We use cookies and similar technologies that are necessary to operate the website. Additional cookies are used to perform analysis of website usage. By continuing to use our website, you consent to our use of cookies. For more information, please read our Cookies Policy.
Closing this modal default settings will be saved.
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is renowned for its rich cultural heritage, diverse population, and adherence to Islamic principles. In a society where Islam is the official religion and holds significant influence over daily life, inquiries regarding religious conversion, particularly frequently arise.
It is crucial for individuals contemplating such a decision to comprehend the legal ramifications and procedures for religious conversion in the UAE.
Is it Legal to Convert from Islam in the UAE?
The UAE operates under Sharia law, which is derived from Islamic teachings and principles. As a result, matters concerning religion, including conversion, are governed by Islamic law.
In the context of converting away from Islam, also known as apostasy, there are legal and social considerations to be aware of in the UAE.
Under Sharia law, apostasy is generally considered a serious offense and is not legally recognised or accepted in many Islamic countries, including the UAE.
While the UAE Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, this right is subject to limitations, particularly when it comes to converting from Islam. Apostasy is viewed as a rejection of the Islamic faith and can carry social and legal consequences.
How to Embrace Islam in the UAE?
If one wants to embrace Islam, one can do so after following the procedures of the Ministry of Justice and other local government authorities. The process may involve:
Methods of Conversion
One method to convert to Islam in the UAE is through IACAD, while the other method is through the UAE Ministry of Justice (MoJ). Both options are similar and free of charge.
Notably, the conversion process does not require physical attendance; it is conducted virtually through electronic means, either via the IACAD or MoJ websites or by phone.
Submission of Documents
All required documents, such as a copy of the passport and Emirates ID, along with two photos (with the woman wearing a headscarf), need to be submitted online through the respective authorities' websites. The authorities' websites list the necessary documents for conversion.
Meeting with a Representative or Judge
After submitting the identification documents, a meeting will be scheduled with a representative or a judge, preferably in the presence of male witnesses. During this meeting, the applicant will declare the Islamic Proclamation, confirming their faith.
Issuance of Conversion Certificate
Following the meeting, a fully attested certificate of conversion will be sent by email and made available through the online portal. The conversion process typically involves only one meeting and is relatively straightforward.
Considerations and Restrictions
It's essential to note that women who are married to non-Muslims cannot convert to Islam, as it would nullify the marriage. Additionally, at this stage, there is no requirement for Islamic courses unless one intends to marry soon afterward. In such cases, basic Islamic courses that last only a few days, may be necessary.
Updating Immigration Records
Once the conversion is complete, it is advisable to take the conversion certificate to the immigration authorities in the UAE to update the religious status on the immigration application.
Additional Rules and Regulations
Islamic law outlines specific rules and procedures for converting to Islam in the UAE. The process for those interested in embracing Islam typically involves several key steps.
Declaration of Faith (Shahada): The central requirement for conversion to Islam is the declaration of faith, known as the Shahada. This declaration affirms the belief in the oneness of Allah and the prophethood of Prophet Muhammad - Peace Be Upon Him. Reciting the Shahada publicly or in the presence of witnesses is a fundamental aspect of converting to Islam.
Islamic Education and Guidance: Many individuals seeking to convert to Islam in the UAE undergo Islamic education and guidance to deepen their understanding of the faith. This may involve attending classes, seeking guidance from religious scholars or mentors, and participating in Islamic rituals and practices.
Public Declaration of Conversion: Some individuals may choose to publicly announce their conversion to Islam, either through social media, community gatherings, or formal ceremonies. While not a legal requirement, this public declaration can be a significant step in embracing the new faith and integrating into the Muslim community.
Embracing Islamic Practices: Upon conversion to Islam, individuals are expected to adopt Islamic practices and adhere to the tenets of the faith. This includes performing the five daily prayers, fasting during Ramadan, giving to charity and upholding Islamic moral and ethical principles.
Legal and Social Considerations
While converting to Islam is generally accepted and supported in the UAE, individuals considering such a step should be aware of the legal and social implications. Apostasy, or renouncing Islam, can result in legal consequences, including potential criminal charges and social stigma.
In the UAE, apostasy is not explicitly defined in the legal code, but actions that are perceived as apostasy, such as publicly renouncing Islam or engaging in activities contrary to Islamic teachings, may be subject to legal scrutiny and social backlash.
Non-Muslim expatriates who convert to Islam may face challenges related to family relationships, employment, and social acceptance, particularly if their conversion is met with resistance from family members or community members.
Converting to Islam in the UAE is a significant step that involves following specific procedures outlined by the IACAD or the Ministry of Justice. It's important to be aware of any legal restrictions and considerations, as well as the administrative steps required to update immigration records following conversion. Overall, the process is accessible and straightforward for those seeking to embrace Islam in the UAE.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
A 60-year-old lawyer has made history by being crowned Miss Universe Buenos Aires. Lawyer and journalist Alejandra Rodríguez challenged stereotypes and warmed hearts everywhere when she was crowned the winner of the Miss Buenos Aires pageant, the Independent reported.
She is the first 60-year-old woman in beauty pageant history to win the title, marking a departure from the ageist norms that typically put youth on a pedestal.
“I am thrilled to be representing this new paradigm in beauty pageants because we are inaugurating a new stage in which women are not only physical beauty but another set of values,” she gushed to the media. “I am the first of this generation to start with this.”
“I think the judges saw my confidence and my passion to represent the women of my generation,” she continued. “I am determined to fight for the crown of Miss Universe Argentina 2024.”
Since she won the coveted Miss Buenos Aires crown, Rodríguez is reportedly a fan favourite for the Miss Argentina crown, which would allow her to compete in the international Miss Universe competition. In the past, the Miss Universe pageant strictly allowed only those between the ages of 18 and 28 to compete.
In September 2023, the Miss Universe Organisation announced that starting in 2024, there will no longer be age limits for pageant contestants. Starting in 2024, every woman over the age of 18 will be able to participate.
Rodríguez isn’t the only one to buck ageist beauty standards in the pageant world, with 47-year-old Haidy Cruz competing to represent the Dominican Republic in the 2024 Miss Universe pageant.
“Participating in a beauty pageant always fascinated me. However, due to becoming a mother at a young age, I was never able to make that dream a reality,” she explained to Hola! USA.
“Miss Universe, which promotes inclusion, offered me the chance to pursue my dream. My inner voice urged me to go for it, to experience the journey instead of just hearing about it.”
Although Cruz was met with skepticism, she has pushed forward, determined to show that her age can be an asset rather than a weakness.
“I must admit that I often ignore what others say. I remain focused on my goals and am determined to achieve them,” she shared.
“I understand that people often speak from their own limitations, and no one can live your dreams for you. Some may not be aware that the terms of the (Miss Universe) have changed. I thank God that I am not affected by what others say. I have been in the public eye for a long time and have learned how to handle criticism. I allow others to express themselves as they please, but in the end, I am the one who decides what affects me or not.”
The Miss Universe pageant will be held in Mexico on 24 September, with countries worldwide competing for the title. Contestants like Rodríguez and Cruz potentially taking the stage will prove to the general public that age is nothing but a number.
For enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
In recent years, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has witnessed significant advancements in its divorce laws, particularly in ensuring the protection and well-being of children throughout the divorce process.
With a focus on prioritising children's interests and fostering healthy co-parenting relationships, the UAE's legal landscape has evolved to promote joint custody arrangements as a means of safeguarding children's rights.
Historically, divorce laws in the UAE leaned towards granting sole custody to one parent, often the mother, with limited visitation rights for the other parent.
However, the UAE's legal framework has transformed to embrace joint custody arrangements, recognizing the importance of both parents' involvement in their children's lives post-divorce.
Joint custody, also known as shared custody, involves both parents sharing responsibility for the upbringing and care of their children. This approach acknowledges the value of maintaining strong bonds with both parents, providing children with stability, emotional support, and a sense of security during a tumultuous time.
How UAE Protects Children's Rights?
The UAE's divorce laws prioritise the child's best interests, ensuring their rights and well-being are protected throughout the divorce process. Courts in the UAE consider various factors when determining custody arrangements, including the child's age, preferences, and the ability of each parent to provide a nurturing environment.
Furthermore, the legal system in the UAE provides mechanisms to address any disputes or conflicts that may arise between parents regarding custody or visitation rights.
Mediation and counseling services are often utilised to help parents reach amicable agreements that serve the child's best interests.
Financial Support and Maintenance
Ensuring financial support for children is another crucial aspect of the UAE's divorce laws. Following divorce, both parents are obligated to provide financial support, known as child maintenance, to meet the child's needs and maintain their standard of living.
Courts in the UAE assess various factors when determining child maintenance, including each parent's income, financial resources, and the child's needs.
Child maintenance orders are enforceable by law, underscoring the importance of ensuring children receive the necessary financial support to thrive.
Case Studies
Gayatri Jayesh, a legal associate at NYK Law Firm, provided insights into the changing terrain of divorce law through two compelling case studies. In one case, a father willingly surrendered all guardianship rights, relieving himself of financial obligations towards his child and wife.
Notably, the wife, who was financially reliant on the husband, sought support under the new joint custody laws, leading to the father being mandated to contribute to the child's upbringing despite not being obliged to support the wife. This ruling demonstrated a favourable stance toward the child's welfare.
In another scenario, Gayatri discussed a contrasting case where the mother relocated abroad, obstructing the father's access to their child. However, under the principles of joint custody outlined in the updated legislation, the father was granted rights to maintain contact and spend time with the child, ensuring his continued presence in the child's life.
"These cases exemplify the evolving landscape of divorce law, where equitable distribution of responsibilities between parents, particularly in joint custody scenarios, is paramount. The judiciary's focus on the child's welfare is evident, even in situations where one parent waives their rights. Such cases underscore the importance of maintaining parental involvement for the child's benefit, as per the updated legal framework," Gayatri explained.
The UAE's latest divorce laws reflect a progressive approach towards safeguarding children's rights and well-being in the aftermath of divorce. By embracing joint custody arrangements, prioritizing the child's best interests, and ensuring adequate financial support, the UAE's legal framework aims to provide a supportive environment for children as they navigate the challenges of divorce.
Ultimately, the UAE's divorce laws aim to promote healthy co-parenting relationships that allow children to maintain loving and meaningful connections with both parents. Through these legal provisions, the UAE endeavours to create a nurturing and stable environment for children, ensuring their continued growth and development despite the challenges of divorce.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
In 2017, when Britain's largest prison, HMP Berwyn, opened its doors, it was celebrated as a £212-million beacon of offender rehabilitation.
However, just seven years later, the facility in North Wales has garnered a drastically altered reputation — now serving as the focal point of a sex scandal that has engulfed the entire Prison Service, Daily Mail reported.
Reports from last year revealed that a staggering 18 women employed at the Category C 'super-prison' for adult males, boasting a capacity of 2,100, had either been dismissed or resigned due to breaching rules regarding relationships with inmates.
Consider the case of probationary officer Ayshea Gunn, who engaged in over 1,200 phone calls, including explicit video calls, with prisoner Khuram Razaq. She even smuggled a pair of underwear into his cell, concealed in her bra.
Similarly, her colleague Emily Watson partook in a sexual act with an inmate in his cell on Christmas Day.
This misconduct is not isolated to HMP Berwyn in Wrexham, which renames cells as 'rooms', blocks as 'communities', and allows inmates to possess personal phones and laptops.
Forbidden Relationships
There has been a concerning surge in the number of female officers from across HM Prison Service found culpable of cultivating forbidden relationships.
Recently, two female prison employees appeared at Bolton Crown Court, accused of simultaneously engaging in relationships with the same inmate. Aleesha Bates, 30, and Jodie Wilkes, 27, exchanged numerous messages with a prisoner in an illicit love triangle at HMP Buckley Hall, Rochdale.
Bates, infatuated, sent explicit messages and photos, even planning a future once the inmate was released. Wilkes, an operational support worker, became involved when a contraband phone with 'dozens' of messages was discovered in the prisoner's possession.
Both women pleaded guilty to misconduct in a public office, resulting in Bates receiving a two-year and eight-month sentence, while Wilkes was given a 12-month suspended sentence for two years.
Although this issue is not exclusive to female staff in male prisons, the statistics are striking. In the three years leading to March 2023, 31 female prison staff in male prisons were dismissed, including one who bore her inmate lover's child and another who tattooed his cell number on her thigh.
This represents a more than 50 per cent increase from the 19 dismissals in the preceding four-year period, not including incidents at private prisons operated by companies like G4S, Serco and Sodexo.
During the same timeframe, five male employees in male prisons and one or two women in female prisons were dismissed for inappropriate relationships.
According to insiders, this is merely the tip of the iceberg. As a former prison officer, identified as Officer A to preserve anonymity, disclosed to the Mail: “The actual numbers will likely be much higher than reported because these incidents are often swept under the rug — if a sexual relationship comes to light, the officer is typically given the opportunity to resign. Authorities prefer to keep these matters confidential as they are deeply embarrassing.”
What Truly Unfolds Behind Prison Walls?
For an outsider, comprehending what motivates an officer to risk an affair with an inmate, knowing the potential consequences if discovered, remains baffling. The question persists: what truly unfolds behind prison walls?
Vanessa Frake, who served in the prison system for 27 years, including as governor at the challenging men's prison Wormwood Scrubs, expresses deep concern over recent revelations.
"I believe this type of behaviour has always existed in some form," she states. "However, when you see the frequency of reported incidents at places like HMP Berwyn, it raises serious questions about how this has been allowed to happen."
Frake points to changes in prison staffing policies as a contributing factor. Historically, under the 1823 Gaol Act, women's prisons were exclusively staffed by women and men's prisons by men for approximately 150 years.
It was only in the 1980s that cross-sex postings began to be advertised. Since then, the influx of women entering the prison service has rapidly increased, with approximately 40 per cent of public sector prison staff now being female.
Additionally, perceptions of prison service employment have shifted over time. "When I joined, I saw it as my lifelong career," Frake reflects. "Unfortunately, nowadays the prison service is often viewed as a temporary stopgap for young individuals who spend a couple of years before moving on to something else."
The minimum entry age for recruits has decreased from 21 (when Frake joined) to just 18. "In my view, that's too young," she asserts. "You have 18-year-olds interacting with seasoned criminals who are much older and experienced."
Frake is not alone in her concerns about younger and less experienced recruits being susceptible to manipulation. "Previously, many officers in challenging prisons were ex-military, with significant real-life experience and a lack of intimidation," notes Officer A, who departed from the system seven years ago after a decade of service in the north-east of England.
"However, there was a shift to hiring more individuals straight out of school who were eager but lacked the confidence to deal with hardened criminals," Officer A continues.
"If you're a 19 or 20-year-old, relatively small in stature, you won't have the same confidence or authority to confront these individuals, and they'll perceive you as more compliant and easier to manipulate than a seasoned officer. It's a harsh reality."
Another former officer, referred to as Officer B, also voices concerns that junior officers are being entrusted with greater responsibilities prematurely. "I speak with former colleagues who say someone with just 18 months of experience might be the most senior person on a wing, making critical decisions for the team. It's concerning."
Frake, author of "The Governor: My Life Inside Britain's Most Notorious Prisons," emphasises deficiencies in training, vetting procedures, and mentorship within the system. "It's all so rushed now," she laments.
"There's overcrowding, staff shortages, and a host of other issues, and then you have someone walking in who isn't perceived as a vulnerable young person, but merely another body expected to manage a prison wing."
Last year, Mark Fairhurst, general secretary of the Prison Officers' Association (POA), cited inadequate training and vetting as contributing factors to officers succumbing to corruption. Fairhurst highlighted that interviews are often conducted remotely via Zoom, making it challenging for supervisors to identify potential issues.
Moreover, guards are reportedly struggling to maintain control over inmates, while inmates keenly observe guards for vulnerabilities they can exploit, Officer B explains.
"To many prisoners, sexual relationships or flirtation isn't the end goal—it's a means to gain leverage for smuggling tobacco, drugs, or mobile phones. They understand that forming a personal connection can be a way to manipulate and gain influence over officers."
“Inexperienced officers, especially younger women working in a male prison environment, may feel vulnerable and targeted.”
Complex Realities
The motivations of prisoners are clear, but what drives officers to fall for these tactics?
Some observers attribute this trend to an unconscious urge to pursue unsuitable partners, perpetuating clichés about women being drawn to 'bad boys'.
However, the reality is more complex and involves a variety of factors, including attraction and a tendency to transgress boundaries. According to Officer B, inmates often employ a deliberate strategy of coercion.
"You cannot show any weakness, or you're done," Officer B advises. "I would caution recruits never to discuss their personal lives in public areas because prisoners listen and use that information against you.
It might start with a small challenge, like a game of pool for a candy bar. If you break the rules, they have leverage. The pressure builds from there."
Once a boundary is breached, others quickly follow, shifting the power dynamic from officer to prisoner. "The inmate has nothing to lose—they're already in prison," Officer B explains.
"But for the officer, their entire life is at stake. If the inmate can ruin you, you'll do anything to prevent that."
When sentencing Bates, Judge Elliot Knopf acknowledged that the prison officer had been 'ensnared' by her lover, remarking that she didn't have to accept his advances.
As for the logistics of illicit affairs within a closely monitored prison, Officer B notes that there are numerous opportunities, such as secluded rooms or cells, especially with accomplices to keep watch.
Officer A recalls an incident where a colleague was caught in a compromising situation with an inmate in a medical room, exposed by a distinctive tattoo that only a few colleagues knew about.
While offenders like the officer in that case may escape consequences, others face severe penalties for crossing the line.
Unfortunately, the focus often shifts solely to the officer, neglecting the manipulative behaviour of prisoners behind bars.
"There are legal mechanisms to address this behaviour," Vanessa emphasises.
"We need to be more assertive in holding these corrupters accountable." A Prison Service spokesperson highlighted efforts to combat corruption within the system, catching the minority of staff engaging in misconduct.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
From today onwards, you have the opportunity to be among the inaugural investors in the grocery retailer Spinneys’ initial public offering (IPO) in Dubai.
Here's what you need to know about purchasing and owning shares before its public listing on May 9 and how to proceed.
Following Spinneys' announcement of offering 900 million shares, equating to a 25 per cent stake, new investors can now subscribe to the IPO at a price range of between Dh1.42 to Dh1.53 per share. This range indicates the company's valuation at Dh5.1 billion to Dh5.5 billion upon listing.
Spinneys operates premium grocery retail supermarkets under the brands ‘Spinneys’, ‘Waitrose’, and ‘Al Fair’ in the UAE and Oman, with more than 70 stores in the UAE alone. It has reserved five per cent of the stake for individual investors, while the remainder is allocated to institutional investors.
By investing and becoming a shareholder, investors will benefit from dividend payouts. The company plans to distribute dividends in April and October each year, allocating 70 per cent of its profits to shareholders.
How to Subscribe to Spinneys Shares?
To subscribe to or purchase Spinneys’ IPO shares, you must submit a subscription application through your bank or brokerage firm in your own name (unless representing another subscriber).
Investors can participate in Spinneys’ IPO through various banks including Emirates NBD, Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, Dubai Islamic Bank, and others.
When investing, ensure you have an updated NIN and complete all necessary fields in the subscription application with the required documents.
How to Apply for a National Investor Number (NIN)?
Apply for an Investor Number instantly or by submitting the necessary documents via DFM eServices on their website.
Minimum Investment Threshold
Individual investors can subscribe with a minimum of Dh5,000, while additional investments can be made in lots of at least Dh1,000. Institutional investors have a minimum subscription of Dh1 million.
Subscription Period and Allotment
The subscription period runs from April 23 to April 29, with share allotment expected by April 30. The final offer price will be determined on May 1.
Considerations for IPO Investments
Investors should bid early in the IPO process to enhance their chances of allotment, as demand typically exceeds supply. It's essential to review the company's prospectus, financial circumstances, and risk tolerance before investing.
Overall, this IPO presents an opportunity for investors to participate in an exciting venture with potential for volatile price movements post-listing.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Congress has passed a bill that could lead to the ban or forced sale of TikTok, marking a significant move against the popular video-sharing platform's Chinese ownership over concerns related to national security.
The Senate voted 79 to 18 in favour of the measure, included as part of a larger package offering aid to Israel, Ukraine, and Taiwan. President Biden plans to sign the bill into law on Wednesday.
Once enacted, the provision will give TikTok's parent company, ByteDance, approximately nine months to sell the app or face a national ban, with the possibility of a 90-day extension.
This bipartisan measure represents a substantial threat to TikTok's US operations, which boast over 170 million users and have become a major economic and cultural force.
Lawmakers cite worries that ByteDance's ownership could potentially compromise American data security, a claim that TikTok disputes.
TikTok is expected to challenge the legislation, setting the stage for a significant legal battle asserting free speech rights for its millions of users. Despite TikTok's efforts to sway lawmakers, including urging users to contact representatives and running ads promoting data security, these actions have not deterred Congress.
The legislative push comes after years of scrutiny over TikTok's ties to China, with concerns about user data vulnerability. TikTok had proposed measures to address these concerns, but negotiations stalled, prompting lawmakers to pursue legislation empowering the executive branch to act against the platform.
