retaliation. Their filing says they have reason to believe Musk personally made the decision to terminate them in retaliation for that activism. When a human resources official suggested conducting an investigation first, Musk replied "I don't care - fire them," the complaint alleges.

SpaceX and Elon Musk did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the lawsuit. SpaceX has previously denied wrongdoing and said that the fired employees violated policies. It also said Musk was not involved in their terminations.

The suit against Musk follows earlier complaints from the same employees to the US National Labour Relations Board (NLRB) that said SpaceX illegally retaliated against them. NLRB prosecutors agreed, but SpaceX sued in January claiming the agency's structure was unconstitutional. An appeals court injunction has put the labor board case on hold.

Separately, on Tuesday the Wall Street Journal reported allegations that Musk made sexual advances to women at SpaceX, including a former intern he had sex with. SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell was quoted in the story accusing the Journal of presenting "untruths, mischaracterisations, and revisionist history," and saying "Elon is one of the best humans I know."

The NLRB lacks authority to hold individual people liable, but the new state court lawsuit names Musk personally as a defendant, citing what it calls his "maniacal control over personnel decisions at his businesses" and his public comments, such as joking on Twitter, regarding a misconduct allegation, "if you touch my wiener, you can have a horse." Musk has denied wrongdoing.

The lawsuit also alleges that SpaceX executives including Musk and Shotwell participated in a video "that mocks and makes light of sexual misconduct and banter," including a scene in which an employee demonstrated the "correct" way to spank a coworker.

The fired employees previously brought some of their claims to California's Civil Rights Department, Bloomberg News reported in February. That agency this week issued them "right to sue" letters clearing the way for them to bring their lawsuit, according to the complaint.

"We need to pursue whatever avenues we can to continue advancing our claims," plaintiff Tom Moline, who worked on SpaceX's Dragon programme, said in an interview. "Even Elon, with all his wealth and power, is not above being held accountable, right?"

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Missouri Executes David Hosier Convicted of Killing Former Lover and Her Husband

A man convicted of killing his former lover and her husband in what prosecutors described as a fit of rage was executed Tuesday evening in Missouri.

David Hosier, 69, was pronounced dead at 6:11 p.m. following a single-dose injection of the sedative pentobarbital at the state prison in Bonne Terre. Hosier was convicted of the 2009 killings of Angela and Rodney Gilpin in the state capital of Jefferson City.

Hosier turned his head a couple of times and breathed hard twice as the drug was administered. All movement stopped within seconds, even as his spiritual adviser seated next to him, the Rev. Jeff Hood, continued to pray.

Investigators said Hosier had a romantic relationship with Angela Gilpin and was angry with her for breaking it off and reconciling with her husband. Hosier maintained until the end that he was innocent and shouldn’t have been convicted on circumstantial evidence.

The way was cleared Monday when Gov. Mike Parson declined to grant clemency, citing Hosier’s “lack of remorse.” Parson, a Republican and former county sheriff, has overseen 10 executions since taking office in 2018. Hosier’s lawyers said no court appeals were pending in the hours before the scheduled execution.

“I leave you all with love,” Hosier had said as part of a final statement released before the execution. “Now I get to go to Heaven. Don’t cry for me. Just join me when your time comes.”

Hosier was the son of an Indiana State Police sergeant killed in the line of duty. Glen Hosier went into a home searching for a murder suspect in 1971 when he was shot to death.

Other officers returned fire and killed the suspect. David Hosier, then 16, was soon sent to military school and enlisted in the Navy after graduating. He served four years of active duty and later moved to Jefferson City, Missouri, where he worked for many years as a firefighter and EMT.

In previous interviews with The Associated Press, Hosier acknowledged having an affair with Angela Gilpin that she ended before getting back with her husband. In September 2009, the two were fatally shot near the doorway to their apartment.

Detective Jason Miles told AP that Hosier made numerous comments to other people threatening to harm Angela Gilpin in the days before the killings. After the shootings, police found an application for a protective order in Angela Gilpin’s purse, and another document in which she expressed fear that Hosier might shoot her and her husband.

Hosier was an immediate suspect, but police couldn’t find him. They used cellphone data to track him to Oklahoma. A chase ensued when an Oklahoma officer tried to stop Hosier’s car. When he got out, he told the officers, “Shoot me, and get it over with,” court records show.

Officers found 15 guns, a bulletproof vest, 400 rounds of ammunition and other weapons in Hosier’s car, the court documents state. The weapons included a submachine gun made from a kit that investigators maintain was used in the killings, though tests on it were inconclusive.

A note was found in the front seat of Hosier’s vehicle. “If you are going with someone do not lie to them,” it read in part. “Be honest with them if there is something wrong. If you do not this could happen to YOU!!”

Hosier said he wasn’t fleeing to Oklahoma, but was simply on a long drive to clear his mind. He had the guns because he likes to hunt, he said. He didn’t recall a note in the car.

The Missouri Supreme Court upheld Hosier’s conviction in 2019. Hosier was the seventh person executed in the U.S. this year and the second in Missouri. Brian Dorsey was executed in April for killing his cousin and her husband in 2006.
Missouri is scheduled to execute another man, Marcellus Williams, on September 24, even though Williams is still awaiting a hearing on his claim of innocence in the 1998 stabbing death of Lisha Gayle.

In January, St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell requested a court hearing after DNA technology unavailable at the time of the crime showed that someone else’s DNA -- but not Williams’ -- was found on the knife used in the stabbing.

Williams was hours away from execution in 2017 when then-Gov. Eric Greitens granted a reprieve and appointed a board of inquiry to examine his innocence claim. The board never reached a conclusion and Parson dissolved it last year.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

UAE's Stringent Cold Call Regulations: Balancing Consumer Privacy with Business Compliance

 

The UAE government has recently implemented stringent regulations on telemarketing via phone calls, enforcing hefty fines of up to Dh150,000 for violators.

These rules, set to take effect in mid-August 2024, are aimed at controlling the rampant issue of cold calls, which are unsolicited calls made to potential customers. This regulatory change marks a significant shift in the telemarketing landscape in the UAE, designed to protect consumer privacy and reduce unwanted disruptions.

What Are Cold Calls?

Cold calls are unsolicited phone calls made by companies or telemarketers to promote products or services to potential customers without prior consent. These calls are often intrusive and can be seen as a nuisance by recipients.

Regulatory Requirements:

  • Prior Approval: Companies must obtain approval from a competent authority before making marketing calls.
  • Licensed Firms: Only licensed telemarketing firms can conduct these calls using registered phone numbers.
  • Calling Hours: Marketing calls are restricted to between 9 am and 6 pm.
  • Do Not Call Registry (DNCR): Companies are prohibited from calling numbers listed on the DNCR.
  • Follow-Up Calls: Banned if the consumer declines the service on the first call.
  • Call Frequency: Only one call per day is allowed if the consumer does not answer or ends the call.

Penalties

  • Warnings and Fines: Violations can result in warnings and fines up to Dh150,000.
  • Severe Violations: These may lead to suspension of telemarketing activities, licence cancellation, and removal from the commercial registry.

Specific Fines

  • Dh75,000 for not obtaining prior approval.
  • Up to Dh150,000 for marketing to DNCR-listed consumers.
  • Fines for using unregistered phone numbers for marketing calls.

Consumer Protection

The new regulations prioritise consumer rights by ensuring transparency and preventing deceptive or aggressive marketing tactics. Consumers can lodge complaints about violations and companies are required to maintain detailed records of all marketing calls. This framework aims to create a more respectful and consent-based telemarketing environment.

Challenges for Telemarketers

  • Compliance Costs: Telemarketing companies will need to invest in compliance mechanisms, increasing operational costs.
  • Operational Changes: Stricter controls may lead to reduced call volumes, affecting telemarketing jobs.

Opportunities

Quality Over Quantity: Emphasis on approved and ethical marketing practices could result in better-targeted marketing efforts and potentially higher conversion rates.

Analytical Perspective

The UAE's new regulations reflect a global trend towards increased scrutiny and regulation of telemarketing practices. By enforcing these rules, the UAE aims to strike a balance between protecting consumer privacy and enabling businesses to operate within a structured, ethical framework.

This shift is expected to lead to more responsible telemarketing practices, enhancing the overall consumer experience while potentially creating a more sustainable business environment for telemarketers who adhere to the new standards.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Saudi Arabia to Allow Non-Saudis to Set Up Law Firms in Bid to Enhance Foreign Investment

Saudi Arabia is considering allowing foreign law firms, licensed to practise the legal profession in the Kingdom, to establish companies wholly owned by non-Saudis to enhance foreign investment, according to the National Competitiveness Centre (NCC).

In a post on its X platform, the NCC sought public opinion regarding a proposal by the Ministry of Justice to amend the first paragraph of Article 50 of the Kingdom’s Code of Law Practice.

The amendment aims to allow foreign law firms, licensed to practise in the Kingdom, to establish professional companies wholly owned by non-Saudis, to provide legal advice on Saudi regulations and to plead before the courts in accordance with the controls specified by the regulations, through a Saudi lawyer registered in the practising lawyers’ register.

According to information posted on the Istitlaa platform, the project aims to develop the legal profession, raise the quality and efficiency of its practice and localise global expertise. This is in addition to enhancing the Kingdom’s competitiveness, improving its business environment and raising the efficiency of the justice system by increasing the level of professionalism in the legal profession.

The project will also contribute to achieving Saudi Arabia’s goals in stimulating foreign investment, moving the regional headquarters of international companies to Saudi Arabia, and creating more qualitative job opportunities for citizens, both directly and indirectly.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Cancelling Your Credit Card to Visa: Essential Things to Take Care of Before Leaving the UAE

 

Dubai is a city of dreams and has changed the lives of many who came here with the hope of creating a better future for themselves and their families. When it's time to go back home after fulfilling your dreams, or relocate to another city for work or retirement, it's important to complete a few essential tasks without fail.

Here's a checklist of things you need to do before leaving the emirate for good:

Cancel your Credit Card and Close your Bank Account

Initiate the process of closing bank accounts well in advance, as it can take several weeks and often requires in-person visits. Follow the bank's specific procedures, including withdrawing funds, returning related documents and obtaining clearance certificates. It's important to cancel your credit cards to avoid annual charges and other hidden fees.

Terminate Tenancy

If you're leaving the country permanently, it's imperative to give notice to your landlord as soon as possible. Understanding the notice period required for terminating your tenancy is crucial. In Dubai, individuals facing hardships due to COVID-19 may be eligible for a force majeure exemption regarding notice periods.

Contact the Rental Disputes Centre at the Dubai Land Department for further guidance. Upon concluding the notice period, obtain Ejari clearance and clearance certificates from utility companies to cancel your tenancy contract.

Mobile Number Transfer

Timing is key when cancelling your UAE mobile number. Consider transferring to Etisalat's Homebound pack, which allows you to keep your UAE number active for 30 or 60 days, facilitating communication with shipping companies, buyers, and potential employers.

Handling Belongings

Assess and categorise your belongings into items for shipment, sale, donation, or disposal. Engaging a relocation company or managing the process yourself depends on your preferences and timeline. Explore various options for selling items and consider donating quality goods to registered charities. Arrange for bulk waste collection services for items not suitable for donation.

 Vehicle Sale

Whether selling your car independently or through a dealer, ensure it undergoes necessary servicing and detailing for an optimal sale. Utilise online platforms and social networks to maximise visibility.

Obtaining School Leaving Certificate

Obtain a school leaving certificate for your child, ensuring all outstanding fees are settled. Schools can provide these certificates, which may require verification by relevant authorities such as the Knowledge and Human Development Authority (KHDA).

Clearing Utility Bills

Ensure utility bills are settled in full and services are disconnected before terminating residential tenancy agreements. Many utility companies offer online processes for bill clearance, with varying processing times.

Cancelling Residence Visa

If your visa is sponsored by an employer or family member, ensure it is cancelled before departure. Employers should proceed through the Ministry of Human Resources, while family-sponsored visas require processing through the General Directorate for Residency and Foreigners Affairs (GDRFA).

By following this checklist meticulously, individuals departing the UAE can streamline their exit process and minimize potential legal complications.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Maximising Eid Al Adha Holidays: Exploring 'Sandwich Leave' Strategies Amid Extended Break

As the auspicious occasion of Eid Al Adha approaches, both public and private sector employees in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) are gearing up to enjoy a well-deserved break.

This year, the Eid Al Adha holidays will span over four days, allowing individuals across the country ample time to observe the religious festivities and spend quality moments with family and loved ones.

The UAE government has officially announced that the Eid Al Adha holidays for both public and private sectors will commence from 9 to 12 Dhu al Hijjah 1445 AH. According to the Gregorian calendar, it is from June 15 to 18, 2024.

This extended break not only honours the significance of Eid Al Adha but also provides an opportunity for individuals to rejuvenate and recharge amidst their busy schedules.
In light of the extended holidays, individuals in the UAE are exploring ways to maximise their time off and make the most of this festive period. One strategy gaining traction among employees is the utilisation of "sandwich leave" to extend their Eid Al Adha break.

"Sandwich leave" refers to the practice of strategically taking additional days off before or after a public holiday to create an extended period of leisure. By strategically planning their leave, individuals can enjoy an extended vacation without consuming excessive annual leave days.

However, it's essential for employees to adhere to their respective organisation's policies and obtain prior approval from their employers before availing sandwich leave. Clear communication and planning ensure smooth workflow continuity and minimise any disruption to business operations during the holiday period.

Eid Al Adha, also known as the Festival of Sacrifice, holds profound cultural and religious significance for Muslims worldwide. It commemorates the willingness of Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham) to sacrifice his son as an act of obedience to God's command. The holiday is marked by special prayers, feasts, charitable acts and the ritual sacrifice of animals, symbolising Prophet Ibrahim's devotion and trust in the Almighty.

During the Eid Al Adha holidays, Muslims in the UAE traditionally gather with family and friends to perform prayers at mosques, share festive meals, exchange gifts and partake in various community events. Additionally, many families embark on travel expeditions to explore the country's diverse landscapes or visit their hometowns to celebrate the occasion with relatives.

As preparations for Eid Al Adha festivities ensue, the UAE remains committed to fostering a spirit of unity, compassion and generosity among its diverse population.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

YouTuber Held for Helicopter-Lamborghini Fireworks Stunt, Could Face 10-Year Jail Term

 

YouTuber Alex Choi was arrested for a stunt video showing people shooting fireworks at a Lamborghini from a helicopter. He was reportedly taken into custody on a federal criminal complaint, alleging that he directed the entire stunt.

According to a statement by the US attorney's office for the Central District of California, Choi directed the video in which two women are seen shooting fireworks at a Lamborghini. The department added that the affidavit stated the aircraft was also seen flying near the ground without filming permits.

Choi posted the video "Destroying a Lamborghini with Fireworks" July 4, 2023 on YouTube. The video has now been deleted from all of his social media platforms.
The Daily Mail shared a part of the video on Instagram with a caption describing the incident.

"YouTuber Alex Choi was arrested over a stunt which saw him filming an arsenal of fireworks being shot at a $300,000 Lamborghini from a helicopter. Now the 24-year-old, who is known for his car-related stunts, has been charged with 'causing the placement of an explosive or incendiary device on an aircraft,' and is facing 10 years in prison," the outlet wrote.

The statement added that law enforcement believes that Choi "did not have a permit to film a shoot using fireworks on a helicopter, and that he purchased the fireworks in Nevada because they were illegal in California." If convicted, he stands to face "a statutory maximum sentence of 10 years in federal prison."

Since being shared some seven hours ago, the video has accumulated nearly 240,000 views. The share has further collected more than 7,000 likes. People posted varied comments while reacting to the share.

"He won’t get convicted because his intent was not malice. He will get a large fine and that’s about it," wrote an Instagram user. "This is going to bring him some likes," joked another.

"Is it illegal to have fun in a controlled environment?" questioned a third. "Anything for clout," posted a fourth.

The video shared by Choi appeared to be a "live-action version of a fictionalised video game scene," cited the statement by the US attorney's office for the Central District of California.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Manchester City Initiates Legal Action Against Premier League's Financial Regulations

Manchester City has initiated legal proceedings against the Premier League regarding recent regulations concerning "associated party transactions" (APTs), which were first introduced in December 2021 and later revised in January 2024. The dispute will be heard by an arbitration tribunal on June 10, with a decision expected within two weeks thereafter.

As per reports from The Times, Manchester City, owned by the Abu Dhabi United Group, has submitted a 165-page document outlining its argument against the regulations. The club asserts that these rules infringe upon competition laws in the United Kingdom. Additionally, they are seeking compensation, claiming that they have been compelled to adhere to these regulations for an extended period.

This move could potentially disrupt the established structure of European football, as many clubs operate as nonprofit member associations or are controlled by investors who expect returns on their investments. By removing cost controls, it could make the business less appealing to investors, especially when there is a trend towards implementing regulations to promote financial sustainability across leagues and organisations like UEFA.

Furthermore, if these regulations are overturned, it could weaken the Premier League's case against Manchester City regarding alleged breaches of financial rules, particularly those concerning sponsorships. This legal challenge from the league's most successful member would undoubtedly be a significant development within the sports industry, given its unprecedented nature.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Supreme Committee Reviews Steps to Bolster Consumer Protection, Legislative Framework

 

The Supreme Committee for Consumer Protection, chaired by Abdulla bin Touq Al Marri, Minister of Economy, convened to evaluate its significant accomplishments and endeavours in 2023. The Committee’s pivotal role in enhancing the UAE’s consumer protection system and establishing a robust legislative infrastructure aligned with international best practices was highlighted.

Additionally, the Committee addressed the recent updates concerning Cabinet Resolution No. 120 of 2022, which focuses on regulating the prices of essential consumer goods within the UAE.

The minister affirmed the UAE’s commitment to refining economic policies and legislation aimed at strengthening consumer protection and safeguarding consumer rights. Under the guidance of its wise leadership, the UAE is dedicated to creating a secure and stable consumer environment, fostering vibrant markets, and adhering to global best practices. These focused efforts are designed to improve the quality of life for both citizens and residents, while simultaneously enhancing the growth and competitiveness of the national economy on regional and global scales, in alignment with the vision of ‘We the UAE 2031’.

“The Committee plays a crucial role in advancing the UAE’s national objectives and strategies for consumer rights protection. Through proactive measures, the Committee develops projects and initiatives that promote the adoption of best business practices in the marketplace. It also establishes mechanisms to regulate prices of goods and products, thus ensuring adherence to legislation governing consumer rights protection. These efforts aim to provide consumers with an exceptional purchasing experience and guarantee the availability of sufficient quantities of goods and products to meet their needs,” the minister noted.

The Committee reviewed its notable achievements in 2023, including significant contributions to establishing an integrated consumer protection framework within the UAE. This was achieved through their contribution to the development and revision of a series of relevant legislation and policies, such as Federal Decree Law No. 5 of 2023 amending Federal Law No. 15 of 2020 on Consumer Protection, and its executive regulation issued by Cabinet Decision No. 66 of 2023.

The Committee effectively implemented pricing policies for essential consumer goods based on Cabinet Decision No. 120 of 2022. Additionally, the Committee issued ten recommendations pertaining to this framework, all of which were successfully executed through collaboration with relevant government bodies and authorities.

MoE’s Endeavours to Regulate Prices

In the same context, the Committee reviewed the efforts made by the Ministry of Economy to enhance market monitoring and prevent price manipulation over the past year. The Ministry’s teams conducted over 96,200 inspection visits across all seven emirates, resulting in the identification of 6,645 violations.

Additionally, during the first quarter of 2024, the Ministry carried out 34,067 inspection visits, leading to 1,896 inspections. Throughout 2023, the Ministry received close to 3,000 complaints and over 133,000 recall requests.

The recall service allows for the tracking and withdrawal of defective or hazardous goods from suppliers, concerned parties, or relevant authorities in the country of origin or any other country. The ministry diligently executed measures within the country to safeguard consumer health, safety, and rights, protect the interests of retailers and manufacturers, and ensure market stability within the country.

New Decisions and Policies

The Committee conducted an in-depth discussion on various decisions and policies for the next phase. These discussions emphasised the necessity for effective regulation and organisation to monitor retail traders, goods suppliers and sales outlets for compliance with UAE pricing regulations on consumer goods.

Furthermore, the Committee focused on creating mechanisms and controls for the unit pricing of specific consumer goods and introducing a code of conduct for the consumer goods industry. This code aims to enhance the contractual relationship between sales outlets and suppliers in the country's markets.

Digital Project

The Committee discussed the possibility of launching a new digital project focused on analysing market data to improve control over product and commodity prices. This initiative will involve developing a smart market analysis system and remote monitoring for consumer goods.

These measures will contribute to market surveillance efforts, enable prompt action in response to any identified violations, and facilitate a more streamlined and user-friendly complaint process. By leveraging cutting-edge technological solutions and advanced technologies, this endeavour ensures the protection of consumer rights and enhances the country's market control system.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Dubai Int’I Airport Apprehends Over 350 Passengers with Fake Passports This Year

 

Between January and March of this year, more than 350 incoming passengers at Dubai International Airport (DXB) were apprehended with fake passports, according to the General Directorate of Residency and Foreigners Affairs (GDRFA) in Dubai. Specifically, 366 individuals were caught using forged passports during this period, up slightly from 355 during the same timeframe last year.

In 2023, the GDRFA examined 16,127 documents, identifying 1,232 as forgeries. Additionally, 443 cases were referred to public prosecution for further investigation and action based on the specifics of each case.

At a press briefing at Dubai Airport’s Terminal 1, a consultant at the Document Examination Centre, highlighted the effectiveness of GDRFA’s systems in identifying fraudulent passports. He pointed out that every counter at Dubai Airports Passport Control is equipped with an advanced machine called Retro Check, which scrutinises suspected fake passports. These machines act as an effective firewall, enabling immigration officers to detect fake passports.

Once a dubious passport is flagged by a control officer, it is sent to the Document Examination Centre for verification. The verification process takes only five minutes, after which a report is sent to the public prosecution.

The consultant emphasised that the GDRFA is “one of the few entities globally with a specialised and accredited centre for document examination.” Unlike many immigration departments worldwide that rely on criminal laboratories, where inspections can take days or weeks, Dubai Airports can verify passports in a remarkably short time.

The GDRFA employs 1,500 passport control officers who handle entry and exit processes, referred to as the first line of defense in document verification. Additionally, there are 30 document examiners, known as the second line of defense, who conduct detailed audits. All staff members are Emiratis.

Legal Consequences

Individuals found with forged or counterfeit travel documents face legal consequences. Those caught departing with such documents are referred to UAE judicial authorities, regardless of whether they were knowingly involved or unwittingly deceived.

Arriving passengers with forged documents are denied entry and promptly returned to their country of origin or handed over to relevant authorities.
The GDRFA also implements special procedures that consider humanitarian factors, recognising that some individuals may have been unknowingly victimised by criminal schemes.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Embark on a Road Trip from UAE to Oman: All You Need to Know About Routes, Documents

Whether it's a weekend escape from the urban bustle or a brief trip for visa renewal, Oman has emerged as a favoured destination for many UAE residents. Its proximity, hassle-free visa procedures, and stunning landscapes make it an appealing choice for those opting to travel by car.

Over time, there have been alterations in routes and entry requirements. From the latest road updates to essential documentation, here's your comprehensive handbook for a car journey from the UAE to Oman.

Route Choices

Hatta, Al Wajajah Border: For travellers originating from Dubai, the Hatta, Al Wajajah border crossing stands out as the preferred route. It's a direct and secure path, typically covering the distance within 1.5-2 hours, subject to traffic conditions.

Situated approximately 140km from Dubai, motorists navigate via the E102 route. This route is equally convenient for residents from Sharjah, Dubai (particularly areas closer to Sharjah), and other northern emirates, accessible through Mleiha Road. From Mleiha Road, drivers encounter two route options:

  •  The first option is the E84 exit, leading towards Hatta, Fujairah, and Khorfakkan, providing a swift alternative.
  •  The second option involves the Wadi Al Helo, Kalba road, offering a scenic journey through mountains and wadis for those with a leisurely pace in mind.

Meyzad, Hafeet Border:

Abu Dhabi residents may favour the Meyzad, Hafeet border, positioned 180km away from the capital city, while for Dubai residents, the border post is approximately 160km away. Close to Al Ain, this route is ideal for travellers heading towards the southern regions of Oman.

Dibba Border:

If Musandam's vibrant corals and crystalline waters are on your itinerary, the Dibba border route is your best bet. For Dubai residents, the journey spans nearly two hours, covering 146km from the city. This route allows entry to expats without an Oman visa, as well as visit visa holders, with access limited to the Dibba Musandam area.

For those eyeing Musandam's Khasab town, UAE residents can opt for the Al Darrah border crossing from Ras Al Khaimah, with the mountainous emirate lying a mere 35km away. However, an Oman visa is mandatory for entry via this border post.

Required Documentation

Residents embarking on the journey from the UAE must carry the following documents:

  •  Original passport
  •  Original visa or a copy for e-visa holders
  •  Emirates ID
  •  Car registration card (mulkiya)
  •  Orange card, serving as proof of valid car insurance in Oman.

Checkpoint Procedures

En route to Hatta from Dubai, approximately 500 metres before the Omani border, a 'Leaving Hatta' sign marks the proximity of the first checkpoint. This is a UAE checkpoint, where security personnel typically request the car's registration card and passports of all occupants. Here, residents are required to pay the exit fee of Dh35 as they depart the Emirates.

Subsequently, travellers reach the Oman border, undergoing passport control and possibly disembarking from their vehicles to enter the building. Officials stamp passports with entry stamps, usually verifying travellers' Emirates IDs. Exiting this post, some residents may undergo vehicle inspections at the final checkpoint in Oman.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Motorists Warned: Dh400 Fine, 4 Black Points for Violating Road Rules in Abu Dhabi

 

To enhance road safety in the emirate, Abu Dhabi Police have employed 3D CGI (Computer-Generated Imagery) technology to educate and remind drivers of essential safety practices when entering roads.

By leveraging this technology, the authorities aim to reduce accidents and ensure smoother traffic flow. The Abu Dhabi Police have highlighted five critical rules that drivers should follow to ensure a safe entry onto the roads:

Slow Down When Approaching Road Entrances: Reduce your speed as you near a road entrance. This allows extra time to assess the situation and respond to any unforeseen events.
Use Side Warning Signals: Properly using turn signals is crucial for communicating your intentions to other road users. This practice helps prevent misunderstandings and potential collisions.
Be Cautious of Parked Vehicles: If there is a vehicle ahead of you or parked near the road entrance, slow down. Parked vehicles can obstruct your view, making it harder to see oncoming traffic or pedestrians.
Give Priority to Vehicles on the Main Road: Always yield to vehicles on the main road. These vehicles have the right of way, and failing to give them priority can lead to dangerous situations.
Ensure the Road is Clear: Before entering a road, double-check to make sure it is free of approaching vehicles. This final check is crucial in preventing accidents.