Efforts to pass this bill gained momentum recently, with key lawmakers and administration officials collaborating for months. House lawmakers strategically paired the TikTok bill with legislation targeting data privacy concerns, allowing for swift advancement through Congress.
Despite bipartisan support, some lawmakers oppose the legislation, fearing government overreach and potential restrictions on online speech. However, the bill's inclusion in a broader foreign aid package facilitated its passage, demonstrating effective legislative maneuvering.
This unexpected turn of events highlights the complex process of policymaking, underscoring the intersection of national security, privacy, and free speech concerns in the digital age.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The Federal Tax Authority (FTA) has urged resident companies that obtained licences in January or February to submit their Corporate Tax applications by May 31, 2024, to avoid breaching tax regulations.
In a press release, the FTA emphasised the importance of adhering to the timelines outlined in FTA Decision No. 3 of 2024, effective from March 1, 2024.
Failure to meet the specified deadlines could result in administrative penalties, as per Cabinet Decision No. 10 of 2024.
Administrative penalties will be enforced on companies failing to comply with the requirement of filing Corporate
Tax registration applications within the designated deadlines for each category of corporate taxable entities. The decision delineates specific deadlines for both legal entities and individuals, whether residents or non-residents.
The FTA has called upon all stakeholders involved in implementing the Corporate Tax Law to familiarise themselves with the legislation, relevant guides available on the FTA’s website and associated decisions, accessible via the following link.
Emphasising the accessibility of Corporate Tax registration through the EmaraTax digital platform at all times, the FTA highlighted that the registration process entails four simple steps, taking approximately 30 minutes.
For added convenience, entities already registered for Value Added Tax (VAT) or Excise Tax can utilise their accounts on EmaraTax to complete the Corporate Tax registration process and submit the necessary documents.
Upon approval of the registration request, applicants will receive a Tax Registration Number (TRN) for Corporate Tax purposes.
The FTA stressed that unregistered entities subject to Corporate Tax must create a new user profile. New users can access the EmaraTax platform via the FTA’s e-Services portal at e-Services Portal, where they can establish an account using their email address and phone number.
Subsequently, they can proceed with registration by providing taxpayer identification and selecting the "Corporate Tax registration" option to complete the process seamlessly.
Furthermore, the FTA facilitates Corporate Tax registration requests through various Government Service Centres across the UAE, staffed by trained specialists offering electronic services adhering to government standards to ensure quality service delivery.
Upon completion of the application processes and verification of the electronically entered data at the service center, FTA officers will review the applications.
Successful applicants will receive their Tax Registration Number (TRN) via the email address provided during the Corporate Tax registration application submission.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Major General Saif Al Zari Al Shamsi, Commander-in-Chief of Sharjah Police, has announced that certificates of destruction will be issued free of charge to all those affected in the Emirate of Sharjah.
Affected individuals are encouraged to complete and submit their applications through the official platforms of the command, including the Sharjah Police Smart App and its website. The initiative supports the authorities' efforts to alleviate the burden on families affected by the floods during these exceptional circumstances.
The official further explained that field teams are working tirelessly in cooperation with all partners and stakeholders to ensure housing stability and provide maximum assistance to affected families, enabling them to return to normal life across all cities in the Emirate of Sharjah soon.
Maj. Gen. Al Shamsi emphasised that the safety and security of citizens, residents, and visitors remain a top priority. The General Command is collaborating with all partners to fulfill its national, societal, and humanitarian responsibilities.
This action aligns with the directives of the wise leadership and demonstrates commitment to its strategy, which prioritises the highest level of preparedness in crisis management.
Ajman Initiative
Ajman Police officers are taking proactive steps to issue car damage reports, eliminating the inconvenience of motorists having to navigate rainwater or visit a police station. The initiative comes in response to the recent heavy rains in the UAE, which caused flooding and stranded vehicles.
In Ajman, the Police General Command has launched a proactive service to issue loss and damage certificates to community members whose vehicles were affected by flooding. This approach aims to streamline the process for affected individuals, ensuring timely assistance without additional inconvenience m
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
In the UAE, Islamic marriages are governed by Sharia law, and specific legal requirements must be met for a marriage to be considered valid under Islamic law.
Here are the key legal requirements for conducting an Islamic marriage in the UAE.
Consent: Both parties must freely consent to the marriage without coercion or duress. Consent is fundamental for the validity of the marriage contract.
Offer and Acceptance (Ijab wa Qabul):The marriage contract (Nikah) is established through an offer from one party and acceptance from the other. This offer and acceptance must occur in the presence of witnesses and with the intention of marriage.
Mahr: The groom must offer a Mahr (dowry) to the bride as a symbol of his commitment and financial responsibility. The Mahr is agreed upon by both parties and is given to the bride as her exclusive property.
Wali (Guardian): The bride must have a Wali (guardian) who acts on her behalf during the marriage contract negotiations and ceremony. The Wali is typically the bride's father, but if he is unavailable, another male relative or a designated Islamic authority may act as her Wali.
Presence of Witnesses: The marriage contract must be witnessed by two male witnesses or one male and two female witnesses who are of sound mind and have reached the age of maturity (puberty).
Announcement: The marriage contract may be publicly announced to ensure transparency and acknowledgment within the community.
Registration: While not mandatory under Islamic law, couples may choose to register their marriage with the relevant authorities for legal recognition and documentation purposes.
It's important to note that while Islamic marriages are recognised under Sharia law in the UAE, couples may also need to fulfill additional legal requirements for civil registration and documentation purposes, particularly for matters such as inheritance, guardianship and spousal rights.
It's advisable for couples to seek guidance from legal experts or religious authorities familiar with Islamic family law in the UAE to ensure compliance with all legal requirements.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The UAE Ministry of Finance (MoF) has announced the launch of a digital public consultation to gather feedback from relevant stakeholders regarding the potential implementation of a Research and Development (R&D) Tax Incentive under the UAE Corporate Tax law.
The consultation period will run from April 19 to May 14, 2024, and can be accessed through the Ministry’s website and the UAE Government portal.
This digital public consultation underscores the Ministry’s commitment to engaging with all stakeholders, including businesses operating in the UAE, advisors, service providers, institutions, and investors.
The objective of this consultation is to assess the range of potential R&D activities conducted by businesses and corporations in the UAE, the types of activities that an R&D Tax Incentive might encompass, and the logistics of implementing and administering such an incentive.
Given that an R&D Tax Incentive would introduce a new concept in the UAE, and to familiarise stakeholders with the concept of R&D, a Guidance Paper is included as part of this consultation. This paper will outline the activities that may qualify as R&D, aligning with the definition provided in the
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) Frascati Manual.
The UAE Ministry of Finance encourages stakeholders to provide clear and concise feedback, supplemented where possible with examples, data, or other supporting information. Responses must be submitted by May 14, 2024, and will be treated confidentially, with no publication of individual responses
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Residing in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) offers numerous advantages, yet it also presents a unique set of challenges, especially concerning weather-related hazards like rain, storms and hail that can cause damage.
With the rise in extreme weather occurrences in the area, comprehending the expenses linked to insuring your vehicle or residence against such perils is essential.
Let's explore how insurance premiums are computed for home and auto coverage in the UAE, as well as the factors that influence the amount you'll be required to pay.
Home Insurance Premiums
When safeguarding your home from rain, storms and hail damage in the UAE, various elements are taken into consideration when determining insurance premiums.
The location of your property plays a significant role, as properties situated in flood-prone or hailstorm-prone areas may face higher insurance premiums due to the elevated risk of damage.
Additionally, the value of your property, encompassing its size, construction material and features, will impact your insurance premium, with higher-value properties potentially attracting higher premiums.
Moreover, your previous claims history can influence your insurance premium, as insurers may perceive you as a higher risk if you have filed claims for weather-related damage in the past, resulting in increased premiums.
Furthermore, the choice of deductibles can also impact your home insurance premium, as selecting a higher deductible can potentially lower your premium, although it means you'll have to cover more expenses out of pocket in the event of a claim.
Auto Insurance Premiums
Auto insurance premiums in the UAE are influenced by various factors such as the value of the vehicle, driving history, coverage options and location.
Vehicle Value: The make, model, age, and condition of your car significantly affect your insurance premium. Typically, newer or more expensive vehicles tend to have higher premiums due to the increased cost of repairs or replacement.
Driving History: Your history of accidents or claims affects your auto insurance premium. If you have a record of accidents, insurance companies may consider you a higher-risk driver, resulting in higher premiums.
Coverage Options: Comprehensive auto insurance policies that provide coverage for weather-related damage, such as rain, storms, and hail damage, generally have higher premiums compared to basic coverage options.
Location: The area where your vehicle is parked influences your insurance premium. Vehicles parked in flood-prone or hailstorm-prone areas are at a higher risk of damage, leading to higher insurance premiums.
Insurance companies in the UAE rely on actuarial data and risk assessment models to calculate insurance premiums.
These premiums are determined by evaluating the probability of a claim occurring and the potential expenses associated with settling such claims.
Various factors, including those mentioned earlier, are carefully considered to determine the appropriate premium for your insurance coverage.
It is crucial for both homeowners and vehicle owners in the UAE to understand the factors that impact insurance premiums for damages caused by rain, storms and hail.
By having a clear understanding of these factors, individuals can make informed decisions about their insurance coverage.
Additionally, taking proactive measures to minimize risks can help individuals strike a balance between having adequate coverage and managing insurance costs effectively.
To ensure they have the right level of protection while keeping insurance costs under control, individuals should consult with insurance providers and explore different coverage options.
By doing so, they can find the most suitable insurance policy that meets their needs and budget.
This is particularly important in the face of unpredictable weather conditions, where having appropriate coverage is essential for financial security.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The UAE experienced severe disruptions due to heavy rains that persisted from late Monday, causing widespread challenges in daily life.
However, authorities and residents joined forces to ensure public safety amidst the inclement weather.
The National Centre of Meteorology confirmed that the record rainfall over the past 24 hours until 9 pm on Tuesday, 16th April, was unprecedented in the UAE's recorded climate history.
As news of the floods circulated on social media, so did rumours linking the weather directly to the UAE's cloud seeding initiatives.
The UAE is renowned for its cloud seeding efforts aimed at increasing rainfall in arid areas. Nevertheless, baseless claims emerged online, suggesting a direct link between the heavy rainfall and cloud seeding operations.
Authorities swiftly addressed these rumours, emphasising that cloud seeding is conducted with stringent scientific protocols and safety measures.
The National Centre of Meteorology clarified that while cloud seeding can influence precipitation under specific conditions, attributing the floods solely to this practice is unsupported.
Spreading Rumours is a Serious Offence
The UAE government's response underscores the gravity with which misinformation is treated. Spreading false information that undermines public trust or jeopardises public safety is a serious offence under UAE law, carrying severe penalties such as fines, imprisonment, or deportation.
Spreading rumours on social media is strictly forbidden in the UAE, carrying severe penalties like imprisonment and hefty fines under Federal Law Number 5 of 2012. Articles 29 and 9 address malicious rumour-spreading and IP address misuse.
Recent decrees, such as Federal Decree-Law No. 34/2021 and No. 31/2021, reflect the government's commitment to combat cybercrimes.
Article 43 penalises spreading false events with fines up to Dh500,000, while Article 52 targets misinformation that disrupts public peace or threatens public interest, with fines starting from Dh100,000 and detention, especially in crises.
Rely on Verified Sources
In response to the rumours, UAE officials urged the public to rely on verified sources for information and refrain from spreading unverified claims on social media.
They emphasised the importance of responsible online behaviour, especially during emergencies, to prevent panic and misinformation from causing further harm.
To combat the proliferation of rumours, UAE authorities have intensified monitoring of social media platforms and online forums.
Those found guilty of spreading false information will face swift and stringent legal action, serving as a deterrent to others tempted to engage in similar activities.
Sharjah Rumour Mongers Warned
Meanwhile, in Sharjah, those spreading rumours were cautioned about potential legal action following the circulation of false narratives on social media claiming that two individuals had died from electrocution while walking through a flooded street in the emirate.
Major General Saif Al Zari Al Shamsi, Commander-in-Chief of Sharjah Police, denied the story circulated on social media about the supposed deaths and urged residents to stop spreading false information.
The report warned people to avoid walking on flooded areas and “touching metallic objects attached to the ground.”
The report stated two people died of electrocution in Sharjah as they tried to cross a flooded road. Both individuals reportedly “died” instantly.
“Power distribution lines are mostly built underground in the UAE, so please avoid walking through flooded areas,” the social media post warned.
Report Denied
Major General Al Shamsi confirmed that they did not register any death due to such incidents.
Sharjah Police warned against spreading false alarms and unverified stories on social media due to its negative impact on society.
“The Sharjah Police informs all fellow citizens and residents not to circulate rumours, misinformation, photos, and news that come to them through social networking sites and other means of smart communication,” Major General Al Shamsi said.
He also asked residents not to distribute such content in any way to avoid legal accountability. The police asked residents to check with authorities any news or information given to them, urging them to verify with Sharjah Police to ensure its credibility.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The Delhi High Court has recently observed that if a “lover” dies by suicide due to “love failure”, then the woman cannot be held responsible for abetting the man’s suicide while granting ‘pre-arrest’ (anticipatory) bail to a woman and a man.
An FIR was registered by a man alleging that the two applicants had abetted his son’s suicide. The woman was stated to be in a romantic relationship with the deceased while the other applicant was stated to be a common friend.
A single-judge bench of Justice Amit Mahajan, in its April 16 order, held, “If a lover commits suicide due to love failure, if a student commits suicide because of his poor performance in the examination, a client commits suicide because his case is dismissed, the lady, examiner, lawyer respectively cannot be held to have abetted the commission of suicide.
For the wrong decision taken by a man of weak or frail mentality, another person cannot be blamed as having abetted his committing suicide.”
When the body of the deceased was found by his mother in his room, a “suicide note” was also recovered in which he had written that he was ending his life because of the applicants.
Justice Mahajan said that a bare reading of Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 306 (abetment of suicide) demonstrates that there are twin requirements – suicide and abetment to commit suicide.
The court said “prima facie” from the WhatsApp chats placed on record, it appeared that the deceased was of “sensitive nature and constantly threatened” the female applicant of ending life whenever she refused to talk to him.
The court also noted that the two applicants were granted interim protection last year pursuant to which they joined the investigation.
“It is correct that the deceased had written the name of the applicants in suicide note, but, in the opinion of this court, there is nothing mentioned, as to the nature of threats in the alleged suicide note written by the deceased of such an alarming proportion so as to drive a ‘normal person’ to contemplate suicide,” the high court said.
The court noted that prima facie the alleged suicide note “only expressed a state of anguish” of the deceased towards the applicants, but it “cannot be inferred that the applicants had any intention”, that led the deceased to commit suicide.
“The allegation with respect to applicants teasing the deceased in regards to the failure of his romantic relationship with the (female) applicant…however, does not appear to be instigation which would amount to abetment of suicide in terms of Section 306 IPC. The factum of the alleged suicide note and whether there was any instigation by the applicants will be seen in trial,” the high court underscored.
It was alleged that a scuffle took place between the deceased and the applicants after he saw them together and asked why they were meeting. During the altercation, the deceased sustained injuries and the applicants allegedly damaged his car by throwing bricks. It was also said that while the deceased was leaving the place, the applicants allegedly instigated him by saying they had made “physical relations with each other and will get married soon”.
The woman argued that she had been falsely implicated, and except for her name mentioned in the alleged suicide note of the deceased, there was nothing to show that “he was prompted, forced and instigated by these persons to commit suicide”.
Meanwhile the police alleged that offence committed by the two applicants is “heinous in nature” and the names of both the applicants were written in suicide note, because of whom the deceased died by suicide. The police said that the CCTV footage from the location where the deceased had met with the applicants was also obtained in which the deceased and the male applicant can be seen in a scuffle.
The high court held that custodial interrogation of the applicants is not required. It said that in the event of arrest, the applicants will be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs50,000 each with two sureties each of the like amount subject to certain conditions.
The court also said that in case the applicants violate the conditions mentioned in the order, the police would be free to move a plea for cancelling their bail. The court, however, clarified that the observations in its order are made to decide the pre-arrest bail applications of the two persons, should not influence the outcome of the trial, and should not be taken as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Global property and casualty insurers showed "alarming" underwriting losses in 2022 as natural catastrophes increased and risk models failed to keep up, a report from consultants Capgemini said on Wednesday.
Global insured losses from natural catastrophes have been surpassing $100 billion annually in recent years, driven higher by issues such as winter storms. Industry sources see climate change and increased building in exposed areas as contributing to the losses.
The insurers' global combined ratio, a measure of claims and expenses against premium revenue, was 103 per cent in 2022, Capgemini said. A level above 100 indicates an underwriting loss. Property insurers have suffered three years of underwriting losses in the past four years, the report said.
Only 27 per cent of insurance executives surveyed believe their firms have advanced predictive modelling capabilities.
"Accurate risk prediction and pricing are becoming increasingly challenging and leading to insurability concerns," Anirban Bose, Capgemini financial services strategic business unit CEO, said in the report.
The report gathered information from 18 insurance markets, including Britain, Hong Kong, India and the United States, through polling of insurance customers and interviews with insurance executives and underwriters.
(The writer is a legal associate at NYK Law Firm, one of the top legal consultants in Dubai)
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, California, has ruled in favour of Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, dismissing some claims in multiple lawsuits alleging that he concealed the harmful effects of Facebook and Instagram on children.
The ruling is part of a broader litigation involving numerous lawsuits filed by children, accusing Meta and other social media companies of fostering addiction to their platforms.
While twenty-five of these cases sought personal liability against Zuckerberg, arguing that his public image and influential role obligated him to fully disclose the risks posed by Meta's platforms to children, Judge Rogers rejected this argument.
She stated that relying on Zuckerberg's unique understanding of Meta's products to establish a personal duty to each plaintiff would set a precedent for a duty to disclose for any public figure, which she deemed untenable.
Meta, though remaining a defendant, refrained from commenting on the ruling, maintaining its denial of any wrongdoing.
The lawsuits, filed on behalf of individual children, assert that social media usage has caused them physical, mental, and emotional distress, including anxiety, depression and in extreme cases, suicide.
The ongoing litigation seeks both damages and an end to the alleged harmful practices of the defendants. Additionally, several states and school districts have also initiated legal action against Meta, with those cases still pending.
(The writer is a legal associate at NYK Law Firm, one of the top legal consultants in Dubai)
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
It reads like a plot straight out of a crime thriller: a plan conceived in the United States, a network of professional shooters and weapon caches strategically placed across various Indian states -- all culminating in a shooting outside Bollywood actor Salman Khan's residence.
Early Sunday morning, around 5am, two men on a motorcycle fired four rounds outside Galaxy Apartments in Mumbai's Bandra, where the actor lives, before swiftly fleeing the scene. CCTV footage captured the assailants wearing caps and carrying backpacks, clearly aiming towards the actor's home. One suspect wore a white t-shirt with a black jacket and denim pants, while the other was in a red t-shirt with denim pants.
According to police sources, both men are affiliated with the notorious Lawrence Bishnoi gang. Bishnoi himself is currently incarcerated at Tihar Jail for several high-profile murder cases, including those involving musician Sidhu Moose Wala and Rajput leader Sukhdev Singh Gogamedi of the Karni Sena.
Origins of the Plot
The scheme originated in the United States, where Anmol Bishnoi, Lawrence Bishnoi's brother, tasked Rohit Godara -- a fellow gangster based in the US -- with selecting shooters. Godara, known for his extensive network of professional shooters across India, likely facilitated this operation. Anmol Bishnoi later claimed responsibility for the incident through a Facebook post, although the post's IP address was traced back to Canada, prompting suspicions of VPN usage.
Godara, a key figure in the Bishnoi gang, played a crucial role by providing weapons through associates strategically located in multiple states. Vishal (alias Kalu), chosen for his involvement in previous violent incidents orchestrated by Godara, along with another suspect, acquired a second-hand bike from Raigad district to reach Khan's residence.
Security Concerns and Past Threats
Salman Khan has been a target of threats before, particularly due to his infamous 1998 black buck hunting incident that reportedly offended the Bishnoi community. Last year, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) identified Khan as a top target on Lawrence Bishnoi's hit list.
In response to heightened security threats, Mumbai Police escalated Khan's security status to Y+ and continue to review this arrangement. Eleven security personnel, including commandos and Personal Security Officers (PSOs), accompany Khan at all times in fully bulletproof vehicles.
The investigation into the recent shooting incident involves a coordinated effort across five states --Maharashtra, Delhi, Rajasthan, Haryana and Punjab. The involvement of multiple agencies, including the Maharashtra ATS and the NIA, underscores the gravity of the situation.
While the case has been transferred to Mumbai's Crime Branch, there has been no formal request to involve the ATS or NIA in the investigation. The sale of the motorcycle used in the crime is currently under scrutiny, as authorities continue to pursue leads to apprehend those responsible.
1998 Blackbuck Poaching Case
During the shooting of his blockbuster movie Hum Saath Saath Hain, Salman Khan allegedly killed two blackbucks in Bhagoda ki Dhani located in Kankani village near Jodhpur in Rajasthan. He was charged under section 9/51 of the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.
In what came to be known as the 1998 Blackbuck Case, his co-actors Saif Ali Khan, Sonali Bendre, Neelam and Tabu were also charged under Section 51 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act and under Section 149 (unlawful assembly) of the Indian Penal Code. However, they were all acquitted after being given the benefit of doubt.
Two other people, namely Dinesh Gawr and Dushyant Singh, were also accused of being with the actors when the poaching allegedly took place.
What Really Happened?
Back in October 1998, the film Hum Saath Saath Hain was being shot in Jodhpur. It has been alleged that the actors were driving around the Kankani Village in a gypsy car when they came across a herd of blackbucks and Salman Khan shot two of them. On realising that they might have been seen, the group of actors allegedly fled the scene.
Blackbucks are sacred to the Bishnoi tribe of Rajasthan; they protect the species for religious reasons. Poonamchand Bishnoi, a member of the sect, claims to have witnessed the event taking place. Bishnoi later testified against the group of actors, saying that he saw the actors fleeing away from the scene.
(The writer is a legal associate at NYK Law Firm, one of the top legal consultants in Dubai)
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The UK government is reportedly preparing to announce plans to prohibit children under the age of 16 from accessing social media platforms within a few weeks. Downing Street is expected to unveil proposals for stricter age limits on apps such as Instagram, Facebook and Snapchat as part of a consultation aimed at enhancing online safety for children, as per The Sunday Times.
The consultation will gather feedback from parents on the appropriate age for children to start using social media, with the suggested range being between 13 and 16 years old. Currently, several platforms allow membership for children as young as 13, including Meta, which recently lowered the minimum age for WhatsApp use in Europe to 13.
The decision was criticised by Smartphone Free Childhood as an instance of “a tech giant prioritising shareholder profits over children’s safety”. A Meta spokesperson stated, “We provide all users with options to control who can add them to groups, and when you receive a message from an unknown number for the first time, we offer the option to block and report the account.”
This development follows a call from Esther Ghey, mother of murdered 16-year-old transgender girl Brianna Ghey, for a social media ban for under-16s. In addition to potential social media restrictions, the government is contemplating banning under-16s from purchasing smartphones. Currently, individuals under 18 need parental consent to obtain phone contracts, but they can buy pay-as-you-go phones independently.
The proposed changes would limit this option for under-16s, although parents would still be able to buy phones for their children. A spokesperson for the Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology stated: “We do not comment on speculation. Our commitment to making the UK the safest place for children online is firm, as demonstrated by our world-leading Online Safety Act.”
(The writer is a legal associate at NYK Law Firm, one of the top legal consultants in Dubai)
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Court cases are mounting in Europe as several NGOs are taking the unprecedented step of suing governments over weapons exports to Israel amid allegations of war crimes in Gaza or genocide, claims Israel denies.
A recent ruling by a Dutch court ordering the government to halt the export of F-35 parts to Israel has sparked similar legal actions in Denmark last month and in France this week.
The Dutch government has appealed the decision, which will be reviewed by the Supreme Court later this year.
"We are greatly inspired by the Dutch court case," said Lars Koch, Secretary-General of Oxfam Denmark, one of the four NGOs involved in the lawsuit against the Danish police and Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
France quickly followed suit as eight NGOs, including Amnesty International, filed an urgent summons with the administrative court of Paris on Thursday. The judge has 48 hours to respond to their request to suspend weapons exports to Israel due to concerns that the Israeli military might use them for war crimes in Gaza.
Aymeric Elluin, Arms Transfers Advocacy Officer at Amnesty International France, anticipates a response early next week. "It's an unprecedented request, so the judge's response is uncertain at this stage," Elluin said.
Defense Minister Sebastien Lecornu has downplayed the significance of French weapons exports to Israel. In 2022, they represented €15 million ($16 million) – equivalent to 0.2 per cent of all of France's weapons sales abroad that year.
"No licences will be granted to Israel for weapons of war to be used in ground operations in Gaza," Lecornu said last month.
Cases could Drag on for Years
Court cases in Denmark and France could drag on for years. However, for those involved, the outcome is less critical than fostering public debate on arms transfers to Israel as soon as the lawsuits are filed.
Other efforts to increase pressure on Israel at the European level include requests from Ireland and Spain to the EU Commission to review a trade agreement amid concerns that the human rights clause has been violated.
There has been no response to the request made in February so far. The bloc is divided over the conflict, which limits its diplomatic influence. Meanwhile, court cases are also accumulating in Berlin as human rights lawyers filed a lawsuit on Friday against a German government decision to approve the export of 3,000 anti-tank weapons to Israel, the second such case this month.
For activists, it's crucial that small EU countries like Denmark uphold the rules-based order. "We are also leveraging the court case for our ongoing campaign for a ceasefire and an immediate halt to arms exports to Israel," said Koch.
Crowdfunding Campaign
Oxfam Denmark launched a crowdfunding campaign on the same day they announced the lawsuit on March 3 to cover legal costs. They have raised 1.5 million DKK ($210,000) from private donors so far.
Fifteen Danish companies supply components for F-35 fighter jets exported to the US and then on to third countries, including Israel. "We argue that you cannot export responsibility for the end use of these weapons," Koch said.
In the UK, the High Court dismissed a legal challenge in February against the Department for Business and Trade over similar concerns of potential breaches of international humanitarian law.
The lawsuit was brought by two NGOs, including the Palestinian human rights organization Al Haq, which is also involved in the Danish case. However, activists hope the dismissal will be overturned at a hearing later this month, allowing the case to proceed.
(The writer is a legal associate at NYK Law Firm, one of the top legal consultants in Dubai)
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Kuwait, with its rich history and vibrant culture, is at a pivotal juncture where tradition converges with modernity. As the nation progresses, its legal framework must also evolve to align with the demands of a dynamic society.
Developing law in Kuwait is a multifaceted endeavour that blends tradition with innovation and harmonises local values with global standards. This article delves into the process of legal development in Kuwait and provide insights into navigating this complex landscape.
Understanding Kuwait's Legal System
Before exploring legal development, it's essential to grasp the foundations of Kuwait’s legal system. Kuwait follows a civil law system heavily influenced by Islamic law (Sharia).
The Constitution of Kuwait serves as the supreme law, defining the framework of governance and fundamental rights. Kuwait has a dual court system comprising civil courts and Sharia courts, each with jurisdiction over specific matters.
Factors Driving Legal Evolution
Several factors contribute to the evolution of law in Kuwait. The society is diverse, with a blend of traditional values and modern aspirations.
Social changes such as urbanisation, globalisation, and demographic shifts influence legal needs and expectations.
Economic growth, driven by oil reserves and diversification efforts, necessitates legal frameworks to regulate commerce, investment, and employment. As a member of the United Nations and signatory to various international treaties, Kuwait is committed to aligning its legal framework with international standards.
Addressing Contemporary Challenges
The digital revolution has transformed governance and law. Developing laws to address cybercrime, data protection, and e-commerce is imperative in the digital age.
Developing law in Kuwait requires a systematic approach that balances legal tradition with contemporary needs. It begins with thorough research and consultation with experts, stakeholders, and the public to understand societal needs and concerns.
Drafting new laws or amending existing ones involves careful consideration of constitutional principles, international norms, and societal expectations to ensure clarity, coherence, and enforceability.
Role of the National Assembly
Kuwait’s National Assembly plays a pivotal role in the legislative process. Proposed laws undergo review and debate, allowing elected representatives to scrutinize and refine legal provisions.
Engaging the public enhances transparency and legitimacy through consultations, hearings and feedback mechanisms.
Investing in Legal Education and Capacity Building
Developing a robust legal framework requires investing in legal education and capacity building. Training programmes for lawmakers, judges, lawyers and legal professionals ensure a competent workforce capable of interpreting and applying the law effectively.
Challenges and Opportunities
Despite progress, Kuwait faces challenges like bureaucratic inefficiencies and judicial backlog, presenting opportunities for innovation, collaboration, and reform.
Embracing change, fostering dialogue, and upholding the rule of law are essential for navigating legal development while safeguarding Kuwait’s values and aspirations.
By adopting a strategic approach and collective effort, Kuwait can continue to evolve its legal framework to meet the evolving needs of its people and the demands of the modern world.
(The writer is a law associate at NYK Law Firm, one of the top legal consultants in Dubai)
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Qatar Airways has evaded a lawsuit in Australia brought by five women who underwent strip-searches and invasive examinations at Doha airport.
According to BBC, the incident occurred after a baby was discovered abandoned in an airport bin in 2020, prompting outrage and condemnation from various nations.
The women sought damages for what they alleged was "unlawful physical contact" and false imprisonment resulting in mental health issues such as depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.
However, their claim was dismissed by Justice John Halley of the Federal Court of Australia on the basis that Qatar Airways could not be held liable under the Montreal Convention, a treaty governing airline liability for passenger injury or death.
Justice Halley also ruled that the airline's staff had no influence over the actions of Qatari police or the examining nurses, deeming the proposition otherwise as "implausible." The lawsuit was also struck down against Qatar's aviation regulator due to immunity from foreign prosecution.
Nonetheless, the women are permitted to pursue their claim against Matar, a subsidiary of Qatar Airways responsible for operating Hamad International Airport.
They argue that Matar employees failed in their duty of care by not preventing the invasive examinations.
The affected women have expressed that they did not consent to the examinations and were not informed of the reasons behind them.
One of them likened the experience to feeling "raped," while another believed she was being kidnapped.
Qatari officials responded to the incident by assuring that the abandoned baby was being cared for and condemned the treatment of the female passengers as not reflective of Qatar's laws or values.
Despite a criminal prosecution in Qatar resulting in a suspended jail term for an airport official, the women proceeded with the lawsuit due to perceived inaction from Doha.
Their goal, as articulated by one of the women, is to seek a formal apology from Qatar and ensure changes in airport procedures to prevent similar incidents in the future, aiming to spare other women from such "demoralising, horrendous treatment."
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The Department of Municipalities and Transport – Abu Dhabi (DMT) has issued Administrative Decision No. (48) of 2024 to regulate the civil use of unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) in Abu Dhabi.
The decision aims to ensure the safe operation of drones and to manage, regulate and monitor drone activities within the emirate. The regulation seeks to standardise drone systems and procedures, promote Abu Dhabi as a leading hub for the drone industry, enhance smart transportation, foster innovation in aviation and attract investment in the local drone sector.
The decision applies to all types of drone-related activities in Abu Dhabi, including design, manufacturing, assembly, modification, inspection, maintenance, simulation systems development, training, qualification, clubs, infrastructure development, airports, fuelling stations, energy and other associated uses, except for those exempted under Federal Decree by Law No. (26) of 2022 on Regulating the Civil Use of Drones and Related Activities.
DMT assumes several responsibilities under this legislation, including oversight, issuance of permits and certificates, establishment of rules for drone flight conditions, setting standards for drone take-off and landing sites and developing guidelines for drone-specific infrastructure like airports and runways in coordination with relevant local and federal authorities.
Additionally, DMT will conduct awareness workshops for drone owners and operators, covering both individuals and entities. These sessions will explain the procedures and requirements for drone operations and associated activities within Abu Dhabi, aligning with administrative directives, civil aviation regulations and technical guidelines governing drone systems in the emirate.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
A video capturing the moment Meghan Brown, a former analyst at JP Morgan, pushed open a glass door, causing it to shatter and injure her, has garnered widespread attention online.
Brown, aged 36 at the time, received a hefty compensation of $35 million following the incident which occurred at a building in New York City in 2015, leaving her with permanent brain damage.
The video footage, shared by a user named Collin Rugg, depicts Brown attempting to exit a building when the glass door unexpectedly breaks upon contact, causing her distress. The clip also shows bystanders rushing to her aid.
Rugg's caption accompanying the video explained: "Former JP Morgan analyst awarded $35 million after a glass door shattered on her in Manhattan. Meghan Brown was leaving a physical therapy appointment in 2015 when the glass door shattered on her."
Detailing the aftermath, Rugg stated: "Brown says the event caused a traumatic brain injury which she says ruined her career. The woman was out of a job for a year due to the incident and returned to JP Morgan where she worked until getting fired in 2021."
Rugg informed that "Jurors awarded Brown $35,184,208 in damages after determining that building owner 271 Madison Co.’s negligence was 'a substantial factor in causing' the injury."
Commentary on the video varied among users, with one expressing skepticism about the compensation amount, stating, "that will be a fun appeal. Does she deserve something? Sure. But 35 million??? Nope."
Another user remarked, "She might as well have won the lottery." According to The New York Post, Brown suffered from various health issues post-incident, including Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), memory decline, sensitivity to light, focus and vocabulary issues, permanent headaches, neck pain, balance problems and distorted depth perception.
Reports also mentioned Brown's necessity to acquire a service dog to prevent her from falling.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The Dubai Centre for Family Businesses, which operates under the umbrella of Dubai Chambers, has developed a new guide aimed at helping family businesses cultivate sustainable growth through the implementation of effective corporate governance.
The ‘Corporate Governance Guidelines for Family Businesses’ toolkit focuses on governance structures, governance frameworks and key regulatory guidelines for family businesses.
The launch of the new toolkit reflects the centre’s ongoing commitment to providing practical guides on the main topics of interest to family enterprises.
It follows the publication of six guides during 2023 addressing key areas affecting the continuity of family-run businesses and aims to support their long-term sustainability and competitiveness.
Mohammad Ali Rashed Lootah, President and CEO of Dubai Chambers, commented: “Family businesses are an essential part of our economy, contributing significantly to Dubai’s non-oil GDP and employing a substantial proportion of the country’s workforce.”
He added: “These companies play a vital role in driving economic growth, and we remain committed to encouraging them to follow best practices in corporate governance that support their continuity and ensure the successful transition of leadership between generations.
The success of family businesses boosts economic activity and contributes to achieving the goals of the Dubai Economic Agenda (D33), which aims to double the size of the emirate’s economy over the coming decade.”
The new guide comes as a continuation of the centre’s efforts to provide effective tools to support family businesses.
It underlines the importance of corporate governance for family businesses, as well as highlighting the main bodies entrusted with family business governance including, family councils, the board of directors and board committees; key governing documents; and the main requirements for board committees and meetings.
Family businesses account for around 90 per cent of the total number of private businesses in the UAE and contribute around 40 per cent of the national GDP.
With an estimated compound annual growth rate of 5.5 per cent in new wealth, the BCG Global Wealth Report 2023 has forecast that private financial wealth in the country will reach US$ 1.3 trillion by 2027, a surge that is expected to drive significant expansion within the family business sector.
Supporting the sustainability and growth of family businesses is crucial in ensuring they remain key contributors to the nation’s economy.
Launched under the umbrella of Dubai Chambers in May 2023, the Dubai Centre for Family Businesses is entrusted with ensuring the growth and long-term sustainability of family businesses in Dubai.
The centre aims to further develop this vital sector and enhance its economic contribution to support the emirate’s future development plans.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Google has agreed to dispose of billions of data records to resolve a lawsuit alleging that it clandestinely tracked the Internet activities of users who believed they were browsing in private.
The terms of the settlement were submitted in the federal court in Oakland, California, pending approval by US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.
Estimated by plaintiffs' attorneys at over $5 billion and potentially as high as $7.8 billion, the settlement does not entail any damages paid by Google. However, individual users retain the right to sue the company for damages.
Initiated in 2020, the class action encompasses millions of Google users who employed private browsing since June 1, 2016.
Users contended that Google's analytics, cookies and apps enabled its subsidiary Alphabet's new tab unit to improperly monitor individuals who set Google Chrome browser to "Incognito" mode and other browsers to "private" browsing mode.
This allegedly transformed Google into an "unaccountable repository of information," granting access to details ranging from users' social circles, culinary preferences, leisure pursuits, shopping tendencies, to the most intimate and potentially sensitive online searches.
According to the settlement terms, Google will enhance disclosures regarding its data collection practices in "private" browsing, a process already underway. Additionally, it will allow Incognito users to block third-party cookies for a period of five years.
Plaintiffs' lawyers highlighted that this would result in Google gathering less data from users' private browsing sessions, consequently reducing its revenue from data monetisation.
Jose Castaneda, a spokesman for Google, expressed the company's satisfaction with the settlement, branding the lawsuit as meritless and emphasising that Google never associates data with individual users in Incognito mode.
Castaneda reiterated Google's commitment to deleting obsolete technical data that was never linked to an individual or utilised for personalisation.
David Boies, representing the plaintiffs, hailed the settlement as a pivotal move towards demanding transparency and accountability from dominant technology entities.
A preliminary settlement was reached in December, forestalling a scheduled trial on February 5, 2024, with terms undisclosed at the time. Plaintiffs' attorneys intend to subsequently pursue unspecified legal fees payable by Google.
Alphabet, Google's parent company, is headquartered in Mountain View, California.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Dubai is gearing up to host a groundbreaking event this month with the inaugural Photonics Middle East conference set to take place from April 19 to 22, 2024.
Expected to draw in 400 scientists and researchers from around the world, the event will be held at the prestigious Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences in Healthcare City.
Dr PT Ajith Kumar, the Technology Chair and Convener of the event, emphasised the significance of this gathering amidst a pivotal moment in science and technology.
"The event arrives at a crucial juncture as we witness a transformative shift from electronics to photonics," remarked Dr Kumar. Photonics, encompassing the science and technology of light and light-based devices, now permeates every facet of human existence, from information communication technology and artificial intelligence to defence and aerospace, education and healthcare and green energy production and manufacturing.
Photonics Middle East uniquely balances the interests of research and development, industry and academia, according to a press note issued by the organisers.
The conference's focal points span an array of critical areas including photonics in medicine and medical diagnostics, artificial intelligence, robotics and communication, green energy, nano-photonics, photonic chips and integrated optics, aerospace, marine and offshore, manufacturing and fabrication, bio-photonics, photonic structures and materials, laser holography and diffractive optics, lasers for healthcare, immersive learning and Metaverse, document security and identification, photonic crystals and materials, precision non-destructive testing and ultra-high density information storage and archiving.
In addition to insightful research presentations by leading global experts, the conference will feature four enriching workshops tailored for students and participants, along with an exhibition titled Photonics Innovation and Solutions.
A key feature of the event is the Photonics Business Conclave, anticipated to draw policy makers, industry leaders, R&D professionals, healthcare experts and institutions, academic institutions and start-ups.
Photonics Middle East is co-organised by Photonics Innovations, Dubai, and Photonyx Global, USA, with support from various departments and institutions.
The gathering promises to be a defining moment in the advancement of photonics, offering a platform for collaboration, innovation and transformative progress on a global scal
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
In today's digital age, data protection has become a critical concern for organisations across all sectors, especially those operating in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
With the UAE's stringent data privacy regulations impacting businesses collecting or processing personal data within its jurisdiction, it's crucial for organisations to take proactive measures to establish or enhance their data protection programs.
Below are key steps that organisations should take to ensure compliance and effectively navigate the landscape of data protection in the UAE.
1 Appointing a Data Protection Officer (DPO)
One of the initial and crucial steps is the appointment of a Data Protection Officer (DPO). This individual plays a pivotal role in overseeing data privacy compliance within the organisation.
Whether the DPO is an internal employee or outsourced to a third party with expertise in data privacy, having a designated DPO showcases the organisation's commitment to upholding privacy standards and cooperating with regulatory requirements.
2 Establishing Comprehensive Consent Mechanisms
Organisations must develop robust consent forms and disclosures for processing personal data. While obtaining explicit consent is fundamental, the law also specifies instances where data processing can occur without consent, such as for public interest, legal proceedings, public health protection, compliance with other laws, and specific limited purposes. Ensuring clear and comprehensive consent mechanisms is essential for compliance.
3 Reviewing Vendor and Supplier Contracts
Conducting a thorough review of contracts with vendors and suppliers is imperative. Organisations need to identify agreements involving data sharing and ensure that these parties adhere to UAE data protection laws. Contractual revisions should reflect data privacy compliance requirements and delineate liabilities effectively, thereby mitigating risks associated with data processing by third parties.
4 Creating Data Mapping and Processing Records
Maintaining a transparent data map and a Record of Processing Activity is crucial for compliance documentation. These records outline the specific processes and systems that utilise personal data, aiding in accountability and demonstrating adherence to regulatory standards.
5 Developing a Comprehensive Breach Response Plan
Organisations should establish a robust breach response plan along with notification procedures. Being able to promptly detect data breaches, initiate response protocols, notify regulators and affected individuals and conduct thorough data analysis are critical components of compliance readiness.
6 Implementing Privacy Impact Assessments
Conducting Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs), Vendor Assessment Questionnaires, and Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) are essential for evaluating privacy risks and obligations. These assessments inform policy development, technology assessments, and decision-making regarding partnerships and data processing activities.
7 Strengthening Information Security Measures
Collaboration with IT teams is essential in implementing robust information security and access control mechanisms. These measures are instrumental in preventing unauthorized access, safeguarding data integrity, and ensuring compliance with data protection regulations.