Penalties

Adhering to these safety guidelines can significantly reduce accidents and enhance overall road safety. However, drivers who fail to follow traffic rules will be penalised according to UAE laws.

  •  Entering a road without ensuring it is clear: Dh400 fine and 4 black points.
  •  Entering a road dangerously: Dh600 fine and 6 black points.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder
Placeholder

Madras High Court Grants Wife Guardianship Over Comatose Husband, Permits Property Sale

The Madras High Court has permitted the wife of a person in a comatose condition to sell/mortgage his immovable property worth over ₹1 crore and utilise the proceeds for taking care of his medical expenses as well as the maintenance of the family, consisting of a son and a daughter.

The petitioner stated that her husband was admitted to a private hospital from February 13 to April 4, during which she spent a substantial amount of money on his treatment. Her husband is currently being cared for by paramedics at home. She requested the court to permit the sale of the property to cover medical expenses and support the family.

In an intra-Court appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against an earlier order, the Court had initially directed the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Civil Court instead of granting her guardianship in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

However, the Division Bench of G.R. Swaminathan and P.B. Balaji JJ set aside this order and issued the following directions:

  • The appellant was appointed as the guardian for her husband's person and properties.
  • The appellant was permitted to manage and dispose of the property on her husband's behalf. She was also directed to ensure that a sum of Rs50 lakhs is deposited in a nationalised bank in her husband's name. The interest accrued from this deposit can be withdrawn by the appellant every three months. This fixed deposit is to remain until the husband's lifetime, after which it will be divided into three equal shares among his legal heirs.
  • The appellant was directed to file an affidavit before the Registry of the Court indicating compliance with the direction to create a fixed deposit of Rs50 lakhs in her husband's name.

After interacting with the petitioner’s children, the court was satisfied that the family had no source of income. Without permission to manage the mentioned property, they would face significant hardship. The court acknowledged that caring for a person in a comatose state is challenging and requires monetary support, including hiring paramedical staff.

The Court noted that the property belongs to the husband and should be used for his benefit. Since the petitioner’s husband cannot care for himself, the appellant is bearing the entire burden. Thus, the Court found it improper to direct the appellant to move to the civil court.

It emphasised that when relief can be granted based on admitted and proven facts, there is no reason to deny the appellant on technical grounds of writ petition maintainability. The court also pointed out that similar writ petitions had been entertained and reliefs granted, making the single judge's decision to dismiss the writ petition incorrect.

The court reiterated that after the petitioner's husband's demise, the fixed deposit would be divided into three equal shares for his legal heirs: his wife, daughter and son.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Wearing Black Coats Unsafe for Lawyers: SC Petition Seeks Dress Code Relaxation

Advocate Shailendra Mani Tripathi has lodged a writ petition with the Supreme Court, urging amendments to the regulations and the Advocates Act of 1961. The petition seeks to exempt legal practitioners from the customary requirement of wearing black coats and gowns, particularly during the intense heat of summer.

Tripathi contends that enforcing the wearing of black attire in hot weather poses significant safety risks to lawyers. The petitioner, represented by a consortium of legal experts, argues that the obligatory attire of black coats exacerbates the discomfort experienced by legal professionals, potentially jeopardising their health and well-being.

As temperatures escalate, the attire, symbolic of the legal profession's decorum, transforms from a symbol of dignity to a potential hazard, exposing lawyers to the perils of heat exhaustion and dehydration.

The petition seeks a directive to the State Bar Councils to determine the 'months of prevailing summer' for each state to exempt the wearing of the black coat and gown during those months.

The petitioner also seeks the establishment of a committee of medical experts to study how wearing warm clothes in summer affects the health and quality of work for advocates and to suggest recommendations accordingly.

The petitioner emphasised that the dress code of black coats and gowns originated from British tradition, but the Advocates Act of 1961 has failed to consider India's climatic conditions.
Furthermore, the plea proposes alternative measures to ensure the preservation of professional decorum while mitigating the risks associated with oppressive heat waves. Suggestions include allowing advocates to opt for lighter, breathable fabrics or providing exemptions from the mandatory wearing of black coats during periods of extreme heat.

Indian capital New Delhi recently hit a record-breaking 52.3 degrees Celsius. With the rising temperatures in the country, wearing a gown and coat may lead to excess absorption of heat and pose serious health risks. This not only makes work conditions unsafe and uncomfortable but also violates the right to a safe workplace.

The plea serves as a poignant reminder of the judiciary's duty to safeguard the interests of its officers of the court, whose invaluable contributions underpin the administration of justice. It underscores the need for a nuanced and empathetic approach towards dress regulations, one that strikes a delicate balance between tradition and practicality.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Third-Party Funding in Arbitration: Benefits, Drawbacks and Regional Perspectives

Arbitration has witnessed significant growth globally, with third-party funding (TPF) emerging as a notable aspect in recent years.  TPF involves an entity unrelated to the dispute providing financial assistance to one party in exchange for a share of the proceeds if the case is successful.

In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, countries like the UAE, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Kuwait, Bahrain, Turkey and Qatar have shown increasing interest in TPF, reflecting its evolving legal landscape and commercial dynamics.

Third-party funding in arbitration is a practice where an external entity finances some or all of the costs associated with a party's pursuit or defense of a claim in exchange for a portion of the proceeds recovered from the successful resolution of the dispute. This funding model is particularly prevalent in complex commercial disputes where the cost of arbitration proceedings can be substantial.

What are the Advantages of Third-Party Funding

  •  Access to Justice: Enables parties with limited financial resources to pursue meritorious claims.
  •  Risk Mitigation: Funders conduct due diligence, increasing the likelihood of success and mitigating risk.
  •  Cost Management: Transfers financial risk to the funder, allowing efficient allocation of resources.
  •  Levelling the Playing Field: Helps rebalance power dynamics in financially unequal disputes.

Disadvantages and Risks

  •  Loss of Control: Funded parties may cede control over proceedings to the funder.
  •  Conflicts of Interest: Funders may have conflicting interests with stakeholders.
  •  Cost of Capital: Financing comes at a cost, diminishing the value of the award.
  •  Enforcement Risks: Enforcement of funding agreements may pose challenges in some jurisdictions.
  •  No Win No Fee: In the "No Win No Fee" model, if the funded party does not succeed, the funder absorbs the entire cost of the proceedings.

The Funder's Involvement and Compensation

Funders play an active role in the arbitration process, collaborating with legal teams. If the claimant prevails, the funder receives a predetermined share of the damages awarded.

TPF offers opportunities for increased access to justice and risk mitigation but presents challenges related to control, conflicts of interest and cost implications. Regulatory frameworks and ethical standards will shape its future trajectory.

(Seyaad Arif is a barrister practicing via SOA LAW, a regulated Bar Standards Board Entity in England & Wales, specialising in Adjudication, Construction Law, Dispute Resolution, International Arbitration and Litigation. He also assists clients in Egypt, Oman, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates)

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

UAE Federal Tax Authority Issues Corporate Tax Guide for Free Zone Persons

 

The Federal Tax Authority (FTA)  has taken a significant step towards clarifying the application of Corporate Tax within Free Zones by issuing a comprehensive guide.

The guide aims to streamline the understanding and implementation of Corporate Tax regulations for Free Zone Persons, particularly in light of the Free Zone Corporate Tax regime.

Under this regime, Qualifying Free Zone Persons benefit from a favourable 0% Corporate Tax rate on their Qualifying Income. The guide serves as a roadmap for businesses operating within Free Zones, offering detailed insights into the conditions for eligibility as a Qualifying Free Zone Person and the types of activities that qualify for this advantageous tax treatment.

By providing illustrative examples, the guide assists businesses in navigating the complexities of Corporate Tax Law as it pertains to Free Zone operations. It elucidates key concepts such as the calculation of Corporate Tax, the determination of Qualifying Income and the treatment of income derived from various sources, including immovable property and Qualifying Intellectual Property.

Furthermore, the guide addresses the importance of maintaining a substantial presence for Qualifying Free Zone Persons and outlines criteria for identifying Permanent Establishments both within and outside the Free Zones.

It underscores the FTA's commitment to ensuring compliance with tax regulations while facilitating the growth of businesses operating within Free Zones.

Recognizing the vital role played by Free Zones in bolstering the UAE economy, the FTA emphasises the manifold benefits offered by these economic hubs. These include relaxed foreign ownership restrictions, streamlined administrative procedures and state-of-the-art infrastructure, all of which contribute to fostering a conducive environment for business growth and innovation.

The FTA urges all Free Zone Persons to thoroughly review the guide to gain a comprehensive understanding of the regulatory framework governing Corporate Tax within Free Zones.

The guide, along with other relevant implementing decisions, is readily accessible on the FTA's official website, reaffirming the authority's commitment to transparency and accessibility in tax administration.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Dubai Link? UK Woman Jailed for Laundering Bitcoin Tied to $5.6B China Fraud

A woman was sentenced to six years and eight months in jail for laundering massive amounts of bitcoin linked to an alleged US$5.6 billion investment fraud in China.

Jian Wen, a former fast food worker who transformed her life with a luxurious lifestyle, was found guilty of one count of money laundering relating to about 150 bitcoin for a Chinese woman between 2017 and 2022. In the wider operation, the police seized over 61,000 bitcoin, now worth over $4 billion.

“This was an offence which was sophisticated and involved significant planning,” Judge Sally-Ann Hales said Friday, as she handed down the sentence. “I am in no doubt that you knew what you were dealing with.”

Wen, who holds British and Chinese citizenship, consistently denied all allegations against her and is appealing against her conviction. She said she was a victim and only followed instructions from a woman described as the “mastermind” by her lawyers.

Wen did not know the money was obtained in a fraud, her lawyer said. She was not accused of any role in the underlying fraud in China. Instead she was “duped and used” and she “bitterly regrets her involvement” with the alleged mastermind, her lawyer Mark Harries said during the Friday hearing.

The prosecution insisted that Wen was driven by greed and financial gains and was the decision maker for the cryptocurrency wallet in her control.

In March, the jury found Wen guilty of one count of money laundering after the prosecution showed thousands of pieces of evidence including WhatsApp messages between Wen and the alleged mastermind in a nearly two-month long trial.

The trial also highlighted the role of a series of intermediaries and professionals in London and Dubai who helped the two women launder bitcoin and buy assets in the UK, Europe and Dubai.

Wen, 42, went from living in the basement of an East London Chinese takeaway where she was employed, to a six-bedroom mansion in a leafy suburb, spending thousands on luxury shopping sprees at Harrods after she started working for the now-arrested woman fugitive.

Separately, the woman’s lawyer said in a statement that she denies the allegations of fraud against her. He said that she acquired substantial holdings of bitcoin through lawful means.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Who Will Face the Music? Ilaiyaraaja’s Legal Notice to ‘Manjummel Boys’ Producers

Veteran Indian music composer Ilaiyarajaa has issued a legal notice to the creators of the Malayalam blockbuster film 'Manjummel Boys' for using the song ‘Kanmani Anbodu’ from the 1991 Tamil movie ‘Gunaa’ without his consent.

Chidambaram, the director of the film, posted a segment of the news on Instagram alongside another Tamil song, "Malarnthum Malaratha," composed by TM Soundararajan for the Tamil film ‘Pasamalar’.

Ilaiyarajaa contends that he is the original composer of the song 'Kanmani Anbodu' and asserts that mere acknowledgment in the title cards does not suffice as permission or licensing for its usage. He accuses the producers of exploiting his work commercially and attracting viewership and publicity through unauthorised means.

Furthermore, Ilaiyarajaa emphasises his absolute rights, including moral rights, over all his original musical compositions. His legal representative demands that the film producers either obtain the composer’s permission, remove the song from the movie, or provide compensation within 15 days, threatening legal action against Soubin Shahir, Babu Shahir, and Shawn Antony if they fail to comply with these options.

In a legal battle dating back to 2015, the Madras High Court had restrained four music labels from monetiSing Ilaiyarajaa’s musical works. In 2019, the court recognized the composer’s special moral rights over 4,500 songs composed for over 1,000 movies between the 1970s and 1990s.

However, in a recent hearing in 2024, a bench of Justices R. Mahadevan and Mohammed Shaffiq asserted that Ilaiyarajaa cannot be considered above the law, despite his stature.

Moreover, in 2020, the Indian Record Manufacturing Company Ltd (INRECO) claimed complete copyright ownership of Ilaiyarajaa’s musical works and sound recordings in approximately 30 films, citing written agreements with the respective film producers.

However, Ilaiyarajaa argued that digital rights emerged after 1996, and the music company should not have authority over his work, contending that the film’s owner cannot supersede his copyright.

Regarding 'Manjummel Boys,' which achieved significant success at the Kerala and Tamil Nadu box offices, becoming the first Malayalam film to gross over Rs200 crore within 26 days of its release, the movie centres around the camaraderie among a group of young men from a lower-middle-class background embarking on a trip to Kodaikanal, Tamil Nadu.

Notably, Kamal Haasan, who starred in Gunaa, congratulated the entire cast and crew of 'Manjummel Boys' post-release, underscoring its success.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Drunk Minor Crashes Porsche, Killing Two IT Engineers in Pune: Should Parents Be Punished?

The Pune police detained the father of a minor involved in the Pune Porsche crash case under Sections 75 and 77 of the Juvenile Justice Act for allowing his son to consume alcohol and drive the Porsche while intoxicated.

The court has sent the minor’s father to police remand. The incident occurred on May 19 in Pune, India, around 2:30 am. CCTV footage revealed that the intoxicated minor was driving the car at an estimated speed of 160 km/h when it crashed into the victims' motorcycle.

This was confirmed after a police investigation. Immediately after the accident, the minor was arrested and taken to the police station for further investigation. It was discovered that he was a minor and intoxicated with alcohol.

He was immediately sent for a medical examination and a blood test. The police booked him under the following sections of the Indian Penal Code: 304, 304A, 337, 338, 427, and 279, as well as MVA sections 184 and 119/177.

What Led to the Massive Media Outrage?

On May 19, the Juvenile Justice Board of Pune granted bail to the minor under the following conditions: Write a 300-word essay on road accidents and their solutions; and assist traffic officers and study traffic rules for 15 days.

These conditions led to a massive outrage on social media. The public questioned why a minor who committed such a negligent act received only a 300-word essay and 15 days of work with the traffic officers as punishment.

After the bail conditions went viral, people criticised the police and the Indian judiciary system. This soon became a pan-Indian breaking news story and gained attention nationwide.

The police then invoked Motor Vehicles Act (MVA) section 185 in the case and filed a review application against the bail granted to the minor boy.

The police commissioner stated that generally, IPC section 304A (causing death by negligence) is invoked in accident cases. “But considering the heinous nature of the incident, we have invoked IPC section 304, which deals with culpable homicide and provides punishment of up to 10 years of imprisonment,” he said.

Now the matter is in the Pune District Court. The police arrested the boy’s father, a real estate developer in Pune, for allegedly giving him a car without number plates and money despite knowing that he drinks and is a minor without a driving licence.

The police have also arrested the owners and managers of two Pune restaurants, where liquor was allegedly served to the minor boy before the accident.

A separate FIR was lodged against the father and the owners and managers of the two restaurants under sections of the Juvenile Justice Act and the MVA. The court has remanded them in police custody till May 24.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Luxury Watch Theft Case: Defendant Receives Jail Sentence, Ordered to Pay Compensation

In a major legal triumph, the legal team representing the complainant, spearheaded by NYK Law Firm, achieved a significant victory by securing a conviction in a theft case.

This case, adjudicated in the Criminal Court of Dubai, centered on the theft of a high-value luxury watch. The defendant was guilty of exploiting the absence of the property owner to steal the watch during an evening gathering.

Throughout the trial, the complainant's legal team demonstrated exceptional skill and knowledge, meticulously presenting evidence and expert testimonies that convincingly established the defendant's guilt.

NYK Law Firm’s lawyers argued persuasively, underlining the premeditated nature of the theft and the defendant's possession of the stolen item. Their ability to dissect and counter the defendant's arguments was pivotal.

The defense suggested that someone else might have placed the watch in the defendant's bag, but this claim was effectively dismantled by the complainant's legal representatives through strategic questioning and presentation of irrefutable forensic evidence.

The Judgment reflected the rigorous effort and deep legal understanding of the complainant's team, underscoring their role not only in securing justice for their client but also in demonstrating the strength of the legal system.

The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment, deportation and has also reserved the right of the complainant to claim compensation.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Abu Dhabi Global Market Regulator Slaps Sarwa Investment Platform with $122,500 Fine

Abu Dhabi Global Market’s financial regulator has imposed a $122,500 fine on the investment platform Sarwa Digital Wealth (Capital) for violating rules related to offering securities.

The penalty was issued after Sarwa was found to have offered securities in ADGM without an approved prospectus during April and May of the previous year, breaching Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) regulations, the financial centre announced.

A prospectus must be approved by the FSRA and should contain all necessary information for an investor to make an informed decision regarding the investment, according to ADGM. Without this prospectus, potential investors did not receive sufficient information to make an informed decision, it stated.

In total, 144 investors subscribed to the offer, committing approximately $2.1 million, ADGM data revealed.

However, Sarwa promptly reversed all committed subscriptions after being notified by the FSRA about the concerns, ADGM noted.
Sarwa also qualified for a fine reduction by agreeing to settle early, with an additional reduction for recognizing the regulatory action taken by the DFSA.

Since its opening in 2015, ADGM has been home to international banks, insurance companies, global asset managers, as well as financial technology and cryptocurrency exchanges, maintaining strict oversight of companies operating within its jurisdiction.

In February, ADGM fined Baker Tilly and its audit principal $62,500 for auditing failures and six financial institutions over $46,000 for reporting violations.

In October of the previous year, it also levied a $486,000 penalty on FinTech company Pyppl for breaking anti-money laundering regulations. In August, it fined KPMG Lower Gulf $30,000 for breaches of audit rules.

The FSRA’s investigation was coordinated with the Dubai International Financial Centre, whose Dubai Financial Services Authority conducted a parallel investigation into a company linked to Sarwa within its jurisdiction.

Sarwa, which has over 150,000 registered users, utilises artificial intelligence to assess an investor’s risk tolerance and assigns them a portfolio of exchange-traded funds, charging lower advisory fees than traditional financial advisers and wealth managers.

In August 2021, Sarwa raised $15 million in a funding round led by Abu Dhabi's Mubadala Investment Company. This Series B round brought the trading platform’s total funding from regional and international investors to about $25 million since its inception, the company reported at the time.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

OpenAI Pulls ChatGPT AI Voice Over its Resemblance to Scarlett Johansson in Movie ‘Her’

OpenAI announced it would pull one of the ChatGPT voices named ‘Sky’ after it created controversy for its resemblance to the voice of actress Scarlett Johansson in ‘Her’, a movie about artificial intelligence.

“We’ve heard questions about how we chose the voices in ChatGPT, especially Sky,” the Microsoft-backed company posted on X. “We are working to pause the use of Sky while we address them.”

The 2013 sci-fi film ‘Her’ is about a man who falls in love with an artificial intelligence system named Samantha, voiced by Johansson.

The news comes one week after OpenAI debuted a range of audio voices for ChatGPT, its viral chatbot, a new AI model called GPT-4o, and a desktop version of ChatGPT.

Users watching the live demonstration of ChatGPT’s audio capabilities immediately began to post on social media that the ‘Sky’ voice sounded like Johansson in the movie. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman seemingly referenced the film in a post on X, simply writing “her.”

In a Sunday blog post, OpenAI wrote that the chatbot’s five voices -- Breeze, Cove, Ember, Juniper and Sky -- were selected through a casting and recording process that spanned five months. Casting professionals received about 400 submissions from voice and screen actors and whittled that number down to 14, according to the company. Then an internal team selected the final five.

“Sky’s voice is not an imitation of Scarlett Johansson but belongs to a different professional actress using her own natural speaking voice,” the company wrote. “To protect their privacy, we cannot share the names of our voice talents.”

OpenAI plans to test Voice Mode in the coming weeks, with early access for paid subscribers to ChatGPT Plus, according to recent blog posts, and it also plans to add new voices.

OpenAI also said the new model can respond to users’ audio prompts “in as little as 232 milliseconds, with an average of 320 milliseconds, which is similar to human response time in a conversation.”

The company, founded in 2015, has been valued at more than $80 billion by investors. It’s under pressure to lead the generative AI market while finding ways to make money as it spends massive sums on processors and infrastructure to build and train its models.

OpenAI, Microsoft and Google are at the helm of a generative AI gold rush as companies in seemingly every industry race to add AI-powered chatbots and agents to avoid being left behind by competitors.

Earlier this month, OpenAI rival Anthropic announced its first enterprise offering and a free iPhone app.

A record $29.1 billion was invested across nearly 700 generative AI deals in 2023, an increase of more than 260 per cent from the prior year, according to PitchBook. The market is predicted to top $1 trillion in revenue within a decade.

In last week’s live presentation, OpenAI team members demonstrated ChatGPT’s audio capabilities. For example, the chatbot was asked to help calm someone before a public speech.

OpenAI researcher Mark Chen demonstrated the model’s ability to tell a bedtime story and asked it to change the tone of its voice to be more dramatic or robotic.

He even asked it to sing the story. The team also asked it to analyse a user’s facial expression to comment on the emotions the person may be experiencing.

“Hey there, what’s up? How can I brighten your day today?” ChatGPT’s audio mode said when a user greeted it.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

How to Cancel UAE Entry Permit Through Immigration Authority:  Steps You Need to Follow

Have you applied for an entry permit for an overseas employee or a family member you wish to sponsor? If your plans have changed, it is essential to cancel their entry permit through the immigration authority where you initially applied.

On May 16, the Federal Authority for Identity, Citizenship, Customs and Port Security (ICP) shared the necessary steps to complete this process via their social media channels.

How to Cancel an Entry Permit

According to the ICP, here are the steps to cancel an entry permit:

  • Visit the ICP website at icp.gov.ae or use the ‘UAEICP’ smartphone application available for Apple and Android devices.
  • Log into your account, or use the UAE Pass for login.
  • Submit a request to cancel the entry permit and attach the required documents.
  • Pay any applicable fees and financial guarantees, then submit the application.
  • The ICP will review your request, and once approved, the entry permit will be cancelled.

Two Scenarios For Entry Permit Cancellation

  • For employment, where a company has applied for a worker's entry permit.
  • For residents sponsoring their family members.

It’s crucial to note that an entry permit can only be cancelled if it has not been used. If the individual has already entered the UAE with the permit, a different application is required.

What is the process’s utility for companies and residents? If you are sponsoring your spouse or other family members, you will get them the ‘family residency entry permit’ for their entry into the UAE.

Following that, you have two months to apply for their medical fitness test, Emirates ID and visa. However, if plans change before this, you can cancel their entry permit through this process.

Applications can be made directly through the ICP for Abu Dhabi, Sharjah, Ajman, Ras Al Khaimah, Fujairah and Umm Al Quwain, or through the General Directorate of Residency and Foreigners Affairs Dubai (GDRFA-D) if the permit was issued in Dubai. To find registered typing centres with the ICP, visit the webpage.

You can visit an ICP-registered typing centre or an Amer centre in Dubai to apply for the cancellation. For ICP, present the sponsor’s Emirates ID. For Amer centres, the sponsor must visit the centre with their Emirates ID.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange Granted Permission to Appeal Against US Extradition

WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange's battle to avoid extradition to the United States received a huge boost on May 20 when London's High Court ruled that US assurances over his case were unsatisfactory and he would get a full appeal hearing.

In March, the High Court provisionally gave Assange, 52, permission to appeal on three grounds. But it gave the US the opportunity to provide satisfactory assurances that it would not seek the death penalty and would allow him to seek to rely on a First Amendment right to free speech in a trial.

In a short ruling, two senior judges said the US submissions were not sufficient and said they would allow the appeal to go ahead.
Assange has been indicted on 17 espionage charges and one charge of computer misuse over his website’s publication of a trove of classified US documents almost 15 years ago.

At a hearing on Monday, the two judges granted permission to appeal. This means Assange will now be able to bring an appeal at the High Court in London.

Assange has been engaged in a 12-year legal battle to avoid extradition from the UK. A large crowd gathered outside the High Court ahead of the decision.

He was not in court for the hearing but his wife Stella, with whom he has two children aged five and seven, was present to hear the decision.
The WikiLeaks founder fled to the Ecuador embassy in London in 2012 while he was facing extradition to Sweden, where he was being investigated after a rape allegation was made against him two years earlier.

He has been battling extradition to the US since 2019 and is currently being held in the maximum-security Belmarsh Prison in London.
Assange’s lawyer Edward Fitzgerald said judges should not accept the assurance given by US prosecutors that he could seek to rely upon the rights and protections given under the First Amendment, as a US court would not be bound by this.

"We say this is a blatantly inadequate assurance," he told the court. Fitzgerald accepted a separate assurance that Assange would not face the death penalty, saying the US had provided an "unambiguous promise not to charge any capital offence".

The US government says Assange’s actions went way beyond those of a journalist gathering information, amounting to an attempt to solicit, steal and indiscriminately publish classified government documents.

James Lewis, representing the US authorities, said Assange’s conduct was “simply unprotected” by the First Amendment.

“No one, neither US citizens nor foreign citizens, are entitled to rely on the First Amendment in relation to publication of illegally obtained national defence information giving the names of innocent sources, to their grave and imminent risk of harm,” he told the court.

US prosecutors allege that Assange encouraged and helped US Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning to steal diplomatic cables and military files that WikiLeaks published.

Assange's lawyers say he could face up to 175 years in prison if convicted, though US authorities have said any sentence would likely be much shorter. 

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Media Outlets Must Adhere to Strict Data Protection Rules, Obtain Info Handling Consent

In a significant move aimed at regulating digital media and enhancing transparency in the UAE's media landscape, the Federal Decree-Law No. 55 of 2023 has been enacted.

This comprehensive legislation marks a pivotal moment in the evolution of media governance, setting clear guidelines for digital media activities and outlining the responsibilities of media practitioners and platforms.

The proliferation of digital media platforms and the widespread dissemination of information online have led to the need for robust regulation to safeguard public interest, uphold journalistic standards and combat misinformation.

Recognising this imperative, the UAE government embarked on drafting legislation to address the unique challenges posed by the digital media landscape.

Key Provisions of Federal Decree-Law No. 55/2023

Registration Requirement for Digital Media Outlets: One of the cornerstone provisions of the decree-law is the requirement for digital media outlets to register with the relevant authorities. This registration process aims to ensure accountability and transparency in the digital media sector, enabling authorities to monitor the activities of media entities operating within the UAE.

Editorial Responsibility and Professional Standards: The decree-law underscores the importance of upholding editorial responsibility and adherence to professional standards in digital media content production. Media practitioners are required to adhere to principles of accuracy, fairness and objectivity, thereby safeguarding the credibility of digital media platforms.