8 Streamlining DSAR Processes
Efficient Data Subject Access Request (DSAR) processes are vital for addressing data subject inquiries promptly and effectively. Leveraging technology workflows, audit trails, and standardised procedures enhances the efficiency and transparency of DSAR handling.
9 Addressing Cross-Border Data Transfers
Organisations engaged in cross-border data transfers must assess the adequacy of data protection in recipient jurisdictions. Special controls, safeguards and documentation may be required to facilitate compliant data transfers while ensuring the protection of personal data.
10 Conducting Ongoing Staff Training
Continuous staff training is crucial for cultivating a culture of data privacy compliance within the organisation. Regular training sessions enable employees to stay updated on evolving regulations, best practices and organisational policies related to data protection.
In conclusion, navigating data protection in the UAE requires a comprehensive and proactive approach from organisations. By implementing these essential steps, organisations can enhance their data protection posture, build stakeholder trust and effectively navigate the complex regulatory landscape in the UAE.
(Thw writer is a legal associate at Dubai-based NYK Law Firm)
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Former US president Donald Trump has posted a $175 million bond in his New York civil fraud case, as revealed in a court document on Monday, thereby avoiding potential asset seizures while awaiting the appeals process.
Previously, a New York appeals court had reduced the bond requirement from the original $454 million to $175 million, granting Trump a 10-day period to meet this revised sum. Originally facing the risk of asset seizure if unable to fulfill the half-billion-dollar bond, Trump secured a significant reduction and swiftly found a company, Knight Specialty Insurance Company from California, to provide the required bond, as confirmed in a court document released on Monday.
In response to the appellate division's decision, Trump stated, "I greatly respect the decision... I will post $175 million in cash and bonds or security or whatever is necessary very quickly, within the 10 days."
This development marks a temporary reprieve for the 77-year-old real estate tycoon, who, despite securing the Republican nomination once again, faces legal challenges stemming from allegations of fraud.
The case revolves around accusations that Trump and his two adult sons misrepresented the value of assets, including Trump Tower and a building at 40 Wall Street, to obtain favourable bank loans and insurance terms.
Trump, along with his family company, was found guilty in a non-jury trial by Judge Arthur Engoron, resulting in a $454 million judgment against him. While Trump is appealing this order, he remains under scrutiny for various alleged crimes, including attempting to overturn the 2020 election and falsifying business records.
In a separate case, Trump is accused of making pre-election hush money payments to a porn star, Stormy Daniels. The presiding judge has expanded a gag order to include family members of those involved, following Trump's attacks on the judge and his family members on social media platform Truth Social.
Facing a criminal trial scheduled to begin on April 15, Trump has expressed willingness to testify. This trial marks a historic event as the first-ever criminal trial of a former US president. Trump's legal battles continue to mount, with four criminal indictments and 88 felony counts against him, reflecting the extensive legal challenges he currently faces.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Microsoft has announced plans to globally separate its chat and video app, Teams, from its Office product, following antitrust scrutiny.
The decision comes six months after the company unbundled the two products in Europe to avoid potential fines from the European Commission, which has been investigating Microsoft's tying of Office and Teams since a complaint filed in 2020 by Slack, a competing workspace messaging app owned by Salesforce.
Teams, originally added to Office 365 for free in 2017, replaced Skype for Business and saw increased popularity during the pandemic, particularly for its video conferencing capabilities. However, rivals argued that bundling the products gave Microsoft an unfair advantage.
To address concerns and provide clarity to customers, Microsoft has decided to extend the separation of Teams from Office globally, a move initially implemented in the European Economic Area and Switzerland on October 1 last year. The decision aims to offer multinational companies more flexibility in their purchasing decisions across different regions.
Analysts suggest that while Microsoft's previous concessions in response to antitrust scrutiny, notably regarding Internet browsers in 1998, led to significant changes in the market, the impact of separating Teams from Office might not be as dramatic given the entrenched nature of enterprise products like Teams.
Despite the separation, Microsoft's user base for Teams has remained relatively stable, according to data from Sensor Tower. The company has also introduced new commercial Microsoft 365 and Office 365 suites without Teams for regions outside the European Economic Area and Switzerland, along with standalone Teams offerings for enterprise customers in those regions.
Customers have the option to continue with their current licensing agreements or switch to the new offerings, with prices for Office without Teams ranging from $7.75 to $54.75 for existing customers and $5.25 for standalone Teams. However, exact pricing may vary by country and currency.
While Microsoft's efforts to unbundle Teams from Office may not fully alleviate antitrust concerns, proactive measures could potentially influence regulators' stance. The company faces the risk of significant fines, up to 10 per cent of its global annual turnover, if found guilty of antitrust breaches, having accumulated 2.2 billion euros ($2.4 billion) in EU antitrust fines over the past decade.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
In today's dynamic media landscape, mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are common strategies employed by companies to expand market presence, acquire new technologies and capitalise on emerging opportunities.
However, given the critical role of intellectual property (IP) in the media industry, conducting thorough due diligence is essential to mitigate risks and ensure the success of M&A transactions.
This study provides a detailed analysis of the due diligence process concerning intellectual property rights (IPR) in media mergers and acquisitions.
Intellectual property assets, including copyrights, trademarks, patents, trade secrets and proprietary technologies, are invaluable assets in the media sector.
They underpin content creation, distribution, licensing, and revenue generation. Therefore, understanding and safeguarding these assets are paramount in M&A transactions to preserve value and mitigate legal and financial risks.
What are the Objectives of IP Due Diligence?
What ate the Key Components of IP Due Diligence?
1. Identification of Intellectual Property Assets: Conduct a comprehensive inventory of all IP assets, including content, brands, technologies, and patents.
2. Ownership and Title Verification: Verify ownership rights, chain of title, and validity of registrations for each IP asset.
3. Assessment of Rights and Licenses: Review agreements, licenses, and contracts to ascertain the scope of rights granted and any restrictions or obligations.
4. Evaluation of IP Portfolio: Assess the strength, uniqueness, and marketability of each IP asset in relation to the target company's business objectives.
5. Risk Analysis and Compliance: Identify legal, regulatory, and infringement risks associated with IP assets and assess compliance with applicable laws and standards.
6. Litigation and Enforcement History: Review past and pending litigation, disputes, or enforcement actions related to IP rights and evaluate potential liabilities.
7. Technology and Innovation: Evaluate the target company's R&D activities, innovation pipeline, and proprietary technologies to assess the value of IP assets.
8. Complexities of Digital Rights Management: With the proliferation of digital content, managing rights and licensing agreements becomes increasingly complex.
9. Globalisation and Cross-Border Issues: M&A transactions involving media companies often involve international IP rights, requiring careful consideration of cross-border regulations and jurisdictional issues.
10. Rapid Technological Advancements: Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, virtual reality, and blockchain pose new challenges and opportunities in IP due diligence.
11. Cultural and Creative Considerations: Media content often involves cultural sensitivities and creative nuances that must be addressed in IP due diligence.
Intellectual property due diligence is a critical aspect of M&A transactions in the media industry, ensuring that buyers understand the value, risks, and opportunities associated with IP assets.
By conducting thorough due diligence, companies can mitigate risks, protect their investments, and position themselves for long-term success in the competitive media landscape.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Corporal punishment is strictly prohibited by law in the UAE. As debates on the topic gain global attention, questions regarding its legality and ethical ramifications have emerged. Given its diverse cultural makeup and contemporary legal framework, the UAE is thrust into the heart of this discourse. Let's delve into the specifics of corporal punishment laws in the UAE.
Legal Framework: In the UAE, it is illegal to use physical violence or other forms of abuse to discipline a child. This includes hitting, slapping, punching, or any other physical act that causes harm. Parents who engage in physical violence towards their child can face criminal charges, including assault and child abuse.
Article 32 of the UAE's Constitution guarantees the protection of human dignity, and any form of physical harm or torture is considered a violation of this fundamental principle. Additionally, the UAE is a signatory to international treaties and conventions, such as the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, which further reinforce its commitment to prohibiting corporal punishment.
Penal Code: The UAE Penal Code explicitly criminalises any act of physical harm or assault against individuals, including corporal punishment. Article 282 of the Penal Code states that anyone who inflicts physical harm on another person shall be liable for punishment, with penalties ranging from fines to imprisonment, depending on the severity of the offense.
Child Rights: In line with international standards, the UAE prioritises the protection of children's rights and welfare. The country ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), which prohibits any form of violence or abuse against children, including corporal punishment. As such, corporal punishment in schools, homes, or any other setting is strictly prohibited under UAE law.
Recent Developments: In recent years, the UAE has taken steps to strengthen its legal framework to safeguard human rights and prevent instances of abuse or violence. In 2016, the UAE issued Federal Law No. 3 of 2016 on Child Rights, which provides comprehensive legal protection for children and prohibits any form of violence or exploitation, including corporal punishment.
Legal Interpretation and Enforcement: While the legal framework in the UAE unequivocally prohibits corporal punishment, challenges remain in terms of interpretation and enforcement of the law. Instances of corporal punishment may still occur in certain settings, such as schools or households, raising concerns about accountability and oversight.
Corporal punishment is unequivocally prohibited under UAE law, which emphasises the protection of human dignity and the rights of individuals, including children. The UAE's legal framework, supported by international treaties and conventions, reaffirms its commitment to preventing any form of physical harm or abuse and promoting a safe and inclusive society for all.
As the UAE continues to strengthen its legal framework and enforcement mechanisms, it remains crucial for stakeholders, including government authorities, educators and civil society organisations, to collaborate in raising awareness and promoting a culture of respect for human rights and non-violence in all aspects of society.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The real estate market in the UAE has experienced significant growth, attracting investors globally. An important aspect of property ownership in the UAE is having a thorough understanding of the legal framework governing property mortgages.
It is essential for property owners, investors and lenders involved in real estate dealings in the UAE to have a solid grasp of UAE property mortgage laws.
By familiarising themselves with the fundamental concepts, processes and legal considerations highlighted in this article, stakeholders can effectively navigate mortgage transactions and safeguard their interests in the ever-evolving UAE property sector.
Key Concepts of UAE Property Mortgage Law
Definition: A mortgage is a legal contract where a property owner (mortgagor) pledges their property as collateral to secure a loan from a lender (mortgagee). The lender maintains a lien on the property until the loan, including principal and interest, is fully repaid.
Mortgage Registration: All property mortgages in the UAE must be registered with the respective emirate's land department to be legally binding. This process involves submitting the mortgage agreement and necessary documents to the land department and paying the required registration fees.
Mortgage Priority: The priority of a mortgage determines its position concerning other creditors' claims on the property. Typically, mortgages are ranked based on their registration date and time with the land department, with earlier registrations holding higher priority.
Rights and Obligations: Property mortgages in the UAE grant specific rights and responsibilities to both the mortgagor and mortgagee. While the mortgagor retains property ownership and possession, the mortgagee has the authority to enforce the mortgage in case of default by the mortgagor.
Procedures for Property Mortgage Transactions
Negotiation and Agreement: The process commences with negotiations between the mortgagor and mortgagee to establish the terms and conditions of the mortgage, such as loan amount, interest rate, repayment schedule, and other relevant terms.
Execution of Mortgage Agreement: Upon reaching a mutual understanding, the parties proceed to execute a mortgage agreement that outlines the terms of the mortgage. This agreement must adhere to the legal requirements set forth by UAE law and must be signed by all parties involved.
Registration Process with Land Department: Following the execution of the mortgage agreement, along with the submission of necessary documentation, the agreement is presented to the land department of the relevant emirate for registration. Once registered, the mortgage is officially documented in the land registry, serving as notice to third parties regarding the mortgagee's stake in the property.
Funds Disbursement: Upon successful registration, the mortgagee releases the loan funds to the mortgagor in accordance with the agreed-upon terms. The mortgagor can utilise these funds for property acquisition, development, or other purposes, as outlined in the mortgage agreement.
Legal Considerations for Property Stakeholders
Conducting Due Diligence: Prior to finalising a mortgage agreement, property owners and investors should conduct thorough due diligence on the property, lender and mortgage terms to mitigate risks and ensure compliance with legal regulations.
Sharia Compliance: In instances where Islamic financing structures like Murabaha or Ijara are utilised, all parties must ensure adherence to Sharia principles governing financial and property transactions.
Default and Foreclosure Awareness: Property owners should understand the implications of defaulting on mortgage payments, which could lead to foreclosure proceedings initiated by the mortgagee to recover the outstanding debt by selling the mortgaged property.
(The writer is a legal associate at Dubai-based NYK Law Firm)
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The International Court of Justice, the world's foremost legal body, has issued a directive to Israel to ensure that essential food supplies and urgent humanitarian aid reach the people of Gaza promptly.
The court's order, issued on Thursday, highlights the alarming onset of famine in the region following nearly six months of conflict. Repeated warnings from the United Nations have underscored the imminent threat of a "man-made famine" in Gaza, attributing the dire situation to
Israel's restrictions on aid, which have resulted in alarming levels of hunger and deprivation. According to the Hague-based UN court, the situation has escalated beyond a mere risk of famine; famine conditions are already prevalent among Palestinians in Gaza. The court has urged Israel to take immediate and effective measures to facilitate the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance.
Following attacks by Hamas on October 7, Israel imposed a comprehensive siege on Gaza, severely limiting access to food, water, and medicine. Although some aid deliveries have since been permitted, humanitarian organisations assert that the sporadic influx of aid trucks falls significantly short of meeting the region's needs.
The UN's human rights chief has even suggested that Israeli restrictions may constitute the use of starvation as a weapon of war. The desperation gripping Gaza was tragically illustrated this week when individuals vying for food aid drowned or were trampled to death as aid parcels were dropped into the sea by parachute.
Matthew Hollingworth, the Palestine director of the World Food Programme, emphasised the severity of the situation, stating, "Nowhere else in the world do so many people face imminent famine."
Access to clean water is also severely limited, forcing Gazans to embark on long journeys in search of water sources that may have already dried up. Maram Abu Amra lamented the daily struggle, saying, "We have to queue for everything... Sometimes, we return empty-handed, without water."
Despite calls for an "immediate ceasefire" by the UN Security Council, heavy fighting and relentless bombardments persist, resulting in further loss of life and destruction of infrastructure. The conflict has transformed much of Gaza into a wasteland and crippled the healthcare system.
Amid the turmoil, allegations have arisen regarding Israeli military actions targeting hospitals, with accusations of militants using medical facilities as cover. Israel has defended its actions, citing the need to combat terrorist infrastructure.
The conflict, which began with an attack by Hamas on October 7, has claimed thousands of lives on both sides and taken a heavy toll on civilian populations.
Efforts to broker a truce have faced significant challenges, with mediators striving to prevent the escalation of violence into a wider regional conflict. The involvement of key players such as the United States, Egypt, and Qatar reflects the international community's efforts to find a peaceful resolution.
In light of the ongoing crisis, discussions have also turned to the governance of Gaza in the post-war period, with considerations for the role of the Palestinian Authority in the region.
The situation remains highly volatile, with the people of Gaza enduring unimaginable hardships amidst the ongoing conflict and humanitarian crisis.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
An Indian expat working at the Abu Dhabi-based hypermarket chain Lulu stands accused of disappearing with approximately Dh600,000 in cash.
Lulu Group International has taken action by filing a complaint with the Abu Dhabi Police against the employee. The individual, aged 38 and originally from the Indian state of Kerala, held a position in the cash office at the LuLu Hypermarket located in Khalidiya Mall, Abu Dhabi City.
The management of the hypermarket launched an internal investigation after the employee failed to report for afternoon duty on March 25. Attempts to contact him proved unsuccessful as his cell phone was switched off. An audit later revealed a significant shortfall of over Dh600,000 in the cash office.
Having served with the Lulu Group for 15 years, the employee resided in Abu Dhabi with his wife and two children. However, following his alleged disappearance, his family reportedly left the UAE without informing anyone, as per the group's statement.
Furthermore, Lulu Group stated that a report has been made against the employee to the Kerala Police, with help from the Indian Embassy in Abu Dhabi.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
A coalition of legal professionals, including prominent figures like senior advocate Harish Salve and Bar Council of India chairperson Manan Kumar Mishra, has penned a letter to the Chief Justice of India (CJI), asserting that a "vested interest group" is exerting undue influence on the judiciary and tarnishing its reputation "through unsubstantiated claims and outdated political agendas."
The letter, dated March 26 and addressed to CJI DY Chandrachud, highlights concerns over what they perceive as orchestrated attempts to manipulate the judiciary, particularly evident in cases involving political figures accused of corruption. These tactics, the letter alleges, pose a threat to the integrity of the courts and undermine the democratic principles they stand for.
While the letter refrains from explicitly naming specific individuals, it implicates a faction of lawyers who, it claims, oscillate between defending politicians during the day and attempting to sway judicial decisions through media influence at night.
The group of lawyers, numbering approximately 600 and including Adish Aggarwala, Chetan Mittal, Pinky Anand, Hitesh Jain, Ujjwala Pawar, Uday Holla and Swarupama Chaturvedi, among others, expressed concerns about the propagation of misleading narratives about the judiciary's past, aimed at influencing court proceedings and gaining political mileage.
Although no specific cases are cited in the letter, its release coincides with ongoing high-profile corruption trials involving opposition leaders. Opposition parties, many of whose members are legal practitioners themselves, have accused the government of orchestrating politically motivated prosecutions, a charge denied by the ruling party.
In their missive to CJI Chandrachud, the signatories lament the erosion of public trust in the judiciary due to what they perceive as baseless allegations of past judicial susceptibility to external influence. They vehemently deny allegations of "bench fixing" and criticise attempts to draw parallels between Indian courts and those in countries lacking in rule of law.
The letter also condemns what it describes as a "my way or the highway" attitude among critics, who selectively praise or disparage judicial decisions based on their personal biases. Such behaviour, the lawyers argue, undermines public confidence in the legal system.
Expressing apprehensions about the timing of these criticisms amidst impending elections, the lawyers recall similar episodes in 2018-2019, characterised by what they term as "hit and run" activities aimed at delegitimising the judiciary.
In conclusion, the lawyers call upon the Supreme Court to vigorously defend the independence and integrity of the judiciary against perceived external pressures.
They emphasise the importance of CJI Chandrachud's leadership in navigating these challenges and stress that silence or inaction risks empowering those seeking to undermine the judiciary's authority.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
American reality TV star and entrepreneur Kim Kardashian is being sued by the Judd Foundation, a non-profit organisation dedicated to preserving the legacy of artist Donald Judd.
The organisation has filed a lawsuit against Kardashian in California federal court, alleging that she featured counterfeit versions of Judd's furniture in a YouTube video.
According to the complaint, Kardashian falsely described tables and chairs produced by Los Angeles-based interior design firm Clements Design as genuine Judd furniture. The foundation accuses Kardashian of false endorsement, while Clements Design faces allegations of false advertising, unfair competition, trademark infringement, and copyright infringement.
Representatives for Kardashian and Clements Design have yet to respond to requests for comment on the lawsuit.
Rainer Judd, president of the Judd Foundation and daughter of the late artist, emphasised the importance of Judd's furniture to his legacy, stating that counterfeit pieces undermine the integrity of his original work.
Donald Judd, a renowned figure in minimalist art, passed away in 1994. His works are housed in prestigious museums such as the Museum of Modern Art in New York and the Tate Modern in London. The foundation ensures that Judd's furniture designs are faithfully reproduced according to his specifications.
The complaint alleges that Kardashian's skincare company, SKKN by Kim, hired Clements Design to produce furniture in Judd's style for its offices. Kardashian purportedly showcased the counterfeit furniture in a 2022 YouTube video tour of the offices, which was later removed.
The lawsuit claims that Kardashian's statements in the video misled viewers into believing that the furniture was authentic Judd pieces. Despite attempts to rectify the situation, including requests to recycle the furniture, delete the video, or issue corrective advertising, Clements Design and Kardashian allegedly refused to comply.
The Judd Foundation asserts that it had no choice but to pursue legal action to protect the integrity of Donald Judd's legacy and ensure accurate representation of his work.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) anticipates a favourable dealmaking landscape in the Middle East for 2024, driven by decarbonisation efforts and economic diversification.
According to a recent report by PwC, the region's non-oil sector growth, increased private sector engagement and vibrant capital markets are stimulating merger and acquisition (M&A) activity.
The report highlights the enduring influence of factors such as technological disruption and climate change, which are propelling investments regionally or abroad, particularly in critical sectors like energy transition and digital transformation.
Emphasising the necessity for dealmakers to adapt, the 2024 TransAct report underscores the importance of reinventing business models, talent acquisition, and maintaining agility amidst market fluctuations, with a focus on mid-market deals to drive value creation.
"While the global economy has witnessed a slower growth rate, the Middle East has exhibited resilience, bolstered by robust economic fundamentals and supportive government policies," the report notes. This resilience has fostered stability and investor confidence, resulting in a relatively active deal market compared to regions grappling with higher interest rates and recessionary concerns.
Despite decreases compared to 2022, the report anticipates continued activity and growth across various sectors in 2024, driven by governments' strategic agendas to advance diversification efforts and strengthen their economies.
Imad Matar, transaction services leader at PwC Middle East, highlights Saudi Arabia's resilient dealmaking environment, particularly in non-oil private sectors such as infrastructure, industrial manufacturing, and clean technology industries.
"In 2023, Saudi Arabia witnessed less pronounced declines in deal volume. IPO activity also remained robust, and we anticipate a strong pipeline for 2024," Matar stated.
He further predicts sustained momentum as the government moves forward with privatisation initiatives, encourages private sector listings to attract investments, enact reforms and reduce reliance on fossil fuels.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Convicted rapist and former Brazil international Dani Alves left a prison near Barcelona on Monday after posting the one-million-euro bail set by a court to ensure his release pending appeal.
The 40-year-old has been in jail since his arrest in January 2023 on suspicion of raping a young woman in the VIP bathroom of a Barcelona nightclub in the early hours of December 31, 2022.
Wearing jeans, a white poloneck and black jacket, his face expressionless, Alves walked out of the Brians 2 prison in San Esteban Sasroviras near Barcelona with his lawyer, according to a media report.
He got into a white car without saying a word to the hordes of reporters waiting nearby, just hours after depositing the sum determined by the court five days earlier.
The former Barcelona player, one of the world’s most decorated footballers, was convicted last month and sentenced to four-and-a-half years in jail, with his lawyers swiftly moving to file an appeal.
But in a surprise move, the court agreed last Wednesday to conditionally release him conditionally in exchange for posting a one-million-euro ($1.08 million) bail, handing over his Spanish and Brazilian passports, staying in Spain and presenting himself to court every week.
Alves had tried to make bail several times since his arrest but his requests were turned down on the basis he was a flight risk since Brazil does not extradite citizens sentenced in other countries.
Alves’ lawyers are seeking his acquittal, and the appeal process could take months to complete.
Prosecutors, however, want his prison sentence doubled to nine years. They and the victim’s lawyer Ester Garcia have appealed the decision to grant Alves bail.
“This sends the message that this is justice for the rich, and even if there is a conviction, if you pay bail there are no criminal consequences,” she told reporters last week.
“It’s a very dangerous message for society,” she added, saying her client was “totally outraged, very despondent and very frustrated”.
Meanwhile, the court’s decision to free Alves was also robustly criticised by Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
“We cannot stay silent in the face of this injustice,” he said on Thursday, stressing that money “cannot undo the crime that a man commits by raping a woman”.
“When sex is something between two people, it has to be agreed to by both of them” and if not, that constitutes “a crime”, he said.
During the trial, the victim, who testified behind a screen to protect her identity, said Alves had violently forced her to have sex despite begging him to let her go, causing her “anguish and terror”, according to prosecutors present for her declaration.
Alves’ lawyers had argued the victim had been “glued” to the player while dancing at the nightclub, saying there was “sexual tension” between them.
But in its 61-page decision, the court said that did not mean “that she consented to anything that might have subsequently happened”.
Spain’s leftist government passed a new law in 2022 that strengthens the country’s penal code against rape by requiring explicit consent for sex acts, a move long demanded by assault survivors and women’s rights groups.
Alves is widely considered one of the greatest defenders of all time, having won 42 trophies. The peak of his career was with Barcelona between 2008 and 2016, alongside Lionel Messi, when he won 23 trophies.
At the time of his arrest, he was contracted to Mexican club Pumas UNAM. He was sacked soon after being detained.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The UN Security Council passed a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza for the month of Ramadan, a breakthrough coming after more than five months since the start of the Israel-Hamas conflict.
The 15-nation Council adopted the resolution, put forth by the 10 non-permanent elected members of the Council, with 14 nations voting in favour, none against and an abstention by permanent member the US.
“The Security Council just approved a long-awaited resolution on Gaza, demanding an immediate ceasefire, and the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages,” UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in a post on X.
“This resolution must be implemented. Failure would be unforgivable,” he said.
The resolution “demands an immediate ceasefire for the month of Ramadan respected by all parties leading to a lasting sustainable ceasefire, and also demands the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages, as well as ensuring humanitarian access to address their medical and other humanitarian needs, and further demands that the parties comply with their obligations under international law in relation to all persons they detain.”
US ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield said that the resolution rightly acknowledges that, during the month of Ramadan, “we must recommit to peace. Hamas can do that by accepting the deal on the table. A ceasefire can begin immediately with the release of the first hostage.”
“And so, we must put pressure on Hamas to do just that. This is the only path to securing a ceasefire and the release of hostages, as we have all called for today. That is what this resolution means, a ceasefire of any duration must come with the release of hostages. This is the only path,” she said.
She said that with the adoption of the resolution, “this Council spoke out in support of the ongoing diplomatic efforts, led by the United States, Qatar, and Egypt, to bring about an immediate and sustainable ceasefire, secure the immediate release of all hostages, and help alleviate the tremendous suffering of Palestinian civilians in Gaza, who are in dire need of protection and life-saving humanitarian assistance.”
The US envoy said that the only path to a durable end to this conflict is the release of all hostages. UK’s Permanent Representative to the UN Ambassador Barbara Woodward said her country has long been calling for an immediate humanitarian pause leading to a sustainable ceasefire without a return to destruction, fighting and loss of life, as the fastest way to get hostages out and aid in.
“That is what this resolution calls for and why the United Kingdom voted yes on this text,” she said.
“This resolution sets out the urgent demand for the unconditional release of all hostages. And we welcome the ongoing diplomatic efforts by Egypt, Qatar and the United States to this end,” she said.
Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett, Ambassador and Permanent Representative of Guyana said that after more than five months of a “war of utter terror and destruction”, a ceasefire is the difference between life and death for hundreds of thousands of Palestinians and others.
“This demand (by the Council) comes at a significant time as Palestinians are observing the Holy Month of Ramadan,” she said.
Louis Charbonneau, UN director at Human Rights Watch, said that Israel needs to immediately respond to the UN Security Council resolution by facilitating the delivery of humanitarian aid, ending the starvation of Gaza’s population, and halting unlawful attacks.
“Palestinian armed groups should immediately release all civilians held hostage. The US and other countries should use their leverage to end atrocities by suspending arms transfers to Israel.”
The adoption of the resolution comes more than five months after the latest conflict in Gaza erupted following the October 7 Hamas attacks against Israel.
The Security Council, with its primary responsibility of maintaining international peace and security, has remained deeply divided and has till now not been able to adopt any resolution on a ceasefire in Gaza.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan has approved a law regulating rehabilitation and correctional centers in Abu Dhabi, in his capacity as the Ruler of Abu Dhabi.
The law delineates the general policies governing rehabilitation and correctional centres in Abu Dhabi, with a focus on safeguarding inmates' rights and providing appropriate social and cultural rehabilitation.
As per the law, punitive and correctional facilities in Abu Dhabi will be renamed rehabilitation and correctional centres. Under the Abu Dhabi Judicial Department, the roles and responsibilities of rehabilitation and correctional centres include receiving inmates, determining appropriate care duties and informing inmates of their responsibilities and expected conduct.
Additionally, these centres are tasked with providing inmates with health and social care services, educational and vocational training opportunities and implementing rehabilitation programmes aimed at reintegrating them as productive members of society.
Moreover, the responsibilities of rehabilitation and correctional centres extend to training staff in accordance with the best international practices, enabling them to effectively carry out their mission of rehabilitating inmates while ensuring efficient economic management within the rehabilitation framework of the emirate.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Kate Middleton, Britain’s Princess of Wales, has revealed she has been diagnosed with cancer and is undergoing chemotherapy. In a video statement on Friday, she said that she had undergone major abdominal surgery in London in January, saying that it was initially thought her condition was noncancerous.
“The surgery was successful. However, tests after the operation found cancer had been present. My medical team therefore advised that I should undergo a course of preventive chemotherapy and I am now in the early stages of that treatment,” her statement said.
“This of course came as a huge shock, and William and I have been doing everything we can to process and manage this privately for the sake of our young family.”
Kensington Palace said it is confident she will make a full recovery, according to the BBC.
“I am well and getting stronger everyday by focusing on the things that will help me heal; in my mind, body and spirits,” Kate later added in her speech.
She asked for space and privacy while she completed her treatment. It was not announced what type of cancer it was, or at what stage it was caught.
Buckingham Palace said King Charles III, her father-in-law, was “so proud of Catherine for her courage in speaking as she did.”
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle also released a statement, saying: “We wish health and healing for Kate and the family, and hope they are able to do so privately and in peace.”
Kate stayed in the hospital following the surgery. At the time, there was no confirmation of what the surgery was, with Kensington Palace saying Kate, 42, hoped that the public would respect “her wish that her personal medical information remains private.” The palace suggested at the time that Kate would not be resuming public duties until after Easter.
Disappearance and Mother’s Day Row
The princess had not been seen in public since Christmas Day 2023 when she was seen walking to and attending a church service alongside the wider royal family, including her children and husband Prince William, the heir to the British throne.
An online frenzy over her condition and her whereabouts dominated social media since news of her operation. The palace had largely stayed silent on the matter, which at times added fuel to the fire.
Obsession reached a peak after a picture of the former Kate Middleton was released on Mother’s Day -- March 10 in the U.K. News agencies pulled the picture later that day, issuing a so-called kill notice, finding it had been edited too heavily.
Every detail of the image was scrutinised, from Kate’s hair to the children’s clothes that seemed inconsistent, to a ledge in the background that appeared warped.
On March 11, Kensington Palace posted a statement from Kate on social media, saying she edited the picture. “Like many amateur photographers, I do occasionally experiment with editing. I wanted to express my apologies for any confusion the family photograph we shared yesterday caused. I hope everyone celebrating had a very happy Mother’s Day. C,” it read.
Since then, images and video of what appeared to be Kate appeared in British tabloid newspapers, further stoking conspiracies and conversation.
‘Kate Could File a Civil Lawsuit’
Earlier this week, reports also emerged that a staff member at the The London Clinic Kate was being treated at tried to access her files without permission to do so.
Princess Kate could take legal action after her private medical records were involved in a security breach at the hospital, according to legal experts.
“Kate can always file a civil lawsuit for invasion of privacy,” a senior legal expert, who is not involved with the case, said on Wednesday. “If she wants to go after the perpetrator to say that her privacy rights were violated, she can absolutely do so.”
The London Clinic has launched an investigation into its employees after members of the hospital reportedly tried to access Kate’s private medical records following her January abdominal procedure, according to media reports.
It should be “easy to catch” the perpetrator, given the nature of the breach, the legal expert noted.
Probe over Breach of Medical Records
The UK Police have been asked to look at claims that at least one worker attempted to access the confidential medical records of Kate during her hospitalisation, a minister said on Wednesday.
Britain’s privacy and data protection watchdog, the Information Commissioner’s Office, told The Washington Post on Wednesday it was assessing a potential breach of Kate’s medical records during her stay at the London hospital.
Under British law, medical facilities are required to protect patient confidentiality, which extends even beyond death. Disclosure of any confidential patient information is only permitted for “the direct clinical care of the patient to whom it relates,” according to England’s National Health Service.
Exceptions apply only when the patient explicitly consents to the disclosure, if it’s required by law, or if the disclosure can be justified in the public interest.
“We can confirm that we have received a breach report and are assessing the information provided,” a spokesperson for the Information Commissioner’s Office said, without giving further details about the nature of the breach or its assessment.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Rupert Murdoch’s British tabloid papers allegedly intercepted Prince Harry’s landline phones and accessed the messages on the pager of his late mother Princess Diana, as disclosed by the British royal’s legal team to the London High Court.
Harry, the younger son of King Charles and the late Princess Diana, along with more than 40 others, are suing News Group Newspapers (NGN) over allegations of unlawful activities by journalists and private investigators associated with its tabloids, the Sun and the now-defunct News of the World, spanning from the mid-1990s until 2016.
In a ruling last July, Judge Timothy Fancourt allowed Harry to proceed to trial with claims of unlawful information gathering, while dismissing allegations of mobile phone hacking due to being filed too late.
During a hearing at the High Court on Thursday, Harry’s legal team sought to amend his lawsuit in response to the ruling, and to introduce additional allegations.
These new claims include assertions that the Sun commissioned private investigators to target his then-girlfriend and now-wife Meghan in 2016, as well as accusations of widespread phone bugging.
According to court documents, Harry's lawyers stated: “The claimant also brings a claim and seeks relief in relation to the interception of landline calls, the interception of calls from cordless phones and analogue mobile calls and the interception of landline voicemails, as distinct from phone hacking.”
The claim also involves allegations regarding Diana, who "was under close surveillance and her calls were being unlawfully intercepted by NGN, which was known about by its editors and senior executives."
NGN is contesting the addition of what they referred to as a “significant number of new allegations” for various reasons, including their late submission, lack of evidence, and their overlap with previously dismissed phone-hacking claims.
NGN’s lawyers argued in court filings: “They cover time periods falling outside the scope of the current pleading and the generic statements of case, and in many cases relate to allegations which have been well-publicised for as long as 30 years.”
NGN’s lawyers also expressed doubts about the feasibility of Harry's case being heard at a trial expected to commence in January next year if his new allegations were to be included.
In 2011, NGN issued an apology for widespread phone hacking by journalists at the News of the World, a publication that Murdoch subsequently shut down due to public outcry. Despite settling over 1,300 claims since then, NGN has consistently denied any wrongdoing by Sunstaff.
During proceedings on Wednesday, lawyers representing Harry and other claimants asserted that Murdoch and other senior executives were complicit in covering up widespread misconduct, providing false evidence to courts, parliament and a public inquiry.
NGN contends that some claimants are utilising these lawsuits as a means to attack the tabloid press and dismisses allegations against its current and former staff as “a baseless and cynical assault on their integrity.”
Since stepping back from royal duties in 2020 to relocate to California, Harry has focused on confronting the British press, alleging intrusion into his private life since childhood and dissemination of false information about him and his loved ones.
In December, Harry won a lawsuit against Mirror Group Newspapers over allegations of phone hacking and unlawful activities, with the judge acknowledging that senior figures were aware of the wrongdoing.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The US Department of Justice filed a landmark lawsuit against Apple, alleging the tech giant's monopolistic practices in the smartphone market.
The lawsuit, supported by several US states, contends that Apple has unlawfully maintained its dominance in the iPhone realm, stifling competition and burdening consumers with excessive costs.
This highly anticipated legal action marks a significant clash between Apple, founded by Steve Jobs in 1976, and the US government, following decades of limited scrutiny from Washington.
Apple now joins other tech giants like Amazon, Google, and Meta (formerly Facebook) facing antitrust scrutiny in the United States. Upon news of the lawsuit, Apple's shares plummeted by as much as 3.75 per cent on Wall Street.
Central to the case are allegations of Apple's exclusionary tactics, which impose stringent and often opaque conditions on firms and developers seeking access to the iPhone's vast user base of 136 million in the US.
The lawsuit claims that these practices compel consumers to remain within the Apple ecosystem and invest in the company's pricier hardware, notably the iPhone.
Apple swiftly refuted the lawsuit's validity, asserting that it is "wrong on the facts and the law," and vowed to vigorously defend against it. The company contends that a favourable ruling for the government would establish a concerning precedent, granting excessive regulatory control over technological innovation.
The lawsuit specifically targets Apple's alleged suppression of "Super Apps," comprehensive web portals that could offer various services on iPhones beyond the confines of the App Store.
Additionally, it accuses Apple of monopolising tap payment technology through its proprietary wallet app and impeding interoperability between messaging apps on iPhones and Android devices.
The broad scope of the case extends to other products and services, including smartwatches and web browsers, where Apple's practices allegedly hinder competition and innovation.
Despite Apple's efforts to diversify revenue streams beyond the iPhone, the company faces mounting pressure amid slowing sales growth. The Department of Justice highlighted Apple's unprecedented profits, surpassing those of any other company in the Fortune 500 and exceeding the GDP of over 100 countries.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The UAE Public Prosecution has successfully concluded its ambitious project, "Classification of Crimes and Digitisation of Criminal Legislation within the Criminal Case Management System."
This pioneering initiative involved the conversion of legal texts into a digital format compatible with information systems, leveraging advanced artificial intelligence (AI) techniques for comprehension and execution.
Aligned with the visionary leadership's directives, the project aimed to harness human and institutional capabilities for attaining a prominent position in digital transformation.
A specialised workforce comprising 30 prosecutors and seven technicians from the Information Technology Department played a pivotal role in this endeavour. Collectively, they devoted an impressive total of 3,821 working hours to meticulously scrutinise, individualise and encode laws into the newly developed system.
This rigorous process resulted in the digitisation of over 17 federal laws and the detailed classification of 32,000 criminal charges, encompassing a wide range of acts, penalties and legal circumstances.
Furthermore, the project is poised to enhance the speed, efficiency and transparency of the penal system through the integration of modern technologies. It will propel the ongoing evolution of digital systems and judicial processes, reinforcing the UAE's status as a global hub and a leading digital governance model.
The Public Prosecution emphasised that the project will streamline tasks and procedures, reducing bureaucratic obstacles by enabling electronic systems to function autonomously. It also aims to automate electronic communication with strategic partners and simplify searches within legal frameworks.
The initiative is expected to establish a benchmark for future legislation, aligning with the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence and emerging technologies.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Delhi Chief Minister and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Arvind Kejriwal has been arrested by Enforcement Directorate in now scrapped Delhi liquor policy scam case. The Delhi High Court on Thursday refused to grant Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal any protection from coercive action in an excise policy-linked money laundering case.
An Enforcement Directorate (ED) team reached CM Arvind Kejriwal's residence in Delhi on Thursday evening, officials said, shortly after the high court refused to grant him protection. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) chief had earlier skipped multiple summonses of the agency in the case.
"We have received news that ED has arrested Arvind Kejriwal... We have always said that Arvind Kejriwal will run the govt from jail. He will remain the CM of Delhi. We have filed a case in the Supreme Court. Our lawyers are reaching SC. We will demand SC have an urgent hearing tonight," said senior AAP leader Atishi.
ED's Aallegations
The ED in a press note had called Kejriwal a "conspirator" in the case. Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) leader in Telengana, K Kavitha, allegedly conspired with Kejriwal, and AAP leaders Manish Sisodia and Sanjay Singh while framing the now-scrapped liquor policy case, the ED has said.
The alleged conspiracy involved making a policy that would benefit a liquor lobby from southern India, which the ED had called the "South Lobby".
In return, the "South Lobby" would give ₹100 crore to the AAP, according to the ED.
Kejriwal's name had appeared in the statements of some accused and witnesses. The ED has mentioned this in its remand note and chargesheets. Vijay Nair, one of the accused in the liquor policy case, frequently visited Kejriwal's office, and would spend most of his time there, the probe agency said.
Nair allegedly told liquor traders that he discussed the policy with Kejriwal. It was Nair, who got Indospirit owner Sameer Mahendru to meet Kejriwal, the investigators have said.
When the meeting was unsuccessful, he got Mahendru and Kejriwal talk in a video call, in which Kejriwal said Nair was his "child" who he trusts. Raghav Magunta, the first accused in the "South Lobby" and now a witness, had said his father, who is a YSR Congress Party MP in Andhra Predesh, met Kejriwal to know more about the liquor policy.
Sisodia's former secretary C Arvind in a statement in December 2022 had said that in March the previous year he got a draft group of ministers report from Sisodia. When he went to Kejriwal's house after Sisodia called him, Arvind said he also saw Satyendar Jain there and the document. He alleged he was surprised because no such proposal was discussed in any group of ministers' (GoM) meeting, but claimed he was asked to make a GoM report based on this document.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Shares in Parkin, which oversees public parking operations, jumped more than 30 per cent in their debut on Dubai bourse on Thursday after the company raised $429 million from investors in the emirate's first privatisation deal this year.
Shares rose as much as 31.4 per cent to Dh2.76 ($0.7516) apiece after the market opened compared to the initial public offering (IPO) price of Dh2.1.
Parkin's IPO was oversubscribed 165 times, attracting $71 billion in demand, a record-breaking debut for Dubai.
Gulf governments are racing to list state companies in a bid to deepen capital markets, part of a wider push to cut their reliance on oil.
Companies in Dubai have raised Dh34.5 billion in the last three years through the sale of shares on the Dubai stock exchange, according to the Dubai Securities and Exchange Higher Committee.
Parkin is the latest of six privatisations embarked upon by the government, first announced in 2021 as part of a programme to list 10 government-linked companies to attract investment to its domestic bourse.
Dubai Taxi Company's IPO late last year raised $316 million through the sale of a 25 per cent stake, which was oversubscribed 130 times.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Former US President Donald Trump stated that if Prince Harry had lied on his visa application regarding drug-taking, he would pursue "appropriate action" if he were to win November's presidential election, refusing to rule out the possibility of Harry leaving the United States.
Trump made these remarks in an interview with British right-leaning media outlet GB News, conducted by presenter and frequent Harry critic Nigel Farage.
US visa applicants are obligated to disclose any history of drug use, as it can impact their application status. Providing false information on an application can lead to penalties, including deportation.
Harry, who has resided in California since 2020, openly admitted to past illegal drug use in his memoir "Spare." Subsequently, the conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation, filed a lawsuit against the US Homeland Security Department to obtain access to Harry's immigration records. Earlier this month, a judge ruled in favour of disclosing the details related to Harry's visa application in that case.