Combating Misinformation and Fake News: In line with global efforts to combat misinformation and fake news, the decree-law contains provisions aimed at curbing the dissemination of false or misleading information. Media outlets are obligated to verify the accuracy of information before publishing or sharing it, thereby promoting responsible journalism and safeguarding public trust.

Protection of Privacy and Personal Data: RecogniSing the importance of privacy rights in the digital age, the decree-law includes provisions to protect the privacy and personal data of individuals. Media outlets are required to adhere to strict data protection regulations and obtain consent before collecting, processing or disclosing personal information.

Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties: To ensure compliance with the provisions of the decree-law, robust enforcement mechanisms have been established, empowering regulatory authorities to take appropriate action against violations. Penalties for non-compliance may include fines, suspension of operations, or revocation of licenses, depending on the severity of the offense.

Impact and Implications: The enactment of Federal Decree-Law No. 55 of 2023 represents a significant milestone in the regulation of digital media in the UAE. By establishing clear guidelines and accountability mechanisms, the decree-law aims to promote responsible journalism, protect public interest and foster a vibrant and trustworthy media ecosystem.

As the digital media landscape continues to evolve, regulatory frameworks must adapt to address emerging challenges and safeguard the integrity of the media environment.

Federal Decree-Law No. 55/2023 reflects the UAE government's commitment to promoting transparency, accountability and professionalism in the digital media sector, ensuring that media practitioners and platforms operate in accordance with the highest standards of ethics and integrity.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Be Cautious: Abu Dhabi Police Warn of Fake Bank Receipts from Fraudulent Buyers

 

If you're selling items online, be cautious of fraudsters who send fake bank receipts, the police have warned.
On Friday, the Abu Dhabi Police issued an alert about a scam targeting online sellers.

These fraudulent buyers typically send 'receipts' claiming they have transferred the money, but no payment is actually made.

Col. Muslim Muhammad Al Amari, director of the Criminal Security Sector, explained that the scam begins when a fraudster identifies an unsuspecting seller who has listed an item for sale online, often on social media platforms.

"After negotiating the terms of the transaction, the 'buyer' sends fake bank receipts, stating that the transfer process will take several days. Using this supposed 'proof' of payment, the scammer then asks to receive the items," said Col. Al Amari.

Victims of this scam end up handing over their items to the fraudulent buyer, only to discover later that the receipt was fake and no money was transferred.

Col. Al Amari urged sellers to withhold items until they have confirmed the payment has been credited to their account. "Do not take any action until the payment has been received," he advised.

Those who encounter such scams should report them immediately to the police. In Abu Dhabi, residents can contact the police via the toll-free hotline 8002626 (AMAN2626), send an SMS to 2828, or email aman@adpolice.gov.ae. Complaints can also be filed through the police's official app. 

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Phased Rollout: UAE Banks Set to Launch Jaywan Debit Cards: UBF Chief

 

 All UAE banks will gradually replace over 10 million existing debit cards with Jaywan debit cards over the next two and a half years.

Abdulaziz Al Ghurair, chairman of the UAE Banks Federation (UBF), confirmed that the rollout will be completed in stages to ensure a smooth transition.

"Replacing these cards will take time, but banks have committed to launching Jaywan cards and will stop issuing other branded cards, focusing on Jaywan locally," said Al Ghurair during a media briefing.

Andrew McCormack, chief operating officer at Al Etihad Payments (AEP), stated: "We have an aggressive growth plan for Jaywan, to start issuing debit cards in Q2 2024. The Central Bank of the UAE will mandate all banks to issue Jaywan debit cards to their customers."

Jaywan cards will be co-badged with Mastercard or Visa, enabling extensive global use.

"The Jaywan card will have two badges to accommodate the large segment of UAE residents who travel extensively, extending its reach beyond the UAE, GCC, and India with the help of co-badge partners Mastercard and Visa," McCormack explained.

In the future, Jaywan is expected to be accepted at the GCC level and through country-to-country agreements with nations like China and India.

The card was created by Al Etihad Payments (AEP), a subsidiary of the Central Bank of the UAE, to enhance the country's financial market infrastructure.

In October 2023, AEP partnered with NPCI International Payments Limited (NIPL) of India to develop the UAE’s first national Domestic Card Scheme (DCS).

Jaywan, announced during Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to the UAE, uses licensed technology from India's payment operator NPCI.

The card will be issued to UAE residents with bank accounts or those banking with exchange houses and will be usable in India once electronic linkages are established.

According to Global Data, the UAE’s cards and payment market was estimated to be nearly $120 billion (Dh440.4 billion) by the end of 2022, with expectations of high single-digit growth in the coming years.

Jaywan's relationship extends into India and GCC countries, enhancing its domestic and international utility without solely relying on Mastercard or Visa systems.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Maternity Leave Guaranteed Under the UAE Labour Code Irrespective of Contract Terms

Maternity leave is a critical component of employment, essential for ensuring the well-being of female workers during and after pregnancy.

The UAE Labour Law prioritises workers' rights, particularly focusing on the welfare of female employees during maternity.

Does the UAE Labour Law Guarantee Maternity Leave?

Yes, the UAE labour law guarantees maternity leave for female employees https://thelawreporters.com/the-legality-of-maternity-laws-in-uae/  even if it is not explicitly included in their employment contracts.

Articles 30 and 65 of Federal Decree-Law No. 33/2021 clearly define the entitlements for female workers.

This legal framework transcends contractual agreements, creating a protective and supportive environment for female workers in the UAE.

Article 30 – Maternity Leave

Female workers are entitled to 60 days of maternity leave, with the first 45 days at full pay and the next 15 days at half pay.

After using maternity leave, a female worker can take up to 45 additional days without pay due to pregnancy or childbirth-related illness, provided she has a medical certificate.

Maternity leave is applicable if childbirth occurs after six months of pregnancy, regardless of the fetus's condition.

If a female worker gives birth to a sick or disabled child, she is entitled to an additional 30 days of leave with full pay and may extend this for another 30 days without pay.

A female worker can request maternity leave at any time from the last day of the month preceding the expected month of delivery, supported by a medical certificate.

The law prohibits termination or warning of termination due to pregnancy, maternity leave, or absence from work as stipulated in Article 30.

Upon returning from maternity leave, a female worker is entitled to one or two daily rest periods for breastfeeding, each not exceeding one hour, for up to six months from the date of delivery.

Article 65 – Nullification of Contrary Conditions

Article 65(3) emphasises the nullification of any conditions that contradict the Decree Law, deeming them null and void unless they are more beneficial to the worker.

Waivers or reconciliations that violate the Decree-Law are also considered null and void.

Article 65 safeguards workers' rights, ensuring that the Decree-Law does not override any additional rights granted under other legislations, agreements, approvals, systems, or employment contracts.

This ensures that workers benefit from more advantageous conditions than the minimum standards set by the Decree Law, promoting fairness and well-being.

Maternity Leave in the Federal Government

As per Article 19 of Federal Decree-Law No. 49 of 2022 on Human Resources Law in the Federal Government, female employees in permanent positions are entitled to three months of maternity leave with full salary.

After returning to work, for six months, female employees are entitled to two hours of reduced working hours daily, either at the beginning or end of the workday, to nurse their child. These breaks are fully paid.

Article 20 also grants female employees five working days of fully paid parental leave, which can be taken continuously or intermittently within six months of the child's birth.

Male employees are also entitled to this leave. Maternity leave cannot be combined with leave without pay.

Maternity Leave in Abu Dhabi

Female employees are entitled to three months of fully paid maternity leave. Upon returning, they are entitled to two hours of daily leave for the first year after delivery to nurse their child. Male employees receive three days of paternity leave.

Maternity Leave in Dubai Government

Decree No. 14 of 2017 regulates maternity, miscarriage, stillbirth and childcare leave for female employees in the Dubai Government.

Female employees receive 90 days of maternity leave from the delivery date and can apply for maternity leave up to 30 days before the expected delivery date.

Annual leave and unpaid leave can be added to maternity leave, totalling up to 120 days.

For one year after the baby’s birth, mothers are entitled to two hours of reduced working hours daily for nursing, either at the beginning or end of the workday. There is no nursing break during Ramadan.

If a female employee gives birth to a child with special needs, she is granted childcare leave until the child turns one-year-old.

According to Dubai Government Human Resources Management Law No. 8 of 2018, male employees are entitled to three days of fully paid paternity leave, taken within one month of the child's birth.

Dubai Government Human Resources Department issued maternity guidelines for Dubai Government employees, which include medical tips for pregnant employees and information on their rights and duties as provided by Decree No. 14 of 2017.

Maternity Leave in Sharjah Government

Since a local decree in 2016, female employees in the Sharjah Government are entitled to 120 days of maternity leave, including 90 days of paid leave and 30 days of unpaid leave.

The decree allows adding annual leave to maternity leave and grants new mothers two hours for nursing their child for six months.

Maternity Leave in Ras Al Khaimah Government

In November 2016, the Ras Al Khaimah Government extended maternity leave to 90 days of paid leave. Previously, in 2015, the nursing period was extended to one year from the baby's birth.

Female employees in the UAE are guaranteed maternity leave under the Labour Code https://thelawreporters.com/uae-maternity-and-paternity-leave-all-you-need-to-know/ , regardless of whether it is explicitly stated in their employment contracts.

This legal protection ensures that female employees can take necessary time off during pregnancy and childbirth without fear of contractual limitations.

Employers must comply with these regulations to foster a workplace that respects and upholds the rights of all employees.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Unlocking Dubai: Your Guide to Extending Tourist Visa, Fees, Process & Essential Info

Whether you're looking to prolong your holiday or explore potential employment opportunities, Dubai offers a wealth of experiences for visitors. If you find yourself wanting to extend your time in this vibrant city, here's a comprehensive guide to help you through the process.

If you're currently on a 30 or 60-day tourist visa, you can extend your stay by another 30 days within the country. To renew your tourist visa, you can choose from the following channels:

GDRFA Website

*Register on the General Directorate of Residency and Foreigners Affairs (GDRFA) website using your email address.
*Log in with your username and click on "New Application."
*Select "For Myself" and fill in the required application data.
*Attach a copy of your passport.
*Pay the service fee of Dh600, plus a five percent value-added tax.

GDRFA App

*Sign up or log in to the General Directorate of Residency and Foreigners Affairs Dubai (GDRFA) app.
*Navigate to the dashboard and access the dependent visa details.
*Tap the 'Renew Residence' icon and fill in the necessary details.
*Choose your preferred delivery method.
*Attach a copy of your passport and submit the fee.
*Await confirmation via SMS/email.

ICP Website

*Register on the Federal Authority for Identity and Citizenship (ICP) website using your email address.
*Log in with your username and access "Public Visa Services."
*Click on 'Extension of Current Visa' and fill in the application details.
*Attach a copy of your passport and proceed to pay the fee.
*Await confirmation via SMS/email.

Amer Service Centre

*Visit the nearest Customer Happiness Centre and obtain an automated turn ticket.
*Submit your application along with all required documents.
*Pay the service fee to the customer service representative.

Amer Website

*
Visit
amer247.com and click on "UAE Tourist Visa" in the top-right corner.
*
Choose the relevant visa type and click "Apply Now."
*
Complete the payment process.
While the standard visa extension fee is Dh600, plus five per cent tax, the total amount may vary based on individual circumstances. Once you've completed the application process, you can expect to receive a response within 48 hours or less.
With a straightforward process outlined through various channels, obtaining a visa extension is convenient and efficient. So now, you don't need to worry about the extended stay; just relax and enjoy all that Dubai has to offer.

Placeholder

UAE Golden Residency Visa Holders are Authorised to Take Up Employment Activities

In the UAE, individuals holding a golden residency visa are authorised to participate in employment activities, as per Article 7 of the Employment Law and Article 6(1)(j) of Cabinet Resolution No. 1 of 2022.

The resolution specifies that the work permit issued to golden visa holders is exclusively for individuals employed by establishments registered with the ministry seeking to hire employees with golden residency visas.

Prior to obtaining a golden residency visa, employees are required to inform their employer of the change in their UAE residency status. Subsequently, the employer must proceed to cancel the existing work permit and UAE residency visa of the employee.

Article 7(3) of Cabinet Resolution No. 1 of 2022 outlines the procedures for canceling work permits, including:

*Submission of an application for cancelling the work permit through the specified channels by the Ministry.
*Completion of the required data and attachment of documents.
*Settlement of any fines for delays in issuing the work permit or for failure to renew it, if applicable.
*Confirmation by the establishment that the worker has received all entitled benefits.
*Adherence to any additional conditions determined by resolution of the Minister or their delegate.

Once the work permit of a prospective UAE golden residency visa holder employee is cancelled, they are eligible to sign a new employment contract with either their existing employer or a prospective one, under Administrative Resolution No. 38 of 2022.

The requirements for obtaining a work permit through the Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratisation

(MoHRE) for a UAE golden residency visa holder, as per Administrative Resolution No. 38 of 2022, include:
*Clear-coloured photo with a white background.
*Copy of a valid passport, with a minimum validity of six months, along with a copy of a valid residency (golden) visa.
*Approved employment contract issued by the ministry, signed by both the employer and the employee.

Academic Certificates
*For Skill levels (1 & 2): Bachelor's Degree or higher, attested by competent authorities.
*For Skill levels (3 & 4): Diploma graduate or higher, attested by competent authorities.
*For Skill level (5): High school certificate, attested by competent authorities. State-issued certificates are excluded.
*A professional license issued by the competent authority, for example, doctor, nurse, etc.
Upon acquiring a golden visa residency, individuals have the option to request their employer to initiate the process for a new work permit.

Transitioning to a golden visa in Dubai enables individuals to engage in employment activities, supported by UAE regulations. For additional assistance, you can contact the MoHRE. 

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

UAE Employers Must Settle Financial Obligations Within 14 Days of Contract Expiration

 

Federal Decree-Law No. 33 of 2021 concerning the Regulation of Employment Relations, Cabinet Resolution No. 1 of 2022 implementing Federal Decree-Law No. 33 of 2021 on Employment Relations Regulation, and Federal Decree-Law No. 29 of 2021 concerning Entry and Residence of Aliens come into play when employees plan to resign in the UAE.

According to Article 53 of the Employment Law, employers must settle all financial obligations owed to employees within 14 days from the contract's expiration, including salaries and other compensations as per the contract terms or relevant resolutions.

Article 7 of Cabinet Resolution No. 1 of 2022 outlines procedures for issuing, renewing and cancelling work permits. Employers must initiate the cancellation process of an employee's work permit with the Ministry of Human Resources & Emiratisation (MoHRE) as per Article 7(3).

Cancellation procedures include submitting an application through specified channels, providing necessary data and documents, paying fines for delays, acknowledging worker entitlements and adhering to additional conditions per resolution.

Additionally, Article 19 of Federal Law No. 6 of 1973 states that individuals must leave the country upon residency revocation.

Article 11 of Federal Decree-Law No. 29 of 2021 outlines fines for individuals residing unlawfully after visa or residence permit cancellation or expiration. Despite visa cancellation, individuals can stay in the UAE until the specified period mentioned in their visa cancellation document issued by relevant authorities.

Resigning employees are entitled to receive salary and end-of-service benefits within 14 days from the date of work permit cancellation, as mandated by law.

Failure of the employer to fulfill financial obligations allows the employee to file a complaint with the Ministry of Human Resources & Emiratisation (MoHRE).

Compliance with UAE employment laws is essential during the resignation process, so it becomes important to understand obligations and timelines to ensure a smooth transition for both employers and employees.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Global Legal Collaboration: A Comprehensive Analysis of UAE Extradition Framework

The United Arab Emirates (UAE), as a signatory of the Riyadh Arab Convention on Judicial Cooperation, extends its legal cooperation to Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Iraq, Algeria, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Tunisia and Morocco.

Additionally, the UAE has established bilateral treaties for judicial collaboration with various countries, including the United Kingdom, France, India, Pakistan, Iran, Australia, China and Egypt.

UAE' s Legal Framework on Judicial Cooperation

The UAE has enacted Federal Law No. 39 of 2006, focusing on mutual judicial cooperation in criminal matters, which incorporates the country's extradition law. In 2012, the UAE ratified an extradition treaty aimed at streamlining prisoner transfers between Gulf states and India.

In the realm of legal practice, discussions often centre around extradition procedures in the UAE. Unlike many jurisdictions, the UAE treats extradition not as a public action but as a judicial order, subject to review by superior courts.

The Extradition Process

The following is the process for extradition:

Receipt of Warrant: The requesting state issues a warrant for arrest as per the terms of the extradition treaty.
Endorsement of Warrant: The central government endorses the warrant, enabling the arrest of the fugitive.
Presentation before Magistrate Court: The arrested fugitive is presented before the magistrate court, which confirms the arrest and notifies the central government.
Transfer of Custody: Upon confirmation, the central government arranges for the transfer of the fugitive to the requesting state's authorities.

Key Considerations in Extradition Requests

Several factors influence extradition requests and procedures:

Territorial Jurisdiction: Extradition may be pursued for crimes committed outside the territory, subject to the discretion of the requested country.
Political Crimes: The requested country may refuse extradition for political crimes.
Priority of Extradition Requests: Priority is given to the country most affected by the crime or where it was committed.
Exceptions to Extradition: Both India and the UAE exempt their nationals from extradition requests.

Key Legal Provisions Governing Extradition in the UAE

Key legal provisions governing extradition in the UAE include:

Constitutional Prohibition: Article 38 of the UAE Constitution explicitly prohibits the extradition of citizens and political refugees.
Penal Code: Articles 121 and 132(1) of the UAE Penal Code, Federal Law No. 3 of 1987, outline provisions related to extradition.
Criminal Procedures Code: Article 304(1) of the Criminal Procedures Code, Federal Law No. 35, addresses extradition procedures.
Residency Law: Articles 23 to 29 of the Residency Law, Federal Law No. 17 of 1972, along with Articles 79 to 92 of its Executive Regulations, further delineate aspects of extradition law.

The Process of Extradition Through Diplomatic Channels

Extradition proceedings in the UAE are conducted through diplomatic channels:

Initiation: The requesting party, typically the Attorney General, submits a formal request to the Ministry of Justice in the requesting country.
Transmission: The Ministry of Justice forwards the extradition request to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which then communicates it to the embassy of the requesting country in the UAE's capital.
Receipt by Requested Party: The embassy transmits the request to the UAE's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which subsequently transfers it to the Ministry of Justice.

Enforcement of Extradition Request

The execution of an extradition request involves several steps:

Arrest: Interpol may issue a Red Notice alert to prevent the fugitive from travelling. The prosecutor may then interview the wanted individual.
Deportation or Incarceration: Depending on the nature of the offense, the individual may be immediately deported or detained pending further proceedings.
Examination of Case: In some cases, such as in the UK, the prosecutor reviews the case file received from the requesting jurisdiction and initiates extradition proceedings before a specialised court.

Available Defenses

Various defenses may be invoked during extradition proceedings:

Dual Criminality: Extradition is permissible only if the individual's actions constitute an offense in both the requesting and requested states.
Political Crimes: Opposition to a political regime may serve as a defense under international law.
Human Rights Concerns: Extradition may be refused if there are concerns about human rights violations or unusual punishment in the requesting jurisdiction.
Conflicts of Jurisdiction: Extradition cannot occur if there is a dispute over which jurisdiction has authority.
Diplomatic Protection: Individuals may seek diplomatic protection, but effective nationality and a genuine bond with the protecting state are essential.
Extradition is a complex legal process shaped by international agreements and domestic laws. While treaties facilitate extradition, resolving jurisdictional conflicts and ensuring compliance with human rights standards remain ongoing challenges. The UAE's engagement in extradition treaties reflects the evolving nature of legal cooperation amid globalisation's complexities.

Placeholder

Abu Dhabi Court Verdict on 84 Accused of Running Terror Outfit Scheduled for July 10

The Abu Dhabi Federal Court of Appeal's State Security Chamber has set a hearing date of July 10 to deliver the verdict in the Case No. 87 of 2023- State Security Offenses, involving the terrorist 'Justice and Dignity Committee' Organisation. This follows a 10-day window granted to defence lawyers to submit their closing arguments.

Eighty-four defendants stand accused in this case of establishing and managing a clandestine terrorist organisation in the UAE known as the 'Justice and Dignity Committee'. The charges against them include planning terrorist acts, fundraising for the Organisation and concealing the source and destination of those funds.

In Thursday's session, attended by the defendants' families and media representatives, the court heard defence lawyers' pleas and their response to the public prosecution. The defence lawyers presented supplementary memos in response to the prosecution's arguments regarding the defendants' pleas.

The public prosecution reaffirmed their position as articulated in the opening statement. The prosecution representative contended that the current charges are materially distinct from those in the prior case number 79 of 2012, as they involve demonstrably criminal actions.

These constitute a separate offence under the principle of material plurality. Notably, the financing of a terrorist organisation was not encompassed in the previous trial. The court also listened -- during the 3-hour session -- to the defendants' own pleadings in the presence of their lawyers.

In their pleadings, the defendants argued that the charges against them were invalid and that the case could not be considered because it had been previously adjudicated in a ruling in the aforementioned case as a primary plea in the case.

They also questioned the evidence presented by the public prosecution, including investigations, technical, financial and media reports. The court then decided to set a hearing date of July 10th to deliver the verdict in the case.

 

Placeholder

Abu Dhabi Big Ticket Raffle Set to Resume Operations; Next Live Draw on June 3

 

Abu Dhabi's Big Ticket has announced the resumption of its operations starting May 9, with the next live draw set for June 3. Last month, the raffle operator temporarily halted its activities.

During May, anyone purchasing tickets for the upcoming draw will stand a chance to win Dh10 million, with the added perk that customers buying two tickets will receive one for free.

The decision to pause operations in April allowed the company to evaluate its readiness to comply with the evolving regulatory framework established by the GCGRA for a safe and regulated commercial gaming environment.

Having operated in the UAE for 32 years, Big Ticket clarified its decision to suspend operations in alignment with the new directives from the Gaming Regulatory Authority, effective April 1, 2024.

In an FAQ on its website, Big Ticket noted the temporary closure of both Zayed International Airport and Al Ain Airport stores, with kiosks being temporarily disabled during this period.

Expressing gratitude for ongoing support, Big Ticket reassured customers of its commitment to upholding the highest standards of transparency, responsibility, and integrity in all prize operations. All previously won prizes are securely protected and guaranteed. 

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Spain Prosecutors Seek To Close Shakira Tax Fraud Case Citing Insufficient Evidence

Spanish prosecutors moved to dismiss a tax fraud case against Shakira just months after opening proceedings against the "Hips Don't Lie" singer over unpaid taxes worth $7 million.

"The Barcelona provincial prosecutor's office for financial crimes has requested that the proceedings against Shakira be closed ... for the 2018 tax year," the prosecutors office said in a statement, pointing to "insufficient evidence".

Prosecutors opened the case in July, accusing the Columbian superstar of using a network of companies, some of them based in tax havens, to cheat the tax office out of 6.6 million euros ($7.09 million) in 2018, including interest and adjustments.

A month later, the so-called Queen of Latin Pop paid 6.6 million euros to settle the debt, her agent told AFP. On November 20, Shakira reached a last-minute settlement with prosecutors on the opening day of her trial over an earlier tax fraud case involving income she earned between 2012 and 2014.

Prosecutors had sought a jail sentence of over eight years for the singer whom they accused of defrauding the tax authorities of 14.5 million euros in a case that centred on how much time she was living in Spain.

Shakira denied the charges, saying she only moved to Spain full time in 2015. By the time the case came to trial, she had already paid 17.45 million euros to settle her outstanding tax debt, prosecutors said at the time.

On the day it opened, the trial -- which had been due to run for three weeks and hear from some 120 witnesses -- was quickly concluded after she agreed to pay a fine of nearly 7.8 million euros to settle the case.

At the time she explained she had settled "with the best interest of my kids at heart" because she needed "to move past the stress and emotional toll of the last several years" and focus on her career.

Now 47, Shakira lives in Miami with her two sons after splitting from Barcelona star defender Gerard Pique. He was himself convicted of tax fraud in 2016 and ordered to pay 2.1 million euros in fines and arrears. Spain's Supreme Court in 2021 annulled his conviction.

Last year, Shakira's superstar Argentine producer Bizarrap won the Latin Grammy for song of the year with a track taking a swipe at Pique -- who has since retired from football -- in which she accuses him of leaving her with a "debt to the tax office".

"People on my team tried to convince me to change the lyrics, but I'm not a UN diplomat. I am an artist and, above all, a woman," Shakira told Spanish celebrity magazine ¡Hola!

Spain has in recent years cracked down on celebrities, including football stars such as Argentina's Lionel Messi and Portugal's Cristiano Ronaldo, for unpaid taxes.
Both players were found guilty of evasion and received prison sentences that were waived for first-time offenders.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Unlicensed Driver Leaves 7-Year-Old Dead in Sharjah Car, Sparks Legal Concerns

In a heart-wrenching turn of events, a tragic incident unfolded in Sharjah, where a seven-year-old Bangladeshi boy lost his life after being left unattended inside a locked vehicle for several hours.

This devastating occurrence not only underscores the dangers of extreme heat, especially within confined spaces, but also raises significant legal concerns surrounding the responsibilities and liabilities of those entrusted with the care of children.

The child, a student of Ibn Sina School, was under the supervision of a female driver hired by his parents for transportation to and from school.

On that fateful Monday morning, , the driver, who lacked the necessary licence for transporting schoolchildren, picked up the students from their homes and parked the car near the school.

Tragically, failing to notice the boy remaining inside, she departed with her husband in another vehicle. It was only upon her return several hours later to pick the students up that the devastating discovery was made – the young boy was lifeless inside the vehicle.

The incident has ignited discussions not only about the immediate safety measures but also about the legal ramifications, including issues of negligence, criminal liability, civil accountability and regulatory compliance.

The shock and grief surrounding the incident have reverberated through the community, with those who know the driver attesting to her state of shock.

The circumstances surrounding the boy's death highlight the dangers of extreme heat, particularly within locked vehicles. With temperatures soaring to nearly 44°C that day, the risk of leaving a child unattended in such conditions is amplified, with experts warning of the potential for fatal consequences.

Despite the heart-breaking tragedy, the boy's parents have reportedly decided to extend forgiveness to the female driver. Yet, uncertainty lingers over whether authorities will initiate legal action without a formal complaint.

If pursued, any legal proceedings would likely centre on issues of negligence, criminal liability, civil liability and regulatory compliance.

Negligence: The driver's failure to ensure the child's safety by leaving him unattended in a locked vehicle may constitute negligence. Negligence involves breaching a duty of care owed to others, resulting in foreseeable harm. In this case, the driver's actions could be deemed negligent, leading to potential criminal charges and civil liability.

Criminal Liability: The driver may face criminal charges for negligent conduct leading to the child's death. Prosecutors could pursue charges such as involuntary manslaughter or endangerment, depending on the circumstances and applicable laws. The severity of the charges would depend on factors such as the degree of negligence and the consequences of the driver's actions.