Farage, a long-time ally of Trump, asked the former president if Prince Harry should be granted any "special privileges" if it was discovered that he had lied on his application.
Trump responded: "No. We'll have to determine if they have information regarding the drugs, and if he indeed lied, appropriate action will be taken."
When pressed on whether this might entail Harry "not staying in America," Trump replied, "Oh, I don't know. You'll have to inform me. It's surprising they didn't know this earlier."
Since Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle stepped back from their royal duties and relocated to California, they have frequently criticised the treatment they received from the British royal family.
From their revealing interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021 to a Netflix documentary series and Harry's forthcoming book, the couple has asserted that the royals and their aides failed to shield them from a hostile press and leaked negative stories.
Since departing for the United States after their marriage in 2018, the couple has seldom returned to Britai.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The Civil Court in Dubai has ruled in favour of an employee, ordering a company to pay Dh200,000 in compensation. The employee was falsely accused by the company of forging contract papers to inflate entitlements, leading to a nine-month travel ban.
The court's decision follows a lawsuit filed by the employee against the company, seeking Dh500,000 in damages. He alleged that the company lodged a baseless complaint to coerce him into forfeiting his labour rights.
The false accusation, the employee argued, not only caused emotional distress but also prevented him from visiting his ailing mother and attending her funeral in his home country.
According to local media reports, the company had alleged that the employee falsified his employment contract to raise his basic salary to Dh20,000 from Dh5,000. However, the Criminal Court acquitted the employee, deeming the company's complaint malicious and solely intended to deprive him of his labor rights.
In addition to the Dh200,000 compensation, the Civil Court ordered the defendants to pay five per cent legal interest and cover all expenses, fees and attorney's fees. The court emphasised the financial and emotional toll on the employee, who faced financial hardship due to the travel ban, which prevented him from bidding farewell to his deceased mother and constrained his ability to secure employment amidst the criminal case.
The employee has been provided with a copy of the acquittal judgment as evidence of his innocence
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Dubai Islamic Bank (DIB) and NMC Healthcare group have reached an out-of-court agreement to resolve all ongoing litigation, as announced in a joint statement on NMC's website. This settlement extends to all legal disputes involving third parties worldwide.
As part of this comprehensive resolution, DIB will receive cash consideration and Holdco notes to settle specific claims. The Holdco notes, issued to legacy creditors in NMC HoldCo SPV Ltd., represent an exchange for their acknowledged claims.
NMC, a prominent UAE-based healthcare provider established by Indian entrepreneur BR Shetty, was placed in administration in 2020 after disclosing over $4 billion in debt.
Under the terms of the settlement, DIB will become an economic owner of NMC Holdco SPV LTD, the new holding company of NMC, incorporated in the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM), pursuant to a deed of company arrangement outlined in the joint statement.
Furthermore, the agreement mandates the discontinuation of all ongoing legal proceedings among the involved parties, with no admission of liability.
NMC Holdco possesses the restructured NMC operating entities through its wholly owned subsidiary, NMC Opco Ltd, also incorporated in the ADGM. NMC Opco oversees and manages 85 healthcare facilities across the UAE and the wider region.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
A 45-year-old beautician has been sentenced to three months in jail by the Dubai Criminal Court for threatening to tarnish a man's reputation unless he paid her Dh1 million.
The court also ruled for her deportation after serving her prison term. The case, heard last Wednesday, involved the Polish defendant using sensitive personal information to extort money from a 57-year-old Australian consultant, with whom she had an intimate relationship.
The relationship soured when the woman discovered the man was married, leading to a confrontation and demanding compensation. Despite the man paying Dh300,000 to keep the affair hidden from his family, the woman persisted in her threats.
Court records reveal that the couple met in September 2022 and separated in March 2023, with the woman initiating a series of disrespectful messages one month after the breakup.
The woman further threatened to defame the man if he didn't pay her Dh1 million, even sending intimate photographs of the couple to his wife, children, and other family members.
The man reported her to the police in May last year, leading to criminal proceedings and a civil case demanding temporary compensation of Dh51,000 for emotional damages.
The Criminal Court convicted the woman, sentenced her to three months in prison, and ordered her deportation, with the civil case referred to the Civil Court for further action.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The UAE Cabinet approved amendments to the executive regulations of the federal law governing citizenship and passports.
His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice-President and Prime Minister of the UAE and Ruler of Dubai, announced these changes after the Cabinet meeting on Monday.
The validity period of the Emirati passport has been extended from 5 to 10 years for individuals aged 21 and above.
These revisions aim to provide citizens with enhanced facilities and comprehensive digital services, ensuring greater convenience and efficiency.
Additionally, the Cabinet adopted a national policy for the circulation and manufacture of biofuels, aligning with the UAE's commitment to promoting clean and sustainable energy sources.
Moreover, the Digital Quality of Life Council shared its achievements in removing over 160,000 websites and accounts promoting harmful content.
His Highness Sheikh Mohammed emphasised the importance of family, media, and educational institutions working together to protect the youth and secure a brighter future.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The State Bank of India (SBI) can't be selective in disclosing information linked to electoral bonds, the Supreme Court of India said on Monday, directing the bank to submit full details of the bonds' numbers to the Election Commission by March 21.
The apex court also ordered the chairman of the bank to file a compliance affidavit by March 21.
The Supreme Court ordered the bank to disclose all "conceivable" electoral bond details in its possession, including unique bond numbers that would disclose the link between the buyer and the recipient political party.
A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, in a strongly worded rebuke, said it had asked the bank to disclose all the details of the bonds and that it should not wait for further orders.
"We had asked all details to be disclosed by the SBI which includes electoral bond numbers as well. Let SBI not be selective in disclosure," the bench, also comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, said.
Senior advocate Harish Salve, appearing for the SBI, said it should not seem that "we are playing with court". He said if the court wants the numbers of electoral bonds, "we will give".
The bank said it will give every bit of information required by the court.
The Supreme Court, meanwhile, said the bank should file an affidavit stating that it has not suppressed any information.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, said the main aim of formulating the electoral bonds scheme was to curb black money in politics. He said that the apex court must be aware of how this judgment is being played outside the court.
He claimed witch-hunting has started over the details. He claimed some social media posts, which "intended to cause embarrassment", have started to surface. He urged the court to issue some direction in this regard.
Responding to the request, CJI DY Chandrachud said: “As judges, we are only on the rule of law and work as per the Constitution. Our court is only to work for the governance of the rule of law in this polity. As judges, we are also discussed in social media but our shoulders are broad enough to take this. We are only enforcing our directions of judgment.”
In two tranches, the SBI has disclosed the names of donors and beneficiaries. The BJP has emerged as the party which has encashed the largest sum over the period of 2019 and 2024. The Trinamool is second on the list, the Congress third and the BRS fourth.
The SBI has not disclosed who has donated to whom. Only the DMK has shared the breakup of donations by donors.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The UAE Ministry of Finance (MoF) announced the commencement of a digital public consultation aimed at gathering feedback from relevant stakeholders regarding the implementation of the Global Minimum Tax (GMT) or Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (Pillar Two) (GloBE Rules), as well as other tax-related matters in the UAE.
The consultation period will run from March 15, 2024 to April 10, 2024, and interested parties can participate through the ministry’s website or the UAE Government Portal.
This digital public consultation underscores the ministry's commitment to engaging with all stakeholders, including multinational groups operating within the UAE, advisors, service providers, and investors.
The consultation process comprises two main components. Firstly, stakeholders will be invited to provide input on potential policy design options for the implementation of the GloBE Rules in the UAE, with a focus on the development of a domestic minimum tax.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has released the GloBE Model Rules, serving as a template for jurisdictions interested in adopting qualified rules.
Secondly, stakeholders' perspectives will be sought on the introduction of substance-based incentives within the UAE, which would be integrated into the UAE Corporate Tax regime.
To facilitate stakeholders' understanding of the rules and ensure well-informed feedback, the ministry has issued a briefing document on the Global Minimum Tax alongside the consultation materials.
The UAE Ministry of Finance encourages stakeholders to provide clear and concise comments, supported by examples, data, or other pertinent information. Responses must be submitted by April 10, 2024, via the ministry's website. All responses will be treated as confidential and will not be made public.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
As the Holy Month of Ramadan commenced on March 11, 2024, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has issued directives to reduce working hours for both public and private sector employees to honor this sacred period.
These changes are mandated by regulatory authorities such as the Federal Authority for Government Human Resources (FAHR) and the Ministry of Human Resources & Emiratisation (MoHRE), and governed by relevant legislation. They aim to accommodate the religious practices of fasting Muslims.
Public Sector
In accordance with directives issued by the FAHR, ministries and federal entities have implemented revised working hours during Ramadan.
Official working hours are set from 9:00 am to 2:30 pm from Monday through Thursday. On Fridays, traditionally a day of communal worship, working hours are further adjusted to 9:00 am to 12:00 pm, with exceptions made for roles requiring extended coverage.
These adjustments enable ministries and federal entities to adopt flexible working arrangements, ensuring compliance with daily working hour requirements while accommodating individual needs.
Private Sector
Private sector employers are required to reduce regular working hours by two hours throughout Ramadan, as prescribed by Cabinet Resolution No. (1) of 2022 and Federal Decree-Law No. (33) of 2021.
This legal framework ensures that employees have sufficient time for rest and sustenance during the fasting period. Additionally, employees who exceed stipulated working hours during Ramadan are entitled to overtime compensation in accordance with UAE Labour Law provisions.
Exemptions
While the overarching principle mandates reduced working hours, exemptions exist for workplaces operating fewer than six hours regularly during the non-Ramadan period.
Similarly, entities with established policies prescribing shorter hours on Fridays may maintain their customary schedules, provided they comply with regulatory standards and uphold employees' rights.
Such flexibility underscores the UAE's commitment to accommodating diverse workplace practices while upholding legal standards and respecting religious observances.
Navigating the intricacies of adjusted working hours during Ramadan requires both public and private sector entities to adhere to regulatory guidelines and protect employees' rights.
By fostering an environment of compliance and understanding, organisations can meet their legal obligations while demonstrating respect for the cultural and religious diversity inherent in the UAE's workforce.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) has introduced groundbreaking legislation, marking the world's first digital assets law and amendments to existing security laws.
These changes are designed to address the implications of the new digital assets framework and revised security regulations, ensuring that DIFC remains abreast of the rapid advancements in global trade and financial markets driven by technological innovation.
After a thorough examination and a period of public consultation in 2023, DIFC has implemented its own digital assets law. Moreover, existing DIFC laws, including contracts law, law of obligations, law of security, law of damages and remedies, trust law, and foundations law, have been updated through DIFC Amendment Law, No. 3 of 2024, to accommodate specific issues related to digital assets.
The updates to the law of obligations also allow for the use of electronic transferable records, equivalent to traditional paper trade documents such as bills of lading, bills of exchange, and promissory notes. Recognising these documents in electronic form enhances efficiency in cross-border digital trade, expediting document transmission and enabling automation of transactions through smart contracts.
Furthermore, significant progress has been made in secured transaction regimes internationally since the enactment of DIFC's security law in 2005. The emergence of platforms facilitating credit extension secured by digital asset collateral necessitated a review of existing laws.
This move aims to clarify security over digital assets and streamline financial collateral provisions within the new law of security, thus modernising DIFC's securities regime to meet evolving market needs.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The European Parliament has approved the world's first comprehensive framework for constraining the risks of artificial intelligence (AI). The sector has seen explosive growth - driving huge profits but also stoking fears about bias, privacy and even the future of humanity.
The AI Act works by classifying products according to risk and adjusting scrutiny accordingly. The law's creators said it would make the tech more "human-centric."
"The AI act is not the end of the journey but the starting point for new governance built around technology," Member of European Parliament (MEP) Dragos Tudorache added.
It also places the EU at the forefront of global attempts to address the dangers associated with AI. China already has introduced a patchwork of AI laws. In October 2023, US President Joe Biden announced an executive order requiring AI developers to share data with the government. But the EU has now gone further.
"The adoption of the AI Act marks the beginning of a new AI era and its importance cannot be overstated," said Enza Iannopollo, principal analyst at Forrester.
"The EU AI Act is the world's first and only set of binding requirements to mitigate AI risks," she added.
She said it would make the EU the "de facto" global standard for trustworthy AI, leaving every other region, including the UK, to "play catch-up."
In November 2023, the UK hosted an AI safety summit but is not planning legislation along the lines of the AI Act.
How the AI Act will Work
The main idea of the law is to regulate AI based on its capacity to cause harm to society. The higher the risk, the stricter the rules. AI applications that pose a "clear risk to fundamental rights" will be banned, for example some of those that involve the processing of biometric data.
AI systems’ considered "high-risk", such as those used in critical infrastructure, education, healthcare, law enforcement, border management or elections, will have to comply with strict requirements.
Low-risk services, such as spam filters, will face the lightest regulation - the EU expects most services to fall into this category. The Act also creates provisions to tackle risks posed by the systems underpinning generative AI tools and chatbots such as OpenAI's ChatGPT.
These would require producers of some so-called general-purpose AI systems, that can be harnessed for a range of tasks, to be transparent about the material used to train their models and to comply with EU copyright law.
OpenAI, Stability AI and graphics chip giant Nvidia are among a handful of AI firms facing lawsuits over their use of data to train generative models. Some artists, writers and musicians have argued the process of "scraping" huge volumes of data, including potentially their own works, from virtually all corners of the internet violates copyright laws.
The Act still has to pass several more steps before it formally becomes law.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Marking a historic milestone in Dubai's financial landscape, Parkin has emerged as the leading provider of paid parking services in the emirate following its highly successful initial public offering (IPO).
The company revealed on Thursday that its IPO achieved an unprecedented level of oversubscription on the Dubai Financial Market, with investor demand reaching an astonishing Dh259 billion, oversubscribing the offering by a staggering 165 times.
In response to overwhelming demand, Parkin made adjustments to accommodate retail investors, increasing the number of ordinary shares by 12 per cent in the retail category. Consequently, the company reduced the tranche for qualified investors, now representing 88 per cent of the offered shares. Parkin set the share price at Dh2.10, translating to a market capitalisation of Dh6.30 billion upon listing.
The IPO generated Dh1.6 billion in funds through the sale of shares, positioning Parkin as the foremost provider of paid parking services in Dubai.
Notably, Parkin's IPO is the inaugural offering of 2024 in the UAE, underlining its significance in the market. With approximately 197,000 paid parking spaces strategically located across the emirate, Parkin stands poised for substantial growth.
The qualified investor tranche attracted over Dh230 billion in demand, marking an oversubscription of 166 times, while the retail offering garnered Dh29 billion in demand, oversubscribed by 153 times, with nearly 63,000 applications—a record-breaking achievement for a DFM IPO.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The US House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed a bill targeting TikTok's ownership, with bipartisan support.
The legislation prohibits app stores from distributing TikTok unless its Chinese parent company relinquishes control of the platform. Despite opposition from former President Donald Trump, the bill gained traction, backed by concerns raised by US security officials regarding national security risks associated with Chinese ownership of TikTok.
Lawmakers dismissed TikTok's lobbying efforts, including an in-app campaign urging users to oppose the bill. Notably, even after Trump's reversal on the issue, 197 Republicans supported the bill. The White House emphasised its stance, clarifying that it seeks to address ownership concerns rather than banning the app outright.
National security advisor Jake Sullivan highlighted the central issue of ownership, emphasising the choice between American or Chinese control over TikTok and its user data. The House's strong vote sets the stage for Senate consideration, potentially increasing pressure on senators to address the matter.
However, challenges remain, particularly regarding concerns over free speech raised by Senator Rand Paul. TikTok's supporters argue that the rights of its millions of American users are at stake. Senate committees, including the commerce committee chaired by Democrat Maria Cantwell, are scrutinising the bill to ensure it aligns with constitutional principles while addressing national security threats.
The legislation gives ByteDance a 180-day deadline to divest TikTok to avoid being removed from app stores. Introduced by Representatives Mike Gallagher and Raja Krishnamoorthi, the bill gained unanimous approval from the House energy and commerce committee.
TikTok's lobbyist, Michael Beckerman, criticised the bill's expedited process, citing constitutional concerns and refuting claims of Chinese government influence over the platform. US officials worry about ByteDance's potential compliance with Chinese demands under national security laws, including FBI director Christopher Wray, who testified that ByteDance might be compelled to provide user data to Beijing upon request.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The retail portion of the Parkin IPO has been increased from 10 per cent to 12 per cent, with the Dubai-based company confirming an "exceptional level of oversubscription."
The retail subscription closed on Tuesday, March 12th. The overall size of the IPO remains at 24.9 per cent. Each investor will be allotted a minimum of 2,000 shares, although the final minimum share tally will be determined once the full extent of the oversubscription is calculated.
The IPO will close today with subscriptions raised from professional investors.
Parkin marks the UAE's first stock market float of the year, and according to banking and market analysts, it has garnered instant demand from both retail and professional investors, as well as significant interest from overseas investors.
The market is already anticipating an oversubscription of well over 100 times for Parkin, driven primarily by the retail demand that has been building up for over three months.
Based on the IPO price range of Dh2 to Dh2.10 per share, the retail tranche will now amount to between Dh179.93 million and Dh188.92 million. The total IPO size remains unchanged at 749.7 million shares, representing 24.99 per cent of the total issued share capital.
Following the increased allocation to UAE retail investors, the allocation for professional investors will be 659.73 million shares instead of the previous 674.73 million, accounting for 88 per cent of the offered shares compared to the previous 90 per cent.
The Parkin listing is scheduled for March 21st.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
In recent months, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has been actively addressing threats to national security and stability through legislative measures and judicial proceedings.
As concerns over seditious activities proliferate, the UAE government has intensified efforts to combat such challenges, underscoring its commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting its citizens and residents.
Amidst this backdrop, the Abu Dhabi Federal Court of Appeal is currently hearing a landmark case involving 84 defendants accused of establishing a clandestine terrorist organization known as the "Committee for Justice and Dignity."
These individuals, allegedly affiliated with the banned Muslim Brotherhood, face charges of plotting violence and unrest within the UAE.
“This case mirrors the broader context of the UAE's response to threats posed by subversive activities. While legislative amendments target seditious content and activities online, the terrorism trial reveals the real-world consequences of such extremist ideologies.
The defendants' alleged efforts to incite public unrest through protests and violent confrontations underscore the gravity of the challenges faced by the UAE in maintaining law and order, said Shulka Chavan Legal Associate at NYK Law Firm.
“The government's proactive stance, reflected in both legal reforms and judicial proceedings, highlights its commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting its citizens and residents from destabilising forces. As the trial progresses and legislative measures are implemented, the UAE continues its efforts to preserve stability, security, and prosperity for all,” she added.
Amid growing concerns over the proliferation of seditious content and activities, authorities in the UAE have intensified efforts to combat threats to national unity and social cohesion. In December 2023, the UAE Cabinet approved amendments to Federal Decree-Law No. 5 of 2012 on Combating Cybercrimes, which include provisions targeting individuals and entities involved in seditious acts online.
Under the revised legislation, the dissemination of seditious material through digital platforms, social media, or any other electronic means is strictly prohibited, with stringent penalties imposed on offenders.
The amendments aim to curb the spread of false information, hate speech, and incitement to violence, thereby safeguarding the UAE's digital landscape from subversive influences.
Furthermore, in January 2024, the UAE Federal National Council (FNC) announced discussions on proposed amendments to Federal Law No. 3 of 1987 on Combating Information Technology Crimes, with a particular focus on enhancing provisions related to sedition.
The proposed amendments seek to strengthen legal mechanisms for prosecuting individuals engaged in seditious activities, including those involving the misuse of information technology.
In a recent statement, the Minister of Interior of the UAE underscored the importance of robust legislation to counter sedition and uphold national security.
He emphasised the need for proactive measures to address emerging threats in the digital age, reaffirming the government's commitment to preserving the UAE's societal fabric and values.
The UAE's stance on sedition reflects a broader trend in the region, with neighboring countries also prioritising legislative measures to combat destabilising forces and safeguard public order. By taking decisive action to strengthen its legal framework, the UAE aims to deter individuals and groups intent on undermining its sovereignty and disrupting social harmony.
While the UAE's efforts to bolster sedition laws have drawn praise from supporters of national security, critics have raised concerns about the potential impact on freedom of expression and civil liberties. Advocates for reform argue for a balanced approach that safeguards national interests while respecting fundamental rights and freedoms.
As debates surrounding sedition laws continue to unfold, the UAE remains steadfast in its commitment to preserving stability, security, and prosperity for all its citizens and residents.
With ongoing legislative reforms and proactive measures, the country seeks to mitigate risks posed by seditious activities and uphold its status as a beacon of security and progress in the region.
(The writer is a legal associate at Dubai-based NYK Law Firm)
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The Ministry of Economy (MoEc) has outlined its plan to strengthen the supervision of prices of products and services in the country's markets during Ramadan 2024.
The goal is to safeguard consumer rights within a comprehensive and leading consumer ecosystem that is in line with global standards, thus maintaining a balanced trade-consumer relationship in the UAE.