Civil Liability: The boy's family could pursue a civil lawsuit against the driver for wrongful death and negligence. Civil liability arises from breaching a duty of care owed to others, resulting in harm or loss.

The family may seek compensation for various damages, including emotional distress, medical expenses and funeral costs.

The driver's lack of license and failure to adhere to safety standards could strengthen the family's case for compensation.

Regulatory Compliance: The incident raises concerns about regulatory compliance regarding transportation standards and safety measures. The driver's lack of licence to transport schoolchildren indicates potential violations of transportation regulations.

Authorities may investigate the incident to determine if the driver and any involved parties complied with relevant laws and regulations governing transportation services. Non-compliance could result in legal consequences, including fines or penalties.

Tragically, this is not the first time such an incident has occurred, serving as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences that can result from negligence in child transportation.

This incident has also drawn attention to the prevalence of illegal car lift services, often chosen by parents due to the cost implications of authorized school buses.

Despite the allure of cheaper alternatives, authorities have issued stern warnings against their use, emphasising the comprehensive security measures and oversight provided by licensed school buses.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Porn Star Stormy Daniels Testifies She Had Sex with Trump, Defense Attacks Her Credibility

Porn star Stormy Daniels described her 2006 encounter with Donald Trump in unflattering terms at his criminal trial on Tuesday, testifying she tried not to think about the sex while it took place and feared it would become public.

For several hours Daniels, 45, offered riveting details on the witness stand about her encounter with Trump, 77, and the hush money deal she reached to stay quiet about it ahead of the 2016 election when he won the White House.

She told jurors that her life descended into "chaos" after the arrangement was made public in 2018, saying she was ostracised and harassed at her home.

"Who do you understand Mr Trump to be referring to as horseface and sleazebag in this post?" prosecutor Susan Hoffinger asked her as she displayed a social media post by Trump. "Me," Daniels replied.

Daniels' testimony provided fodder for Trump's lawyers to seek a mistrial, arguing that details, such as her statement that Trump did not wear a condom, served no purpose other than to inflame the jury. Justice Juan Merchan denied that request but agreed that some of her testimony ran too far afield.

Trump's lawyers attacked her credibility and grilled her about inconsistent statements she has made over the years about her time with Trump.

Daniels also conceded that she "hates" Trump and wanted to make money off her story. Her explanation for why she went public after seven years of silence and denials also was unclear.

Trump, the Republican candidate for president again this year, did not react as he watched from the defense table. He has pleaded not guilty to charges of falsifying business records to cover up a $130,000 hush money payment to Daniels and denies having sex with Daniels.

His legal team has suggested that Daniels was angling for a spot on "The Apprentice," a popular reality TV show then hosted by Trump, a New York real estate mogul.

Daniels confirmed that she hoped he would cast her on the show following their encounter. "This was a very big day, a very revealing day. As you see their case is totally falling apart," Trump told reporters outside the courtroom at the end of the day. The trial resumes on Thursday when Daniels will again take the stand.

Trump Made Sexual Advances

Daniels said Trump made sexual advances after inviting her to his hotel suite at a celebrity golf tournament in Lake Tahoe, Nevada. Daniels testified she grew up as the daughter of a low-income single mother.

She said Trump told her: "This is the only way you're getting out of the trailer park." Daniels said she "blacked out" despite consuming no drugs or alcohol after Trump prevented her from leaving the room by blocking the door. She said she woke up on the bed with her clothes off.

"I was trying to think about anything other than what was happening there," Daniels testified. Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, said she did not tell Trump to stop. "I didn't say anything at all," she said. She said she left the hotel room quickly afterward.

The Republican politician, who served as president from 2017 to 2021, says the trial is an attempt to hobble his attempt to win back the White House from Democratic President Joe Biden in a Nov. 5 election.

Wearing a black outfit and black glasses, Daniels testified that she worked in strip clubs and pornography after a childhood in which her mother was often gone for days at a time.

Satin Pajamas and a Spanking

She said Trump greeted her at his hotel suite wearing satin pajamas. She said she grew annoyed by Trump's frequent interruptions and asked him: "Are you always this arrogant and pompous?"

Trump then dared Daniels to spank him with a magazine and she obliged. “He was much more polite after that,” she said.
"That's bullshit," Trump appeared to say on Tuesday as he watched from the defendant's table.

The alleged encounter took place while Trump was married to his current wife Melania. Daniels said she confided in only a few people about the sex. She said she saw Trump at public events on several occasions in the years that followed, but then fell out of touch with him after he did not put her on "The Apprentice."

Daniels said she was determined to keep the incident private after being threatened in a parking lot in 2011 but changed her mind during Trump's 2016 presidential bid, when he faced multiple accusations of sexual misbehavior.

"My motivation wasn't money, it was to get the story out," she said. Daniels ultimately negotiated a $130,000 payment with Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen, and prosecutors say Trump falsified business records to obscure the fact that he reimbursed Cohen for the payment.

She testified she was eager to collect before the 2016 election because she was worried he would not pay her if he won. The case is widely seen as less consequential than three other criminal prosecutions Trump faces, but it is the only one certain to go to trial before the election.

The other cases charge Trump with trying to overturn his 2020 presidential defeat and mishandling classified documents after leaving office. Trump has pleaded not guilty to all three.

In Florida, where Trump is accused of illegally keeping classified documents, a judge decided to indefinitely postpone the trial on Tuesday, greatly reducing the odds he will face a jury in the two federal case before the election.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Man Who Fatally Stabbed Woman and Set Fire to Ajman Shop Apprehended Within 10 Minutes

Placeholder

Launch of Unified GCC Tourist Visa System Anticipated by End of 2024: SCTDA Official

 

The launch of the unified GCC tourist visa system is anticipated by the end of 2024, as revealed by Khalid Jasim Al Midfa from the Sharjah Commerce and Tourism Authority (SCTDA) during the Arabian Travel Market event.

Al Midfa emphasised the importance of the e-service component in this initiative, aiming to streamline the process without compromising security.

The system, termed GCC Grand Tours, will enable tourists to explore the six GCC countries for more than 30 days, making regional travel more accessible and economical, according to Abdullah bin Touq Al Marri, UAE’s Minister of Economy.

Al Marri highlighted the potential of this visa scheme to showcase the diverse tourism offerings across the GCC, attracting longer stays from tourists and positioning the region as a premier destination.

Discussions are underway to develop comprehensive tour packages in collaboration with major tourism operators, hotels and airlines. Al Midfa stressed the collaboration between government entities and the private sector to facilitate seamless travel experiences.

The focus is on extending visitors' stays within the UAE and the GCC region, aligning with international travel norms where leisure trips typically span several weeks. Coordination efforts are also underway to synchronise major events, ensuring a cohesive and appealing itinerary for tourists.

Once the unified tourist visa is operational, both leisure and business travel packages will be readily available from the private sector.

Sarah Buhijji, CEO of Bahrain Tourism and Exhibitions Authority, echoed the sentiment, expressing Bahrain's commitment to promoting regional tourism packages. Collaborative efforts with Saudi Arabia and other GCC nations aim to present the entire region as a unified and compelling destination for travellers, she noted.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

UAE Corporate Tax: Black Points for Tax Agents' Incorrect Advice Starting July 1

Starting July 1, UAE tax agents will face penalties, known as 'black points', for providing incorrect advice to clients regarding their corporate tax obligations.

The move is part of a broader effort to enhance the regulation of tax agents in the UAE, aligning with international standards. These penalties aim to deter misconduct and negligence among tax agents, ensuring they adhere to updated standards and continuously update their knowledge.

The application of 'black points' will vary based on the nature of the violation:

  • If the violation is committed by an individual tax agent not associated with a corporate entity, black points will be applied to the individual.
  • If the violation involves a tax agent employed by the client, both the individual agent and the corporate client will receive black points.
  • If the violation involves a representative of a corporate tax agent affecting the client, both the individual tax agent and the tax agency will be penalised.
  • If the violation involves a representative of a tax agency not affecting the represented client, only the individual tax agent will receive black points.

Tax agents are an intrinsic part of the unfolding corporate tax regime in the UAE. As per the Federal Tax Authority (FTA), they will represent clients before the authority and will oversee the filing of their annual tax returns.

In fact, it is prohibited to practice as a tax agent without completing the registration and receiving accreditation from the FTA.The criteria for accreditation are:

  • A Bachelor's or Master's degree in tax, accounting, or law from a recognised educational institution. Or a tax certification from an internationally known tax institution if the Bachelor's degree is in any other field.
  • Recent professional experience of at least three years in either tax, accounting, or law.
  • Language proficiency documentation for both Arabic and English, written and spoken.

Penalties on tax agents also come into effect for other acts of omission or commission. Now, if a tax agent is found to have shared information about the client - or any taxpayer -- with a third party without their explicit consent in writing, they will face a deduction of 100 points.

The exception is when agents have a reason to disclose under a 'legal, professional, or regulatory obligation'.

Additionally, 200 points will be docked if tax agents promote, design, or jointly design 'aggressive tax planning' marketed to multiple taxpayers, with the intention to breach any law or jeopardise the integrity of the tax system, resulting in a loss of revenue for the FTA.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Pakistani Teenager Who Went Missing Three Weeks Ago Found Dead in Ajman

Ibrahim Muhammad, the 17-year-old Pakistani teenager who disappeared almost three weeks ago following a disagreement with his mother, has tragically been found dead. As the elder of two sons, his mother tearfully confirmed the devastating news delivered by Ajman Police, stating, "Today, I was summoned to identify his body. It was indeed him.

My heart has shattered into countless pieces," she told local media. She revealed that his body was found near Al Khor Tower in Ajman. The family had filed a missing person report, and Ibrahim's father had made an impassioned plea for his safe return.

Expressing the rollercoaster of emotions she endured, Ibrahim's mother said: "I have been oscillating between hope and despair. We received reports of possible sightings in Sharjah on numerous occasions recently, and each time I rushed there in anticipation.

However, they all turned out to be false alarms. Every morning, I woke up with the hope of my son's return, but today, my worst nightmares have become reality. No mother should endure such anguish."

Missing Cases on the Rise

Ibrahim's disappearance follows the case of another 17-year-old from Pakistan who went missing in Sharjah on April 14 but was reunited with his family after five days. The boy's father explained that he had sent his son to fetch a carpenter, but he never returned. The circumstances surrounding his return remain ambiguous as his father opted not to disclose details for privacy reasons.

Recent months have witnessed several instances of teenagers going missing in the UAE, underscoring the difficulties encountered by young individuals and their families. Just last month, a French teenager who vanished in Sharjah was located in the desert not far from her residence.

Similarly, a Sharjah teenager with autism disappeared from a shopping mall and was found 18 kilometres away at Dubai Airport, thanks to the alertness of an Indian passenger. In December, an 11-year-old boy disappeared from Arabian Ranches, triggering an extensive search operation involving drones and search dogs. He was eventually located late at night.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Dubai: Man Handed Life Sentence for Murdering Girlfriend, Concealing Body in Suitcase

In the Dubai Criminal Court, an Asian individual has been sentenced to life imprisonment, followed by deportation, for the murder of his girlfriend in his apartment amid a dispute between them.

The perpetrator concealed the deceased girlfriend's body in a large suitcase and attempted to dispose of it in a waste container for the building where he resided, after spending a day with her remains under a bed in his bedroom. The Court of Appeal has upheld this ruling.

The incident, occurring in International City, traces back to January 2022, when a building guard alerted the police upon discovering a body inside a suitcase near the building’s waste container. Upon opening the suitcase, a portion of a human foot protruded, initially mistaken for a doll by the guard. Upon closer inspection, he discovered the body of a woman and promptly notified the authorities.

During interrogation, the guard revealed his ability to identify the victim, a woman who frequented the same building where he worked, particularly one of the apartments occupied by a young Asian man.

A police officer disclosed that a team of investigators entered the suspect’s apartment and gathered evidence from the crime scene. Although traces of the murder were found inside the room, the suspect was absent from the premises. Subsequently, a search warrant was issued, leading to his arrest in a nearby hotel in the Jebel Ali area.

Upon questioning, the defendant confessed to a prior friendship with the victim, revealing that he had killed her during a dispute on the day of the crime. Their relationship had originated from a chance meeting at a nightclub, progressing into a close friendship and romantic involvement.

Plans were made to formalise their relationship, but a disagreement ensued, escalating into a verbal altercation on the day of the incident. The defendant cited the termination of their relationship by the victim as the catalyst for the dispute, expressing his refusal to let her go and his attempts to reconcile. When she attempted to leave the apartment, the altercation turned physical, resulting in her demise by strangulation.

Afterwards, he disposed of her belongings and mobile phone in a waste container near a hotel where he had previously stayed, with the assistance of three friends. These accomplices were also convicted and sentenced to imprisonment, followed by deportation, for their complicity in concealing the crime from authorities despite their awareness of it.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Dubai RDC Upholds Landlord Right, Evicting Tenant Who Refused to Vacate

In a noteworthy development within the realm of landlords' property rights, the Dubai Rental Dispute Settlement Centre (RDC) has issued a significant judgment. The ruling establishes a pivotal precedent intended to incentivise landlords, particularly investors in real estate in the country, to play a more active role in their investments.

The case revolved around a rental dispute between a landlord and a tenant, wherein the landlord sought to regain possession of his property successfully.

Background

The landlord leased the property to the tenant on a yearly basis. In compliance with Law No. 26 of 2007 and its amended Law No. 33 of 2008, which regulate the relationship between landlords and tenants in the Emirateof Dubai, the landlord served the tenant with a 12-month legal notice to vacate the apartment, expressing the intention to reclaim it for personal use.

However, upon the expiration of the notice period, the tenant refused to vacate the premises, leading to a dispute. Subsequently, the landlord initiated eviction proceedings against the tenant in the Rental Dispute Settlement Centre (RDC). In the initial court hearing, the judgment was erroneously pronounced in favour of the tenant.

Legal Proceedings

NYK Law Firm contested for the landlord's right to regain possession of his property and pursued an appeal in the Appeal Court (RDC). The landlord's action was in accordance with Article 25(2)(d) of Law No. 33 of 2008, which stipulates that upon the expiration of the lease contract, the landlord may seek eviction of the tenant if the intention is to sell the property.

This provision mandates that the landlord must notify the tenant of the eviction reasons at least 12 months prior to the eviction date, and the notice must be served through a Notary Public or by registered mail. It's worth noting that the landlord fulfilled these conditions.

Ruling

In the appellate ruling, the Honourable Court delivered a judgment favouring the landlord, thereby instructing the tenant to vacate the property. Additionally, the court directed the tenant to settle all outstanding rental dues up to the date of eviction and to obtain all necessary clearances from authorities such as DEWA and other relevant entities.

The ruling serves to underscore the legal obligation of tenants to fulfill their commitments to landlords in accordance with the terms of the lease agreement and applicable laws. Furthermore, it reaffirms the principle that tenants are responsible for adhering to the terms of their tenancy contracts and for maintaining compliance with regulatory requirements governing the rental of properties.

Through such decisions, the legal system reinforces the importance of upholding contractual obligations and ensuring equitable relationships between landlords and tenants within the framework of the law.

Conclusion

This ruling stands as a significant motivator for landlords to diligently adhere to the laws governing tenancy agreements. By observing legal protocols and fulfilling their obligations, landlords can defend their position should they encounter disputes requiring legal intervention.

Courts are inclined to favour landlords who adhere to such legal requirements, as evidenced by the favourable judgment in this case. Moreover, the ruling sends a clear message to tenants regarding the importance of respecting the rights and responsibilities outlined in their lease agreements.

It serves as a deterrent against the misuse of legal protections afforded to tenants, emphasising the need for tenants to uphold their end of the contractual commitment. By fulfilling their obligations, tenants contribute to fostering a harmonious and equitable rental environment where both parties can confidently rely on the terms of their agreements.

In essence, this ruling not only reinforces the legal framework governing landlord-tenant relationships but also promotes a culture of compliance and mutual respect between both parties. It underscores the vital role of the legal system in safeguarding the rights and interests of landlords and tenants alike, ultimately contributing to the stability and fairness of the rental market.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

New York Judge Fines Donald Trump $9,000 for Violating Gag Order in Hush Money Case

New York Judge Juan Merchan has fined former President Donald Trump for repeatedly violating the gag order in the hush money trial. Merchan ruled Trump violated the gag order nine times for criticising expected trial witnesses in posts on social media and his campaign page. Trump must pay the $9,000 fine by the end of the week.

Merchan also threatened incarceration if Trump willfully violates the gag order again, writing in his ruling, “Therefore, defendant is hereby warned that the Court will not tolerate continued willful violations of its lawful orders and that if necessary and appropriate under the circumstances, it will impose an incarceratory punishment.”

Trump did not visibly react as the judge was reading his decision in court. Trump on Tuesday afternoon removed the seven “offending posts” from Truth Social and the two “offending posts” from his campaign website, as Merchan ordered.

In last week’s hearing on gag order violations, Trump’s defense argued that reposts of other people’s words do not violate the gag order and that the posts represent protected political speech in response to attacks.

Merchan rejected both arguments in his contempt ruling Tuesday. First, he found that reposts are, in this case, endorsements. “There can be no doubt whatsoever, that Defendant’s intent and purpose when reposting, is to communicate to his audience that he endorses and adopts the posted statement as his own,” Merchan wrote.

Second, Merchan acknowledged that the gag order does allow Trump to respond to political attacks, but said criticisms of key witnesses were not allowed. “To allow such attacks upon protected witnesses with blanket assertions that they are all responses to ‘political attacks’ would be an exception that swallowed the rule.

The Expanded Order does not contain such an exception,” he wrote.

Prosecutors had asked Merchan to hold Trump in contempt for violating the gag order, citing 10 social media posts from before and during the trial where the district attorney’s office accused Trump of violating the judge’s restrictions barring Trump from commenting on witnesses and jurors. They also want the posts taken down.

Prosecutors cited Trump’s comments about Michael Cohen, Stormy Daniels and the makeup of the jury pool. The judge made the ruling after a hearing last week that, at times, got heated between him and Trump’s defense attorney Todd Blanche.

Prosecutors have subsequently flagged an additional four comments that Trump has made since last week’s hearing, including about Cohen and former AMI chief David Pecker, who testified last week. Merchan has scheduled another hearing on Thursday to address those comments.

$1,000 per violation is the maximum allowed by New York State law. This is the first sanction against Trump for violating the gag order in this case.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Binance Founder Changpeng Zhao Sentenced to Four Months for Allowing Money Laundering

Changpeng Zhao, founder of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, was sentenced to four months in prison for looking the other way as criminals used the platform to move money connected to child sex abuse, drug trafficking and terrorism.

US District Judge Richard A. Jones credited the founder and former CEO of Binance for taking responsibility for his wrongdoing. Zhao, 47, pleaded guilty in November to one count of failing to maintain an anti-money-laundering program. Binance agreed to pay $4.3 billion to settle related allegations from the US government.

“I failed here,” Zhao told the court on Tuesday. “I deeply regret my failure, and I am sorry.”

But the judge said he was troubled by Zhao’s decision to ignore US banking requirements that would have slowed the company’s explosive growth. “Better to ask for forgiveness than permission,” is what Zhao told his employees about the company’s approach to US law, prosecutors said.

“No person — regardless of wealth — is immune from prosecution or above the laws of the United States,” Jones said.

The sentence, which included a previously agreed-to $50 million fine, was far less than the three years the Justice Department had sought, but defense attorneys had asked that Zhao spend no time in prison.

Zhao is the first person ever sentenced to prison time for such violations of the Bank Secrecy Act, which requires US financial institutions to know who their customers are, to monitor transactions and to file reports of suspicious activity. Prosecutors said no one had ever violated the regulations to the extent Zhao did. If he did not receive time in custody for the offense, no one would, rendering the law toothless, they argued.

“This wasn’t a mistake,” Justice Department lawyer Kevin Mosley told Jones. “When Mr. Zhao violated the BSA he was well aware of the requirements.” For example, Mosley said, Zhao directed the company to disguise customers’ locations in the US in an effort to avoid having to comply with US law.

The Justice Department on Monday sent a letter urging Congress to stiffen penalties in such cases. Violations can allow billions of dollars to flow illicitly through the US financial system, but penalties under the government’s sentencing guidelines are “poorly calibrated to address the severity of the crimes,” the letter said.

Binance allowed more than 1.5 million virtual currency trades, totaling nearly $900 million, that violated US sanctions, including ones involving Hamas’ al-Qassam Brigades, al-Qaeda and Iran, prosecutors have said.

Defense attorneys Mark Bartlett and William Burck told the judge there was no evidence Zhao knew of any specific transaction that would have been barred by US regulations or sanctions.
Also, they argued, Binance transactions that violated US sanctions constituted a miniscule portion for a company that processed trillions of dollars per year. And they noted that Zhao began making changes to improve Binance’s compliance before stepping down.

In a letter to the court, Zhao wrote that there was “no excuse for my failure to establish the necessary compliance controls at Binance.”

“I wish I could change that part of Binance’s story,” he added. “But under my direction, Binance has now implemented the most stringent anti-money laundering controls of any non- US exchange, and those controls have been in place since 2022.”

Zhao, his legal team and family members left after Tuesday’s hearing without speaking to reporters. Zhao will report to serve his sentence at a date yet to be determined.

Scandals, Market Meltdowns

The cryptocurrency industry has been marred by scandals and market meltdowns. Zhao was perhaps best known as the chief rival to Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of FTX, which was the second-largest crypto exchange before it collapsed in 2022. Bankman-Fried was convicted last November of fraud for stealing at least $10 billion from customers and investors and sentenced to 25 years in prison.

Zhao and Bankman-Fried were originally friendly competitors in the industry, with Binance investing in FTX when Bankman-Fried launched the exchange in 2019. The relationship deteriorated, however, culminating in Zhao announcing that he was selling all of his cryptocurrency investments in FTX in early November 2022. FTX filed for bankruptcy a week later.

More recently, Nigeria has recently sought to try Binance and two of its executives on money laundering and tax evasion charges. The US Justice Department on Tuesday charged early bitcoin investor Roger Ver, known as “bitcoin Jesus” for his avid promotion of the currency, with evading $50 million in taxes.

The judge described Zhao’s life story as remarkable: He grew up in rural China and his family immigrated to Canada following the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. He worked at a McDonald’s beginning at age 14 and eventually became enamoured of the tech industry while in college.

He founded Binance in 2017, motivated at least in part by a desire to help people in underdeveloped countries access reliable banking. The company made him a crypto celebrity and a billionaire many times over; he announced in 2021 that he intends to give away nearly all of his fortune.

Zhao’s philanthropic interests include funding free online education programmes for children across the globe and work by small research labs to cure diseases. Zhao’s attorneys pointed to his willingness to leave the United Arab Emirates, where he and his family live, to enter his guilty plea in the US, even though the two countries don’t have an extradition treaty.

They also argued that he would not be safe in prison. Because he is not a US citizen, he is ineligible for placement in a minimum security facility. Given his status and wealth, as well as Binance’s cooperation with US law enforcement in certain investigations, he might be a target for violence in a medium security prison, they suggested.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Billionaire’s Paradise: Dubai's 120 Richest Families, Individuals Own $1 Trillion in Wealth

Dubai hosts over 120 of the world's wealthiest families and individuals, boasting a collective net worth exceeding $1 trillion (Dh3.67 trillion).

The UAE has emerged as a magnet for thousands of millionaires globally, particularly following the pandemic, solidifying its status as the foremost wealth destination in the Middle East, Africa, and South Asia (MEASA) and ranking among the top 22 wealthiest cities worldwide, according to the Dubai International Financial Centre.

Recent data reveals a significant influx of more than 3,500 millionaires from Africa and 1,500 high-net-worth individuals from the UK relocating to Dubai in the past decade, as cited by New World Wealth.

Moreover, Henley Private Wealth reports that 9,700 millionaires migrated to the UAE in 2022 and 2023 alone. Dubai is currently home to 68,500 millionaires with at least $1 million in liquid assets, along with 206 centi-millionaires and 15 billionaires, according to the World's Wealthiest Cities Report 2023.

This surge in affluent residents includes a diverse array of individuals from the Indian Subcontinent, Russia, Europe and other South Asian and Southeast Asian nations, drawn to Dubai for its safety, security, minimal taxation, exceptional healthcare and educational infrastructure.

Many of these billionaire families are locally grown enterprises that have flourished under the favourable business legislation and environment in Dubai. Abdulla bin Touq Al Marri, UAE's Minister of Economy, notes the nation's enduring appeal as a hub for business and investment in the GCC and wider MENA region, aiming to become the focal point for family businesses.

DIFC Plays a Pivotal Role

The Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) plays a pivotal role in supporting the management of assets for these affluent families and individuals. By attracting global financial asset managers, DIFC has facilitated professional management of portfolios for millionaires and family-owned businesses, further enhancing Dubai's allure as a wealth management destination.

In 2023, DIFC introduced the world's first Family Wealth Centre, dedicated to enhancing global family wealth and supporting family businesses. With 230 banks, including 27 of the top 29 globally systemic banks, over 350 reputable wealth and asset management firms and more than 440 registered foundations, DIFC has cemented its reputation as a premier destination for family businesses worldwide, as emphasised by Essa Kazim, governor of DIFC.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Iraqi Father Takes Legal Action Against BP Over Son's Death Linked to Flaring

An Iraqi father is initiating legal proceedings against the UK-based oil giant BP concerning the passing of his 21-year-old son. Hussein Julood alleges that the practice of burning off gas, known as flaring, at a BP-managed oil field in Iraq contributed to his son Ali's leukemia.

A 2022 investigation by BBC World Service revealed that Ali's village, situated within the field, had elevated levels of cancer-causing pollutants associated with flaring.

BP acknowledges the concerns raised and expresses its commitment to facilitating change. The case marks a significant instance of an individual taking legal action against a major oil corporation regarding its flaring practices.

The claim, outlined in a letter seen by BBC News, asserts that Ali's leukemia and subsequent demise were caused by "toxic emissions from the Rumaila oilfield," for which BP, as the lead contractor, shares responsibility.

Julood seeks compensation covering his son's medical expenses, loss of earnings, funeral costs and the emotional toll of losing his son. Speaking to BBC News, Julood emphasised the broader implications of his case, representing not only himself but also the local community suffering from pollution.

Wessen Jazrawi, a partner at Hausfeld & Co representing, underscored the significance of this environmental litigation, aiming to hold major carbon-emitting companies accountable for their harmful practices.

Flaring, the burning of gas released during oil extraction, poses significant health risks due to its emission of cancer-causing chemicals like benzene. The Rumaila oil field, according to BBC analysis of World Bank data, records the highest documented levels of flaring globally.

Julood's primary objective with his claim is to halt regular flaring in Rumaila to prevent further harm to families in the region. Ali's battle with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia began at the age of 15, undergoing extensive treatment before his passing at 21. His father describes him as a vibrant individual, whose untimely death deeply affected the family.

Ali's documentation of life within the Rumaila oil field, along with pollution monitoring conducted by the BBC, revealed heightened exposure to carcinogens among local residents, raising concerns about increased leukemia risk.

While the Iraqi government owns the Rumaila oil field, BP leads its management through the Rumaila Operating Organisation (ROO) consortium. BP's flaring emissions from Rumaila in 2021 surpassed 3.7 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent, a figure exceeding the annual emissions of two million UK cars.

Although the incident occurred in Iraq, Julood can pursue the claim in UK courts due to BP's UK headquarters. BP's response emphasises its support for ROO's efforts to reduce flaring and emissions at Rumaila.

Despite assurances from BP, Julood observes continued flaring and pollution, highlighting the disparity between promises and action. Julood alleges additional cancer-related deaths in the community since Ali's passing, underscoring the urgency of addressing environmental concerns.

BP faces the choice of entering compensation negotiations or contesting the claim, with the latter potentially leading to a court hearing in the UK.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

 

Placeholder

UAE Supports Converting to Islam While Apostasy is a Serious Offense

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is renowned for its rich cultural heritage, diverse population, and adherence to Islamic principles. In a society where Islam is the official religion and holds significant influence over daily life, inquiries regarding religious conversion, particularly frequently arise.

It is crucial for individuals contemplating such a decision to comprehend the legal ramifications and procedures for religious conversion in the UAE.

Is it Legal to Convert from Islam in the UAE?

The UAE operates under Sharia law, which is derived from Islamic teachings and principles. As a result, matters concerning religion, including conversion, are governed by Islamic law.

In the context of converting away from Islam, also known as apostasy, there are legal and social considerations to be aware of in the UAE.

Under Sharia law, apostasy is generally considered a serious offense and is not legally recognised or accepted in many Islamic countries, including the UAE.

While the UAE Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, this right is subject to limitations, particularly when it comes to converting from Islam. Apostasy is viewed as a rejection of the Islamic faith and can carry social and legal consequences.

How to Embrace Islam in the UAE?

If one wants to embrace Islam, one can do so after following the procedures of the Ministry of Justice and other local government authorities. The process may involve:

  • Declaration to embrace Islam at the Ministry of Justice.
  • Declaration of embracing Islam at the Judicial Department in the emirate of Abu Dhabi.
  • Request for issuance of a certificate declaring Islam from Islamic Affairs & Charitable Activities Department (IACAD). 

Methods of Conversion

One method to convert to Islam in the UAE is through IACAD, while the other method is through the UAE Ministry of Justice (MoJ). Both options are similar and free of charge.

Notably, the conversion process does not require physical attendance; it is conducted virtually through electronic means, either via the IACAD or MoJ websites or by phone.

Submission of Documents

All required documents, such as a copy of the passport and Emirates ID, along with two photos (with the woman wearing a headscarf), need to be submitted online through the respective authorities' websites. The authorities' websites list the necessary documents for conversion.

Meeting with a Representative or Judge

After submitting the identification documents, a meeting will be scheduled with a representative or a judge, preferably in the presence of male witnesses. During this meeting, the applicant will declare the Islamic Proclamation, confirming their faith.

Issuance of Conversion Certificate

Following the meeting, a fully attested certificate of conversion will be sent by email and made available through the online portal. The conversion process typically involves only one meeting and is relatively straightforward.

Considerations and Restrictions

It's essential to note that women who are married to non-Muslims cannot convert to Islam, as it would nullify the marriage. Additionally, at this stage, there is no requirement for Islamic courses unless one intends to marry soon afterward. In such cases, basic Islamic courses that last only a few days, may be necessary.

Updating Immigration Records

Once the conversion is complete, it is advisable to take the conversion certificate to the immigration authorities in the UAE to update the religious status on the immigration application.

Additional Rules and Regulations

Islamic law outlines specific rules and procedures for converting to Islam in the UAE. The process for those interested in embracing Islam typically involves several key steps.

Declaration of Faith (Shahada): The central requirement for conversion to Islam is the declaration of faith, known as the Shahada. This declaration affirms the belief in the oneness of Allah and the prophethood of Prophet Muhammad - Peace Be Upon Him. Reciting the Shahada publicly or in the presence of witnesses is a fundamental aspect of converting to Islam.

Islamic Education and Guidance: Many individuals seeking to convert to Islam in the UAE undergo Islamic education and guidance to deepen their understanding of the faith. This may involve attending classes, seeking guidance from religious scholars or mentors, and participating in Islamic rituals and practices.

Public Declaration of Conversion: Some individuals may choose to publicly announce their conversion to Islam, either through social media, community gatherings, or formal ceremonies. While not a legal requirement, this public declaration can be a significant step in embracing the new faith and integrating into the Muslim community.

Embracing Islamic Practices: Upon conversion to Islam, individuals are expected to adopt Islamic practices and adhere to the tenets of the faith. This includes performing the five daily prayers, fasting during Ramadan, giving to charity and upholding Islamic moral and ethical principles.

Legal and Social Considerations

While converting to Islam is generally accepted and supported in the UAE, individuals considering such a step should be aware of the legal and social implications. Apostasy, or renouncing Islam, can result in legal consequences, including potential criminal charges and social stigma.

In the UAE, apostasy is not explicitly defined in the legal code, but actions that are perceived as apostasy, such as publicly renouncing Islam or engaging in activities contrary to Islamic teachings, may be subject to legal scrutiny and social backlash.

Non-Muslim expatriates who convert to Islam may face challenges related to family relationships, employment, and social acceptance, particularly if their conversion is met with resistance from family members or community members.

Converting to Islam in the UAE is a significant step that involves following specific procedures outlined by the IACAD or the Ministry of Justice. It's important to be aware of any legal restrictions and considerations, as well as the administrative steps required to update immigration records following conversion. Overall, the process is accessible and straightforward for those seeking to embrace Islam in the UAE.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Safeguarding Children's Rights: Evolution of Child Rights Protection in UAE Divorce Laws

In recent years, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has witnessed significant advancements in its divorce laws, particularly in ensuring the protection and well-being of children throughout the divorce process.

With a focus on prioritising children's interests and fostering healthy co-parenting relationships, the UAE's legal landscape has evolved to promote joint custody arrangements as a means of safeguarding children's rights.

Historically, divorce laws in the UAE leaned towards granting sole custody to one parent, often the mother, with limited visitation rights for the other parent.

However, the UAE's legal framework has transformed to embrace joint custody arrangements, recognizing the importance of both parents' involvement in their children's lives post-divorce.

Joint custody, also known as shared custody, involves both parents sharing responsibility for the upbringing and care of their children. This approach acknowledges the value of maintaining strong bonds with both parents, providing children with stability, emotional support, and a sense of security during a tumultuous time.

How UAE Protects Children's Rights?

The UAE's divorce laws prioritise the child's best interests, ensuring their rights and well-being are protected throughout the divorce process. Courts in the UAE consider various factors when determining custody arrangements, including the child's age, preferences, and the ability of each parent to provide a nurturing environment.

Furthermore, the legal system in the UAE provides mechanisms to address any disputes or conflicts that may arise between parents regarding custody or visitation rights.

Mediation and counseling services are often utilised to help parents reach amicable agreements that serve the child's best interests.

Financial Support and Maintenance

Ensuring financial support for children is another crucial aspect of the UAE's divorce laws. Following divorce, both parents are obligated to provide financial support, known as child maintenance, to meet the child's needs and maintain their standard of living.

Courts in the UAE assess various factors when determining child maintenance, including each parent's income, financial resources, and the child's needs.

Child maintenance orders are enforceable by law, underscoring the importance of ensuring children receive the necessary financial support to thrive.

Case Studies

Gayatri Jayesh, a legal associate at NYK Law Firm, provided insights into the changing terrain of divorce law through two compelling case studies. In one case, a father willingly surrendered all guardianship rights, relieving himself of financial obligations towards his child and wife.

Notably, the wife, who was financially reliant on the husband, sought support under the new joint custody laws, leading to the father being mandated to contribute to the child's upbringing despite not being obliged to support the wife. This ruling demonstrated a favourable stance toward the child's welfare.

In another scenario, Gayatri discussed a contrasting case where the mother relocated abroad, obstructing the father's access to their child. However, under the principles of joint custody outlined in the updated legislation, the father was granted rights to maintain contact and spend time with the child, ensuring his continued presence in the child's life.

"These cases exemplify the evolving landscape of divorce law, where equitable distribution of responsibilities between parents, particularly in joint custody scenarios, is paramount. The judiciary's focus on the child's welfare is evident, even in situations where one parent waives their rights. Such cases underscore the importance of maintaining parental involvement for the child's benefit, as per the updated legal framework," Gayatri explained.

The UAE's latest divorce laws reflect a progressive approach towards safeguarding children's rights and well-being in the aftermath of divorce. By embracing joint custody arrangements, prioritizing the child's best interests, and ensuring adequate financial support, the UAE's legal framework aims to provide a supportive environment for children as they navigate the challenges of divorce.

Ultimately, the UAE's divorce laws aim to promote healthy co-parenting relationships that allow children to maintain loving and meaningful connections with both parents. Through these legal provisions, the UAE endeavours to create a nurturing and stable environment for children, ensuring their continued growth and development despite the challenges of divorce.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Sex Scandal: Why Are So Many Female Guards Having Sex with Prisoners in This UK Jail?

 

In 2017, when Britain's largest prison, HMP Berwyn, opened its doors, it was celebrated as a £212-million beacon of offender rehabilitation.

However, just seven years later, the facility in North Wales has garnered a drastically altered reputation — now serving as the focal point of a sex scandal that has engulfed the entire Prison Service, Daily Mail reported.

Reports from last year revealed that a staggering 18 women employed at the Category C 'super-prison' for adult males, boasting a capacity of 2,100, had either been dismissed or resigned due to breaching rules regarding relationships with inmates.

Consider the case of probationary officer Ayshea Gunn, who engaged in over 1,200 phone calls, including explicit video calls, with prisoner Khuram Razaq. She even smuggled a pair of underwear into his cell, concealed in her bra.

Similarly, her colleague Emily Watson partook in a sexual act with an inmate in his cell on Christmas Day.

This misconduct is not isolated to HMP Berwyn in Wrexham, which renames cells as 'rooms', blocks as 'communities', and allows inmates to possess personal phones and laptops.

Forbidden Relationships

There has been a concerning surge in the number of female officers from across HM Prison Service found culpable of cultivating forbidden relationships.

Recently, two female prison employees appeared at Bolton Crown Court, accused of simultaneously engaging in relationships with the same inmate. Aleesha Bates, 30, and Jodie Wilkes, 27, exchanged numerous messages with a prisoner in an illicit love triangle at HMP Buckley Hall, Rochdale.

Bates, infatuated, sent explicit messages and photos, even planning a future once the inmate was released. Wilkes, an operational support worker, became involved when a contraband phone with 'dozens' of messages was discovered in the prisoner's possession.

Both women pleaded guilty to misconduct in a public office, resulting in Bates receiving a two-year and eight-month sentence, while Wilkes was given a 12-month suspended sentence for two years.

Although this issue is not exclusive to female staff in male prisons, the statistics are striking. In the three years leading to March 2023, 31 female prison staff in male prisons were dismissed, including one who bore her inmate lover's child and another who tattooed his cell number on her thigh.

This represents a more than 50 per cent increase from the 19 dismissals in the preceding four-year period, not including incidents at private prisons operated by companies like G4S, Serco and Sodexo.

During the same timeframe, five male employees in male prisons and one or two women in female prisons were dismissed for inappropriate relationships.

According to insiders, this is merely the tip of the iceberg. As a former prison officer, identified as Officer A to preserve anonymity, disclosed to the Mail: “The actual numbers will likely be much higher than reported because these incidents are often swept under the rug — if a sexual relationship comes to light, the officer is typically given the opportunity to resign. Authorities prefer to keep these matters confidential as they are deeply embarrassing.”

What Truly Unfolds Behind Prison Walls?

For an outsider, comprehending what motivates an officer to risk an affair with an inmate, knowing the potential consequences if discovered, remains baffling. The question persists: what truly unfolds behind prison walls?

Vanessa Frake, who served in the prison system for 27 years, including as governor at the challenging men's prison Wormwood Scrubs, expresses deep concern over recent revelations.

"I believe this type of behaviour has always existed in some form," she states. "However, when you see the frequency of reported incidents at places like HMP Berwyn, it raises serious questions about how this has been allowed to happen."

Frake points to changes in prison staffing policies as a contributing factor. Historically, under the 1823 Gaol Act, women's prisons were exclusively staffed by women and men's prisons by men for approximately 150 years.

It was only in the 1980s that cross-sex postings began to be advertised. Since then, the influx of women entering the prison service has rapidly increased, with approximately 40 per cent of public sector prison staff now being female.

Additionally, perceptions of prison service employment have shifted over time. "When I joined, I saw it as my lifelong career," Frake reflects. "Unfortunately, nowadays the prison service is often viewed as a temporary stopgap for young individuals who spend a couple of years before moving on to something else."

The minimum entry age for recruits has decreased from 21 (when Frake joined) to just 18. "In my view, that's too young," she asserts. "You have 18-year-olds interacting with seasoned criminals who are much older and experienced."

Frake is not alone in her concerns about younger and less experienced recruits being susceptible to manipulation. "Previously, many officers in challenging prisons were ex-military, with significant real-life experience and a lack of intimidation," notes Officer A, who departed from the system seven years ago after a decade of service in the north-east of England.

"However, there was a shift to hiring more individuals straight out of school who were eager but lacked the confidence to deal with hardened criminals," Officer A continues.

"If you're a 19 or 20-year-old, relatively small in stature, you won't have the same confidence or authority to confront these individuals, and they'll perceive you as more compliant and easier to manipulate than a seasoned officer. It's a harsh reality."

Another former officer, referred to as Officer B, also voices concerns that junior officers are being entrusted with greater responsibilities prematurely. "I speak with former colleagues who say someone with just 18 months of experience might be the most senior person on a wing, making critical decisions for the team. It's concerning."

Frake, author of "The Governor: My Life Inside Britain's Most Notorious Prisons," emphasises deficiencies in training, vetting procedures, and mentorship within the system. "It's all so rushed now," she laments.

"There's overcrowding, staff shortages, and a host of other issues, and then you have someone walking in who isn't perceived as a vulnerable young person, but merely another body expected to manage a prison wing."

Last year, Mark Fairhurst, general secretary of the Prison Officers' Association (POA), cited inadequate training and vetting as contributing factors to officers succumbing to corruption. Fairhurst highlighted that interviews are often conducted remotely via Zoom, making it challenging for supervisors to identify potential issues.

Moreover, guards are reportedly struggling to maintain control over inmates, while inmates keenly observe guards for vulnerabilities they can exploit, Officer B explains.

"To many prisoners, sexual relationships or flirtation isn't the end goal—it's a means to gain leverage for smuggling tobacco, drugs, or mobile phones. They understand that forming a personal connection can be a way to manipulate and gain influence over officers."

“Inexperienced officers, especially younger women working in a male prison environment, may feel vulnerable and targeted.”

Complex Realities

The motivations of prisoners are clear, but what drives officers to fall for these tactics?

Some observers attribute this trend to an unconscious urge to pursue unsuitable partners, perpetuating clichés about women being drawn to 'bad boys'.

However, the reality is more complex and involves a variety of factors, including attraction and a tendency to transgress boundaries. According to Officer B, inmates often employ a deliberate strategy of coercion.

"You cannot show any weakness, or you're done," Officer B advises. "I would caution recruits never to discuss their personal lives in public areas because prisoners listen and use that information against you.

It might start with a small challenge, like a game of pool for a candy bar. If you break the rules, they have leverage. The pressure builds from there."

Once a boundary is breached, others quickly follow, shifting the power dynamic from officer to prisoner. "The inmate has nothing to lose—they're already in prison," Officer B explains.

"But for the officer, their entire life is at stake. If the inmate can ruin you, you'll do anything to prevent that."

When sentencing Bates, Judge Elliot Knopf acknowledged that the prison officer had been 'ensnared' by her lover, remarking that she didn't have to accept his advances.

As for the logistics of illicit affairs within a closely monitored prison, Officer B notes that there are numerous opportunities, such as secluded rooms or cells, especially with accomplices to keep watch.

Officer A recalls an incident where a colleague was caught in a compromising situation with an inmate in a medical room, exposed by a distinctive tattoo that only a few colleagues knew about.

While offenders like the officer in that case may escape consequences, others face severe penalties for crossing the line.
Unfortunately, the focus often shifts solely to the officer, neglecting the manipulative behaviour of prisoners behind bars.
"There are legal mechanisms to address this behaviour," Vanessa emphasises.

"We need to be more assertive in holding these corrupters accountable." A Prison Service spokesperson highlighted efforts to combat corruption within the system, catching the minority of staff engaging in misconduct.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

 

Placeholder

Get in Early: Spinneys IPO Opens in Dubai for Investors -- Here's How to Invest!

From today onwards, you have the opportunity to be among the inaugural investors in the grocery retailer Spinneys’ initial public offering (IPO) in Dubai.

Here's what you need to know about purchasing and owning shares before its public listing on May 9 and how to proceed.

Following Spinneys' announcement of offering 900 million shares, equating to a 25 per cent stake, new investors can now subscribe to the IPO at a price range of between Dh1.42 to Dh1.53 per share. This range indicates the company's valuation at Dh5.1 billion to Dh5.5 billion upon listing.

Spinneys operates premium grocery retail supermarkets under the brands ‘Spinneys’, ‘Waitrose’, and ‘Al Fair’ in the UAE and Oman, with more than 70 stores in the UAE alone. It has reserved five per cent of the stake for individual investors, while the remainder is allocated to institutional investors.

By investing and becoming a shareholder, investors will benefit from dividend payouts. The company plans to distribute dividends in April and October each year, allocating 70 per cent of its profits to shareholders.

How to Subscribe to Spinneys Shares?

To subscribe to or purchase Spinneys’ IPO shares, you must submit a subscription application through your bank or brokerage firm in your own name (unless representing another subscriber).

Investors can participate in Spinneys’ IPO through various banks including Emirates NBD, Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, Dubai Islamic Bank, and others.

When investing, ensure you have an updated NIN and complete all necessary fields in the subscription application with the required documents.

How to Apply for a National Investor Number (NIN)?

Apply for an Investor Number instantly or by submitting the necessary documents via DFM eServices on their website.

  • Register for DFM eServices on the DFM website or DFM Smart Services mobile app.
  • Log in with your username and password.
  • Select the eFORMS tab, choose the form, and complete it.
  • Attach the required documents and click ‘Submit.’
  • Receive the Investor Number via SMS and email notification upon request status update.

Minimum Investment Threshold

Individual investors can subscribe with a minimum of Dh5,000, while additional investments can be made in lots of at least Dh1,000. Institutional investors have a minimum subscription of Dh1 million.

Subscription Period and Allotment

The subscription period runs from April 23 to April 29, with share allotment expected by April 30. The final offer price will be determined on May 1.

Considerations for IPO Investments

Investors should bid early in the IPO process to enhance their chances of allotment, as demand typically exceeds supply. It's essential to review the company's prospectus, financial circumstances, and risk tolerance before investing.

Overall, this IPO presents an opportunity for investors to participate in an exciting venture with potential for volatile price movements post-listing.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Congress Passes Bill Targeting TikTok, Potentially Leading to its Ban After Years of Delays

Congress has passed a bill that could lead to the ban or forced sale of TikTok, marking a significant move against the popular video-sharing platform's Chinese ownership over concerns related to national security.

The Senate voted 79 to 18 in favour of the measure, included as part of a larger package offering aid to Israel, Ukraine, and Taiwan. President Biden plans to sign the bill into law on Wednesday.

Once enacted, the provision will give TikTok's parent company, ByteDance, approximately nine months to sell the app or face a national ban, with the possibility of a 90-day extension.

This bipartisan measure represents a substantial threat to TikTok's US operations, which boast over 170 million users and have become a major economic and cultural force.

Lawmakers cite worries that ByteDance's ownership could potentially compromise American data security, a claim that TikTok disputes.

TikTok is expected to challenge the legislation, setting the stage for a significant legal battle asserting free speech rights for its millions of users. Despite TikTok's efforts to sway lawmakers, including urging users to contact representatives and running ads promoting data security, these actions have not deterred Congress.

The legislative push comes after years of scrutiny over TikTok's ties to China, with concerns about user data vulnerability. TikTok had proposed measures to address these concerns, but negotiations stalled, prompting lawmakers to pursue legislation empowering the executive branch to act against the platform.

Efforts to pass this bill gained momentum recently, with key lawmakers and administration officials collaborating for months. House lawmakers strategically paired the TikTok bill with legislation targeting data privacy concerns, allowing for swift advancement through Congress.

Despite bipartisan support, some lawmakers oppose the legislation, fearing government overreach and potential restrictions on online speech. However, the bill's inclusion in a broader foreign aid package facilitated its passage, demonstrating effective legislative maneuvering.

This unexpected turn of events highlights the complex process of policymaking, underscoring the intersection of national security, privacy, and free speech concerns in the digital age.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

FTA Urges Resident Corporations to File Corporate Tax Applications by May 31

The Federal Tax Authority (FTA) has urged resident companies that obtained licences in January or February to submit their Corporate Tax applications by May 31, 2024, to avoid breaching tax regulations.

In a press release, the FTA emphasised the importance of adhering to the timelines outlined in FTA Decision No. 3 of 2024, effective from March 1, 2024.

Failure to meet the specified deadlines could result in administrative penalties, as per Cabinet Decision No. 10 of 2024.

Administrative penalties will be enforced on companies failing to comply with the requirement of filing Corporate

Tax registration applications within the designated deadlines for each category of corporate taxable entities. The decision delineates specific deadlines for both legal entities and individuals, whether residents or non-residents.

The FTA has called upon all stakeholders involved in implementing the Corporate Tax Law to familiarise themselves with the legislation, relevant guides available on the FTA’s website and associated decisions, accessible via the following link.

Emphasising the accessibility of Corporate Tax registration through the EmaraTax digital platform at all times, the FTA highlighted that the registration process entails four simple steps, taking approximately 30 minutes.

For added convenience, entities already registered for Value Added Tax (VAT) or Excise Tax can utilise their accounts on EmaraTax to complete the Corporate Tax registration process and submit the necessary documents.

Upon approval of the registration request, applicants will receive a Tax Registration Number (TRN) for Corporate Tax purposes.

The FTA stressed that unregistered entities subject to Corporate Tax must create a new user profile. New users can access the EmaraTax platform via the FTA’s e-Services portal at e-Services Portal, where they can establish an account using their email address and phone number.

Subsequently, they can proceed with registration by providing taxpayer identification and selecting the "Corporate Tax registration" option to complete the process seamlessly.

Furthermore, the FTA facilitates Corporate Tax registration requests through various Government Service Centres across the UAE, staffed by trained specialists offering electronic services adhering to government standards to ensure quality service delivery.

Upon completion of the application processes and verification of the electronically entered data at the service center, FTA officers will review the applications.

Successful applicants will receive their Tax Registration Number (TRN) via the email address provided during the Corporate Tax registration application submission.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

UAE Rains: Sharjah Police Announces Fees Waiver for Car Damage Certificates

Major General Saif Al Zari Al Shamsi, Commander-in-Chief of Sharjah Police, has announced that certificates of destruction will be issued free of charge to all those affected in the Emirate of Sharjah.

Affected individuals are encouraged to complete and submit their applications through the official platforms of the command, including the Sharjah Police Smart App and its website. The initiative supports the authorities' efforts to alleviate the burden on families affected by the floods during these exceptional circumstances.

The official further explained that field teams are working tirelessly in cooperation with all partners and stakeholders to ensure housing stability and provide maximum assistance to affected families, enabling them to return to normal life across all cities in the Emirate of Sharjah soon.

Maj. Gen. Al Shamsi emphasised that the safety and security of citizens, residents, and visitors remain a top priority. The General Command is collaborating with all partners to fulfill its national, societal, and humanitarian responsibilities.

This action aligns with the directives of the wise leadership and demonstrates commitment to its strategy, which prioritises the highest level of preparedness in crisis management.

Ajman Initiative

Ajman Police officers are taking proactive steps to issue car damage reports, eliminating the inconvenience of motorists having to navigate rainwater or visit a police station. The initiative comes in response to the recent heavy rains in the UAE, which caused flooding and stranded vehicles.

In Ajman, the Police General Command has launched a proactive service to issue loss and damage certificates to community members whose vehicles were affected by flooding. This approach aims to streamline the process for affected individuals, ensuring timely assistance without additional inconvenience m

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Unlocking Matrimony: Essential Legal Requiements for Islamic Marriage in the UAE

In the UAE, Islamic marriages are governed by Sharia law, and specific legal requirements must be met for a marriage to be considered valid under Islamic law.

Here are the key legal requirements for conducting an Islamic marriage in the UAE.

Consent: Both parties must freely consent to the marriage without coercion or duress. Consent is fundamental for the validity of the marriage contract.
Offer and Acceptance (Ijab wa Qabul):The marriage contract (Nikah) is established through an offer from one party and acceptance from the other. This offer and acceptance must occur in the presence of witnesses and with the intention of marriage.
Mahr: The groom must offer a Mahr (dowry) to the bride as a symbol of his commitment and financial responsibility. The Mahr is agreed upon by both parties and is given to the bride as her exclusive property.
Wali (Guardian): The bride must have a Wali (guardian) who acts on her behalf during the marriage contract negotiations and ceremony. The Wali is typically the bride's father, but if he is unavailable, another male relative or a designated Islamic authority may act as her Wali.
Presence of Witnesses: The marriage contract must be witnessed by two male witnesses or one male and two female witnesses who are of sound mind and have reached the age of maturity (puberty).
Announcement: The marriage contract may be publicly announced to ensure transparency and acknowledgment within the community.
Registration: While not mandatory under Islamic law, couples may choose to register their marriage with the relevant authorities for legal recognition and documentation purposes.

It's important to note that while Islamic marriages are recognised under Sharia law in the UAE, couples may also need to fulfill additional legal requirements for civil registration and documentation purposes, particularly for matters such as inheritance, guardianship and spousal rights.

It's advisable for couples to seek guidance from legal experts or religious authorities familiar with Islamic family law in the UAE to ensure compliance with all legal requirements.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

MoF Launches Public Consultation on Implementation of R&D Incentive under UAE Tax Law

The UAE Ministry of Finance (MoF) has announced the launch of a digital public consultation to gather feedback from relevant stakeholders regarding the potential implementation of a Research and Development (R&D) Tax Incentive under the UAE Corporate Tax law.

The consultation period will run from April 19 to May 14, 2024, and can be accessed through the Ministry’s website and the UAE Government portal.

This digital public consultation underscores the Ministry’s commitment to engaging with all stakeholders, including businesses operating in the UAE, advisors, service providers, institutions, and investors.