Through this plan, the ministry aims to bolster its collaboration with partners in enforcing consumer protection laws and regulations in the country. It also seeks to educate consumers about the country's legislative framework for consumer protection and guide them towards making informed consumption choices.
Abdullah Sultan Al Fan Al Shamsi, Assistant Undersecretary for the Monitoring and Follow Up Sector at the Ministry of Economy, emphasised that the UAE is moving forward in establishing a comprehensive regulatory and legal framework to safeguard consumers and guarantee their rights.
He pointed out that the ministry consistently works in cooperation with relevant government bodies at the federal and local levels, particularly through the Supreme Committee for Consumer Protection, engaging and coordinating with the cooperative sector, private sector and other stakeholders to create a safe and favourable environment for consumers when buying products or using services.
“The Consumer Protection Department at the ministry organised over 26 meetings with suppliers of essential goods in the country in 2023. These goods include cooking oil, eggs, dairy products, rice, sugar, poultry, legumes, bread and wheat.
All these meetings were aimed at ensuring the adequate availability of products to meet consumer needs during Ramadan 2024,” he said.
Al Shamsi added: “The UAE implements best policies to ensure a strategic supply of all vital goods required by citizens, residents and visitors in the country, in ample quantities for extended periods.”
He also pointed out that as Ramadan approaches, the UAE markets see a substantial increase in the availability of goods and products, especially that of essential consumer items.
He further emphasised the ministry’s commitment to meeting all consumer needs and facilitating their access to these goods effortlessly and without any unjustified price hikes and providing the quantities they require.
In addition, Al Shamsi explained that the prices of essential goods cannot be increased without prior approval from the Ministry and relevant authorities, following the pricing policy for basic consumer goods.
This policy includes a ban on raising prices for nine key items: cooking oil, eggs, dairy, rice, sugar, poultry, legumes, bread and wheat.
The enactment of Federal Decree Law No. 5 of 2023 amending certain provisions of Federal Law No. 15 of 2020 on consumer protection, along with its executive regulations, has strengthened consumer rights and supported national efforts to tighten price regulation in the UAE’s markets.
This involves the imposition of over 43 obligations on suppliers and implementing comprehensive regulatory measures to promote fair business practices.
New initiatives
Al Shamsi reviewed a series of new initiatives that the ministry, in collaboration with relevant federal and local authorities and economic development departments, seeks to implement during the next phase. They will promote a safe environment for consumers in the country and raise it to new levels of competitiveness and prosperity. These initiatives include:
Market Tnspection Tours
Al Shamsi revealed that in 2023, the ministry's teams carried out nearly 96,200 inspection tours, resulting in the detection of 6,645 violations. The number of inspections carried out by the ministry in January and February 2024 totalled approximately 620.
He noted that these tours form part of the ministry’s efforts to further monitor markets and outlets and assess merchants’ commitment to price labelling, as well as prevent cases of commercial fraud and trademark infringements.
Al Shamsi also confirmed the availability of alternatives to consumers, giving them the option to choose products based on their purchasing needs and budget.
This allows them the flexibility to shift from one brand to another when its price is higher, the quality is low, or there are other competitive advantages. This is of great significance since the purchasing decisions of consumers are a key and critical factor that influences prices, market trends, and supply and demand.
He pointed out the key role consumers play as partners in the market monitoring efforts by interacting with regulatory bodies and contacting the ministry or relevant authorities through available channels to file complaints.
The can also report harmful business practices for consumer protection, or submit proposals and ideas that contribute to the development of the consumer protection culture in the country by dialing 8001222.
He called on consumers to adhere to conscious purchasing practices such as retaining the invoice, which is the first step towards securing their rights and matching them with what they had purchased.
Invoices guarantee that any complaints regarding the violation of consumer rights are lodged with the relevant competent authority.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Rental Disputes Centre (RDC), the judicial arm of Dubai Land Department (DLD), has inked a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the Tarahum Charity Foundation to strengthen their strategic partnership in community and charitable endeavours.
Aligned with the commitment to realise the vision of His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice President and Prime Minister of the UAE and Ruler of Dubai, the collaboration aims to provide support to citizens and residents dealing with rental issues and judicial rulings.
The agreement between the two parties aligns with the UAE’s directives to foster partnerships between the public and private sectors and enhance cooperation in areas of mutual interest.
The MoU was signed by Judge Abdulqader Mousa Mohammed, Chairman of the Rental Disputes Centre at Dubai Land Department, and Osama Ibrahim Seddiqi, Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Tarahum Charity Foundation.
The signing ceremony was attended by Eng. Marwan bin Ghalita, CEO of the Real Estate Regulatory Agency at the Dubai Land Department, Judge Abdulaziz Abdulrahman Anwahi, President of ‘Yadul Khair’ committee and Mohammad Al Mulla, Deputy Director General of Tarahum Charity Foundation.
Judge Abdulqader Mousa Mohammed said: “The Rental Disputes Centre is steadfast in its mission to provide aid and support to families facing rental disputes. Our partnership with the Tarahum Charity Foundation marks a crucial stride in realising our vision, aligning with the directives of our esteemed leadership to strengthen collaboration between the government and private sectors in pursuit of the emirate’s goals.
We are pleased with this partnership and anticipate further enhancing the role and impact of the ‘Yadul Khair’ committee within the RDC, embodying the humanitarian ethos that defines Dubai.”
As outlined in the memorandum, the collaboration aims to define a framework and parameters for the partnership between the two entities, with the goal of realising their vision, strategic goals, and satisfying stakeholders. This involves fostering cooperation through community involvement, as well as promoting and advertising shared ventures through suitable media channels and effective methods.
Osama Ibrahim Seddiqi said: “The memorandum of understanding aims to establish an institutional partnership with steady steps and clear visions to serve and assist individuals facing rental issues and judicial rulings in Dubai.”
He emphasised that the joint effort aims to assist humanitarian cases affected by rental lawsuit issues and resulting judicial rulings from the Rental Disputes Centre. He also underpinned that this memorandum would serve as a beacon of hope for struggling families to start a new life, bringing happiness back to them.
He also highlighted the role of RDC in achieving precise and speedy justice, providing both judicial and humanitarian services and promoting tolerance in UAE society through an integrated judicial system focused on consolidating a secure real estate environment, underscoring that the Tarahum Charity Foundation greatly prioritises assisting all segments of society, considering it a top priority.
Judge Abdulaziz Abdulrahman Anwahi affirmed that this initiative aims to support humanitarian cases affected by rental disputes in Dubai and alleviate their burden during the holy month of Ramadan. He emphasised that the RDC handles many humanitarian cases, which the centre prioritises over material concerns in line with the law and ethos of Dubai.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Bitcoin briefly rose to a record high on Friday in volatile trading, as crypto mania continued to sweep through the investment community.
The leading cryptocurrency topped the $70,000 mark for the first time, boosted by investor demand for new US spot exchange-traded crypto products and expectations for global interest rates to fall. It rose to as high as $70,105 before quickly dropping, and was last trading at $68,317.72.
Billions of dollars have flowed into ETFs in the past few weeks, and the market is getting extra support from an outlook that includes an upgrade to the ethereum blockchain platform, home to the second-largest cryptocurrency ether , and a bitcoin "halving" event, which slows the flow of bitcoin minting, in April.
Still, some say it's hard to shake off the speculative nature of these assets. After hitting a record high on Tuesday, bitcoin sharply reversed course and fell more than 10 per cent back below the $60,000 level.
"Navigating old highs is notoriously tricky and the bitcoin dam doesn’t tend to burst at the first time of asking," Reuters said, quoting Antoni Trenchev, co-founder of crypto lending platform Nexo. "Volatility defines bitcoin bull markets, and 2024 will be littered with sudden and gut-wrenching 10 per cent -20 per cent plunges."
The approval of 11 spot bitcoin ETFs by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in late January marked a watershed moment for the industry, following an 18-month-long crypto winter plagued by a string of high-profile corporate bankruptcies and scandals.
Even institutional investors, who once shunned crypto due to its sharp, wild moves, have begun committing long-term money, which analysts say could help sustain the latest leg of this rally.
Net flows into the 10 largest US spot bitcoin funds reached $2.2 billion in the week ended March 1, with more than $2 billion of that going into BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust, opens new tab, according to London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) data.
The recent optimism over bitcoin has also spilled over to other digital tokens, particularly ether, which ranks second behind bitcoin in terms of total market value, up more than 60 per cent since the start of the year.
Ether was last up 1.62 per cent at $3,939.84. Crypto stocks were also up on Friday, with shares of Coinbase, opens new tab last higher at 8.2 per cent, and crypto miners Riot Platforms, opens new tab and Marathon Digital, opens new tab up 5.1 per cent and 9.6 per cent, respectively.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
In a significant move towards bolstering the nation's capabilities in investigating financial crimes, the UAE Executive Office of Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing (EO AMLCTF) and Dubai Police have inked a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to strengthen collaborative efforts in combatting financial crimes.
The official signing ceremony took place on the sidelines of the third edition of the World Police Summit, held from March 5 to 7 at the World Trade Centre in Dubai.
The MoU, signed by Hamid AlZaabi, Director-General of the EO AMLCTF, and Expert Major General Khalil Ibrahim Al Mansouri, Assistant Commander-in-Chief for Criminal Investigation Affairs at Dubai Police, signifies a deep commitment to joint endeavours by both organisations in countering money laundering and financial crimes.
Hamid AlZaabi emphasised that the agreement would significantly enhance the UAE's capabilities in investigating and combating financial crimes. "Law enforcement agencies serve as a vital pillar in the fight against financial crimes, leading investigations into suspected illicit activities and working closely with prosecutors to secure convictions.
In recent years, several high-profile arrests related to financial crimes have been made by law enforcement agencies, reflecting substantial efforts to foster a secure national economy. The activities outlined in this MOU will strengthen these capabilities, sending a clear message to criminals that their illicit actions will not be tolerated within the UAE's borders,” he noted.
Khalil Ibrahim Al Mansouri said that the MoU is part of Dubai Police's collaborative efforts with relevant entities to enhance the means of combating financial crimes. "Under the wise leadership's directives, joint efforts have achieved significant success, recently leading to the United Arab Emirates being removed from the FATF (Financial Action Task Force) grey list. Today, through our collaborative efforts, we continue to develop tools and resources that align with the strategic objectives between the parties and contribute to establishing effective mechanisms to decisively confront financial crimes."
Through the MoU, the EO AMLCTF and Dubai Police reiterate their shared commitment to enhancing cooperation in exchanging information and specialised studies, conducting joint awareness campaigns and launching academic programmes, training courses and workshops to cultivate and bolster specialised competencies in the field. They will also collaborate on developing strategies and technological solutions to address the evolving challenges posed by these types of crimes.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 43493428. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Authorities in the UAE have announced that Bitcoin and other digital currencies will be accepted for donations during Ramadan, alongside conventional methods such as cash, in-kind contributions and digital payments.
Various fundraising avenues exist, including vouchers, SMS campaigns, markets, exhibitions, auctions, and charity dinners. Additionally, donors can contribute through monthly deductions, bank transfers, social media, and digital platforms.
Mohammed Naqi, Director of the Ministry of Community Development's non-profit public associations department, cautioned against unlawful fundraising activities. Only approved entities, such as associations, federal and local authorities, and non-profit organisations, are permitted to raise funds for charity after obtaining authorisation.
Unauthorised fundraising can result in fines ranging from Dh200,000 to Dh500,000 and imprisonment. Repeat offenders may face doubled penalties, while entities falsely claiming charitable status could be fined up to Dh100,000. Authorised entities must acquire permits for fundraising, and donations must be channeled through charitable organisations; individual fundraising activities are prohibited.
Naqi emphasised that the law aims to prevent exploitation and terrorism financing, underscoring the importance of verifying licensed entities before donating. A list of accredited organisations authorised to collect donations is available on the Ministry of Community Development's website, and suspected violations can be reported to their call centre at 800623.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The Indian Consulate has introduced a life insurance package tailored for expatriate workers in the UAE.
Approximately 3.5 million Indian nationals live in the UAE, of whom around 65 per cent are blue-collar workers. The new scheme ensuring that the employees’ families will get compensation of up to Dh75,000 in case of their death, be it due to accidents or natural causes.
Announced by the Consulate in Dubai, the Life Protection Plan (LPP) became effective on March 1.
The initiative was specifically designed to cater to the needs of the 2.27 million blue-collar workers employed in the UAE, aiming to fill the void in employment benefits, the consulate highlighted.
Despite the prevalent provision of health insurance and compensation for work-related incidents, there exists a notable absence of mandatory coverage for natural deaths among employees. Consequently, the families of many workers could find themselves without adequate funds for repatriation expenses in the unfortunate event of the breadwinner's demise.
In response to this pressing concern, the Indian Consulate facilitated a meeting between prominent UAE-based companies that recruit blue-collar workers and two insurance service providers, striving to tackle this gap in coverage.
What are the Benefits?
The insurance scheme presents annual premiums varying between Dh37 and Dh72, applicable to individuals aged 18 to 70 years.
In the event of a worker's death due to either an accident or natural causes, beneficiaries are eligible for compensation ranging from Dh35,000 to Dh75,000, contingent upon the chosen premium.
Additionally, the plan offers coverage up to Dh12,000 for the repatriation of the insured employee's remains.
Two insurance firms collaborated on tailoring a package tailored specifically for blue-collar workers, followed by negotiations on the terms and conditions with recruitment companies.
The Policy and Compensation
Community Welfare
In 2022, the Indian Consulate registered 1,750 deaths in Dubai, with 1,100 of them being workers. A comparable pattern was observed in 2023, where 1,000 worker fatalities were recorded out of a total of 1,513 deaths. Over 90 per cent of these fatalities were due to natural causes.
“The welfare of the Indian community remains our utmost priority," said Consul-General Satish Sivan.
"Keeping in view a large number of natural death cases of workers in a year and in order to provide some financial benefits to the family of the deceased, the Consulate-General of India, Dubai, encourages all companies to consider a subscription to the LPP," he added.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Bitcoin surged to a two-year high on Tuesday, surpassing $68,600 and closely approaching its all-time peak as investment pours into the leading cryptocurrency.
This year, Bitcoin has seen a 50 per cent increase, with a significant portion of the surge occurring in recent weeks, coinciding with a surge in investments into US-listed bitcoin funds.
During Asian trading hours on Tuesday, Bitcoin hovered around $68,500, reaching a session high of $68,828, just shy of its all-time high of $68,999.99 set in November 2021.
The approval of spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds earlier this year in the United States paved the way for new institutional investors, reigniting excitement and momentum similar to the surge seen in 2021.
"It's crypto mania 4.0, and I think if we continue to see fairly low bond and rate volatility, it could keep going. There's definitely something of an irrational behavior creeping into the market," Kyle Rodda, senior markets analyst at Capital.com, was quoted as saying by Reuters.
According to London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) data, net inflows into the top 10 US spot bitcoin funds totalled $2.17 billion in the week ending March 1, with more than half of that directed towards BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust.
"The appetite to gain exposure to Bitcoin is reaching insatiable levels. While Bitcoin may be overbought in the short term, the upward momentum is far from over, and declines will likely be well supported, with a move towards $80,000 not out of the question," Tony Sycamore, a market analyst at IG, told Reuters.
This rally coincides with record-breaking performances on stock indexes such as Japan's Nikkei, the S&P 500, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq, along with decreasing volatility indicators in equities and foreign exchange markets.
Ethereum, Bitcoin's smaller counterpart, has also seen significant gains amid speculation surrounding the potential approval of exchange-traded funds. Ethereum is up over 50 per cent for the year, currently trading at $3,649.
On Monday, a regulatory filing revealed that the US Securities and Exchange Commission has further delayed its decision on an application by asset manager BlackRock for a spot ethereum exchange-traded fund.
Additionally, Tether, a cryptocurrency company, announced that the number of dollar-pegged stablecoins issued by Tether has surpassed $100 billion. Tether issues stablecoins designed to maintain a constant value of $1.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Dubai authorities have introduced a comprehensive set of guidelines aimed at promoting responsible riding and reducing accidents.
Outlined by the Roads and Transport Authority (RTA), these guidelines encompass various safety stipulations that E-scooter users must adhere to while navigating Dubai's streets and pathways.
To ensure passenger safety, the RTA has banned E-scooters from Dubai Metro and Tram.
Age Requirement: Users must be at least sixteen (16) years old to operate an E-scooter.
Protective Gear: Wearing a protective helmet, appropriate gear, and shoes is mandatory.
Parking:E-scooters must be parked in designated areas to avoid obstructing pedestrian and vehicle traffic.
Consideration for Others: Users should maintain a safe distance between e-scooters, bikes, and pedestrians and avoid blocking pathways.
No Passengers: It is prohibited to carry passengers on E-scooters.
Traffic Regulations: Adherence to traffic instructions, regulations and warning signs is essential.
Safety Checks: Regular checks of the E-scooter's technical specifications, lights, horns, tires, and brakes are necessary.
Manufacturing Standards: E-scooters must comply with climatic conditions and specifications approved by relevant authorities.
Speed Limit: The maximum speed limit for E-scooters is set at 20 km/h.
Additionally, users are required to inform competent authorities in the event of any accidents, regardless of whether damage to others occurred.
E-scooter riders are urged to practice caution and avoid reckless behaviour that could endanger public safety.
These safety guidelines underscore the commitment of Dubai authorities to promoting responsible E-scooter usage and ensuring the well-being of both riders and pedestrians. The RTA reserves the right to introduce further stipulations as deemed necessary in the future.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
In 2023, the UAE enacted 15 new federal laws and implemented 62 regulatory decisions within the finance sector.
Nine major national projects were also undertaken during this period. His Highness Sheikh Maktoum bin Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Deputy Ruler of Dubai, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, disclosed these developments in a statement on Sunday, underscoring the review conducted by Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice-President and Prime Minister of the UAE and Ruler of Dubai, regarding the financial accomplishments and initiatives of the UAE government for the same year.
It was also revealed that the government executed 151 decisions aimed at bolstering resource efficiency and sustainability within the government.
Notably, the total federal assets soared to Dh481.5 billion in 2023, positioning the UAE as the global leader in four key indicators of financial competitiveness.
His Highness Sheikh Maktoum emphasised in his statement that these achievements reflect the efficacy of national financial policies as well as the robustness of financial institutions and digital infrastructure within the country.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
UAE-based Emirates Telecommunications Group Company (e&) has announced its commitment to invest $6 billion between 2024 and 2025 across 16 countries to enhance connectivity.
The investment aims to bolster technological advancements, infrastructure development and innovative digital solutions, with the goal of extending meaningful connectivity to all residents.
The pledge was made during the Mobile World Congress at the International Telecommunication Union’s (ITU) Partner2Connect Digital Coalition, as disclosed on the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange (ADX) on Friday.
The investment is part of the group's business plan and is intended to provide accessible and affordable network connectivity and digital services across its operational countries in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East.
Notably, the Mobile World Congress, held in Barcelona, Spain from February 26 to 29, witnessed the mobile industry committing over $9 billion to support ITU's global connectivity efforts.
This latest commitment adds to the total value of planned investments in infrastructure, services, and ITU's campaign support, surpassing $46 billion since the platform's inception in March 2022.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Individuals who use tracking devices to monitor their spouses could face severe legal consequences, including imprisonment. While these devices are commonly used for keeping track of pets or belongings like car keys, some people are misusing them to intrude upon the privacy of their family members.
The Abu Dhabi Judicial Department recently released a statement emphasising that using tracking devices, such as GPS trackers, to spy on individuals in the UAE violates the law. "Utilising tracking devices for the purpose of stalking or spying on individuals in the UAE may result in imprisonment along with significant fines," the statement noted.
"Abusing these devices to infringe upon the privacy of others is subject to legal penalties," it added. This cautionary announcement follows a recent court case in Dubai where a woman was prosecuted for placing a tracking device on her former spouse. The 41-year-old woman was charged with violating her ex-husband's privacy by concealing an Apple AirTag within a teddy bear belonging to their daughter. The incident occurred subsequent to the couple's divorce in July.
The ex-husband became aware of the device through alerts on his mobile phone, which led him directly to the teddy bear. He accused his former wife of invading his privacy by monitoring his whereabouts. The woman denied the allegations, asserting that the tracking device was intended for locating her pets rather than for surveillance purposes.
Lately, there has been a surge in cases involving surveillance apps installed on phones. Such actions not only infringe upon an individual's privacy but also often result in children becoming collateral damage in parental disputes.
Under the cybercrime law, misusing tracking devices could result in a minimum of six months' imprisonment or fines ranging from Dh150,000 to Dh500,000, or both. Tracking devices are readily available both in stores and online, with prices varying between Dh20 and Dh2,000 depending on the technology.
According to UAE law, GPS tracking devices can only be used on registered commercial vehicles.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Starting today (March 1, 2024), commuters will no longer be permitted to bring E-scooters onto the Dubai Metro and Dubai Tram. The Roads and Transport Authority (RTA) of Dubai announced via their official platform that this prohibition is implemented to prioritise commuter safety.