The objective of this consultation is to assess the range of potential R&D activities conducted by businesses and corporations in the UAE, the types of activities that an R&D Tax Incentive might encompass, and the logistics of implementing and administering such an incentive.

Given that an R&D Tax Incentive would introduce a new concept in the UAE, and to familiarise stakeholders with the concept of R&D, a Guidance Paper is included as part of this consultation. This paper will outline the activities that may qualify as R&D, aligning with the definition provided in the

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) Frascati Manual.

The UAE Ministry of Finance encourages stakeholders to provide clear and concise feedback, supplemented where possible with examples, data, or other supporting information. Responses must be submitted by May 14, 2024, and will be treated confidentially, with no publication of individual responses

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Navigating Insurance Costs for Rain, Storm and Hail Damage in the UAE

Residing in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) offers numerous advantages, yet it also presents a unique set of challenges, especially concerning weather-related hazards like rain, storms and hail that can cause damage.

With the rise in extreme weather occurrences in the area, comprehending the expenses linked to insuring your vehicle or residence against such perils is essential.

Let's explore how insurance premiums are computed for home and auto coverage in the UAE, as well as the factors that influence the amount you'll be required to pay.

Home Insurance Premiums

When safeguarding your home from rain, storms and hail damage in the UAE, various elements are taken into consideration when determining insurance premiums.

The location of your property plays a significant role, as properties situated in flood-prone or hailstorm-prone areas may face higher insurance premiums due to the elevated risk of damage.

Additionally, the value of your property, encompassing its size, construction material  and features, will impact your insurance premium, with higher-value properties potentially attracting higher premiums.

Moreover, your previous claims history can influence your insurance premium, as insurers may perceive you as a higher risk if you have filed claims for weather-related damage in the past, resulting in increased premiums.

Furthermore, the choice of deductibles can also impact your home insurance premium, as selecting a higher deductible can potentially lower your premium, although it means you'll have to cover more expenses out of pocket in the event of a claim.

Auto Insurance Premiums

Auto insurance premiums in the UAE are influenced by various factors such as the value of the vehicle, driving history, coverage options and location.

Vehicle Value: The make, model, age, and condition of your car significantly affect your insurance premium. Typically, newer or more expensive vehicles tend to have higher premiums due to the increased cost of repairs or replacement.
Driving History: Your history of accidents or
claims affects your auto insurance premium. If you have a record of accidents, insurance companies may consider you a higher-risk driver, resulting in higher premiums.
Coverage Options: Comprehensive auto insurance policies that provide coverage for weather-related damage, such as rain, storms, and hail damage, generally have higher premiums compared to basic coverage options.
Location: The area where your vehicle is parked influences your insurance premium. Vehicles parked in flood-prone or hailstorm-prone areas are at a higher risk of damage, leading to higher insurance premiums.

Insurance companies in the UAE rely on actuarial data and risk assessment models to calculate insurance premiums.

These premiums are determined by evaluating the probability of a claim occurring and the potential expenses associated with settling such claims.

Various factors, including those mentioned earlier, are carefully considered to determine the appropriate premium for your insurance coverage.

It is crucial for both homeowners and vehicle owners in the UAE to understand the factors that impact insurance premiums for damages caused by rain, storms and hail.

By having a clear understanding of these factors, individuals can make informed decisions about their insurance coverage.

Additionally, taking proactive measures to minimize risks can help individuals strike a balance between having adequate coverage and managing insurance costs effectively.

To ensure they have the right level of protection while keeping insurance costs under control, individuals should consult with insurance providers and explore different coverage options.

By doing so, they can find the most suitable insurance policy that meets their needs and budget.

This is particularly important in the face of unpredictable weather conditions, where having appropriate coverage is essential for financial security.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Miscreants Fuelled Rumours as Heavy Rains Wrecked Havoc in UAE: Punishment is Imminent

The UAE experienced severe disruptions due to heavy rains that persisted from late Monday, causing widespread challenges in daily life.

However, authorities and residents joined forces to ensure public safety amidst the inclement weather.

The National Centre of Meteorology confirmed that the record rainfall over the past 24 hours until 9 pm on Tuesday, 16th April, was unprecedented in the UAE's recorded climate history.

As news of the floods circulated on social media, so did rumours linking the weather directly to the UAE's cloud seeding initiatives.

The UAE is renowned for its cloud seeding efforts aimed at increasing rainfall in arid areas. Nevertheless, baseless claims emerged online, suggesting a direct link between the heavy rainfall and cloud seeding operations.

Authorities swiftly addressed these rumours, emphasising that cloud seeding is conducted with stringent scientific protocols and safety measures.

The National Centre of Meteorology clarified that while cloud seeding can influence precipitation under specific conditions, attributing the floods solely to this practice is unsupported.

Spreading Rumours is a Serious Offence

The UAE government's response underscores the gravity with which misinformation is treated. Spreading false information that undermines public trust or jeopardises public safety is a serious offence under UAE law, carrying severe penalties such as fines, imprisonment, or deportation.

Spreading rumours on social media is strictly forbidden in the UAE, carrying severe penalties like imprisonment and hefty fines under Federal Law Number 5 of 2012. Articles 29 and 9 address malicious rumour-spreading and IP address misuse.

Recent decrees, such as Federal Decree-Law No. 34/2021 and No. 31/2021, reflect the government's commitment to combat cybercrimes.

Article 43 penalises spreading false events with fines up to Dh500,000, while Article 52 targets misinformation that disrupts public peace or threatens public interest, with fines starting from Dh100,000 and detention, especially in crises.

Rely on Verified Sources

In response to the rumours, UAE officials urged the public to rely on verified sources for information and refrain from spreading unverified claims on social media.

They emphasised the importance of responsible online behaviour, especially during emergencies, to prevent panic and misinformation from causing further harm.

To combat the proliferation of rumours, UAE authorities have intensified monitoring of social media platforms and online forums.

Those found guilty of spreading false information will face swift and stringent legal action, serving as a deterrent to others tempted to engage in similar activities.

Sharjah Rumour Mongers Warned

Meanwhile, in Sharjah, those spreading rumours were cautioned about potential legal action following the circulation of false narratives on social media claiming that two individuals had died from electrocution while walking through a flooded street in the emirate.

Major General Saif Al Zari Al Shamsi, Commander-in-Chief of Sharjah Police, denied the story circulated on social media about the supposed deaths and urged residents to stop spreading false information.

The report warned people to avoid walking on flooded areas and “touching metallic objects attached to the ground.”

The report stated two people died of electrocution in Sharjah as they tried to cross a flooded road. Both individuals reportedly “died” instantly.

“Power distribution lines are mostly built underground in the UAE, so please avoid walking through flooded areas,” the social media post warned.

Report Denied

Major General Al Shamsi confirmed that they did not register any death due to such incidents.
Sharjah Police warned against spreading false alarms and unverified stories on social media due to its negative impact on society.

“The Sharjah Police informs all fellow citizens and residents not to circulate rumours, misinformation, photos, and news that come to them through social networking sites and other means of smart communication,” Major General Al Shamsi said.

He also asked residents not to distribute such content in any way to avoid legal accountability. The police asked residents to check with authorities any news or information given to them, urging them to verify with Sharjah Police to ensure its credibility.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Woman Can’t be Held for Abetting Suicide if ‘Lover’ Ends Life Due to ‘Love Failure’: Delhi Court

The Delhi High Court has recently observed that if a “lover” dies by suicide due to “love failure”, then the woman cannot be held responsible for abetting the man’s suicide while granting ‘pre-arrest’ (anticipatory) bail to a woman and a man.

An FIR was registered by a man alleging that the two applicants had abetted his son’s suicide. The woman was stated to be in a romantic relationship with the deceased while the other applicant was stated to be a common friend.

A single-judge bench of Justice Amit Mahajan, in its April 16 order, held, “If a lover commits suicide due to love failure, if a student commits suicide because of his poor performance in the examination, a client commits suicide because his case is dismissed, the lady, examiner, lawyer respectively cannot be held to have abetted the commission of suicide.

For the wrong decision taken by a man of weak or frail mentality, another person cannot be blamed as having abetted his committing suicide.”
When the body of the deceased was found by his mother in his room, a “suicide note” was also recovered in which he had written that he was ending his life because of the applicants.

Justice Mahajan said that a bare reading of Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 306 (abetment of suicide) demonstrates that there are twin requirements – suicide and abetment to commit suicide.

The court said “prima facie” from the WhatsApp chats placed on record, it appeared that the deceased was of “sensitive nature and constantly threatened” the female applicant of ending life whenever she refused to talk to him.

The court also noted that the two applicants were granted interim protection last year pursuant to which they joined the investigation.

“It is correct that the deceased had written the name of the applicants in suicide note, but, in the opinion of this court, there is nothing mentioned, as to the nature of threats in the alleged suicide note written by the deceased of such an alarming proportion so as to drive a ‘normal person’ to contemplate suicide,” the high court said.

The court noted that prima facie the alleged suicide note “only expressed a state of anguish” of the deceased towards the applicants, but it “cannot be inferred that the applicants had any intention”, that led the deceased to commit suicide.

“The allegation with respect to applicants teasing the deceased in regards to the failure of his romantic relationship with the (female) applicant…however, does not appear to be instigation which would amount to abetment of suicide in terms of Section 306 IPC. The factum of the alleged suicide note and whether there was any instigation by the applicants will be seen in trial,” the high court underscored.

It was alleged that a scuffle took place between the deceased and the applicants after he saw them together and asked why they were meeting. During the altercation, the deceased sustained injuries and the applicants allegedly damaged his car by throwing bricks. It was also said that while the deceased was leaving the place, the applicants allegedly instigated him by saying they had made “physical relations with each other and will get married soon”.

The woman argued that she had been falsely implicated, and except for her name mentioned in the alleged suicide note of the deceased, there was nothing to show that “he was prompted, forced and instigated by these persons to commit suicide”.

Meanwhile the police alleged that offence committed by the two applicants is “heinous in nature” and the names of both the applicants were written in suicide note, because of whom the deceased died by suicide. The police said that the CCTV footage from the location where the deceased had met with the applicants was also obtained in which the deceased and the male applicant can be seen in a scuffle.

The high court held that custodial interrogation of the applicants is not required. It said that in the event of arrest, the applicants will be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs50,000 each with two sureties each of the like amount subject to certain conditions.

The court also said that in case the applicants violate the conditions mentioned in the order, the police would be free to move a plea for cancelling their bail. The court, however, clarified that the observations in its order are made to decide the pre-arrest bail applications of the two persons, should not influence the outcome of the trial, and should not be taken as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Global Property Insurers See 'Alarming' Losses as Risk Models Lag, Says Report

Global property and casualty insurers showed "alarming" underwriting losses in 2022 as natural catastrophes increased and risk models failed to keep up, a report from consultants Capgemini said on Wednesday.

Global insured losses from natural catastrophes have been surpassing $100 billion annually in recent years, driven higher by issues such as winter storms. Industry sources see climate change and increased building in exposed areas as contributing to the losses.

The insurers' global combined ratio, a measure of claims and expenses against premium revenue, was 103 per cent in 2022, Capgemini said. A level above 100 indicates an underwriting loss. Property insurers have suffered three years of underwriting losses in the past four years, the report said.

Only 27 per cent of insurance executives surveyed believe their firms have advanced predictive modelling capabilities.

"Accurate risk prediction and pricing are becoming increasingly challenging and leading to insurability concerns," Anirban Bose, Capgemini financial services strategic business unit CEO, said in the report.

The report gathered information from 18 insurance markets, including Britain, Hong Kong, India and the United States, through polling of insurance customers and interviews with insurance executives and underwriters.

(The writer is a legal associate at NYK Law Firm, one of the top legal consultants in Dubai)

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Judge Dismisses Certain Claims Against Zuckerberg Regarding Social Media Harm on Children

The US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, California, has ruled in favour of Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, dismissing some claims in multiple lawsuits alleging that he concealed the harmful effects of Facebook and Instagram on children.

The ruling is part of a broader litigation involving numerous lawsuits filed by children, accusing Meta and other social media companies of fostering addiction to their platforms.

While twenty-five of these cases sought personal liability against Zuckerberg, arguing that his public image and influential role obligated him to fully disclose the risks posed by Meta's platforms to children, Judge Rogers rejected this argument.

She stated that relying on Zuckerberg's unique understanding of Meta's products to establish a personal duty to each plaintiff would set a precedent for a duty to disclose for any public figure, which she deemed untenable.

Meta, though remaining a defendant, refrained from commenting on the ruling, maintaining its denial of any wrongdoing.

The lawsuits, filed on behalf of individual children, assert that social media usage has caused them physical, mental, and emotional distress, including anxiety, depression and in extreme cases, suicide.

The ongoing litigation seeks both damages and an end to the alleged harmful practices of the defendants. Additionally, several states and school districts have also initiated legal action against Meta, with those cases still pending.

(The writer is a legal associate at NYK Law Firm, one of the top legal consultants in Dubai)

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Planned in the US, Executed in Mumbai: Decoding the Salman Khan Firing Incident

It reads like a plot straight out of a crime thriller: a plan conceived in the United States, a network of professional shooters and weapon caches strategically placed across various Indian states -- all culminating in a shooting outside Bollywood actor Salman Khan's residence.

Early Sunday morning, around 5am, two men on a motorcycle fired four rounds outside Galaxy Apartments in Mumbai's Bandra, where the actor lives, before swiftly fleeing the scene. CCTV footage captured the assailants wearing caps and carrying backpacks, clearly aiming towards the actor's home. One suspect wore a white t-shirt with a black jacket and denim pants, while the other was in a red t-shirt with denim pants.

According to police sources, both men are affiliated with the notorious Lawrence Bishnoi gang. Bishnoi himself is currently incarcerated at Tihar Jail for several high-profile murder cases, including those involving musician Sidhu Moose Wala and Rajput leader Sukhdev Singh Gogamedi of the Karni Sena.

Origins of the Plot

The scheme originated in the United States, where Anmol Bishnoi, Lawrence Bishnoi's brother, tasked Rohit Godara -- a fellow gangster based in the US -- with selecting shooters. Godara, known for his extensive network of professional shooters across India, likely facilitated this operation. Anmol Bishnoi later claimed responsibility for the incident through a Facebook post, although the post's IP address was traced back to Canada, prompting suspicions of VPN usage.

Godara, a key figure in the Bishnoi gang, played a crucial role by providing weapons through associates strategically located in multiple states. Vishal (alias Kalu), chosen for his involvement in previous violent incidents orchestrated by Godara, along with another suspect, acquired a second-hand bike from Raigad district to reach Khan's residence.

Security Concerns and Past Threats

Salman Khan has been a target of threats before, particularly due to his infamous 1998 black buck hunting incident that reportedly offended the Bishnoi community. Last year, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) identified Khan as a top target on Lawrence Bishnoi's hit list.

In response to heightened security threats, Mumbai Police escalated Khan's security status to Y+ and continue to review this arrangement. Eleven security personnel, including commandos and Personal Security Officers (PSOs), accompany Khan at all times in fully bulletproof vehicles.

The investigation into the recent shooting incident involves a coordinated effort across five states --Maharashtra, Delhi, Rajasthan, Haryana and Punjab. The involvement of multiple agencies, including the Maharashtra ATS and the NIA, underscores the gravity of the situation.

While the case has been transferred to Mumbai's Crime Branch, there has been no formal request to involve the ATS or NIA in the investigation. The sale of the motorcycle used in the crime is currently under scrutiny, as authorities continue to pursue leads to apprehend those responsible.

1998 Blackbuck Poaching Case

During the shooting of his blockbuster movie Hum Saath Saath Hain, Salman Khan allegedly killed two blackbucks in Bhagoda ki Dhani located in Kankani village near Jodhpur in Rajasthan. He was charged under section 9/51 of the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.

In what came to be known as the 1998 Blackbuck Case, his co-actors Saif Ali Khan, Sonali Bendre, Neelam and Tabu were also charged under Section 51 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act and under Section 149 (unlawful assembly) of the Indian Penal Code. However, they were all acquitted after being given the benefit of doubt.

Two other people, namely Dinesh Gawr and Dushyant Singh, were also accused of being with the actors when the poaching allegedly took place.

What Really Happened?

Back in October 1998, the film Hum Saath Saath Hain was being shot in Jodhpur. It has been alleged that the actors were driving around the Kankani Village in a gypsy car when they came across a herd of blackbucks and Salman Khan shot two of them. On realising that they might have been seen, the group of actors allegedly fled the scene.

Blackbucks are sacred to the Bishnoi tribe of Rajasthan; they protect the species for religious reasons. Poonamchand Bishnoi, a member of the sect, claims to have witnessed the event taking place. Bishnoi later testified against the group of actors, saying that he saw the actors fleeing away from the scene.

(The writer is a legal associate at NYK Law Firm, one of the top legal consultants in Dubai)

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

UK Set to Announce Social Media Prohibition Plans for Under-16s Within Weeks

The UK government is reportedly preparing to announce plans to prohibit children under the age of 16 from accessing social media platforms within a few weeks. Downing Street is expected to unveil proposals for stricter age limits on apps such as Instagram, Facebook and Snapchat as part of a consultation aimed at enhancing online safety for children, as per The Sunday Times.

The consultation will gather feedback from parents on the appropriate age for children to start using social media, with the suggested range being between 13 and 16 years old. Currently, several platforms allow membership for children as young as 13, including Meta, which recently lowered the minimum age for WhatsApp use in Europe to 13.

The decision was criticised by Smartphone Free Childhood as an instance of “a tech giant prioritising shareholder profits over children’s safety”. A Meta spokesperson stated, “We provide all users with options to control who can add them to groups, and when you receive a message from an unknown number for the first time, we offer the option to block and report the account.”

This development follows a call from Esther Ghey, mother of murdered 16-year-old transgender girl Brianna Ghey, for a social media ban for under-16s. In addition to potential social media restrictions, the government is contemplating banning under-16s from purchasing smartphones. Currently, individuals under 18 need parental consent to obtain phone contracts, but they can buy pay-as-you-go phones independently.

The proposed changes would limit this option for under-16s, although parents would still be able to buy phones for their children. A spokesperson for the Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology stated: “We do not comment on speculation. Our commitment to making the UK the safest place for children online is firm, as demonstrated by our world-leading Online Safety Act.

(The writer is a legal associate at NYK Law Firm, one of the top legal consultants in Dubai)

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Europe Faces Mounting Court Cases to Halt Weapons Exports to Israel Amid Gaza Conflict

Court cases are mounting in Europe as several NGOs are taking the unprecedented step of suing governments over weapons exports to Israel amid allegations of war crimes in Gaza or genocide, claims Israel denies.

A recent ruling by a Dutch court ordering the government to halt the export of F-35 parts to Israel has sparked similar legal actions in Denmark last month and in France this week.

The Dutch government has appealed the decision, which will be reviewed by the Supreme Court later this year.

"We are greatly inspired by the Dutch court case," said Lars Koch, Secretary-General of Oxfam Denmark, one of the four NGOs involved in the lawsuit against the Danish police and Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

France quickly followed suit as eight NGOs, including Amnesty International, filed an urgent summons with the administrative court of Paris on Thursday. The judge has 48 hours to respond to their request to suspend weapons exports to Israel due to concerns that the Israeli military might use them for war crimes in Gaza.

Aymeric Elluin, Arms Transfers Advocacy Officer at Amnesty International France, anticipates a response early next week. "It's an unprecedented request, so the judge's response is uncertain at this stage," Elluin said.

Defense Minister Sebastien Lecornu has downplayed the significance of French weapons exports to Israel. In 2022, they represented €15 million ($16 million) – equivalent to 0.2 per cent of all of France's weapons sales abroad that year.

"No licences will be granted to Israel for weapons of war to be used in ground operations in Gaza," Lecornu said last month.

Cases could Drag on for Years

Court cases in Denmark and France could drag on for years. However, for those involved, the outcome is less critical than fostering public debate on arms transfers to Israel as soon as the lawsuits are filed.

Other efforts to increase pressure on Israel at the European level include requests from Ireland and Spain to the EU Commission to review a trade agreement amid concerns that the human rights clause has been violated.

There has been no response to the request made in February so far. The bloc is divided over the conflict, which limits its diplomatic influence. Meanwhile, court cases are also accumulating in Berlin as human rights lawyers filed a lawsuit on Friday against a German government decision to approve the export of 3,000 anti-tank weapons to Israel, the second such case this month.

For activists, it's crucial that small EU countries like Denmark uphold the rules-based order. "We are also leveraging the court case for our ongoing campaign for a ceasefire and an immediate halt to arms exports to Israel," said Koch.

Crowdfunding Campaign

Oxfam Denmark launched a crowdfunding campaign on the same day they announced the lawsuit on March 3 to cover legal costs. They have raised 1.5 million DKK ($210,000) from private donors so far.

Fifteen Danish companies supply components for F-35 fighter jets exported to the US and then on to third countries, including Israel. "We argue that you cannot export responsibility for the end use of these weapons," Koch said.

In the UK, the High Court dismissed a legal challenge in February against the Department for Business and Trade over similar concerns of potential breaches of international humanitarian law.

The lawsuit was brought by two NGOs, including the Palestinian human rights organization Al Haq, which is also involved in the Danish case. However, activists hope the dismissal will be overturned at a hearing later this month, allowing the case to proceed.

(The writer is a legal associate at NYK Law Firm, one of the top legal consultants in Dubai)

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Navigating Legal Evolution: A Comprehensive Guide to Developing Law in Kuwait

Kuwait, with its rich history and vibrant culture, is at a pivotal juncture where tradition converges with modernity. As the nation progresses, its legal framework must also evolve to align with the demands of a dynamic society.

Developing law in Kuwait is a multifaceted endeavour that blends tradition with innovation and harmonises local values with global standards. This article delves into the process of legal development in Kuwait and provide insights into navigating this complex landscape.

Understanding Kuwait's Legal System

Before exploring legal development, it's essential to grasp the foundations of Kuwait’s legal system. Kuwait follows a civil law system heavily influenced by Islamic law (Sharia).

The Constitution of Kuwait serves as the supreme law, defining the framework of governance and fundamental rights. Kuwait has a dual court system comprising civil courts and Sharia courts, each with jurisdiction over specific matters.

Factors Driving Legal Evolution

Several factors contribute to the evolution of law in Kuwait. The society is diverse, with a blend of traditional values and modern aspirations.

Social changes such as urbanisation, globalisation, and demographic shifts influence legal needs and expectations.

Economic growth, driven by oil reserves and diversification efforts, necessitates legal frameworks to regulate commerce, investment, and employment. As a member of the United Nations and signatory to various international treaties, Kuwait is committed to aligning its legal framework with international standards.

Addressing Contemporary Challenges

The digital revolution has transformed governance and law. Developing laws to address cybercrime, data protection, and e-commerce is imperative in the digital age.

Developing law in Kuwait requires a systematic approach that balances legal tradition with contemporary needs. It begins with thorough research and consultation with experts, stakeholders, and the public to understand societal needs and concerns.

Drafting new laws or amending existing ones involves careful consideration of constitutional principles, international norms, and societal expectations to ensure clarity, coherence, and enforceability.

Role of the National Assembly

Kuwait’s National Assembly plays a pivotal role in the legislative process. Proposed laws undergo review and debate, allowing elected representatives to scrutinize and refine legal provisions.

Engaging the public enhances transparency and legitimacy through consultations, hearings and feedback mechanisms.

Investing in Legal Education and Capacity Building

Developing a robust legal framework requires investing in legal education and capacity building. Training programmes for lawmakers, judges, lawyers and legal professionals ensure a competent workforce capable of interpreting and applying the law effectively.

Challenges and Opportunities

Despite progress, Kuwait faces challenges like bureaucratic inefficiencies and judicial backlog, presenting opportunities for innovation, collaboration, and reform.

Embracing change, fostering dialogue, and upholding the rule of law are essential for navigating legal development while safeguarding Kuwait’s values and aspirations.

By adopting a strategic approach and collective effort, Kuwait can continue to evolve its legal framework to meet the evolving needs of its people and the demands of the modern world.

(The writer is a law associate at NYK Law Firm, one of the top legal consultants in Dubai)

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Qatar Airways Escapes Lawsuit Over Strip-searches of Women at Doha Airport

Qatar Airways has evaded a lawsuit in Australia brought by five women who underwent strip-searches and invasive examinations at Doha airport.

According to BBC, the incident occurred after a baby was discovered abandoned in an airport bin in 2020, prompting outrage and condemnation from various nations.

The women sought damages for what they alleged was "unlawful physical contact" and false imprisonment resulting in mental health issues such as depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.

However, their claim was dismissed by Justice John Halley of the Federal Court of Australia on the basis that Qatar Airways could not be held liable under the Montreal Convention, a treaty governing airline liability for passenger injury or death.

Justice Halley also ruled that the airline's staff had no influence over the actions of Qatari police or the examining nurses, deeming the proposition otherwise as "implausible." The lawsuit was also struck down against Qatar's aviation regulator due to immunity from foreign prosecution.

Nonetheless, the women are permitted to pursue their claim against Matar, a subsidiary of Qatar Airways responsible for operating Hamad International Airport.

They argue that Matar employees failed in their duty of care by not preventing the invasive examinations.

The affected women have expressed that they did not consent to the examinations and were not informed of the reasons behind them.

One of them likened the experience to feeling "raped," while another believed she was being kidnapped.

Qatari officials responded to the incident by assuring that the abandoned baby was being cared for and condemned the treatment of the female passengers as not reflective of Qatar's laws or values.

Despite a criminal prosecution in Qatar resulting in a suspended jail term for an airport official, the women proceeded with the lawsuit due to perceived inaction from Doha.

Their goal, as articulated by one of the women, is to seek a formal apology from Qatar and ensure changes in airport procedures to prevent similar incidents in the future, aiming to spare other women from such "demoralising, horrendous treatment."

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Abu Dhabi Authority Issues Rules to Regulate Civil Use of Drones in Emirate

The Department of Municipalities and Transport – Abu Dhabi (DMT) has issued Administrative Decision No. (48) of 2024 to regulate the civil use of unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) in Abu Dhabi.

The decision aims to ensure the safe operation of drones and to manage, regulate and monitor drone activities within the emirate. The regulation seeks to standardise drone systems and procedures, promote Abu Dhabi as a leading hub for the drone industry, enhance smart transportation, foster innovation in aviation and attract investment in the local drone sector.

The decision applies to all types of drone-related activities in Abu Dhabi, including design, manufacturing, assembly, modification, inspection, maintenance, simulation systems development, training, qualification, clubs, infrastructure development, airports, fuelling stations, energy and other associated uses, except for those exempted under Federal Decree by Law No. (26) of 2022 on Regulating the Civil Use of Drones and Related Activities.

DMT assumes several responsibilities under this legislation, including oversight, issuance of permits and certificates, establishment of rules for drone flight conditions, setting standards for drone take-off and landing sites and developing guidelines for drone-specific infrastructure like airports and runways in coordination with relevant local and federal authorities.

Additionally, DMT will conduct awareness workshops for drone owners and operators, covering both individuals and entities. These sessions will explain the procedures and requirements for drone operations and associated activities within Abu Dhabi, aligning with administrative directives, civil aviation regulations and technical guidelines governing drone systems in the emirate.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Ex-JP Morgan Analyst Receives $35M After Viral Glass Door Accident

A video capturing the moment Meghan Brown, a former analyst at JP Morgan, pushed open a glass door, causing it to shatter and injure her, has garnered widespread attention online.

Brown, aged 36 at the time, received a hefty compensation of $35 million following the incident which occurred at a building in New York City in 2015, leaving her with permanent brain damage.

The video footage, shared by a user named Collin Rugg, depicts Brown attempting to exit a building when the glass door unexpectedly breaks upon contact, causing her distress. The clip also shows bystanders rushing to her aid.

Rugg's caption accompanying the video explained: "Former JP Morgan analyst awarded $35 million after a glass door shattered on her in Manhattan. Meghan Brown was leaving a physical therapy appointment in 2015 when the glass door shattered on her."

Detailing the aftermath, Rugg stated: "Brown says the event caused a traumatic brain injury which she says ruined her career. The woman was out of a job for a year due to the incident and returned to JP Morgan where she worked until getting fired in 2021."

Rugg informed that "Jurors awarded Brown $35,184,208 in damages after determining that building owner 271 Madison Co.’s negligence was 'a substantial factor in causing' the injury."

Commentary on the video varied among users, with one expressing skepticism about the compensation amount, stating, "that will be a fun appeal. Does she deserve something? Sure. But 35 million??? Nope."

Another user remarked, "She might as well have won the lottery." According to The New York Post, Brown suffered from various health issues post-incident, including Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), memory decline, sensitivity to light, focus and vocabulary issues, permanent headaches, neck pain, balance problems and distorted depth perception.

Reports also mentioned Brown's necessity to acquire a service dog to prevent her from falling.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

 

Placeholder

Dubai Centre for Family Businesses Launches New Corporate Governance Toolkit

The Dubai Centre for Family Businesses, which operates under the umbrella of Dubai Chambers, has developed a new guide aimed at helping family businesses cultivate sustainable growth through the implementation of effective corporate governance.

The ‘Corporate Governance Guidelines for Family Businesses’ toolkit focuses on governance structures, governance frameworks and key regulatory guidelines for family businesses.

The launch of the new toolkit reflects the centre’s ongoing commitment to providing practical guides on the main topics of interest to family enterprises.

It follows the publication of six guides during 2023 addressing key areas affecting the continuity of family-run businesses and aims to support their long-term sustainability and competitiveness.

Mohammad Ali Rashed Lootah, President and CEO of Dubai Chambers, commented: “Family businesses are an essential part of our economy, contributing significantly to Dubai’s non-oil GDP and employing a substantial proportion of the country’s workforce.”

He added: “These companies play a vital role in driving economic growth, and we remain committed to encouraging them to follow best practices in corporate governance that support their continuity and ensure the successful transition of leadership between generations.

The success of family businesses boosts economic activity and contributes to achieving the goals of the Dubai Economic Agenda (D33), which aims to double the size of the emirate’s economy over the coming decade.”

The new guide comes as a continuation of the centre’s efforts to provide effective tools to support family businesses.

It underlines the importance of corporate governance for family businesses, as well as highlighting the main bodies entrusted with family business governance including, family councils, the board of directors and board committees; key governing documents; and the main requirements for board committees and meetings.

Family businesses account for around 90 per cent of the total number of private businesses in the UAE and contribute around 40 per cent of the national GDP.

With an estimated compound annual growth rate of 5.5 per cent in new wealth, the BCG Global Wealth Report 2023 has forecast that private financial wealth in the country will reach US$ 1.3 trillion by 2027, a surge that is expected to drive significant expansion within the family business sector.

Supporting the sustainability and growth of family businesses is crucial in ensuring they remain key contributors to the nation’s economy.

Launched under the umbrella of Dubai Chambers in May 2023, the Dubai Centre for Family Businesses is entrusted with ensuring the growth and long-term sustainability of family businesses in Dubai.

The centre aims to further develop this vital sector and enhance its economic contribution to support the emirate’s future development plans.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Google to Destroy Billions of Browsing Data to Settle Consumer Privacy Lawsuit

Google has agreed to dispose of billions of data records to resolve a lawsuit alleging that it clandestinely tracked the Internet activities of users who believed they were browsing in private.

The terms of the settlement were submitted in the federal court in Oakland, California, pending approval by US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.

Estimated by plaintiffs' attorneys at over $5 billion and potentially as high as $7.8 billion, the settlement does not entail any damages paid by Google. However, individual users retain the right to sue the company for damages.

Initiated in 2020, the class action encompasses millions of Google users who employed private browsing since June 1, 2016.

Users contended that Google's analytics, cookies and apps enabled its subsidiary Alphabet's new tab unit to improperly monitor individuals who set Google Chrome browser to "Incognito" mode and other browsers to "private" browsing mode.

This allegedly transformed Google into an "unaccountable repository of information," granting access to details ranging from users' social circles, culinary preferences, leisure pursuits, shopping tendencies, to the most intimate and potentially sensitive online searches.

According to the settlement terms, Google will enhance disclosures regarding its data collection practices in "private" browsing, a process already underway. Additionally, it will allow Incognito users to block third-party cookies for a period of five years.

Plaintiffs' lawyers highlighted that this would result in Google gathering less data from users' private browsing sessions, consequently reducing its revenue from data monetisation.

Jose Castaneda, a spokesman for Google, expressed the company's satisfaction with the settlement, branding the lawsuit as meritless and emphasising that Google never associates data with individual users in Incognito mode.

Castaneda reiterated Google's commitment to deleting obsolete technical data that was never linked to an individual or utilised for personalisation.

David Boies, representing the plaintiffs, hailed the settlement as a pivotal move towards demanding transparency and accountability from dominant technology entities.

A preliminary settlement was reached in December, forestalling a scheduled trial on February 5, 2024, with terms undisclosed at the time. Plaintiffs' attorneys intend to subsequently pursue unspecified legal fees payable by Google.

Alphabet, Google's parent company, is headquartered in Mountain View, California.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Dubai Set to Host Inaugural International Photonics Conference this Month

Dubai is gearing up to host a groundbreaking event this month with the inaugural Photonics Middle East conference set to take place from April 19 to 22, 2024.

Expected to draw in 400 scientists and researchers from around the world, the event will be held at the prestigious Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences in Healthcare City.

Dr PT Ajith Kumar, the Technology Chair and Convener of the event, emphasised the significance of this gathering amidst a pivotal moment in science and technology.

"The event arrives at a crucial juncture as we witness a transformative shift from electronics to photonics," remarked Dr Kumar. Photonics, encompassing the science and technology of light and light-based devices, now permeates every facet of human existence, from information communication technology and artificial intelligence to defence and aerospace, education and healthcare and green energy production and manufacturing.

Photonics Middle East uniquely balances the interests of research and development, industry and academia, according to a press note issued by the organisers.

The conference's focal points span an array of critical areas including photonics in medicine and medical diagnostics, artificial intelligence, robotics and communication, green energy, nano-photonics, photonic chips and integrated optics, aerospace, marine and offshore, manufacturing and fabrication, bio-photonics, photonic structures and materials, laser holography and diffractive optics, lasers for healthcare, immersive learning and Metaverse, document security and identification, photonic crystals and materials, precision non-destructive testing and ultra-high density information storage and archiving.

In addition to insightful research presentations by leading global experts, the conference will feature four enriching workshops tailored for students and participants, along with an exhibition titled Photonics Innovation and Solutions.

A key feature of the event is the Photonics Business Conclave, anticipated to draw policy makers, industry leaders, R&D professionals, healthcare experts and institutions, academic institutions and start-ups.

Photonics Middle East is co-organised by Photonics Innovations, Dubai, and Photonyx Global, USA, with support from various departments and institutions.

The gathering promises to be a defining moment in the advancement of photonics, offering a platform for collaboration, innovation and transformative progress on a global scal

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Navigating Data Protection in the UAE: Essential Steps for Organisations

 

In today's digital age, data protection has become a critical concern for organisations across all sectors, especially those operating in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

With the UAE's stringent data privacy regulations impacting businesses collecting or processing personal data within its jurisdiction, it's crucial for organisations to take proactive measures to establish or enhance their data protection programs.

Below are key steps that organisations should take to ensure compliance and effectively navigate the landscape of data protection in the UAE.

1 Appointing a Data Protection Officer (DPO)

One of the initial and crucial steps is the appointment of a Data Protection Officer (DPO). This individual plays a pivotal role in overseeing data privacy compliance within the organisation.

Whether the DPO is an internal employee or outsourced to a third party with expertise in data privacy, having a designated DPO showcases the organisation's commitment to upholding privacy standards and cooperating with regulatory requirements.

2 Establishing Comprehensive Consent Mechanisms

Organisations must develop robust consent forms and disclosures for processing personal data. While obtaining explicit consent is fundamental, the law also specifies instances where data processing can occur without consent, such as for public interest, legal proceedings, public health protection, compliance with other laws, and specific limited purposes. Ensuring clear and comprehensive consent mechanisms is essential for compliance.

3 Reviewing Vendor and Supplier Contracts

Conducting a thorough review of contracts with vendors and suppliers is imperative. Organisations need to identify agreements involving data sharing and ensure that these parties adhere to UAE data protection laws. Contractual revisions should reflect data privacy compliance requirements and delineate liabilities effectively, thereby mitigating risks associated with data processing by third parties.

4 Creating Data Mapping and Processing Records

Maintaining a transparent data map and a Record of Processing Activity is crucial for compliance documentation. These records outline the specific processes and systems that utilise personal data, aiding in accountability and demonstrating adherence to regulatory standards.

5 Developing a Comprehensive Breach Response Plan

Organisations should establish a robust breach response plan along with notification procedures. Being able to promptly detect data breaches, initiate response protocols, notify regulators and affected individuals and conduct thorough data analysis are critical components of compliance readiness.

6 Implementing Privacy Impact Assessments

Conducting Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs), Vendor Assessment Questionnaires, and Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) are essential for evaluating privacy risks and obligations. These assessments inform policy development, technology assessments, and decision-making regarding partnerships and data processing activities.

7 Strengthening Information Security Measures

Collaboration with IT teams is essential in implementing robust information security and access control mechanisms. These measures are instrumental in preventing unauthorized access, safeguarding data integrity, and ensuring compliance with data protection regulations.

8 Streamlining DSAR Processes

Efficient Data Subject Access Request (DSAR) processes are vital for addressing data subject inquiries promptly and effectively. Leveraging technology workflows, audit trails, and standardised procedures enhances the efficiency and transparency of DSAR handling.

9 Addressing Cross-Border Data Transfers

Organisations engaged in cross-border data transfers must assess the adequacy of data protection in recipient jurisdictions. Special controls, safeguards and documentation may be required to facilitate compliant data transfers while ensuring the protection of personal data.

10 Conducting Ongoing Staff Training

Continuous staff training is crucial for cultivating a culture of data privacy compliance within the organisation. Regular training sessions enable employees to stay updated on evolving regulations, best practices and organisational policies related to data protection.

In conclusion, navigating data protection in the UAE requires a comprehensive and proactive approach from organisations. By implementing these essential steps, organisations can enhance their data protection posture, build stakeholder trust and effectively navigate the complex regulatory landscape in the UAE.

(Thw writer is a legal associate at Dubai-based NYK Law Firm)

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Former US President Donald Trump Posts $175million Bond in New York Civil Fraud Case

Former US president Donald Trump has posted a $175 million bond in his New York civil fraud case, as revealed in a court document on Monday, thereby avoiding potential asset seizures while awaiting the appeals process.

Previously, a New York appeals court had reduced the bond requirement from the original $454 million to $175 million, granting Trump a 10-day period to meet this revised sum. Originally facing the risk of asset seizure if unable to fulfill the half-billion-dollar bond, Trump secured a significant reduction and swiftly found a company, Knight Specialty Insurance Company from California, to provide the required bond, as confirmed in a court document released on Monday.

In response to the appellate division's decision, Trump stated, "I greatly respect the decision... I will post $175 million in cash and bonds or security or whatever is necessary very quickly, within the 10 days."

This development marks a temporary reprieve for the 77-year-old real estate tycoon, who, despite securing the Republican nomination once again, faces legal challenges stemming from allegations of fraud.

The case revolves around accusations that Trump and his two adult sons misrepresented the value of assets, including Trump Tower and a building at 40 Wall Street, to obtain favourable bank loans and insurance terms.

Trump, along with his family company, was found guilty in a non-jury trial by Judge Arthur Engoron, resulting in a $454 million judgment against him. While Trump is appealing this order, he remains under scrutiny for various alleged crimes, including attempting to overturn the 2020 election and falsifying business records.

In a separate case, Trump is accused of making pre-election hush money payments to a porn star, Stormy Daniels. The presiding judge has expanded a gag order to include family members of those involved, following Trump's attacks on the judge and his family members on social media platform Truth Social.

Facing a criminal trial scheduled to begin on April 15, Trump has expressed willingness to testify. This trial marks a historic event as the first-ever criminal trial of a former US president. Trump's legal battles continue to mount, with four criminal indictments and 88 felony counts against him, reflecting the extensive legal challenges he currently faces.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Microsoft to Separate Teams and Office Globally Amid Antitrust Scrutiny: Report

Microsoft has announced plans to globally separate its chat and video app, Teams, from its Office product, following antitrust scrutiny.

The decision comes six months after the company unbundled the two products in Europe to avoid potential fines from the European Commission, which has been investigating Microsoft's tying of Office and Teams since a complaint filed in 2020 by Slack, a competing workspace messaging app owned by Salesforce.

Teams, originally added to Office 365 for free in 2017, replaced Skype for Business and saw increased popularity during the pandemic, particularly for its video conferencing capabilities. However, rivals argued that bundling the products gave Microsoft an unfair advantage.

To address concerns and provide clarity to customers, Microsoft has decided to extend the separation of Teams from Office globally, a move initially implemented in the European Economic Area and Switzerland on October 1 last year. The decision aims to offer multinational companies more flexibility in their purchasing decisions across different regions.

Analysts suggest that while Microsoft's previous concessions in response to antitrust scrutiny, notably regarding Internet browsers in 1998, led to significant changes in the market, the impact of separating Teams from Office might not be as dramatic given the entrenched nature of enterprise products like Teams.

Despite the separation, Microsoft's user base for Teams has remained relatively stable, according to data from Sensor Tower. The company has also introduced new commercial Microsoft 365 and Office 365 suites without Teams for regions outside the European Economic Area and Switzerland, along with standalone Teams offerings for enterprise customers in those regions.

Customers have the option to continue with their current licensing agreements or switch to the new offerings, with prices for Office without Teams ranging from $7.75 to $54.75 for existing customers and $5.25 for standalone Teams. However, exact pricing may vary by country and currency.

While Microsoft's efforts to unbundle Teams from Office may not fully alleviate antitrust concerns, proactive measures could potentially influence regulators' stance. The company faces the risk of significant fines, up to 10 per cent of its global annual turnover, if found guilty of antitrust breaches, having accumulated 2.2 billion euros ($2.4 billion) in EU antitrust fines over the past decade.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

What is Intellectual Property Due Diligence in Media Mergers & Acquisitions

In today's dynamic media landscape, mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are common strategies employed by companies to expand market presence, acquire new technologies and capitalise on emerging opportunities.

However, given the critical role of intellectual property (IP) in the media industry, conducting thorough due diligence is essential to mitigate risks and ensure the success of M&A transactions.

This study provides a detailed analysis of the due diligence process concerning intellectual property rights (IPR) in media mergers and acquisitions.

Intellectual property assets, including copyrights, trademarks, patents, trade secrets and proprietary technologies, are invaluable assets in the media sector.

They underpin content creation, distribution, licensing, and revenue generation. Therefore, understanding and safeguarding these assets are paramount in M&A transactions to preserve value and mitigate legal and financial risks.

What are the Objectives of IP Due Diligence?

  • Identify and assess all intellectual property assets owned or utilised by the target company.
  • Verify ownership rights, validity, and enforceability of intellectual property rights.
  • Evaluate the strength, value, and marketability of the intellectual property portfolio.
  • Identify potential risks, liabilities, and compliance issues related to intellectual property.
  • Develop strategies for protecting and maximising the value of intellectual property post-acquisition.

What ate the Key Components of IP Due Diligence?

1. Identification of Intellectual Property Assets: Conduct a comprehensive inventory of all IP assets, including content, brands, technologies, and patents.

2. Ownership and Title Verification: Verify ownership rights, chain of title, and validity of registrations for each IP asset.

3. Assessment of Rights and Licenses: Review agreements, licenses, and contracts to ascertain the scope of rights granted and any restrictions or obligations.

4. Evaluation of IP Portfolio: Assess the strength, uniqueness, and marketability of each IP asset in relation to the target company's business objectives.

5. Risk Analysis and Compliance: Identify legal, regulatory, and infringement risks associated with IP assets and assess compliance with applicable laws and standards.

6. Litigation and Enforcement History: Review past and pending litigation, disputes, or enforcement actions related to IP rights and evaluate potential liabilities.

7. Technology and Innovation: Evaluate the target company's R&D activities, innovation pipeline, and proprietary technologies to assess the value of IP assets.

8. Complexities of Digital Rights Management: With the proliferation of digital content, managing rights and licensing agreements becomes increasingly complex.

9. Globalisation and Cross-Border Issues: M&A transactions involving media companies often involve international IP rights, requiring careful consideration of cross-border regulations and jurisdictional issues.

10. Rapid Technological Advancements: Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, virtual reality, and blockchain pose new challenges and opportunities in IP due diligence.

11. Cultural and Creative Considerations: Media content often involves cultural sensitivities and creative nuances that must be addressed in IP due diligence.

Intellectual property due diligence is a critical aspect of M&A transactions in the media industry, ensuring that buyers understand the value, risks, and opportunities associated with IP assets.

By conducting thorough due diligence, companies can mitigate risks, protect their investments, and position themselves for long-term success in the competitive media landscape.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Corporal Punishment in Schools, Homes Illegal; Jail, Fine for Offenders

Corporal punishment is strictly prohibited by law in the UAE. As debates on the topic gain global attention, questions regarding its legality and ethical ramifications have emerged. Given its diverse cultural makeup and contemporary legal framework, the UAE is thrust into the heart of this discourse. Let's delve into the specifics of corporal punishment laws in the UAE.

Legal Framework: In the UAE, it is illegal to use physical violence or other forms of abuse to discipline a child. This includes hitting, slapping, punching, or any other physical act that causes harm. Parents who engage in physical violence towards their child can face criminal charges, including assault and child abuse.

Article 32 of the UAE's Constitution guarantees the protection of human dignity, and any form of physical harm or torture is considered a violation of this fundamental principle. Additionally, the UAE is a signatory to international treaties and conventions, such as the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, which further reinforce its commitment to prohibiting corporal punishment.

Penal Code: The UAE Penal Code explicitly criminalises any act of physical harm or assault against individuals, including corporal punishment. Article 282 of the Penal Code states that anyone who inflicts physical harm on another person shall be liable for punishment, with penalties ranging from fines to imprisonment, depending on the severity of the offense.

Child Rights: In line with international standards, the UAE prioritises the protection of children's rights and welfare. The country ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), which prohibits any form of violence or abuse against children, including corporal punishment. As such, corporal punishment in schools, homes, or any other setting is strictly prohibited under UAE law.

Recent Developments: In recent years, the UAE has taken steps to strengthen its legal framework to safeguard human rights and prevent instances of abuse or violence. In 2016, the UAE issued Federal Law No. 3 of 2016 on Child Rights, which provides comprehensive legal protection for children and prohibits any form of violence or exploitation, including corporal punishment.

Legal Interpretation and Enforcement: While the legal framework in the UAE unequivocally prohibits corporal punishment, challenges remain in terms of interpretation and enforcement of the law. Instances of corporal punishment may still occur in certain settings, such as schools or households, raising concerns about accountability and oversight.

Corporal punishment is unequivocally prohibited under UAE law, which emphasises the protection of human dignity and the rights of individuals, including children. The UAE's legal framework, supported by international treaties and conventions, reaffirms its commitment to preventing any form of physical harm or abuse and promoting a safe and inclusive society for all.

As the UAE continues to strengthen its legal framework and enforcement mechanisms, it remains crucial for stakeholders, including government authorities, educators and civil society organisations, to collaborate in raising awareness and promoting a culture of respect for human rights and non-violence in all aspects of society.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Legal Framework and Regulations Governing Property Mortgages in UAE

The real estate market in the UAE has experienced significant growth, attracting investors globally. An important aspect of property ownership in the UAE is having a thorough understanding of the legal framework governing property mortgages.

It is essential for property owners, investors and lenders involved in real estate dealings in the UAE to have a solid grasp of UAE property mortgage laws.

By familiarising themselves with the fundamental concepts, processes and legal considerations highlighted in this article, stakeholders can effectively navigate mortgage transactions and safeguard their interests in the ever-evolving UAE property sector.

Key Concepts of UAE Property Mortgage Law

Definition: A mortgage is a legal contract where a property owner (mortgagor) pledges their property as collateral to secure a loan from a lender (mortgagee). The lender maintains a lien on the property until the loan, including principal and interest, is fully repaid.

Mortgage Registration: All property mortgages in the UAE must be registered with the respective emirate's land department to be legally binding. This process involves submitting the mortgage agreement and necessary documents to the land department and paying the required registration fees.

Mortgage Priority: The priority of a mortgage determines its position concerning other creditors' claims on the property. Typically, mortgages are ranked based on their registration date and time with the land department, with earlier registrations holding higher priority.

Rights and Obligations: Property mortgages in the UAE grant specific rights and responsibilities to both the mortgagor and mortgagee. While the mortgagor retains property ownership and possession, the mortgagee has the authority to enforce the mortgage in case of default by the mortgagor.

Procedures for Property Mortgage Transactions

Negotiation and Agreement: The process commences with negotiations between the mortgagor and mortgagee to establish the terms and conditions of the mortgage, such as loan amount, interest rate, repayment schedule, and other relevant terms.

Execution of Mortgage Agreement: Upon reaching a mutual understanding, the parties proceed to execute a mortgage agreement that outlines the terms of the mortgage. This agreement must adhere to the legal requirements set forth by UAE law and must be signed by all parties involved.

Registration Process with Land Department: Following the execution of the mortgage agreement, along with the submission of necessary documentation, the agreement is presented to the land department of the relevant emirate for registration. Once registered, the mortgage is officially documented in the land registry, serving as notice to third parties regarding the mortgagee's stake in the property.

Funds Disbursement: Upon successful registration, the mortgagee releases the loan funds to the mortgagor in accordance with the agreed-upon terms. The mortgagor can utilise these funds for property acquisition, development, or other purposes, as outlined in the mortgage agreement.

Legal Considerations for Property Stakeholders

Conducting Due Diligence: Prior to finalising a mortgage agreement, property owners and investors should conduct thorough due diligence on the property, lender and mortgage terms to mitigate risks and ensure compliance with legal regulations.

Sharia Compliance: In instances where Islamic financing structures like Murabaha or Ijara are utilised, all parties must ensure adherence to Sharia principles governing financial and property transactions.

Default and Foreclosure Awareness: Property owners should understand the implications of defaulting on mortgage payments, which could lead to foreclosure proceedings initiated by the mortgagee to recover the outstanding debt by selling the mortgaged property.

(The writer is a legal associate at Dubai-based NYK Law Firm)

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

International Court of Justice Orders Israel to Ensure Urgent Aid Reaches People of Gaza

The International Court of Justice, the world's foremost legal body, has issued a directive to Israel to ensure that essential food supplies and urgent humanitarian aid reach the people of Gaza promptly.

The court's order, issued on Thursday, highlights the alarming onset of famine in the region following nearly six months of conflict. Repeated warnings from the United Nations have underscored the imminent threat of a "man-made famine" in Gaza, attributing the dire situation to

Israel's restrictions on aid, which have resulted in alarming levels of hunger and deprivation. According to the Hague-based UN court, the situation has escalated beyond a mere risk of famine; famine conditions are already prevalent among Palestinians in Gaza. The court has urged Israel to take immediate and effective measures to facilitate the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance.

Following attacks by Hamas on October 7, Israel imposed a comprehensive siege on Gaza, severely limiting access to food, water, and medicine. Although some aid deliveries have since been permitted, humanitarian organisations assert that the sporadic influx of aid trucks falls significantly short of meeting the region's needs.

The UN's human rights chief has even suggested that Israeli restrictions may constitute the use of starvation as a weapon of war. The desperation gripping Gaza was tragically illustrated this week when individuals vying for food aid drowned or were trampled to death as aid parcels were dropped into the sea by parachute.

Matthew Hollingworth, the Palestine director of the World Food Programme, emphasised the severity of the situation, stating, "Nowhere else in the world do so many people face imminent famine."

Access to clean water is also severely limited, forcing Gazans to embark on long journeys in search of water sources that may have already dried up. Maram Abu Amra lamented the daily struggle, saying, "We have to queue for everything... Sometimes, we return empty-handed, without water."

Despite calls for an "immediate ceasefire" by the UN Security Council, heavy fighting and relentless bombardments persist, resulting in further loss of life and destruction of infrastructure. The conflict has transformed much of Gaza into a wasteland and crippled the healthcare system.

Amid the turmoil, allegations have arisen regarding Israeli military actions targeting hospitals, with accusations of militants using medical facilities as cover. Israel has defended its actions, citing the need to combat terrorist infrastructure.

The conflict, which began with an attack by Hamas on October 7, has claimed thousands of lives on both sides and taken a heavy toll on civilian populations.

Efforts to broker a truce have faced significant challenges, with mediators striving to prevent the escalation of violence into a wider regional conflict. The involvement of key players such as the United States, Egypt, and Qatar reflects the international community's efforts to find a peaceful resolution.

In light of the ongoing crisis, discussions have also turned to the governance of Gaza in the post-war period, with considerations for the role of the Palestinian Authority in the region.

The situation remains highly volatile, with the people of Gaza enduring unimaginable hardships amidst the ongoing conflict and humanitarian crisis.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Lulu Employee Flees After Allegedly Stealing Dh600,000 From Cash Office

An Indian expat working at the Abu Dhabi-based hypermarket chain Lulu stands accused of disappearing with approximately Dh600,000 in cash.

Lulu Group International has taken action by filing a complaint with the Abu Dhabi Police against the employee. The individual, aged 38 and originally from the Indian state of Kerala, held a position in the cash office at the LuLu Hypermarket located in Khalidiya Mall, Abu Dhabi City.

The management of the hypermarket launched an internal investigation after the employee failed to report for afternoon duty on March 25. Attempts to contact him proved unsuccessful as his cell phone was switched off. An audit later revealed a significant shortfall of over Dh600,000 in the cash office.