With the objective of bolstering road safety measures and ensuring compliance with regulations, Dubai will introduce a state-of-the-art robotic system in March. This innovative technology will be tasked with identifying violations committed by users of bicycles and electric scooters.
Unveiled by the RTA on Thursday, the advanced AI-powered robot will be deployed to oversee bicycle and electric scooter usage. It will utilise its AI capabilities to detect various infractions, including large gatherings, failure to wear safety gear such as helmets, improper parking of scooters, carrying multiple passengers on a single scooter and riding scooters in pedestrian-restricted zones.
Identified violations will be promptly reported to Dubai Police for collaborative analysis and action.
Equipped with state-of-the-art technology and adhering to strict safety standards, the robot boasts over 85 per cent accuracy in violation detection. It delivers data within five seconds and has a surveillance range of up to two kilometres.
For enhanced safety and security, the robot is equipped with sensors that automatically stop its movement when within 1.5 metres of an object or individual.
E-scooter Rules in Dubai
Riding an E-scooter against the flow of traffic is strictly prohibited. Carrying passengers is not allowed and e-scooters should only be used in designated areas.
In recent years, e-scooters have gained popularity among residents due to their affordability and ease of use and maintenance. However, failure to adhere to regulations can result in fines, confiscation of the e-scooter, and in severe cases, accidents leading to injuries or fatalities.
Here is a comprehensive guide outlining the regulations governing e-scooter usage in Dubai:
Permit: If you have a valid driving licence, you are exempt from obtaining an e-scooter permit. You will need to carry your driving licence with you when riding the electric scooter and present it to a police officer, when asked. If you do not have a driving licence, you will need to apply for an e-scooter permit.
You can request the permit via the official RTA website at rta.ae, and there's no fee involved. Simply complete the online training courses and pass the test.
Upon successful completion of the test, you'll be issued an electronic permit for your e-scooter license via the RTA website. Once obtained, you'll need to download and store the permit on your mobile device.
Speed Limit: As per RTA regulations, the speed limits on bicycle and E-scooter paths vary based on the location: 20 km/h is the maximum speed allowed on designated paths within residential areas and beaches. For the Meydan track and streets shared with vehicles, the speed limit is set at 30 km/h.
Age Limit: You must be 16 years old and above to ride an e-scooter in Dubai. This is as per Executive Council Resolution No. (13) of 2022 issued by His Highness Sheikh Hamdan bin Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Crown Prince of Dubai and Chairman of the Executive Council of Dubai in March 2022.
Safety First
Ensuring safety while riding an e-scooter is paramount, as highlighted by the RTA and Dubai Police. The majority of e-scooter incidents stem from riders' failure to adhere to basic safety protocols. Common violations include neglecting to wear mandated safety equipment, riding against traffic flow and unauthorised use of specified vehicle paths.
To safeguard oneself and fellow road users, it's imperative for e-scooter riders to consistently observe these fundamental rules:
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Before you hit the road, there are 6 key things to consider to ensure a smooth rental experience.
Renting a car in Dubai offers unparalleled convenience and flexibility for exploring the city and its surroundings. However, before you hit the road, there are several important factors to consider to ensure a smooth and hassle-free rental experience.
Here are the top five things to keep in mind before renting a car in Dubai:
1. Valid Driver's Licence: Before renting a car in Dubai, ensure that you possess a valid driver's licence issued by a recognised authority in your home country. Alternatively, an International Driving Permit (IDP) may be required for certain nationalities. Make sure to check the specific requirements with the rental company to avoid any issues during the rental process.
2. Age Requirement: In Dubai, the minimum age for renting a car is typically 21 years. However, some rental companies may have higher age requirements, especially for luxury or high-performance vehicles. Be sure to verify the age restrictions with the rental company beforehand to ensure that you meet the eligibility criteria.
3. Insurance Coverage: Insurance coverage is a crucial aspect of renting a car in Dubai. Before signing the rental agreement, inquire about the insurance options available, including comprehensive coverage for the vehicle, third-party liability, and personal accident insurance. Understanding the extent of coverage and any exclusion will help you make an informed decision and avoid potential liabilities in case of an accident or damage to the vehicle.
4. Rental Terms and Conditions: Carefully review the terms and conditions of the rental agreement before finalizing your booking. Pay attention to important details such as rental duration, mileage limits, fuel policies, and any additional charges or fees. Clarify any questions or concerns with the rental company to avoid misunderstandings and unexpected expenses during the rental period.
5. Vehicle Inspection and Documentation: Before accepting the rental vehicle, conduct a thorough inspection of its exterior and interior for any pre-existing damage or defects. Take note of any scratches, dents, or mechanical issues and inform the rental company to avoid being held responsible for damages you did not cause. Additionally, ensure that all necessary documentation, including rental agreements, insurance papers, and vehicle registration documents, are provided and properly maintained throughout the rental period.
5. Familiarise yourself with the Traffic Laws: It is crucial to familiarise yourself with the traffic laws and regulations in Dubai to ensure compliance while driving. Speed limits, road signs, and driving etiquette may differ from your home country, so it is important to educate yourself on local traffic laws before getting behind the wheel. By adhering to all traffic laws, you can avoid fines, penalties, and legal consequences during your rental period. Prioritise safety, drive responsibly and respect local laws to have a safe and enjoyable driving experience in the city.
By considering these six factors before renting a car in Dubai, you can make informed decisions and enjoy a safe and enjoyable driving experience in the city. Remember to plan ahead, research rental options, and communicate openly with the rental company to ensure a seamless rental process.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The Abu Dhabi Judicial Department's Lawyers Affairs Committee accepted the application to add a citizen lawyer to the list of practicing attorneys while also reviewing the requests of ten attorneys whose registrations had expired more than two months ago.
This came during the meeting held under the chairmanship of His Excellency Counselor Yousef Saeed Al Abri, Undersecretary of the Judicial Department - Abu Dhabi.
The committee considered three complaints against lawyers and took appropriate decisions regarding them. It also reviewed seven requests for lawyers and approved the request to register a representative of a lawyer’s office in the list of office representatives.
The Undersecretary of the Judicial Department chaired the committee, which also included Judge Bushaib Hajami, President of the Al Ain Court of Appeal; Judge Assem Al Saadani, Abu Dhabi Court of Appeal; Counselor Muhammad Dhuwayher Al Kathiri, Public Prosecution; Counselor Ali Al Fraihat, Attorney Abdullah Fadl Al Hammadi; and Khamis Mubarak Al Qubaisi, director of the division of lawyers and experts’ affairs served as the committee’s rapporteur.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
Finding the best lawyer to address your legal concerns can often be a time consuming task. However, with NYK Law Firm, you can gain access to the premier legal consultants in the UAE, ensuring the resolution of all your legal matters efficiently.
In a commendable initiative aimed at providing legal assistance to labourers, NYK Law Firm partnered with Dubai Rotary Club of Downtown to host a legal aid session at Al Naboodah Labour Camp.
The event, held on Sunday from 11am to 1pm, saw the participation of around 50 labourers representing diverse nationalities, including India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.
Sunil Ambalavelil, Chairman of the Dubai-based NYK Law Firm, spearheaded the legal aid initiative. Accompanied by Rtn. PDRR. Devanand Mahadeva, President of Dubai Rotary Club of Downtown, and a team of five legal associates, he took charge at the event, offering assistance to labourers seeking guidance on legal matters in their home countries. Initially hesitant, the labourers gradually opened up to the lawyers, sharing their queries and apprehensions.
The session was organised into group discussions, with each group of labourers guided by a legal associate from NYK Law Firm. The legal associates patiently listened to the labourers' concerns and provided them with relevant legal advice and guidance.
For issues requiring further consultation or legal aid in their home countries, the NYK team facilitated connections with lawyers specialised in the relevant jurisdictions.
Sunil Ambalavelil expressed his satisfaction with the event, noting, "it’s heartening to see the labourers opening up and actively seeking legal guidance. We aim to equip them with the necessary knowledge and assistance to address their legal challenges effectively. I extend my heartfelt gratitude to Rtn. PDRR. Devanand Mahadeva, President of Dubai Rotary Club of Downtown, for giving us this opportunity."
The labourers hailed the opportunity to engage with seasoned professionals regarding their legal woes. One labourer remarked, "I was hesitant at first, but the lawyers made me feel comfortable, and I was able to get clarity on my legal issues.”
The legal aid session served as a valuable platform for labourers to receive legal assistance and gain insights into managing legal issues in their home countries.
The collaboration between NYK Law Firm and Dubai Rotary Club of Downtown underscores the importance of community-driven initiatives in addressing the needs of vulnerable populations and promoting access to justice
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The UAE Ministry of Finance has unveiled Federal Decree-Law No. 35 for 2023, focused on enhancing the legislative framework for the inventorying and administration of government properties.
The decree encompasses the organisation of all federal assets, be they real estate or otherwise, with the overarching goal of more effectively managing and enhancing the financial resources of the federal government both domestically and internationally.
By implementing leading global practices, the law aims to streamline the governance of federal assets, optimise their utilisation and promote sustainable growth.
Furthermore, it aspires to elevate the country's global competitiveness rankings and bolster its credit rating.
The new legislation mandates the development of a cutting-edge electronic platform to catalog federal real estate properties, enhancing their protection, oversight, and upkeep. This initiative strengthens asset security and fosters transparency, in line with the country's digitalisation efforts.
The law provides clarity on the definition and registration procedures for federal real estate assets, addressing uncertainties in their management and utilisation.
It introduces strategies for optimising government asset returns by enabling efficient leasing and usage while accommodating the specific requirements of federal entities.
Under the decree-law, federal government assets encompass various properties used for public services such as roads, railways and bridges, including movable assets supporting these properties referred to as "real estate by allocation."
It also encompasses other non-real estate federal properties and federation-owned personal property not designated for public use, whether movable or immovable.
Additionally, the legislation delineates rights related to any federal property and explicitly identifies intangible assets as recognised properties of the federation.
Moreover, the decree-law outlines regulations for managing private federal properties and non-real estate assets not allocated to public service, specifying procedures for acquisition, utilisation, and disposal. It establishes a registry for federal real estate properties and facilitates coordination with relevant local authorities for asset recovery or transfer to local governments.
The law outlines the management of federal properties within and outside the state, sets leasing rules for private properties, and stipulates requirements for using and benefiting from federal assets.
The law also emphasises the need to comply with local urban planning and building regulations to ensure the optimal utilisation of these properties.
“One of the key aspects of the law is the emphasis on property rights and fair usage. The law establishes guidelines for the allocation and use of federal properties, ensuring that they are utilised in a manner that promotes sustainable development and benefits the public interest. This includes provisions for the protection of property rights, fair competition in the allocation of properties and the prevention of misuse or abuse of federal properties,” said a senior legal associate at international law firm Kaden Boriss.
The new law will replace the federal Decree-law No. 16 of 2018 concerning federal government real estate properties when it comes into effect on March 28,2024. The aforementioned decree-law can be found on the UAE legislation platform.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The case involving members of the Muslim Brotherhood charged with crimes related to the establishment and management of a terrorist organisation, as well as money laundering, saw an adjournment to the next session on March 7. The State Security Chamber of the Abu Dhabi Federal Appeals Court is set to hear arguments from the counsels representing the "Justice and Dignity Committee OrganiSation," a group deemed as a terrorist entity.
The 84 defendants, comprising individuals and entities, stand accused of various crimes, including the formation and operation of a terrorist organisation, along with the laundering of proceeds derived from its clandestine operations.
The Public Prosecution had concluded their pleas, which extended over two separate sessions, during which they confirmed that this case is completely different from case number 79 of 2012 State Security Offenses, and is not a retrial of the defendants according to the evidence presented in the public session, which included confessions and statements of the defendants.
The confessions were consistent with the investigations of the State Security Apparatus, and the testimonies and reports of the experts who were assigned to monitor and analyse the activities of the defendants.
The Public Prosecution demanded the maximum statutory sentence on the defendants, based on Article 88 of the Penal Code, which states that if crimes were committed for a single purpose and were inextricably linked, they must be considered a single crime and the punishment prescribed for the most serious of those crimes must be imposed.
Article 90 of the Penal Code also states that if the perpetrator in the case provided for in Article 88 of this law has been convicted of a crime punishable by a lesser penalty, he must then be tried for the crime that is punishable by the maximum penalty. In this case, the court shall order the execution of the punishment imposed in the latter judgment, after deducting what was actually executed from the previous judgment.
Terrorist Justice and Dignity Committee Organisation
The Public Prosecution's pleadings extended over two separate sessions. In the first session, which lasted for about 5 hours and was attended by the defendants' counsels, their families, and media representatives, the prosecution presented their evidence against the defendants on charges of establishing and managing a clandestine terrorist organisation in the UAE (The Justice and Dignity Committee), for the purpose of committing terrorist acts and collecting and laundering money to serve the organisation.
The prosecution presented evidence against the defendants, including confessions of one of the defendants that the organisation studied the events that coincided with the so-called "Arab Spring Revolutions" in order to create a similar revolutionary model in the UAE.
The defendant also confessed that the first and second defendants proposed the establishment of the terrorist "Justice and Dignity Committee" organisation as a clandestine organisation separate from the "Reform Call" terrorist organisation, with the intent to instigate a violent revolution that would involve clashes with security personnel, resulting in deaths and the disruption of essential state functions.
The defendant also confessed that the method of the aforementioned terrorist organisation relied on cultivating widespread anger and resentment within society, seeking to manipulate these emotions into mass street protests that would inevitably turn violent through confrontations with security forces, potentially leading to casualties and injuries.
The organisation would then exploit this as fuel to increase resentment and promote it in the media, both domestically and internationally, in order to obtain support from external organisations. The defendant also confessed that the organisation established teams and identified their tasks and members.
The defendant also confessed that the organisation planned to stage a public demonstration in a well-known square in the country.
The defendant concluded his confessions by stating that the meeting of the organisation's members in the second defendant's house clearly demonstrates the true nature of the terrorist organisation, its purpose, and its method of inciting chaos, even if it leads to bloodshed and loss of life.
Organisational structure and 5 Teams
The Public Prosecution presented to the audience the organisational structure of the terrorist Justice and Dignity Committee Organisation, which was headed by the second defendant. The organisation consisted of five teams:
The electronic team: This team was responsible for spreading news on the internet and social media platforms that would incite public opinion.
The legal team: This team was responsible for communicating with local, regional, and international legal organisations.
The national team: This team was responsible for mobilising notables and intellectuals in the country against what they called "violations by the security services."
The media team: This team was responsible for creating accounts on social media platforms, publishing tweets and news, and carrying out media campaigns. The team also trained the organisation's youth on how to incite public opinion on the internet and try to prepare people's minds for the idea of a "revolution."
The external action team: This team was responsible for facilitating the escape of the organisation's members from the country, coordinating with the other Muslim Brotherhood organisations in the Gulf to support the fugitives, and working to organise media campaigns against the State's institutions from abroad.
The Public Prosecution reviewed documents proving the defendants' involvement in inciting public opinion and undermining citizens' confidence in State institutions in order to create a state of tension in society that could explode. The prosecution presented a document proving that some members of the organisation met at one of their homes, and this document shows the attendees discussing a proposal to "raise questions to incite public opinion."
The prosecution also presented documents that were seized from one of the defendants, which included a plan to translate news, articles, and incitement reports into English, and to contact media outlets, including 27 foreign media platforms, and provide them with archival material. The plan also included holding a series of meetings with prominent journalists from foreign countries on the pretext that there was a state of discontent in the society, so that the foreign media would cover it.
The Public Prosecution also presented a video clip proving that one of the defendants incited students to go out into the streets, film it, and circulate it on social media platforms in order to incite this segment of society to protest in the streets to pressure State institutions.
The Public Prosecution also presented pictures of tweets by one of the defendants in which he compared "Tahrir Square" in Egypt to one of the famous squares in the country, symbolising it as a "square for revolution".
Electronic Monitoring
In its presentation of evidence, the Public Prosecution relied on a report by a committee of media experts that was formed to analyse the organisation's media and electronic activity. The committee concluded that this activity was carried out in a systematic manner with a unified approach, and that the defendants deliberately sought to create a state of popular anger, incite public opinion, and incite it, target national unity, cast doubt and belittle the success of the country's development model, generate a state of anger, and create a state of tension and direct the collective mind towards accepting the idea of gathering and protesting.
The Public Prosecution commented on the report of the media committee, stating that the committee's findings from electronic monitoring and analysis of the defendants' accounts, what they published on social media platforms, and their media activity, indicate the correctness of the investigation findings, witness testimony, and the defendant's confession, confirming the existence of an electronic media plan that matches his confession.
Audio recordings and confessions
The Prosecution also presented the defendants' confessions to paying monthly sums of money to the organisation, facilitating the holding of meetings of its members in their homes, exploiting the so-called "Arab Spring Revolutions" to serve the agendas of the terrorist organisation, and inciting people to take to the streets and stage demonstrations. The Public Prosecution also presented audio recordings proving that the defendants distributed the tasks of the teams in the terrorist "Justice and Dignity Committee" organisation, in addition to using university students and activists to serve the purposes of the organisation, and seeking the help of others from outside the organisation to give the impression that public opinion is interacting with them.
In the second public session, the Public Prosecution addressed in its pleas the charge of money laundering proceeds from the crimes of establishing and founding a secret terrorist organisation. The prosecution confirmed that the members of the organisation established two companies as fictitious economic arms to launder the proceeds obtained, which were collected through monthly subscriptions from the members of the organisation, in addition to collecting donations illegally.
The Public Prosecution presented the testimony of a witness who confirmed that the secret terrorist organisation relied on several sources of funding, namely subscriptions imposed on the members at a rate of 5% of the monthly income of employees and 1% of the profits of those working in the field of trade or professionals.
The witness also confirmed that the collection and transfer of money was carried out in a secret organisational manner, in addition to collecting donations, charities, and Zakat money from some individuals, in addition to donations from members of the organisation.
The Public Prosecution presented the confession of one of the defendants (the financial manager) about illegally collecting donations and monthly subscriptions and placing them in a safe in his house, on the condition that he would hand them over to the heads of the central committees of the organisation based on the instructions of the members of the organisation's board of directors.
The prosecution presented a document obtained from the computer of the aforementioned defendant, which included a statement of the funds that were collected monthly in one year. A document written in the defendant's handwriting was also presented, in which he mentioned some of the amounts received, along with another document related to donation money.
Companies to Invest Illegal Funds
The aforementioned witness also confirmed that the organisation established a financial entity through which the Group could be financed through real estate investments, whether in their personal names or in partnership with others. The two companies mentioned above contributed to the establishment of two other companies, and the aforementioned companies worked to disguise the origin and nature of their illegal funds by channeling them into a variety of projects within the country. They camouflaged these funds by merging them with other legitimate commercial activities, hiding them from the scrutiny of security services.
The witness testified that the organisation deliberately used a chain of companies to mask the true source of the funds. This intentional obfuscation, achieved through transfers between companies, aimed to make it extremely challenging to trace the money back to its origin.
Obtaining Bank Loans
The Public Prosecution presented evidence of suspicious funds being transferred between these companies, as planned by an organisation member, who exploited his position in one of the banks in the UAE, to purchase assets, shares, and real estate in the name of the aforementioned companies, for the purpose of laundering the funds.
The Public Prosecution relied on the testimony of two members of the Financial Review Committee formed under the Public Prosecution's decision on the investigations from the Financial Intelligence Unit, which confirmed, after scrutiny, that the terrorist organisation committed the crime of money laundering through 6 interconnected companies, contracting with several banks in the country and using the funds to invest in financial and real estate assets, aiming to grow their capital.
After meticulously reviewing defendants' confessions, testimonies of 8 witnesses, reports from the Media Committee and Financial Intelligence Unit, and other supporting evidence, the Public Prosecution delivered its final arguments. They demanded the maximum sentence for the defendants, citing their proven intent to inflict harm on the community, endanger public safety, and jeopardise state institutions.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.
The UAE has implemented Federal Law No. (10) of 2023 on Mental Health, which encompasses various provisions and penalties related to the treatment and care of mental health patients.
Individuals responsible for the care of mental health patients in the UAE may face fines of up to Dh200,000 and a minimum prison sentence of one year if found guilty of mistreatment or negligence resulting in serious injury or physical disability to the patient.
The latest UAE law emphasises that proper care and treatment of mental health patients are paramount. Stringent regulations are in place to safeguard the well-being of individuals under care. Any individual responsible for their care must adhere strictly to these regulations to ensure compliance with legal requirements and uphold the rights of patients.
Furthermore, the law stipulates that individuals who intentionally provide false information in a medical report regarding the psychiatric condition of a person, to admit or discharge them from a mental health facility, may face imprisonment or a fine ranging from Dh50,000 to Dh200,000, or one of these penalties.
Moreover, anyone aiding a person under compulsory admission to escape may be sentenced to imprisonment for a maximum of three months and fined between Dh50,000 and Dh100,000, or one of these penalties.
For any enquiries or information, contact ask@tlr.ae or call us on +971 52 644 3004. Follow The Law Reporters on WhatsApp Channels.