Having served with the Lulu Group for 15 years, the employee resided in Abu Dhabi with his wife and two children. However, following his alleged disappearance, his family reportedly left the UAE without informing anyone, as per the group's statement.

Furthermore, Lulu Group stated that a report has been made against the employee to the Kerala Police, with help from the Indian Embassy in Abu Dhabi.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

‘Vested Interest Group Trying to Pressure Judiciary’: Indian Lawyers Petition CJI

 A coalition of legal professionals, including prominent figures like senior advocate Harish Salve and Bar Council of India chairperson Manan Kumar Mishra, has penned a letter to the Chief Justice of India (CJI), asserting that a "vested interest group" is exerting undue influence on the judiciary and tarnishing its reputation "through unsubstantiated claims and outdated political agendas."

The letter, dated March 26 and addressed to CJI DY Chandrachud, highlights concerns over what they perceive as orchestrated attempts to manipulate the judiciary, particularly evident in cases involving political figures accused of corruption. These tactics, the letter alleges, pose a threat to the integrity of the courts and undermine the democratic principles they stand for.

While the letter refrains from explicitly naming specific individuals, it implicates a faction of lawyers who, it claims, oscillate between defending politicians during the day and attempting to sway judicial decisions through media influence at night.

The group of lawyers, numbering approximately 600 and including Adish Aggarwala, Chetan Mittal, Pinky Anand, Hitesh Jain, Ujjwala Pawar, Uday Holla and Swarupama Chaturvedi, among others, expressed concerns about the propagation of misleading narratives about the judiciary's past, aimed at influencing court proceedings and gaining political mileage.

Although no specific cases are cited in the letter, its release coincides with ongoing high-profile corruption trials involving opposition leaders. Opposition parties, many of whose members are legal practitioners themselves, have accused the government of orchestrating politically motivated prosecutions, a charge denied by the ruling party.

In their missive to CJI Chandrachud, the signatories lament the erosion of public trust in the judiciary due to what they perceive as baseless allegations of past judicial susceptibility to external influence. They vehemently deny allegations of "bench fixing" and criticise attempts to draw parallels between Indian courts and those in countries lacking in rule of law.

The letter also condemns what it describes as a "my way or the highway" attitude among critics, who selectively praise or disparage judicial decisions based on their personal biases. Such behaviour, the lawyers argue, undermines public confidence in the legal system.

Expressing apprehensions about the timing of these criticisms amidst impending elections, the lawyers recall similar episodes in 2018-2019, characterised by what they term as "hit and run" activities aimed at delegitimising the judiciary.

In conclusion, the lawyers call upon the Supreme Court to vigorously defend the independence and integrity of the judiciary against perceived external pressures.

They emphasise the importance of CJI Chandrachud's leadership in navigating these challenges and stress that silence or inaction risks empowering those seeking to undermine the judiciary's authority.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Kim Kardashian Sued by Judd Foundation over Counterfeit Furniture

American reality TV star and entrepreneur Kim Kardashian is being sued by the Judd Foundation, a non-profit organisation dedicated to preserving the legacy of artist Donald Judd.

The organisation has filed a lawsuit against Kardashian in California federal court, alleging that she featured counterfeit versions of Judd's furniture in a YouTube video.

According to the complaint, Kardashian falsely described tables and chairs produced by Los Angeles-based interior design firm Clements Design as genuine Judd furniture. The foundation accuses Kardashian of false endorsement, while Clements Design faces allegations of false advertising, unfair competition, trademark infringement, and copyright infringement.

Representatives for Kardashian and Clements Design have yet to respond to requests for comment on the lawsuit.

Rainer Judd, president of the Judd Foundation and daughter of the late artist, emphasised the importance of Judd's furniture to his legacy, stating that counterfeit pieces undermine the integrity of his original work.

Donald Judd, a renowned figure in minimalist art, passed away in 1994. His works are housed in prestigious museums such as the Museum of Modern Art in New York and the Tate Modern in London. The foundation ensures that Judd's furniture designs are faithfully reproduced according to his specifications.

The complaint alleges that Kardashian's skincare company, SKKN by Kim, hired Clements Design to produce furniture in Judd's style for its offices. Kardashian purportedly showcased the counterfeit furniture in a 2022 YouTube video tour of the offices, which was later removed.

The lawsuit claims that Kardashian's statements in the video misled viewers into believing that the furniture was authentic Judd pieces. Despite attempts to rectify the situation, including requests to recycle the furniture, delete the video, or issue corrective advertising, Clements Design and Kardashian allegedly refused to comply.

The Judd Foundation asserts that it had no choice but to pursue legal action to protect the integrity of Donald Judd's legacy and ensure accurate representation of his work.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Energy Transition and Diversification Key Catalysts for Middle East Deal Making in 2024

PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) anticipates a favourable dealmaking landscape in the Middle East for 2024, driven by decarbonisation efforts and economic diversification.

According to a recent report by PwC, the region's non-oil sector growth, increased private sector engagement and vibrant capital markets are stimulating merger and acquisition (M&A) activity.

The report highlights the enduring influence of factors such as technological disruption and climate change, which are propelling investments regionally or abroad, particularly in critical sectors like energy transition and digital transformation.

Emphasising the necessity for dealmakers to adapt, the 2024 TransAct report underscores the importance of reinventing business models, talent acquisition, and maintaining agility amidst market fluctuations, with a focus on mid-market deals to drive value creation.

"While the global economy has witnessed a slower growth rate, the Middle East has exhibited resilience, bolstered by robust economic fundamentals and supportive government policies," the report notes. This resilience has fostered stability and investor confidence, resulting in a relatively active deal market compared to regions grappling with higher interest rates and recessionary concerns.

Despite decreases compared to 2022, the report anticipates continued activity and growth across various sectors in 2024, driven by governments' strategic agendas to advance diversification efforts and strengthen their economies.

Imad Matar, transaction services leader at PwC Middle East, highlights Saudi Arabia's resilient dealmaking environment, particularly in non-oil private sectors such as infrastructure, industrial manufacturing, and clean technology industries.

"In 2023, Saudi Arabia witnessed less pronounced declines in deal volume. IPO activity also remained robust, and we anticipate a strong pipeline for 2024," Matar stated.

He further predicts sustained momentum as the government moves forward with privatisation initiatives, encourages private sector listings to attract investments, enact reforms and reduce reliance on fossil fuels.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Dani Alves, Former Brazilian Soccer Star, Released on Bail After Conviction for Rape

Convicted rapist and former Brazil international Dani Alves left a prison near Barcelona on Monday after posting the one-million-euro bail set by a court to ensure his release pending appeal.

The 40-year-old has been in jail since his arrest in January 2023 on suspicion of raping a young woman in the VIP bathroom of a Barcelona nightclub in the early hours of December 31, 2022.

Wearing jeans, a white poloneck and black jacket, his face expressionless, Alves walked out of the Brians 2 prison in San Esteban Sasroviras near Barcelona with his lawyer, according to a media report.

He got into a white car without saying a word to the hordes of reporters waiting nearby, just hours after depositing the sum determined by the court five days earlier.

The former Barcelona player, one of the world’s most decorated footballers, was convicted last month and sentenced to four-and-a-half years in jail, with his lawyers swiftly moving to file an appeal.

But in a surprise move, the court agreed last Wednesday to conditionally release him conditionally in exchange for posting a one-million-euro ($1.08 million) bail, handing over his Spanish and Brazilian passports, staying in Spain and presenting himself to court every week.

Alves had tried to make bail several times since his arrest but his requests were turned down on the basis he was a flight risk since Brazil does not extradite citizens sentenced in other countries.

Alves’ lawyers are seeking his acquittal, and the appeal process could take months to complete.
Prosecutors, however, want his prison sentence doubled to nine years. They and the victim’s lawyer Ester Garcia have appealed the decision to grant Alves bail.

“This sends the message that this is justice for the rich, and even if there is a conviction, if you pay bail there are no criminal consequences,” she told reporters last week.

“It’s a very dangerous message for society,” she added, saying her client was “totally outraged, very despondent and very frustrated”.

Meanwhile, the court’s decision to free Alves was also robustly criticised by Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.

“We cannot stay silent in the face of this injustice,” he said on Thursday, stressing that money “cannot undo the crime that a man commits by raping a woman”.

“When sex is something between two people, it has to be agreed to by both of them” and if not, that constitutes “a crime”, he said.

During the trial, the victim, who testified behind a screen to protect her identity, said Alves had violently forced her to have sex despite begging him to let her go, causing her “anguish and terror”, according to prosecutors present for her declaration.

Alves’ lawyers had argued the victim had been “glued” to the player while dancing at the nightclub, saying there was “sexual tension” between them.

But in its 61-page decision, the court said that did not mean “that she consented to anything that might have subsequently happened”.

Spain’s leftist government passed a new law in 2022 that strengthens the country’s penal code against rape by requiring explicit consent for sex acts, a move long demanded by assault survivors and women’s rights groups.

Alves is widely considered one of the greatest defenders of all time, having won 42 trophies. The peak of his career was with Barcelona between 2008 and 2016, alongside Lionel Messi, when he won 23 trophies.

At the time of his arrest, he was contracted to Mexican club Pumas UNAM. He was sacked soon after being detained.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

UN Security Council Passes Resolution Favouring Immediate Ceasefire in Gaza during Ramadan

The UN Security Council passed a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza for the month of Ramadan, a breakthrough coming after more than five months since the start of the Israel-Hamas conflict.

The 15-nation Council adopted the resolution, put forth by the 10 non-permanent elected members of the Council, with 14 nations voting in favour, none against and an abstention by permanent member the US.

“The Security Council just approved a long-awaited resolution on Gaza, demanding an immediate ceasefire, and the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages,” UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in a post on X.

“This resolution must be implemented. Failure would be unforgivable,” he said.

The resolution “demands an immediate ceasefire for the month of Ramadan respected by all parties leading to a lasting sustainable ceasefire, and also demands the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages, as well as ensuring humanitarian access to address their medical and other humanitarian needs, and further demands that the parties comply with their obligations under international law in relation to all persons they detain.”

US ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield said that the resolution rightly acknowledges that, during the month of Ramadan, “we must recommit to peace. Hamas can do that by accepting the deal on the table. A ceasefire can begin immediately with the release of the first hostage.”

“And so, we must put pressure on Hamas to do just that. This is the only path to securing a ceasefire and the release of hostages, as we have all called for today. That is what this resolution means, a ceasefire of any duration must come with the release of hostages. This is the only path,” she said.

She said that with the adoption of the resolution, “this Council spoke out in support of the ongoing diplomatic efforts, led by the United States, Qatar, and Egypt, to bring about an immediate and sustainable ceasefire, secure the immediate release of all hostages, and help alleviate the tremendous suffering of Palestinian civilians in Gaza, who are in dire need of protection and life-saving humanitarian assistance.”

The US envoy said that the only path to a durable end to this conflict is the release of all hostages. UK’s Permanent Representative to the UN Ambassador Barbara Woodward said her country has long been calling for an immediate humanitarian pause leading to a sustainable ceasefire without a return to destruction, fighting and loss of life, as the fastest way to get hostages out and aid in.

“That is what this resolution calls for and why the United Kingdom voted yes on this text,” she said.

“This resolution sets out the urgent demand for the unconditional release of all hostages. And we welcome the ongoing diplomatic efforts by Egypt, Qatar and the United States to this end,” she said.

Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett, Ambassador and Permanent Representative of Guyana said that after more than five months of a “war of utter terror and destruction”, a ceasefire is the difference between life and death for hundreds of thousands of Palestinians and others.

“This demand (by the Council) comes at a significant time as Palestinians are observing the Holy Month of Ramadan,” she said.

Louis Charbonneau, UN director at Human Rights Watch, said that Israel needs to immediately respond to the UN Security Council resolution by facilitating the delivery of humanitarian aid, ending the starvation of Gaza’s population, and halting unlawful attacks.

“Palestinian armed groups should immediately release all civilians held hostage. The US and other countries should use their leverage to end atrocities by suspending arms transfers to Israel.”

The adoption of the resolution comes more than five months after the latest conflict in Gaza erupted following the October 7 Hamas attacks against Israel.

The Security Council, with its primary responsibility of maintaining international peace and security, has remained deeply divided and has till now not been able to adopt any resolution on a ceasefire in Gaza.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

UAE: President Enacts Legislation Transforming Rehabilitation Centers in Abu Dhabi

UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan has approved a law regulating rehabilitation and correctional centers in Abu Dhabi, in his capacity as the Ruler of Abu Dhabi.

The law delineates the general policies governing rehabilitation and correctional centres in Abu Dhabi, with a focus on safeguarding inmates' rights and providing appropriate social and cultural rehabilitation.

As per the law, punitive and correctional facilities in Abu Dhabi will be renamed rehabilitation and correctional centres. Under the Abu Dhabi Judicial Department, the roles and responsibilities of rehabilitation and correctional centres include receiving inmates, determining appropriate care duties and informing inmates of their responsibilities and expected conduct.

Additionally, these centres are tasked with providing inmates with health and social care services, educational and vocational training opportunities and implementing rehabilitation programmes aimed at reintegrating them as productive members of society.

Moreover, the responsibilities of rehabilitation and correctional centres extend to training staff in accordance with the best international practices, enabling them to effectively carry out their mission of rehabilitating inmates while ensuring efficient economic management within the rehabilitation framework of the emirate.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Kate Reveals She has Cancer; Could File Civil Lawsuit over Records Breach at Hospital

Kate Middleton, Britain’s Princess of Wales, has revealed she has been diagnosed with cancer and is undergoing chemotherapy. In a video statement on Friday, she said that she had undergone major abdominal surgery in London in January, saying that it was initially thought her condition was noncancerous.

“The surgery was successful. However, tests after the operation found cancer had been present. My medical team therefore advised that I should undergo a course of preventive chemotherapy and I am now in the early stages of that treatment,” her statement said.

“This of course came as a huge shock, and William and I have been doing everything we can to process and manage this privately for the sake of our young family.”

Kensington Palace said it is confident she will make a full recovery, according to the BBC.
“I am well and getting stronger everyday by focusing on the things that will help me heal; in my mind, body and spirits,” Kate later added in her speech.

She asked for space and privacy while she completed her treatment. It was not announced what type of cancer it was, or at what stage it was caught.
Buckingham Palace said King Charles III, her father-in-law, was “so proud of Catherine for her courage in speaking as she did.”

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle also released a statement, saying: “We wish health and healing for Kate and the family, and hope they are able to do so privately and in peace.”

Kate stayed in the hospital following the surgery. At the time, there was no confirmation of what the surgery was, with Kensington Palace saying Kate, 42, hoped that the public would respect “her wish that her personal medical information remains private.” The palace suggested at the time that Kate would not be resuming public duties until after Easter.

Disappearance and Mother’s Day Row

The princess had not been seen in public since Christmas Day 2023 when she was seen walking to and attending a church service alongside the wider royal family, including her children and husband Prince William, the heir to the British throne.

An online frenzy over her condition and her whereabouts dominated social media since news of her operation. The palace had largely stayed silent on the matter, which at times added fuel to the fire.

Obsession reached a peak after a picture of the former Kate Middleton was released on Mother’s Day -- March 10 in the U.K. News agencies pulled the picture later that day, issuing a so-called kill notice, finding it had been edited too heavily.

Every detail of the image was scrutinised, from Kate’s hair to the children’s clothes that seemed inconsistent, to a ledge in the background that appeared warped.

On March 11, Kensington Palace posted a statement from Kate on social media, saying she edited the picture. “Like many amateur photographers, I do occasionally experiment with editing. I wanted to express my apologies for any confusion the family photograph we shared yesterday caused. I hope everyone celebrating had a very happy Mother’s Day. C,” it read.

Since then, images and video of what appeared to be Kate appeared in British tabloid newspapers, further stoking conspiracies and conversation.

‘Kate Could File a Civil Lawsuit’

Earlier this week, reports also emerged that a staff member at the The London Clinic Kate was being treated at tried to access her files without permission to do so.

Princess Kate could take legal action after her private medical records were involved in a security breach at the hospital, according to legal experts.
“Kate can always file a civil lawsuit for invasion of privacy,” a senior legal expert, who is not involved with the case, said on Wednesday. “If she wants to go after the perpetrator to say that her privacy rights were violated, she can absolutely do so.”

The London Clinic has launched an investigation into its employees after members of the hospital reportedly tried to access Kate’s private medical records following her January abdominal procedure, according to media reports.

It should be “easy to catch” the perpetrator, given the nature of the breach, the legal expert noted.

Probe over Breach of Medical Records

The UK Police have been asked to look at claims that at least one worker attempted to access the confidential medical records of Kate during her hospitalisation, a minister said on Wednesday.

Britain’s privacy and data protection watchdog, the Information Commissioner’s Office, told The Washington Post on Wednesday it was assessing a potential breach of Kate’s medical records during her stay at the London hospital.

Under British law, medical facilities are required to protect patient confidentiality, which extends even beyond death. Disclosure of any confidential patient information is only permitted for “the direct clinical care of the patient to whom it relates,” according to England’s National Health Service.

Exceptions apply only when the patient explicitly consents to the disclosure, if it’s required by law, or if the disclosure can be justified in the public interest.

“We can confirm that we have received a breach report and are assessing the information provided,” a spokesperson for the Information Commissioner’s Office said, without giving further details about the nature of the breach or its assessment.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Prince Harry's Landline Calls were Bugged by Murdoch’s Tabloids, Say Lawyers

Rupert Murdoch’s British tabloid papers allegedly intercepted Prince Harry’s landline phones and accessed the messages on the pager of his late mother Princess Diana, as disclosed by the British royal’s legal team to the London High Court.

Harry, the younger son of King Charles and the late Princess Diana, along with more than 40 others, are suing News Group Newspapers (NGN) over allegations of unlawful activities by journalists and private investigators associated with its tabloids, the Sun and the now-defunct News of the World, spanning from the mid-1990s until 2016.

In a ruling last July, Judge Timothy Fancourt allowed Harry to proceed to trial with claims of unlawful information gathering, while dismissing allegations of mobile phone hacking due to being filed too late.

During a hearing at the High Court on Thursday, Harry’s legal team sought to amend his lawsuit in response to the ruling, and to introduce additional allegations.

These new claims include assertions that the Sun commissioned private investigators to target his then-girlfriend and now-wife Meghan in 2016, as well as accusations of widespread phone bugging.

According to court documents, Harry's lawyers stated: “The claimant also brings a claim and seeks relief in relation to the interception of landline calls, the interception of calls from cordless phones and analogue mobile calls and the interception of landline voicemails, as distinct from phone hacking.”

The claim also involves allegations regarding Diana, who "was under close surveillance and her calls were being unlawfully intercepted by NGN, which was known about by its editors and senior executives."

NGN is contesting the addition of what they referred to as a “significant number of new allegations” for various reasons, including their late submission, lack of evidence, and their overlap with previously dismissed phone-hacking claims.

NGN’s lawyers argued in court filings: “They cover time periods falling outside the scope of the current pleading and the generic statements of case, and in many cases relate to allegations which have been well-publicised for as long as 30 years.”

NGN’s lawyers also expressed doubts about the feasibility of Harry's case being heard at a trial expected to commence in January next year if his new allegations were to be included.

In 2011, NGN issued an apology for widespread phone hacking by journalists at the News of the World, a publication that Murdoch subsequently shut down due to public outcry. Despite settling over 1,300 claims since then, NGN has consistently denied any wrongdoing by Sunstaff.

During proceedings on Wednesday, lawyers representing Harry and other claimants asserted that Murdoch and other senior executives were complicit in covering up widespread misconduct, providing false evidence to courts, parliament and a public inquiry.

NGN contends that some claimants are utilising these lawsuits as a means to attack the tabloid press and dismisses allegations against its current and former staff as “a baseless and cynical assault on their integrity.”

Since stepping back from royal duties in 2020 to relocate to California, Harry has focused on confronting the British press, alleging intrusion into his private life since childhood and dissemination of false information about him and his loved ones.

In December, Harry won a lawsuit against Mirror Group Newspapers over allegations of phone hacking and unlawful activities, with the judge acknowledging that senior figures were aware of the wrongdoing.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

US Files Landmark Case Against Apple For Monopolising Smartphone Market

The US Department of Justice filed a landmark lawsuit against Apple, alleging the tech giant's monopolistic practices in the smartphone market.

The lawsuit, supported by several US states, contends that Apple has unlawfully maintained its dominance in the iPhone realm, stifling competition and burdening consumers with excessive costs.

This highly anticipated legal action marks a significant clash between Apple, founded by Steve Jobs in 1976, and the US government, following decades of limited scrutiny from Washington.

Apple now joins other tech giants like Amazon, Google, and Meta (formerly Facebook) facing antitrust scrutiny in the United States. Upon news of the lawsuit, Apple's shares plummeted by as much as 3.75 per cent on Wall Street.

Central to the case are allegations of Apple's exclusionary tactics, which impose stringent and often opaque conditions on firms and developers seeking access to the iPhone's vast user base of 136 million in the US.

The lawsuit claims that these practices compel consumers to remain within the Apple ecosystem and invest in the company's pricier hardware, notably the iPhone.

Apple swiftly refuted the lawsuit's validity, asserting that it is "wrong on the facts and the law," and vowed to vigorously defend against it. The company contends that a favourable ruling for the government would establish a concerning precedent, granting excessive regulatory control over technological innovation.

The lawsuit specifically targets Apple's alleged suppression of "Super Apps," comprehensive web portals that could offer various services on iPhones beyond the confines of the App Store.

Additionally, it accuses Apple of monopolising tap payment technology through its proprietary wallet app and impeding interoperability between messaging apps on iPhones and Android devices.

The broad scope of the case extends to other products and services, including smartwatches and web browsers, where Apple's practices allegedly hinder competition and innovation.

Despite Apple's efforts to diversify revenue streams beyond the iPhone, the company faces mounting pressure amid slowing sales growth. The Department of Justice highlighted Apple's unprecedented profits, surpassing those of any other company in the Fortune 500 and exceeding the GDP of over 100 countries.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Public Prosecution Completes Crime Classification and Criminal Legislation Digitisation Project

The UAE Public Prosecution has successfully concluded its ambitious project, "Classification of Crimes and Digitisation of Criminal Legislation within the Criminal Case Management System."

This pioneering initiative involved the conversion of legal texts into a digital format compatible with information systems, leveraging advanced artificial intelligence (AI) techniques for comprehension and execution.

Aligned with the visionary leadership's directives, the project aimed to harness human and institutional capabilities for attaining a prominent position in digital transformation.
A specialised workforce comprising 30 prosecutors and seven technicians from the Information Technology Department played a pivotal role in this endeavour. Collectively, they devoted an impressive total of 3,821 working hours to meticulously scrutinise, individualise and encode laws into the newly developed system.

This rigorous process resulted in the digitisation of over 17 federal laws and the detailed classification of 32,000 criminal charges, encompassing a wide range of acts, penalties and legal circumstances.

Furthermore, the project is poised to enhance the speed, efficiency and transparency of the penal system through the integration of modern technologies. It will propel the ongoing evolution of digital systems and judicial processes, reinforcing the UAE's status as a global hub and a leading digital governance model.

The Public Prosecution emphasised that the project will streamline tasks and procedures, reducing bureaucratic obstacles by enabling electronic systems to function autonomously. It also aims to automate electronic communication with strategic partners and simplify searches within legal frameworks.

The initiative is expected to establish a benchmark for future legislation, aligning with the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence and emerging technologies.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

ED Arrests Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal in Liquor Policy Money Laundering Case

Delhi Chief Minister and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Arvind Kejriwal has been arrested by Enforcement Directorate in now scrapped Delhi liquor policy scam case. The Delhi High Court on Thursday refused to grant Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal any protection from coercive action in an excise policy-linked money laundering case.

An Enforcement Directorate (ED) team reached CM Arvind Kejriwal's residence in Delhi on Thursday evening, officials said, shortly after the high court refused to grant him protection. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) chief had earlier skipped multiple summonses of the agency in the case.

"We have received news that ED has arrested Arvind Kejriwal... We have always said that Arvind Kejriwal will run the govt from jail. He will remain the CM of Delhi. We have filed a case in the Supreme Court. Our lawyers are reaching SC. We will demand SC have an urgent hearing tonight," said senior AAP leader Atishi.

ED's Aallegations

The ED in a press note had called Kejriwal a "conspirator" in the case. Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) leader in Telengana, K Kavitha, allegedly conspired with Kejriwal, and AAP leaders Manish Sisodia and Sanjay Singh while framing the now-scrapped liquor policy case, the ED has said.

The alleged conspiracy involved making a policy that would benefit a liquor lobby from southern India, which the ED had called the "South Lobby".
In return, the "South Lobby" would give ₹100 crore to the AAP, according to the ED.

Kejriwal's name had appeared in the statements of some accused and witnesses. The ED has mentioned this in its remand note and chargesheets. Vijay Nair, one of the accused in the liquor policy case, frequently visited Kejriwal's office, and would spend most of his time there, the probe agency said.

Nair allegedly told liquor traders that he discussed the policy with Kejriwal. It was Nair, who got Indospirit owner Sameer Mahendru to meet Kejriwal, the investigators have said.

When the meeting was unsuccessful, he got Mahendru and Kejriwal talk in a video call, in which Kejriwal said Nair was his "child" who he trusts. Raghav Magunta, the first accused in the "South Lobby" and now a witness, had said his father, who is a YSR Congress Party MP in Andhra Predesh, met Kejriwal to know more about the liquor policy.

Sisodia's former secretary C Arvind in a statement in December 2022 had said that in March the previous year he got a draft group of ministers report from Sisodia. When he went to Kejriwal's house after Sisodia called him, Arvind said he also saw Satyendar Jain there and the document. He alleged he was surprised because no such proposal was discussed in any group of ministers' (GoM) meeting, but claimed he was asked to make a GoM report based on this document.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.

Placeholder

Dubai's Parkin Shares Jump more than 30% in UAE’s First IPO of the Year

 

Shares in Parkin, which oversees public parking operations, jumped more than 30 per cent in their debut on Dubai bourse on Thursday after the company raised $429 million from investors in the emirate's first privatisation deal this year.

Shares rose as much as 31.4 per cent to Dh2.76 ($0.7516) apiece after the market opened compared to the initial public offering (IPO) price of Dh2.1.

Parkin's IPO was oversubscribed 165 times, attracting $71 billion in demand, a record-breaking debut for Dubai.

Gulf governments are racing to list state companies in a bid to deepen capital markets, part of a wider push to cut their reliance on oil.

Companies in Dubai have raised Dh34.5 billion in the last three years through the sale of shares on the Dubai stock exchange, according to the Dubai Securities and Exchange Higher Committee.

Parkin is the latest of six privatisations embarked upon by the government, first announced in 2021 as part of a programme to list 10 government-linked companies to attract investment to its domestic bourse.

Dubai Taxi Company's IPO late last year raised $316 million through the sale of a 25 per cent stake, which was oversubscribed 130 times.

For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 64